What's your opinion of the Oculus Rift Price? It's $599

  • 144 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for naz99
naz99

2941

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 naz99
Member since 2002 • 2941 Posts

@aigis well thats messed up, it may have been worth it with the controllers, also what if you dont need an xb one pad thats an extra unnecessary expense.

Avatar image for aigis
aigis

7355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#102  Edited By aigis
Member since 2015 • 7355 Posts

@naz99 said:

@aigis well thats messed up, it may have been worth it with the controllers, also what if you dont need an xb one pad thats an extra unnecessary expense.

On the oculus shop they only have that package as a pre-order option. Maybe down the road they will separate it, but I think they are trying to get some money out of people by bundling while people are really excited for vr. Here's the post they made about on their site if you're interested

Avatar image for naz99
naz99

2941

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103  Edited By naz99
Member since 2002 • 2941 Posts

@aigis: Thanks,I was interested until now...think I will wait for the vive and buy that complete with the controllers, it has always looked like a worthy contender.

Avatar image for ConanTheStoner
ConanTheStoner

23838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104  Edited By ConanTheStoner
Member since 2011 • 23838 Posts

Actually sounds pretty reasonable to me, though I'm not going to jump on the bandwagon right away.

Give it some time, let the early adopters do their adopting, see how things pan out, then if it proves to be a good thing, it'll have already come down in price and I'll be on board.

Actually I say that, but the company I work with is already doing VR development, I'll probably just get one for free lol.

Avatar image for Epak_
Epak_

11911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#105  Edited By Epak_
Member since 2004 • 11911 Posts

Screw that, I'd have to upgrade my PC too. Gonna wait for PS4 VR.

Avatar image for the_master_race
the_master_race

5226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#106 the_master_race
Member since 2015 • 5226 Posts

patience is a virtue

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107  Edited By mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts

Avatar image for kratosyoloswag
KratosYOLOSwag

1827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#108 KratosYOLOSwag
Member since 2013 • 1827 Posts

Does it come with a giant enemy crab?

Avatar image for deactivated-5d1e44cf96229
deactivated-5d1e44cf96229

2814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109  Edited By deactivated-5d1e44cf96229
Member since 2015 • 2814 Posts

It's more expensive than I hoped it would be (I was hoping for a $500 price point), but considering that this is cutting edge technology, I think the price is fair, but I just think they did a poor job of managing people's price expectations. But I much rather they deliver an expensive device that delivers an amazing virtual reality experience over a cheap device that delivers a shitty virtual reality experience.

Cutting edge technology is always going to be expensive and out of reach for the mass market consumers at first. The price of the Oculus Rift is comparable to the price that DVD players and Blu-ray players were when they first launched and just like DVD players and Blu-ray players eventually dropped to a more mass market friendly price, so will virtual reality headsets, but I can't wait for that as I've been dreaming of having a great virtual reality headset ever since I was a little kid and now it is finally almost here. I can afford to buy it while still paying all my bills, so there is no way I'm going to hold out on buying something that I always told myself I would someday buy ever since I was like 5 years old.

Avatar image for eNT1TY
eNT1TY

1319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 eNT1TY
Member since 2005 • 1319 Posts

I always assumed they would be priced similar to the sdk versions which if i recall were around $300-350. They even hinted after dk2 that the retail price may be just a bit pricier yet still in that ballpark. $600 is not in the same ballpark as $350. I would have pre-purchased for $400 but ill wait for more software if i am even to consider dropping $600 on one. Guess they felt that if people are willing to drop $500-600 on gpus they would be willing to for vr as well.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#111 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

It's a high-end device meant for hyper-enthusiasts.

I'm not the least bit surprised.

Avatar image for Dogswithguns
Dogswithguns

11359

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#112 Dogswithguns
Member since 2007 • 11359 Posts

@Berserker1_5 said:

Hate to say it, I was expecting $350-450

It being $600 is a bit too much. I can't say I want to buy it anymore. I really put off right now

What's a different $150 more, huh?

No.. I think it should be around 200.

Avatar image for legendofsense
legendofsense

320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 legendofsense
Member since 2013 • 320 Posts

@quadknight said:
@makemefamous07 said:

Thats a joke. $600 is way to much. Didnt sony learn from the PS3 launch LOL. Sony is gonna loose alot of money because of this garbage. At launch it will sell but then it will fall flat on sonys face. The casuals and main hardcore gamers will not buy this. Hope sony has money left after this bombs in there face much like 3D

WTF are you smoking son? Oculus Rift is not Sony's device. You mean Facebook.

If you're going to bash something at least get your facts straight about what it is you're bashing.

Can't...be..serious..

Avatar image for NathanDrakeSwag
NathanDrakeSwag

17392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 NathanDrakeSwag
Member since 2013 • 17392 Posts

This will bomb so hard. $600 is already a ton of money for high end products people actually want. Let alone an unproven gimmick.

Avatar image for xhawk27
xhawk27

12194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115  Edited By xhawk27
Member since 2010 • 12194 Posts

@naz99 said:

@aigis: Thanks,I was interested until now...think I will wait for the vive and buy that complete with the controllers, it has always looked like a worthy contender.

The cost of the controller is like $50. So you still have to pay $550. Vive is going to be the same or maybe even more. The cost of their controllers might be really high.

Avatar image for gamecubepad
gamecubepad

7214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -12

User Lists: 0

#117  Edited By gamecubepad
Member since 2003 • 7214 Posts
@mems_1224 said:

lol. Reality may have changed his mind.

Avatar image for StrongBlackVine
StrongBlackVine

13262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118  Edited By StrongBlackVine
Member since 2012 • 13262 Posts

@svaubel: Just because some rich, hardcore early adopters bought the early stock doesn't mean this price is sustainable.

Avatar image for phoenix5352
phoenix5352

387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#119 phoenix5352
Member since 2011 • 387 Posts

600 dollars is a bit pricey , because games it is supporting aren't that good yet

Avatar image for Litchie
Litchie

36121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#120  Edited By Litchie  Online
Member since 2003 • 36121 Posts

Pretty much what I was expecting. Not getting one for that price right now, but I want one.

Avatar image for DJ-Lafleur
DJ-Lafleur

35604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#121 DJ-Lafleur
Member since 2007 • 35604 Posts

Wasn't terribly interested in the first place, but that $600, while perhaps not unreasonable, certainly doesn't help to make me change my stance.

For me VR has always been a "wait and see" thing. VR is going to have to prove itself before I even think about shelling out that kind of cash.

Avatar image for MirkoS77
MirkoS77

17980

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#122 MirkoS77
Member since 2011 • 17980 Posts

@demi0227_basic said:

Bummer is, there's nothing out there right now that I could really "upgrade." I have, for me, pretty nice everything. Beyerdynamic dt-990 premium cans, powered by a Schiit stack dac/amp, Yamaha receiver with 7.1 Klipsch reference speakers, 4790k @4.7ghz, 16gb ddr 2400, 2 ssds (boot/game) and 2 4tb hdd's, Asus Swift Rog Screen, 980ti sli, and to boot it's all under water. I feel pretty spoiled, but it's a bummer not having any real upgrades without absurd diminishing returns.

Holy crap man. That's one hell of a rig. I think you're set until.....2025. Yea.

OT, I'm a bit surprised at the cost....I was expecting $500 at most. I'll be waiting probably about a year until the CV2 version hits and Touch comes out. Hopefully by then eye tracking will be standard, resolution will be much better, more software will be out, and it'll all be cheaper. I need to upgrade my rig in the meantime anyway.

Avatar image for iambatman7986
iambatman7986

4649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#123 iambatman7986
Member since 2013 • 4649 Posts

$600 is more than I'm willing to pay for it. It needs to be at least $200 cheaper for me to consider it.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d78760d7d740
deactivated-5d78760d7d740

16386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#124  Edited By deactivated-5d78760d7d740
Member since 2009 • 16386 Posts

If Sony prices it at ~$350 I wonder what features they will be cutting out in order to keep it that way.

$600 is crazy.

Avatar image for deactivated-583e460ca986b
deactivated-583e460ca986b

7240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 deactivated-583e460ca986b
Member since 2004 • 7240 Posts

Well there are obviously a ton of enthusiast out there buying this thing. Mine isn't shipping until June!

Avatar image for inggrish
inggrish

10503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#126 inggrish
Member since 2005 • 10503 Posts

I'm surprised at how many people expected it to be cheaper. It's not something I would buy personally, but it was clear from the off this wasn't too be a compromised piece of tech for the masses, but to be a step in a new direction.

Avatar image for lastcoin
lastcoin

248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127  Edited By lastcoin
Member since 2015 • 248 Posts

@Wasdie said:
@razik said:

Well that's VR dead unless PSVR is €200

VR is going to die much quicker if terrible VR irreverence is what gets a large market share because of it's cheaper price. The PS4's version of VR is going to come off as a horrible gimmick as they can't even come close to matching a PC in any aspect.

A shitty first impression for a $250 (more likely $300) device is going to kill it much sooner than a fantastic experience at an unreachable pricepoint.

Properly done VR is a game changing experience. But that's the key, it has to be properly done. If it's not done right it'll come off as a gimmick and destroy people's perception of VR. Oculus is going to provide the one product on the market that has a non compromised approach to the counter the inevitable shitstorm against VR that the PS4's VR will be.

Did you ever use PSVR before you make these comments?

Avatar image for aigis
aigis

7355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#128 aigis
Member since 2015 • 7355 Posts

@xhawk27: I dunno, i think vive and ps vr are going to be a little cheaper than rift because they dont have the audio support. I think rifts preorder price is just bundling a bunch of stuff to take advantage of people who are excited about vr since they are the first ones up

Avatar image for lastcoin
lastcoin

248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 lastcoin
Member since 2015 • 248 Posts

Never expected Oculus Rift to cost over 400usd,it is just a screen with two glasses,literally is my phone+2 magnifying glasses.

And Rift is support by 1000 dollars PC,which should make it costs even less.

The edge+ costs $599,with a 2560x1440 screen,two cpu( 2.1GHz + 1.5GHz),one gpu and camera.

Rift costs the same with a 2160 x 1200 screen and two magnifying glasses?

What's the deal?

Avatar image for Sushiglutton
Sushiglutton

10466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#130  Edited By Sushiglutton
Member since 2009 • 10466 Posts
@lastcoin said:

Never expected Oculus Rift to cost over 400usd,it is just a screen with two glasses,literally is my phone+2 magnifying glasses.

And Rift is support by 1000 dollars PC,which should make it costs even less.

The edge+ costs $599,with a 2560x1440 screen,two cpu( 2.1GHz + 1.5GHz),one gpu and camera.

Rift costs the same with a 2160 x 1200 screen and two magnifying glasses?

What's the deal?

It's actually two seperate screens 1080x1200 / eye. Those lenses are not your regular magnifying glasses.... There's also high precision positional/rotational tracking, camera, headphones, controller.

Using demeaning descriptions is just lazy rhetoric. It's like saying that soccer is "22 guys/gals chasing a ball", or fine dining is "just some atoms on a plate". There's zero value to that type of "analysis".

Avatar image for lastcoin
lastcoin

248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131  Edited By lastcoin
Member since 2015 • 248 Posts

@Sushiglutton said:
@lastcoin said:

Never expected Oculus Rift to cost over 400usd,it is just a screen with two glasses,literally is my phone+2 magnifying glasses.

And Rift is support by 1000 dollars PC,which should make it costs even less.

The edge+ costs $599,with a 2560x1440 screen,two cpu( 2.1GHz + 1.5GHz),one gpu and camera.

Rift costs the same with a 2160 x 1200 screen and two magnifying glasses?

What's the deal?

It's actually two seperate screens 1080x1200 / eye. Those lenses are not your regular magnifying glasses.... There's also high precision positional/rotational tracking, camera, headphones, controller.

Using diminishing descriptions is just lazy rhetoric. It's like describing soccer as "22 guys/gals chasing a ball", or fine dining as "just some atoms on a plate". There's zero value to that type of "analysis".

Almost every gamer got a headset,no one need another pair.

You much been using controller already if you game on PC.If you don't,you gotta be hating it,so what's good they give you another one.

It is not two 1080x1200 screens,it is one 2160x1200 screens split over duals 1080x1200 displays.

And google is selling those lenses in less than $20.(Less than $10 at some places.)

What in my mind was,all we want is a VR headset.$599?What's the deal facebook?

Avatar image for Sushiglutton
Sushiglutton

10466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#132  Edited By Sushiglutton
Member since 2009 • 10466 Posts

@lastcoin said:
@Sushiglutton said:
@lastcoin said:

Never expected Oculus Rift to cost over 400usd,it is just a screen with two glasses,literally is my phone+2 magnifying glasses.

And Rift is support by 1000 dollars PC,which should make it costs even less.

The edge+ costs $599,with a 2560x1440 screen,two cpu( 2.1GHz + 1.5GHz),one gpu and camera.

Rift costs the same with a 2160 x 1200 screen and two magnifying glasses?

What's the deal?

It's actually two seperate screens 1080x1200 / eye. Those lenses are not your regular magnifying glasses.... There's also high precision positional/rotational tracking, camera, headphones, controller.

Using diminishing descriptions is just lazy rhetoric. It's like describing soccer as "22 guys/gals chasing a ball", or fine dining as "just some atoms on a plate". There's zero value to that type of "analysis".

Almost every gamer got a headset,no one need another pair.

You much been using controller already if you game on PC.If you don't,you gotta be hating it,so what's good they give you a another one.

It is not two 1080x1200 screens,it is one 2160x1200 screens split over duals 1080x1200 displays.

And google are selling those lenses in less than $20.(Less than $10 at some places.)

What in my mind was,all we want is a VR headset.$599?What's the deal facebook?

These headphones are og higher quality than the typical gaming ones, hence why they are included.

OR uses two seperate screens. DK1-2 used one screen, they changed that design for crescent bay onwards.

http://gizmodo.com/heres-the-final-oculus-rift-coming-in-early-2016-1710650824

"Inside, there are a pair of low persistence OLED screens, one for each eye."

Avatar image for lastcoin
lastcoin

248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133  Edited By lastcoin
Member since 2015 • 248 Posts

@Sushiglutton said:
@lastcoin said:
@Sushiglutton said:
@lastcoin said:

Never expected Oculus Rift to cost over 400usd,it is just a screen with two glasses,literally is my phone+2 magnifying glasses.

And Rift is support by 1000 dollars PC,which should make it costs even less.

The edge+ costs $599,with a 2560x1440 screen,two cpu( 2.1GHz + 1.5GHz),one gpu and camera.

Rift costs the same with a 2160 x 1200 screen and two magnifying glasses?

What's the deal?

It's actually two seperate screens 1080x1200 / eye. Those lenses are not your regular magnifying glasses.... There's also high precision positional/rotational tracking, camera, headphones, controller.

Using diminishing descriptions is just lazy rhetoric. It's like describing soccer as "22 guys/gals chasing a ball", or fine dining as "just some atoms on a plate". There's zero value to that type of "analysis".

Almost every gamer got a headset,no one need another pair.

You much been using controller already if you game on PC.If you don't,you gotta be hating it,so what's good they give you a another one.

It is not two 1080x1200 screens,it is one 2160x1200 screens split over duals 1080x1200 displays.

And google are selling those lenses in less than $20.(Less than $10 at some places.)

What in my mind was,all we want is a VR headset.$599?What's the deal facebook?

These headphones are og higher quality than the typical gaming ones, hence why they are included.

OR uses two seperate screens. DK1-2 used one screen, they changed that design for crescent bay onwards.

http://gizmodo.com/heres-the-final-oculus-rift-coming-in-early-2016-1710650824

"Inside, there are a pair of low persistence OLED screens, one for each eye."

What?That would even lower their manufacture cost!

Oh,and a high quality headphone could easily cost more than $599,experting Rift pack with a typical $100 quality's headset,or worse.

Avatar image for demi0227_basic
demi0227_basic

1940

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#134 demi0227_basic
Member since 2002 • 1940 Posts

@MirkoS77 said:
@demi0227_basic said:

Bummer is, there's nothing out there right now that I could really "upgrade." I have, for me, pretty nice everything. Beyerdynamic dt-990 premium cans, powered by a Schiit stack dac/amp, Yamaha receiver with 7.1 Klipsch reference speakers, 4790k @4.7ghz, 16gb ddr 2400, 2 ssds (boot/game) and 2 4tb hdd's, Asus Swift Rog Screen, 980ti sli, and to boot it's all under water. I feel pretty spoiled, but it's a bummer not having any real upgrades without absurd diminishing returns.

Holy crap man. That's one hell of a rig. I think you're set until.....2025. Yea.

OT, I'm a bit surprised at the cost....I was expecting $500 at most. I'll be waiting probably about a year until the CV2 version hits and Touch comes out. Hopefully by then eye tracking will be standard, resolution will be much better, more software will be out, and it'll all be cheaper. I need to upgrade my rig in the meantime anyway.

That's what I'm thinking too. I'll wait until there's software to make it worthwhile. A high end monitor will work with everything. This device...not yet.

My wife is a prankster too. She may hit me in the gut while I have the thing on, and I'd never see it coming!

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

They should have talked with Nvidia and offered a more value oriented bundle with an upcoming higher end graphics card.

Avatar image for Kruiz_Bathory
Kruiz_Bathory

4765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#138 Kruiz_Bathory
Member since 2009 • 4765 Posts

Bastards bumping threads

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

That stuff is gonna f with people's vision, just watch. Developers will do things which will disorient the eyes. A lawsuit will follow.

Avatar image for gcfreak898
gcfreak898

2031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#140 gcfreak898
Member since 2003 • 2031 Posts

To be competitive the price is too high for the average consumer to invest in. I'd wait and see if it turns out to be some sort of fad like 3D was.

Avatar image for sovkhan
sovkhan

1591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 sovkhan
Member since 2015 • 1591 Posts

Here, it's 700€ and for me it's a big NO!!!

Properly done or not, there's no way that I pay that much for VR, NO WAY!!!

Maybe when it's around 300ish, and even then better have a cutting edge flightsim a la DCS or Falcon 4.0, 'cause that's the only thing i'll buy it for.

Avatar image for Pikminmaniac
Pikminmaniac

11514

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#143 Pikminmaniac
Member since 2006 • 11514 Posts

It's just $599 too expensive. Then there's the irreversible cost of time for using it.

Avatar image for 360ru13r
360ru13r

1856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#144 360ru13r
Member since 2008 • 1856 Posts

Given you still need about a 1000 dollar PC to be able to remotely use the headset. I can say it is a bit too much.