What's to say the 360 won't end up like the original Xbox?

  • 99 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Felous1
Felous1

4557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Felous1
Member since 2006 • 4557 Posts
Yeah well the Wii is more expensive than the PS2 and it's competing against it plus the XBOX 360 and PS3 and is outselling all of them at the moment. I'm not trying to bash the 360 cause I plan on buying one soon, but I'm just saying that I see where the TC is coming from, and think MS could have done so much more with their one year head start.peaceful_anger
The 360 cost $300-$400 and didn't have the same appeal to a broad audience as the Wii.
Avatar image for the-very-best
the-very-best

14486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#52 the-very-best
Member since 2006 • 14486 Posts
[QUOTE="the-very-best"][Will all those people switch to the 360 after they're finished with their PS2 or does it make more sense that they'd switch to the PS3 since it's getting the continuations to all major series from the PS2?Felous1
This question is random and offtopic, but I will answer you. Brand helps, but people aren't that loyal to brand name as you think. Take a look back at the PS1/ 64 generation and you will understand. The 360 didn't do very well, but wasn't that the same case with the PS2 launch as well ?



Yeah, it was random but I wanted to know your opinion about it since I know you're preferred console is the 360 (that came off in a negative way but that's not my intention).

PS1/64 gen is very different to this gen. Nintendo lost a lot of dev support due to the choice for cartridges instead of CD. It lost FFVII and lost Japan. Sony had the hit GT as well and Nintendo had nothing to counter it.

This gen Sony still has all the major series that made the PS2 so successful, GTA, GT, MGS, FF etc.

I don't see a major reason why people would switch to the 360 if they were happy with their PS2 and the PS3 offers more of the same which is why I'm saying the 360 could end up like the original Xbox, ie. 2nd place.
Avatar image for the-very-best
the-very-best

14486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#53 the-very-best
Member since 2006 • 14486 Posts
[QUOTE="DaysAirlines"] And I also remember you saying that the PS3 would outsell the 360 in January too.



Yeah, I did. I was a little surprised it didn't but the difference wasn't too large so I think it will outsell it in the coming months.

All of Janurary's numbers suprised me actually. I also expected PSP to sell a lot less, and DS/Wii to sell many more units than they did...
Avatar image for Voryn_Dagoth
Voryn_Dagoth

124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Voryn_Dagoth
Member since 2007 • 124 Posts
The 360 is outselling the PS3.....and that is impressive since PS3 just came out. Besides, 360=/=Xbox. MS has by far more support now.
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts
Trying to explain to you why the Xbox is a good system would be like trying to explain the fossil record to the Amish, a lot of work and you still wouldn't believe me anyway.
Avatar image for DaysAirlines
DaysAirlines

9537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 DaysAirlines
Member since 2006 • 9537 Posts
Trying to explain to you why the Xbox is a good system would be like trying to explain the fossil record to the Amish, a lot of work and you still wouldn't believe me anyway.Riverwolf007
That's so good it's sig worthy.
Avatar image for OhSnapitz
OhSnapitz

19282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 OhSnapitz
Member since 2002 • 19282 Posts
Trying to explain to you why the Xbox is a good system would be like trying to explain the fossil record to the Amish, a lot of work and you still wouldn't believe me anyway.Riverwolf007
/thread.
Avatar image for Voryn_Dagoth
Voryn_Dagoth

124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Voryn_Dagoth
Member since 2007 • 124 Posts
[QUOTE="the-very-best"][QUOTE="DaysAirlines"] And I also remember you saying that the PS3 would outsell the 360 in January too.



Yeah, I did. I was a little surprised it didn't but the difference wasn't too large so I think it will outsell it in the coming months.

All of Janurary's numbers suprised me actually. I also expected PSP to sell a lot less, and DS/Wii to sell many more units than they did...


There we go. If the PS3 cannot outsell the 360 now, it will hurt down the line, and be harder, since MS is more aggressive with game negotiations. MS is not is using their money to their advantage, and the PS3 doesn't have the enough games to take out 360. Unlike the PS2 which was unopposed with 3rd party support, this time is different.
Avatar image for the-very-best
the-very-best

14486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#59 the-very-best
Member since 2006 • 14486 Posts
Trying to explain to you why the Xbox is a good system would be like trying to explain the fossil record to the Amish, a lot of work and you still wouldn't believe me anyway.Riverwolf007


I'm not arguing whether or not the 360 is a good system.
Avatar image for fixer293
fixer293

4770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#60 fixer293
Member since 2003 • 4770 Posts
The 360 will not end up like the original, because it has stolen the thunder from PS3. 360 is delivering on the goods, while PS3 is not.
Avatar image for Felous1
Felous1

4557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Felous1
Member since 2006 • 4557 Posts
[QUOTE="the-very-best"]PS1/64 gen is very different to this gen. Nintendo lost a lot of dev support due to the choice for cartridges instead of CD. It lost FFVII and lost Japan. Sony had the hit GT as well and Nintendo had nothing to counter it.

This gen Sony still has all the major series that made the PS2 so successful, GTA, GT, MGS, FF etc.

I don't see a major reason why people would switch to the 360 if they were happy with their PS2 and the PS3 offers more of the same which is why I'm saying the 360 could end up like the original Xbox, ie. 2nd place.


It was different, but there are similarities.

Nintendo screwed up in some ways like you said.
Sony came out of nowhere and Nintendo had a big brand name known to a lot of gamers and even non-gamers.

This time around Sony screwed around by making the PS3 too expensive making it risky for developers. Because this generation it's more expensive to make games, thus, making consoles lose exclusives. Not only that, but it's also harder to develop for.
Microsoft launched first and worked with developers trying to make everything easier for developers. XBL and development tools for example.


By the way, Microsoft also has GTA and Forza 2 to counter GT as well. Also, you shouldn't underestimate new IPS.
Avatar image for the-very-best
the-very-best

14486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#62 the-very-best
Member since 2006 • 14486 Posts
[QUOTE="Felous1"]Nintendo screwed up in some ways like you said.
Sony came out of nowhere and Nintendo had a big brand name known to a lot of gamers and even non-gamers.

This time around Sony screwed around by making the PS3 too expensive making it risky for developers. Because this generation it's more expensive to make games, thus, making consoles lose exclusives. Not only that, but it's also harder to develop for.
Microsoft launched first and worked with developers trying to make everything easier for developers. XBL and development tools for example.

By the way, Microsoft also has GTA and Forza 2 to counter GT as well. Also, you shouldn't underestimate new IPS.



I don't underestimate new IP's....Gears is proof that you shouldn't.

Forza only sold 1 million so I don't really think that can be considered a competitor.

GTA going to 360 launch day is one of the major reasons I think the console will sell more than the original Xbox. However, the rest of the line-up still has too many PC counterparts which is a major reason the original Xbox did not sell that well.

I think you're underestimating Sony a little though. (Maybe I'm underestimating MS, dunno)...Sony didn't stay on top for 10 years because they're stupid. PS3 will be irreristable to the PS2 audience once the major series like GT5, GTAIV, MGSIV, FFXIII are all on the same console. That's the major reason I think Sony will win this gen again despite the price.

You have to remember price isn't everything. I mean, GC was the cheapest last gen and it sold the least...

PS2 was also the most expensive last gen and sold the most (Xbox had a price drop before it).
Avatar image for KeV-Unreal
KeV-Unreal

3245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 KeV-Unreal
Member since 2006 • 3245 Posts

Great post "the-very-best", interesting indeed. ummm but what do I think about the fate of Xbox 360? Im not quite so sure Considering the launch.

from wikipedia:

"The Xbox 360 crashing with errors, some reported the hard drive does not respond in certain situations while others report error messages during various games or unusually fast overheating."

"The high demand for the Xbox 360 led to some owners almost immediately re-selling their console for vastly increased prices."

Xbox 360 had a horrible start and its seems Sony has the advantage on system launch over Microsoft. Microsoft rush, Sony didn't.

Avatar image for fixer293
fixer293

4770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#64 fixer293
Member since 2003 • 4770 Posts

A $600 price can turn away the attention of any fan, and you are underestimating the 360.

Avatar image for waynehead895
waynehead895

18660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#65 waynehead895
Member since 2005 • 18660 Posts
I liked the Xbox. So I don't see the problem but I do think the 360 will be much better.
Avatar image for Felous1
Felous1

4557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Felous1
Member since 2006 • 4557 Posts


I don't underestimate new IP's....Gears is proof that you shouldn't.

Forza only sold 1 million so I don't really think that can be considered a competitor.

GTA going to 360 launch day is one of the major reasons I think the console will sell more than the original Xbox. However, the rest of the line-up still has too many PC counterparts which is a major reason the original Xbox did not sell that well.

I think you're underestimating Sony a little though. (Maybe I'm underestimating MS, dunno)...Sony didn't stay on top for 10 years because they're stupid. PS3 will be irreristable to the PS2 audience once the major series like GT5, GTAIV, MGSIV, FFXIII are all on the same console. That's the major reason I think Sony will win this gen again despite the price.

You have to remember price isn't everything. I mean, GC was the cheapest last gen and it sold the least...

PS2 was also the most expensive last gen and sold the most (Xbox had a price drop before it).
the-very-best
I don't underestimate Sony, Sony simply screwed up with its price and they are gonna pay the price. Also, Microsoft having better developer support with XBL and better tools is bad for Sony.
Avatar image for Skippyj9
Skippyj9

2825

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#68 Skippyj9
Member since 2004 • 2825 Posts
I say wait for more the more appealing games to come out before saying that the 360 will end up likes its predecessor.

By appealing games, I mean the usual ever-so-talked-about games such as Halo 3, Mass Effect, Assassin's Creed, Bioshock, maybe Blue Dragon for those who care, etc.


Toaster_Cell
You don't need a 360 to play Assassin's Creed or Bioshock... but I do want Mass Effect...
Avatar image for KeV-Unreal
KeV-Unreal

3245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#69 KeV-Unreal
Member since 2006 • 3245 Posts

[QUOTE="Felous1"]Nintendo screwed up in some ways like you said.
Sony came out of nowhere and Nintendo had a big brand name known to a lot of gamers and even non-gamers.

This time around Sony screwed around by making the PS3 too expensive making it risky for developers. Because this generation it's more expensive to make games, thus, making consoles lose exclusives. Not only that, but it's also harder to develop for.
Microsoft launched first and worked with developers trying to make everything easier for developers. XBL and development tools for example.

By the way, Microsoft also has GTA and Forza 2 to counter GT as well. Also, you shouldn't underestimate new IPS.
the-very-best


I don't underestimate new IP's....Gears is proof that you shouldn't.

Forza only sold 1 million so I don't really think that can be considered a competitor.

GTA going to 360 launch day is one of the major reasons I think the console will sell more than the original Xbox. However, the rest of the line-up still has too many PC counterparts which is a major reason the original Xbox did not sell that well.

I think you're underestimating Sony a little though. (Maybe I'm underestimating MS, dunno)...Sony didn't stay on top for 10 years because they're stupid. PS3 will be irreristable to the PS2 audience once the major series like GT5, GTAIV, MGSIV, FFXIII are all on the same console. That's the major reason I think Sony will win this gen again despite the price.

You have to remember price isn't everything. I mean, GC was the cheapest last gen and it sold the least...

PS2 was also the most expensive last gen and sold the most (Xbox had a price drop before it).

Gears was hype as a Halo killer according to EGM.

Remember last gen, games like GTA and MGS was also for Xbox and did that help sells?

Avatar image for the-very-best
the-very-best

14486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#70 the-very-best
Member since 2006 • 14486 Posts
I don't underestimate Sony, Sony simply screwed up with its price and they are gonna pay the price. Also, Microsoft having better developer support with XBL and better tools is bad for Sony.Felous1


Well there isn't a lot of evidence to suggest expensive products don't always work out.

PS1 was more expensive than the N64 by $100 and still dominated. PS2 was more expensive than GC and Xbox (it dropped the price early) and still dominated.

This time PS3's $100 more expensive than the 360. Both are very expensive though which is why I think it will be about 2-3 years before most consumers jump on board rather than 2 years before the PS2 saw its sales spike.
Avatar image for mythrol
mythrol

5237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#71 mythrol
Member since 2005 • 5237 Posts
If the 360 is just like the original xbox, which is what you're trying to say - then what does that make the PS3? Since a console that has been out for 15 months is STILL outselling it in NA. Does that make the PS3 the next gamecube? No. I didn't think so. However, I think it's been very apparent that 360 sales have actually increased, since the other two consoles came out on the market. I think a lot of people were saying, "We're going to wait and see how the PS3 turned out." And then when they saw, they decided on the 360. Also the whole argument that "The PS3 is selling faster than the 360 in the same time frame" is very much a false statement since the 360 was restricted with console shortages until March and the PS3 is readily avaliable. However, I think it's a very big sign when the 360 outsold the PS3 in NA in Jan. It basically means that Sony is losing on two fronts. They're losing to the Wii in Japan, and the 360 in NA. Sony better start sucking up hard to Europe.
Avatar image for the-very-best
the-very-best

14486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#72 the-very-best
Member since 2006 • 14486 Posts

Gears was hype as a Halo killer according to EGM.

Remember last gen, games like GTA and MGS was also for Xbox and did that help sells?

KeV-Unreal

That's another good point.
Avatar image for Felous1
Felous1

4557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Felous1
Member since 2006 • 4557 Posts


Well there isn't a lot of evidence to suggest expensive products don't always work out.

PS1 was more expensive than the N64 by $100 and still dominated. PS2 was more expensive than GC and Xbox (it dropped the price early) and still dominated.

This time PS3's $100 more expensive than the 360. Both are very expensive though which is why I think it will be about 2-3 years before most consumers jump on board rather than 2 years before the PS2 saw its sales spike.
the-very-best
The problem is, consumers will compare the consoles. Which puts the PS3 in a very bad position. The 360 is gonna drop the price soon enough, but right now it's $100-$200 dollars cheaper with 1 year worth of games. The Wii has an amazing momentum and it only costs $250 bundled with one game.
Avatar image for OhSnapitz
OhSnapitz

19282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 OhSnapitz
Member since 2002 • 19282 Posts
If the 360 is just like the original xbox, which is what you're trying to say - then what does that make the PS3? Since a console that has been out for 15 months is STILL outselling it in NA. Does that make the PS3 the next gamecube? No. I didn't think so. However, I think it's been very apparent that 360 sales have actually increased, since the other two consoles came out on the market. I think a lot of people were saying, "We're going to wait and see how the PS3 turned out." And then when they saw, they decided on the 360. Also the whole argument that "The PS3 is selling faster than the 360 in the same time frame" is very much a false statement since the 360 was restricted with console shortages until March and the PS3 is readily avaliable. However, I think it's a very big sign when the 360 outsold the PS3 in NA in Jan. It basically means that Sony is losing on two fronts. They're losing to the Wii in Japan, and the 360 in NA. Sony better start sucking up hard to Europe.mythrol
Someone give this man a cookie or something..
Avatar image for the-very-best
the-very-best

14486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#75 the-very-best
Member since 2006 • 14486 Posts
The problem is, consumers will compare the consoles. Which puts the PS3 in a very bad position. The 360 is gonna drop the price soon enough, but right now it's $100-$200 dollars cheaper with 1 year worth of games. The Wii has an amazing momentum and it only costs $250 bundled with one game.Felous1


Consumers won't compare anything. They know about brands and they buy games that are advertised well for those consoles.

And your point still doesn't counter my argument that expensive products can do well. PS1 being much more expensive than the N64 didn't stop it from dominating.

Wii's momentum will wear off when GTAIV is not released on the console (Well, it's momentum with casuals anyway. I think the non gamer support for the console will continue).
Avatar image for Thrice_III
Thrice_III

1539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#76 Thrice_III
Member since 2004 • 1539 Posts
[QUOTE="OhSnapitz"]Are you really that blind? The Sony name alone should've been enough to sell the system but it didn't outsell ANYTHING this holiday season because it was Too Damned expensive.. The 360 outsold the PS3 for 3 months straight.. and it doesn't look as if it'll stop anytime soon.. Stop making excuses for Sony and admit the truth. As of right now the PS3 is in last place and the price point isn't helping.. the-very-best


The majority of consumers typically wait 2 years before buying their next gen console (evident by the sales spike 2 years after the launch of the PS2). If PS3 has sold around 2 mil without any major titles and a hefty price tag it's going to be interesting how many units it will sell when it's a little cheaper and has the series that made the PS2 so popular.

PS3 will begin outselling the 360 in the coming months (Just a prediction, not a fact).

I agree with everything you've basically said so far. Consumers are going to be buying into the next gen 2 to 3 years from now. Just look at how many PS2 owners there are(100million plus) and how many they are still selling, it will be several years from now before they make up their mind on what system they'll buy in the next gen race and I wouldn't be surprised if it is the console and the game names that they know so well.(I mean Sony) PS3 will be cheaper and actually have more than a few games worth buying. The 360 should have sold more with their headstart.
Avatar image for Felous1
Felous1

4557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 Felous1
Member since 2006 • 4557 Posts
Consumers won't compare anything. the-very-best
I can assure you they will compare before spending $500-$600 dollars on a game console. Again, if brand was everything, Nintendo would still be number 1 since the NES.
Avatar image for south411
south411

2136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 south411
Member since 2006 • 2136 Posts
[QUOTE="-CC-"]

[QUOTE="the-very-best"]Why is the PS3 outselling the 360 in its time period? the-very-best

The 360 outsold the PS3 every month the PS3 has been on sale. Lie on a forum if it makes you feel better about the PS3 but the #s dont lie. 360 > PS3 sales.



PS3 sales in the first months after launch surpass the 360 sales in the first months after launch. That's why I said "in its time period".

correct, but its when all 3 are out that we see the true sales and how they rack up against each other
Avatar image for Felous1
Felous1

4557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 Felous1
Member since 2006 • 4557 Posts
Just look at how many PS2 owners there are(100million plus) and how many they are still selling.Thrice_III
The NES sold more than 60 million units. Now take a look at the numbers for the 64 and GC. http://www.nintendo.com/systemsclassic?type=nes
Avatar image for Thrice_III
Thrice_III

1539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#80 Thrice_III
Member since 2004 • 1539 Posts
[QUOTE="the-very-best"]Consumers won't compare anything. Felous1
I can assure you they will compare before spending $500-$600 dollars on a game console. Again, if brand was everything, Nintendo would still be number 1 since the NES.

But Nintendo in the n64 era lost brand game names as the-very-best mentioned. It just isn't the Sony brand name but the Final Fantasy brand name, the MGS brand name, etc... 360 gained the GTA brand name and so far the GeoW brand name is also big, so they will do much better than they did last gen.
Avatar image for Felous1
Felous1

4557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Felous1
Member since 2006 • 4557 Posts
Wii's momentum will wear off when GTAIV is not released on the consolethe-very-best
I'm gonna quote Reggie here: "People said the same thing about the DS, that it was a gimmick and it would wear off." That was not the case was it ?
Avatar image for El_Fanboy
El_Fanboy

5789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 El_Fanboy
Member since 2002 • 5789 Posts
the original xbox was awesome, so if it ended up like that it would be ok, with great games and cutting edge graphics.
Avatar image for the-very-best
the-very-best

14486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#83 the-very-best
Member since 2006 • 14486 Posts
[QUOTE="the-very-best"]Consumers won't compare anything. Felous1
I can assure you they will compare before spending $500-$600 dollars on a game console. Again, if brand was everything, Nintendo would still be number 1 since the NES.



Brand power means a lot in certain markets IF it is combined with other essential things like games + dev support.

Take DS/PSP for example. Nintendo still have control over their handheld market and why? Because consumers know and trust Nintendo to deliver games like Pokemon, Mario, Advance Wars etc in the handheld market...this is despite PSP getting 2 GTA's and an MGS.

PS3 has the brand name and the games + dev support.
Avatar image for klabut
klabut

3264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#84 klabut
Member since 2006 • 3264 Posts
It's actually selling pretty well Wii is just doing better. 10 million in one year is pretty good.
Avatar image for Thrice_III
Thrice_III

1539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#85 Thrice_III
Member since 2004 • 1539 Posts
[QUOTE="Thrice_III"]Just look at how many PS2 owners there are(100million plus) and how many they are still selling.Felous1
The NES sold more than 60 million units. Now take a look at the numbers for the 64 and GC. http://www.nintendo.com/systemsclassic?type=nes

Once again Nintendo lost the support of developers with their decision to stay with cartridges. So far no developers have really left Sony, they have just merely joined the 360 so like I said the 360 will do better than the original xbox but I don't see the PS3 doing much worse than the PS2.
Avatar image for the-very-best
the-very-best

14486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#86 the-very-best
Member since 2006 • 14486 Posts
[QUOTE="the-very-best"]Wii's momentum will wear off when GTAIV is not released on the consoleFelous1
I'm gonna quote Reggie here: "People said the same thing about the DS, that it was a gimmick and it would wear off." That was not the case was it ?



There is no doubt that casual support will switch to PS3 when GTA comes out, followed by GT etc.

I didn't say that all support will stop for the console. I think hardcore gamers and non gamers will still strongly support the console due to games like SSBB and Wii health pack, Wiisports etc.

PS2 shows us that casuals need their Madden, GT, GTA fix, and Xbox surpassing the GC also shows that.

Casuals aren't going to ignore the first main entry in years for the GTA series. That is one thing I'm sure about.
Avatar image for Felous1
Felous1

4557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 Felous1
Member since 2006 • 4557 Posts
Once again Nintendo lost the support of developers with their decision to stay with cartridges. So far no developers have really left Sony, they have just merely joined the 360 so like I said the 360 will do better than the original xbox but I don't see the PS3 doing much worse than the PS2.Thrice_III
It's just like I said before. " This time around Sony screwed around by making the PS3 too expensive making it risky for developers. Because this generation it's more expensive to make games, thus, making consoles lose exclusives. Not only that, but it's also harder to develop for. Microsoft launched first and worked with developers trying to make everything easier for them. XBL and better development tools for example."
Avatar image for Felous1
Felous1

4557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 Felous1
Member since 2006 • 4557 Posts
Casuals aren't going to ignore the first main entry in years for the GTA series. That is one thing I'm sure about.the-very-best
Which can be found from day one on a system that's $200 dollars cheaper.
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#89 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts

What's to say the 360 won't end up like the Xbox?

And what's to say that the PS3 will end up like the PS2?

No one knows, and I am not speculating, but 360 is running in 1st place so far, and that's all I'm going by.

Avatar image for Thrice_III
Thrice_III

1539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#90 Thrice_III
Member since 2004 • 1539 Posts
[QUOTE="Thrice_III"]Once again Nintendo lost the support of developers with their decision to stay with cartridges. So far no developers have really left Sony, they have just merely joined the 360 so like I said the 360 will do better than the original xbox but I don't see the PS3 doing much worse than the PS2.Felous1
It's just like I said before. " This time around Sony screwed around by making the PS3 too expensive making it risky for developers. Because this generation it's more expensive to make games, thus, making consoles lose exclusives. Not only that, but it's also harder to develop for. Microsoft launched first and worked with developers trying to make everything easier for them. XBL and better development tools for example."

But have developers actually stopped supporting the PS3?? I haven't heard of any developers that were strong PS2 supports leaving the PS3 because of the price. Developers actually left Nintendo for some time because of their decision. Has any actually left Sony yet?
Avatar image for the-very-best
the-very-best

14486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#91 the-very-best
Member since 2006 • 14486 Posts
[QUOTE="the-very-best"]Casuals aren't going to ignore the first main entry in years for the GTA series. That is one thing I'm sure about.Felous1
Which can be found from day one on a system that's $200 dollars cheaper.



Well then there's GT. Consumers won't overlook that either. And for the more hardcore gamers there is FF, MGS, DMC.

Avatar image for Felous1
Felous1

4557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 Felous1
Member since 2006 • 4557 Posts
But have developers actually stopped supporting the PS3??Thrice_III
Developers will go where the money is at, which is the 360 right now. Sony already lost an important exclusive, VF5. There's no saying which game will be next to lose exclusivity. Which in this case is worst for Sony because the 360 has a bigger userbase.
Avatar image for user_nat
user_nat

3130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 user_nat
Member since 2006 • 3130 Posts
The 360 already is completly different situation from the original xbox, you can't really compare the 2. The 360 is leading the xbox never was.
Avatar image for Felous1
Felous1

4557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 Felous1
Member since 2006 • 4557 Posts
Which can be found from day one on a system that's $200 dollars cheaper.the-very-best


Well then there's GT. Consumers won't overlook that either. And for the more hardcore gamers there is FF, MGS, DMC.

Again, development cost is high this generation. 3 of those games you listed are from third-party, which 2 of then could be coming out on the 360.
Avatar image for the-very-best
the-very-best

14486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#95 the-very-best
Member since 2006 • 14486 Posts
[QUOTE="Thrice_III"]But have developers actually stopped supporting the PS3??Felous1
Developers will go where the money is at, which is the 360 right now. Sony already lost an important exclusive, VF5. There's no saying which game will be next to lose exclusivity. Which in this case is worst for Sony because the 360 has a bigger userbase.



I'm not trying to undermine the loss of an exclusive (because I think that's quite bad) but VF isn't really a major series. The last one only sold 1 million. It's comparable to the loss of NG as an exclusive really.

Btw, devs trusted the PS2 over the DC despite it launching a year earlier. PS3 certainly hasn't lost any major dev support. All the major companies are supporting the PS3 so far.
Avatar image for Thrice_III
Thrice_III

1539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#96 Thrice_III
Member since 2004 • 1539 Posts
[QUOTE="Thrice_III"]But have developers actually stopped supporting the PS3??Felous1
Developers will go where the money is at, which is the 360 right now. Sony already lost an important exclusive, VF5. There's no saying which game will be next to lose exclusivity. Which in this case is worst for Sony because the 360 has a bigger userbase.

So the PS3 hasn't lost developers, but the 360 has gained. Good for 360 and a little bad for the PS3. Like I said I don't think Sony will reach PS2 levels but won't lose much fanbase. While I think both the Wii and 360 will grow in fanbase.(as they won't just be stealing a little market share from Sony, but will also be growing the gaming market in general, especially the Wii)
Avatar image for tonywilsn
tonywilsn

840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 tonywilsn
Member since 2005 • 840 Posts
Some people believe that the 360 has the console war already won but sales argue otherwise. According to a few sources (vgcharts, teamxbox) the 360 is only doing slightly better (6% better to be exact) than the original Xbox was in its time period (talking sales here).

Why is the 360 only selling slightly better than the original Xbox in its time period? Why is the PS3 outselling the 360 in its time period? Shouldn't the 360 have sold more considering it released a year earlier than both the Wii and PS3?

I'm not arguing that the 360 is a flop, I'm just saying that there is no evidence to suggest that the 360 will be number 1 in the console war. Nintendo, on the other hand, have really improved their game. Wii is doing much better than the GC was in its time period. PS3 is doing about the same as the PS2, worse in Japan due to the Wii atm. We'll see what happens I suppose but my point was that there isn't any evidence to suggest the 360 will be number 1. Just want to point that out.

What do you guys think? A little surprised the 360 isn't selling incredibly? Or do you believe the year head start will cause the 360 to be more popular in the end?
the-very-best
well it sold a little more than the original the reason its not selling is the same reason the ps3 isn't selling lack of really good games . And don't give me the 360 fanboy posting the Gears fo war crap after this what else has M$ COME OUT WITH that matches Gears of war nothin its a once maybe twice a year really good game ayear . THAT still blows even for the ps3 since the exculsive games are going multplatfrom . The 360 is cheaper than the ps3 is all . So suck it up cause i know its the truth if you have proof prove me wrong then if not quit posting crap here !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Avatar image for nnavidson
nnavidson

934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 nnavidson
Member since 2006 • 934 Posts

[QUOTE="Felous1"][QUOTE="the-very-best"]Casuals aren't going to ignore the first main entry in years for the GTA series. That is one thing I'm sure about.the-very-best
Which can be found from day one on a system that's $200 dollars cheaper.



Well then there's GT. Consumers won't overlook that either. And for the more hardcore gamers there is FF, MGS, DMC.

Hardcore gamers are going to own all systems by the end of this generation

Avatar image for HeedleGlavin
HeedleGlavin

15373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#99 HeedleGlavin
Member since 2005 • 15373 Posts
Some people believe that the 360 has the console war already won but sales argue otherwise. According to a few sources (vgcharts, teamxbox) the 360 is only doing slightly better (6% better to be exact) than the original Xbox was in its time period (talking sales here).

Why is the 360 only selling slightly better than the original Xbox in its time period? Why is the PS3 outselling the 360 in its time period? Shouldn't the 360 have sold more considering it released a year earlier than both the Wii and PS3?

I'm not arguing that the 360 is a flop, I'm just saying that there is no evidence to suggest that the 360 will be number 1 in the console war. Nintendo, on the other hand, have really improved their game. Wii is doing much better than the GC was in its time period. PS3 is doing about the same as the PS2, worse in Japan due to the Wii atm. We'll see what happens I suppose but my point was that there isn't any evidence to suggest the 360 will be number 1. Just want to point that out.

What do you guys think? A little surprised the 360 isn't selling incredibly? Or do you believe the year head start will cause the 360 to be more popular in the end?
the-very-best
Agreed. Furthermore, Japan is a severe handicap for MS.
Avatar image for rykaziel
rykaziel

1149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 rykaziel
Member since 2003 • 1149 Posts
I thought that the Xbox had the best games, best online, and overall best experience of any other system last generation. I'm hoping it will follow in its footsteps.