This topic is locked from further discussion.
Video games haven't ben just simple games since the NES era. They've grown into an art form, into interactive personal experiences that i can't define in any other way. I thought this is something that's commonly agreed upon.
but the fact is that most everyone can think of some movie or song or book that truly touched and moved them. Not so with games. Most games are clumsy as hell, don't go very much beyond mindless action, and even the few that do elevate the genre don't have the same kind of widespread cultural presence as with other art forms. Most people are aware of Citizen Kane, but mention video games and most people are just going to be thinking about Super Mario Bros and Mortal Kombat.MrGeezer
What? I literally haven't met one soul that casually watches movies, that know of Citizen Kane, or hell, even Blade Runner, or anything els that isn't shoved in their face by marketing. How much you know of a medium depends on how much time you've put into it, how interested you are in that particular medium.
Obviously people that aren't gamers, or casually play games, will not know of Planescape: Torment, for example. But anyone that holds gaming as their hobby, will know of it. All of this is, ofcourse, based on my limited personal experience.
For the purposes of this discussion, absolutely. The whole point of communicating to someone in college admissions is to make a good impression so you get admitted. The whole point of everything you say at a job interview is to look good so you get hired. If you're gonna state a hobby, it damn sure better be one that doesn't reflect poorly on you. If you're gonna mention games, it doesn't matter how "artistically valid" they are, what matters is what the interviewer thinks about them. And video games are mostly perceived as shallow and mindless.So artistic validity is linked to what is mainstream culturally?
Interesting.
Ilovegames1992
[QUOTE="Sali217"] I hate movies, no movie has ever "moved" me. Movies can't even come remotely close to the greatness of some literature, and yet they are still considered art and worthwhile.MrGeezer"Watching movies" is also a pretty crappy answer to the question of what one's hobbies are, but the fact remains that film has gained at least some measure of mainstream cultural respect. People at least accept that mature, intelligent, thought-provoking and inspiring movies actually exist, while games are still very largely seem as dumb trash. That's not even an unfair generalization either. Take the absolute best of the games that have had any kind of mainstream cultural impact, and 9 times out of 10 you're gonna be left with something that's dumber and more immature and irrelevant than even an "average" movie. If movies don't even come close to the greatness of literature, then games don't even come close to the greatness of movies.
I could argue that the maturity (not violence or sex), the thought provoking complexity is in the gameplay. Look at games like Hearts of Iron III or Amnesia. Games excell at mature, intelligent, thought-provoking and inspiring aspects trough their gameplay, and the atmosphere that's molded by the sound design, music and artstyle. These are experiences that the film medium cannot even begin to touch.Â
These aren't movies, the gaming and the film medium are completely different, both excell at different things (movies = storytelling, games = gameplay).
Saying that video games are art is an incredibly broad generalization, however that doesn't mean that video games cannot be art. People seem to forget that not all movies and books can be considered as art since both, like games, can be founded on market research and can therefore be adapted to appeal to the lowest common denominator. Imo, art is supposed to represent a focused vision of an individual or a group regardless of whether or not it will appeal to the masses. However, this is not to say that art cannot be popular as there is evidence to the contrary with games like Shadow of the Colossus, Majora's Mask etc.
Â
Now that is not say that the two games I've listed could be considered art to everybody and therein lies the problem with the term due is its heavily subjective nature. To me, the second a game elicits an emotional response that is beyond simple fun then I would probably consider it art. For others the conditions on which someone might consider a game art could be different.
Â
To add to my first point  "Imo, art is supposed to represent a focused vision of an individual or a group regardless of whether or not it will appeal to the masses" I should add that a person or a group's focus doesn't have to be artistic and it could be to just make an awesome game and therefore what I meant is that it is more likely for a game to have an artistic focus under these circumstances as most companies know that making a game with an artistic focus is very hit and miss and is therefore much more likely to take the safe route.
Just say you like reading.
Anyway, don't let Bioshock Infinite trick you, it's a game about shooting people in the face and going towards the objective marker. All they did is provide you with an unusually involved justification for the face shooting.
Cherokee_Jack
lol don't let books read you, they are just a reason to turn pages and look at text.Â
Seriously, of course games are supposed to be fun too. Â
[QUOTE="Ilovegames1992"]For the purposes of this discussion, absolutely. The whole point of communicating to someone in college admissions is to make a good impression so you get admitted. The whole point of everything you say at a job interview is to look good so you get hired. If you're gonna state a hobby, it damn sure better be one that doesn't reflect poorly on you. If you're gonna mention games, it doesn't matter how "artistically valid" they are, what matters is what the interviewer thinks about them. And video games are mostly perceived as shallow and mindless.So artistic validity is linked to what is mainstream culturally?
Interesting.
MrGeezer
Sure i guess. Which i indicative of how prejudice society can be i guess.
For a job interview or something. But i think that's changing more and ore now with such activities reaching more mainstream audiences.
I probably wouldn't bring up many hobbies like that though, other than maybe literature at a push, because its so old and has this pretentious quality about it.
Tbh, literature is really the only form of "entertainment" hobby I'd bring up in a job interview and even at that I'd probably be more inclined to talk about my cabinet building and bee keeping hobbies instead.Sali217Yep. The thing about movies and video games is that they boil down to "things I like". And what you like generally isn't gonna impress anyone, they're more concerned with what you make or what you provide. They want to see someone who is productive rather than someone who simply consumes. Now, it's one thing if you MAKE movies or music or books. If you're an artist like a writer or a musician, that's worth mentioning, but no one wants to hear about what you like. At least with literature you can more reasonably pass that off as "studies", but when they ask you what you read, your answer better be more Tolstoy and less Tom Clancy.
@MrGeezer
I respectfully disagree
Games like The Walking Dead prove that video gamesa are more than just "mindless fun". Books and Movies have been around for a long time so of coures people are moved more by those mediums.. Dosn't take away the fact people are moved by video games as well. About time video games get where they should we'll be dead. The fact you and me are having this conversation proves my point.
Â
:)
The Walking dead could be the greatest thing in the world, but it doesn't matter if the person you're trying to impress has never played it. You mention The Walking Dead to someone at an interview, and all they're gonna be thinking is "videogame based on that dumb show with the zombies".I respectfully disagree
Games like The Walking Dead prove that vidoeo gamesa are more than just "mindless fun.". Books and Movies have been around for a long time so of coures people ar moved more by those mediums.. Dosn't take away the fact people are moved by video games as well. About time vidoe games get where they should we'll be deaddead.. The fact you and me are having this conversation proves my point.
Â
:)
Blazed
Who cares what other people think? Video games are video games and hopefully the name never changes. Once all the old people die out and our generation rules the world no one is gonna look down on you for playing video games :Pmems_1224
[QUOTE="Blazed"]The Walking dead could be the greatest thing in the world, but it doesn't matter if the person you're trying to impress has never played it. You mention The Walking Dead to someone at an interview, and all they're gonna be thinking is "videogame based on that dumb show with the zombies".I respectfully disagree
Games like The Walking Dead prove that vidoeo gamesa are more than just "mindless fun.". Books and Movies have been around for a long time so of coures people ar moved more by those mediums.. Dosn't take away the fact people are moved by video games as well. About time vidoe games get where they should we'll be deaddead.. The fact you and me are having this conversation proves my point.
Â
:)
MrGeezer
The medium hasn't been around long enough for peope to respect it yet. Eventually it will get respect over time. We have come a long way these past 2 generations but the medium has a long road ahead of it. Wish I could be around to see it happen.
:x
[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"]
Just say you like reading.
Anyway, don't let Bioshock Infinite trick you, it's a game about shooting people in the face and going towards the objective marker. All they did is provide you with an unusually involved justification for the face shooting.
NaveedLife
lol don't let books read you, they are just a reason to turn pages and look at text.Â
Seriously, of course games are supposed to be fun too. Â
Yes, and that's just it, Bioshock Infinite is a game built to be fun. It plainly has objectives, progression, mechanics, and failure states, and it's structured more tightly than goddamn Mario 64.
There are certainly pieces of software whose "game-ness" is debatable, but Infinite isn't one of them, and neither are Metro or TLOU.
That's all fine and well, but I wasn't even talking about that. I was simply saying that games aren't there NOW. Sure, I like to believe that games will grow and mature and eventually become as accepted as film or literature. But right now they aren't. And with good reason. The thing is, we can argue all day why video games or movies or novels or songs should be considered great art, but that's not something you can convince people of simply by argument. Show, don't tell. I'm not pretending that great stuff doesn't fly under the radar, sure that happens. But if it's really that great, it probably doesn't need explaining, it probably doesn't need convincing and argumentation. Stanley Kubrick's films aren't considered some of the all-time greats because someone was just really good at arguing that we should all think that Stanley Kubrick's films are great. Stanley Kubrick's films are considered some of the all time greats because the man just made the movies and then the movies spoke for themselves. The bottom line is this: while there are certainly great games and innovative games and thought provoking games and emotional games, they're mostly just appealing to gamers. It's pretty much gamers who take them seriously, and no one else (although more and more people are becoming gamers). That's preaching to the choir. One can say all they want about how games should be considered "artistically valid", one can make all the arguments they want to support it. But by the large, the only ones buying that are the people who already game. Video games are still mostly considered dumb pop tripe on the level of Justin Bieber or Britney Spears, and that notion is not going to go away until the industry generates works of art that FORCES people to pay attention to it. Sure we have our Bioshocks and our Walking Deads and our Metal Gear Solids, and we gamers hold those games up as te pinnacle of what can be achieved by the art form, but for the most part it's preaching to the choir. More and more people are becoming gamers, more and more of these games are selling assloads of copies, and yet we still fail to have games that demand non gamers to be blown away and see how much they are missing. Gaming has yet to find its "masterpiece" that forces people to take it seriously. Are we getting closer to that goal? I think so. Will we get there eventually? Hopefully, and I suspect it'll probably happen evntually. Are we there NOW? Sorry, but I don't think so.The medium hasn't been around long enough for peope to respect it yet. Eventually it will get respect over time. We have come a long way these past 2 generations but the medium has a long road ahead of it. Wish I could be around to see it happen.
:x
Blazed
Gaming has a masterpiece by the way, it's called Super Mario. Cause you know... it's a good game that brings people together, rather than sitting alone playing a game that thinks it's a film.m25105Nintendo had Decades to make Mario evolve, and the best they could do was the same boring ass Mario game over and over again Meanwhile Frozenbyte surfaced a few years ago and now they have Trine 2, leagues better than that Italian Plumber.
[QUOTE="m25105"]Gaming has a masterpiece by the way, it's called Super Mario. Cause you know... it's a good game that brings people together, rather than sitting alone playing a game that thinks it's a film.LulekaniNintendo had Decades to make Mario evolve, and the best they could do was the same boring ass Mario game over and over again Meanwhile Frozenbyte surfaced a few years ago and now they have Trine 2, leagues better than that Italian Plumber. I didn't know SMG1 as a remake of SMB1. Go figure.
[QUOTE="Lulekani"][QUOTE="m25105"]Gaming has a masterpiece by the way, it's called Super Mario. Cause you know... it's a good game that brings people together, rather than sitting alone playing a game that thinks it's a film.nintendoboy16Nintendo had Decades to make Mario evolve, and the best they could do was the same boring ass Mario game over and over again Meanwhile Frozenbyte surfaced a few years ago and now they have Trine 2, leagues better than that Italian Plumber. I didn't know SMG1 as a remake of SMB1. Go figure. You're right, it's more like straightforward and restricted Mario 64. Oh yeah and it's in space. Go figure.
Meh I disagree entirely, walking dead is an example of merging to mediums, nothing special about it. I would argue that competitive e-sport games are more in line with the "more than just mindless fun" definition as it focuses on the element unique to interactive media the "Game" aspect. People quickly forget how sports are just mindless games kicking leather balls around ect... and at one point were just seen as that.... yet they never were "mindless" nothing about competitive interactivity is mindless.@MrGeezer
I respectfully disagree
Games like The Walking Dead prove that video gamesa are more than just "mindless fun". Books and Movies have been around for a long time so of coures people are moved more by those mediums.. Dosn't take away the fact people are moved by video games as well. About time video games get where they should we'll be dead. The fact you and me are having this conversation proves my point.
Â
:)
Blazed
[QUOTE="m25105"]Gaming has a masterpiece by the way, it's called Super Mario. Cause you know... it's a good game that brings people together, rather than sitting alone playing a game that thinks it's a film.LulekaniNintendo had Decades to make Mario evolve, and the best they could do was the same boring ass Mario game over and over again Meanwhile Frozenbyte surfaced a few years ago and now they have Trine 2, leagues better than that Italian Plumber. I don't know what's more silly, the fact that you think Super Mario is boring or think that it's the same game over and over again. Super Mario World was the last 2D sidescrolling platform game until New Super Mario Bros. Meaning it took almost 18 years before they made another. Mario Kart, Doctor Mario, Mario 64 and Mario Galaxy are not 2D platform games. Oh and by the way, New Super Mario Bros. Wii sold over 25 million copies showing that people still love playing 2D sidescrollers.
[QUOTE="Lulekani"][QUOTE="m25105"]Gaming has a masterpiece by the way, it's called Super Mario. Cause you know... it's a good game that brings people together, rather than sitting alone playing a game that thinks it's a film.m25105Nintendo had Decades to make Mario evolve, and the best they could do was the same boring ass Mario game over and over again Meanwhile Frozenbyte surfaced a few years ago and now they have Trine 2, leagues better than that Italian Plumber. I don't know what's more silly, the fact that you think Super Mario is boring or think that it's the same game over and over again. Super Mario World was the last 2D sidescrolling platform game until New Super Mario Bros. Meaning it took almost 18 years before they made another. Mario Kart, Doctor Mario, Mario 64 and Mario Galaxy are not 2D platform games. Oh and by the way, New Super Mario Bros. Wii sold over 25 million copies showing that people still love playing 2D sidescrollers. Ahhh now I think I understand. Mario doesn't evolve because his fans Don't evolve. Right ?
[QUOTE="m25105"][QUOTE="Lulekani"] Nintendo had Decades to make Mario evolve, and the best they could do was the same boring ass Mario game over and over again Meanwhile Frozenbyte surfaced a few years ago and now they have Trine 2, leagues better than that Italian Plumber.LulekaniI don't know what's more silly, the fact that you think Super Mario is boring or think that it's the same game over and over again. Super Mario World was the last 2D sidescrolling platform game until New Super Mario Bros. Meaning it took almost 18 years before they made another. Mario Kart, Doctor Mario, Mario 64 and Mario Galaxy are not 2D platform games. Oh and by the way, New Super Mario Bros. Wii sold over 25 million copies showing that people still love playing 2D sidescrollers. Ahhh now I think I understand. Mario doesn't evolve because his fans Don't evolve. Right ? This argument is even dumber than the other one.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment