When we choose one system, we choose it for it exclusives

  • 89 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for aka_aj03
aka_aj03

5911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 aka_aj03
Member since 2004 • 5911 Posts

When we choose one system, we basically choose it for it exclusive titles.... right? Multiplathforms are bonuses.

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts
Well,you can't choose the Wii for its multiplatofrms
Avatar image for gammon56
gammon56

779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 gammon56
Member since 2009 • 779 Posts

When we choose one system, we basically choose it for it exclusive titles.... right? Multiplathforms are bonuses.

aka_aj03
Wrong we choose for library
Avatar image for Respawn-d
Respawn-d

2936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Respawn-d
Member since 2010 • 2936 Posts

Lems will say library because they have had a lack of true exclusives for over 2 years

Avatar image for oldkingallant
oldkingallant

4958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 oldkingallant
Member since 2010 • 4958 Posts

This argument assumes that multiplatform games are on EVERY platform and are all equally great. This is not the case.

For whatever reason, I always end up liking exclusives the best and buying only a few multiplats (and I usually end up liking them less than exclusives, only great I've played this gen are Arkham Asylum, Red Dead Redemption, The Orange Box, and Mass Effect), so I choose for exclusives with this in mind. Not trying to be elitist or anything, but it seems like exclusives are always my favorites. Maybe just a coincidence, I suspect it's because of how the game can be perfected to its system's strengths and cover weaknesses multiplats occasionally show, but more likely it's just a coincidence. Always been that way, since before I gave a crap about all this stuff and just has an N64 and PS1. Crash Bandicoot, Super Mario 64, Legend of Zelda, Banjo Kazooie... they always end up my favorites.

Still, as I said, this argument assumes an idealistic condition, and as such is not the case, no, most people do not fully buy just for exclusives.

Avatar image for OreoMilkshake
OreoMilkshake

12833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#6 OreoMilkshake
Member since 2009 • 12833 Posts
Well it would be terribly hard to choose between 2 systems if they all had the same games, so, yeah.
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#7 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64057 Posts
The exclusives play a large part in the discussion, but the pverall library matters when comparing all 4 platforms seperately. What games are going to appeal to you more. What combination of games suites your taste better. It's not as simple as this game has the most exclusives I want to play. It might go even further than that.
Avatar image for deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a

26108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#8 deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
Member since 2008 • 26108 Posts
Course.
Avatar image for Phaze-Two
Phaze-Two

3444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Phaze-Two
Member since 2009 • 3444 Posts

False. I choose my consoles for their overall library.

exclusives + multiplats > just exclusives. that's a fact.

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#10 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
Um, no. I choose a system that can let me play the games I want. Exclusive or multiplatform is a stupid and silly distinction that should not matter outside the SW "world"
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#11 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64057 Posts

Lems will say library because they have had a lack of true exclusives for over 2 years

Respawn-d
Alan Wake, Gears of War 2, Forza 3, Halo 3: ODST, Shadow Complex, Trials HD, Banjo Kazoie Nuts and Bolts, Fable 2(ok I'll atleast admit I hate this game), Viva Pinata Trouble in Paradise, Toy Soldiers, I'm seriously missing the "lack of true exclusives for over 2 years" part :| and yes I'm more than willing to admit the PS3 has had arguably superior exclusives.
Avatar image for TaigaTiger
TaigaTiger

660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 TaigaTiger
Member since 2009 • 660 Posts

i choose my system by familiarity, quality, style, afford ability, reliability, features, media, and games

but ya'know not everyone thinks like this

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#13 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts

Lems will say library because they have had a lack of true exclusives for over 2 years

Respawn-d
Or, gamers would say games and not make an artificial distinction...
Avatar image for windsquid9000
windsquid9000

3206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 windsquid9000
Member since 2009 • 3206 Posts

No, we choose it whatever games we can play on the system.

Avatar image for shinrabanshou
shinrabanshou

8458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 shinrabanshou
Member since 2009 • 8458 Posts

People don't really choose a system because it has OMG more exclusives, or OMG 100 more games in total.

They choose whichever system has the most of the particular games they want, be they exclusive or multiplatform.

Avatar image for Respawn-d
Respawn-d

2936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Respawn-d
Member since 2010 • 2936 Posts
[QUOTE="Respawn-d"]

Lems will say library because they have had a lack of true exclusives for over 2 years

jg4xchamp
Alan Wake, Gears of War 2, Forza 3, Halo 3: ODST, Shadow Complex, Trials HD, Banjo Kazoie Nuts and Bolts, Fable 2(ok I'll atleast admit I hate this game), Viva Pinata Trouble in Paradise, Toy Soldiers, I'm seriously missing the "lack of true exclusives for over 2 years" part :| and yes I'm more than willing to admit the PS3 has had arguably superior exclusives.

If were going to include dlc games in this argument then we need to include psn games like wipeout, flower, fat princes ect ect aswell. I dont know why the post history of some many of you guys slam ps3 in 2007 for having no games but then defend 360 this year and last. Btw odst was overpriced
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#17 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64057 Posts

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="Respawn-d"]

Lems will say library because they have had a lack of true exclusives for over 2 years

Respawn-d

Alan Wake, Gears of War 2, Forza 3, Halo 3: ODST, Shadow Complex, Trials HD, Banjo Kazoie Nuts and Bolts, Fable 2(ok I'll atleast admit I hate this game), Viva Pinata Trouble in Paradise, Toy Soldiers, I'm seriously missing the "lack of true exclusives for over 2 years" part :| and yes I'm more than willing to admit the PS3 has had arguably superior exclusives.

If were going to include dlc games in this argument then we need to include psn games like wipeout, flower, fat princes ect ect aswell. I dont know why the post history of some many of you guys slam ps3 in 2007 for having no games but then defend 360 this year and last. Btw odst was overpriced

it was overpriced, and you're comparing 2 years of work to one year where the only thing that honestly still holds up

Unchart acutally what does hold up?

Uncharted 2 was fantastic, the prequel? not so much

Tools of Destruction DESERVED that 7.5(sorry spruce)

Heavenly Sword is sinfully bad as far as hack n slash games are concerned. If I slam games from back then it's because I genuinly did not like them. infAMOUS, killzone 2, Uncharted 2, God of War 3 are all good-fantastic in their own way. The 360 over the last 2+ years has been the PS3s whipping boy, but "lack of true exclusives for over 2 years" that would be a wrong statement.

There is a difference between saying X system has games I don't want to play, and x system doesn't have exclusives. One is clearly preference, the other is a bold faced lie. Difference is I have some consistency with those statements, and eventually the glass shatters and you realise how stupid some of these SW arguements are. You personally get smarter(2006 me= loveably stupid, 2010 me= All kinds of awesome :) )

Plus I never discredited the PSN library. Comet Crash, Critter Crunch and Fat Princess are a ton of fun. Games are games, and fun is fun. The pricing, and type of game they are hold no merit if the quality is up to par. Braid is one of my 10 favorite games this gen and it's DL. World of Goo would be up there as well. Whether that speaks to the quality of those two titles or the state of mainstream retail gaming is a matter of someone else's opinion. I personally think they are legit. Flower is certainly up there as well. It's the only time the six axis doesn't suck.

Avatar image for gammon56
gammon56

779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 gammon56
Member since 2009 • 779 Posts
[QUOTE="Respawn-d"][QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="Respawn-d"]

Lems will say library because they have had a lack of true exclusives for over 2 years

Alan Wake, Gears of War 2, Forza 3, Halo 3: ODST, Shadow Complex, Trials HD, Banjo Kazoie Nuts and Bolts, Fable 2(ok I'll atleast admit I hate this game), Viva Pinata Trouble in Paradise, Toy Soldiers, I'm seriously missing the "lack of true exclusives for over 2 years" part :| and yes I'm more than willing to admit the PS3 has had arguably superior exclusives.

If were going to include dlc games in this argument then we need to include psn games like wipeout, flower, fat princes ect ect aswell. I dont know why the post history of some many of you guys slam ps3 in 2007 for having no games but then defend 360 this year and last. Btw odst was overpriced

Bungie admitted that and microsoft made them.
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#19 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="Respawn-d"]

Lems will say library because they have had a lack of true exclusives for over 2 years

Respawn-d
Alan Wake, Gears of War 2, Forza 3, Halo 3: ODST, Shadow Complex, Trials HD, Banjo Kazoie Nuts and Bolts, Fable 2(ok I'll atleast admit I hate this game), Viva Pinata Trouble in Paradise, Toy Soldiers, I'm seriously missing the "lack of true exclusives for over 2 years" part :| and yes I'm more than willing to admit the PS3 has had arguably superior exclusives.

If were going to include dlc games in this argument then we need to include psn games like wipeout, flower, fat princes ect ect aswell. I dont know why the post history of some many of you guys slam ps3 in 2007 for having no games but then defend 360 this year and last. Btw odst was overpriced

ODST was more game than many released this gen, and there was only a few games in there that were downloadable. And he was not making a list war, he was countering your false generalization.
Avatar image for _Cadbury_
_Cadbury_

2936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#20 _Cadbury_
Member since 2006 • 2936 Posts
Yes. I chose ps3 so I could play ratchet and clank and other exclusives. I did not choose the ps3 because it has say BFBC2. Because the 360 also has that game and therefore it offers no advantage to the ps3 i.e That multiplatform game could not have contributed to my decision to purchase the ps3 and I therefore based my decision on what makes the ps3 distinctive.
Avatar image for treedoor
treedoor

7648

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 treedoor
Member since 2004 • 7648 Posts

Wrong, you choose it because there's stuff on it you want to play regardless of it being exclusive or not.

Avatar image for Silverbond
Silverbond

16130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Silverbond
Member since 2008 • 16130 Posts

SW says that the whole library counts all of the time.

Avatar image for gammon56
gammon56

779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 gammon56
Member since 2009 • 779 Posts

SW says that the whole library counts all of the time.

Silverbond
Go away silverbond. jk The whole library always counts of course
Avatar image for oldkingallant
oldkingallant

4958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 oldkingallant
Member since 2010 • 4958 Posts
Yes. I chose ps3 so I could play ratchet and clank and other exclusives. I did not choose the ps3 because it has say BFBC2. Because the 360 also has that game and therefore it offers no advantage to the ps3 i.e That multiplatform game could not have contributed to my decision to purchase the ps3 and I therefore based my decision on what makes the ps3 distinctive._Cadbury_
But the 360 has Mass Effect... which is a multiplat... What if you weren't sure about a 360 or PS3, but reaaaallllly wanted Mass Effect? Well you'd prolly choose the 360. Therefore it's possible to make choices based on multiplats.
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#25 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64057 Posts

SW says that the whole library counts all of the time.

Silverbond
Eh not really. Again it would go further than just overall library, and just overall exclusives. It narrows it down to what games you want to play most. What combination of games matter more. Overall. Value, etc. Not counting exclusives as smething important is silly since they are important. THEY ARE EXCLUSIVE to one platform, but counting them is the end all be all can be a poor way of deciding given the quality multiplatform titles on other platforms, etc.
Avatar image for oldkingallant
oldkingallant

4958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 oldkingallant
Member since 2010 • 4958 Posts

SW says that the whole library counts all of the time.

Silverbond
This is merely what System Wars says. What does The Bond say?
Avatar image for Silverbond
Silverbond

16130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Silverbond
Member since 2008 • 16130 Posts

[QUOTE="Silverbond"]

SW says that the whole library counts all of the time.

oldkingallant

This is merely what System Wars says. What does The Bond say?

The Bond no longer offers his opinion on matters such as this.

Avatar image for _Cadbury_
_Cadbury_

2936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#28 _Cadbury_
Member since 2006 • 2936 Posts
[QUOTE="_Cadbury_"]Yes. I chose ps3 so I could play ratchet and clank and other exclusives. I did not choose the ps3 because it has say BFBC2. Because the 360 also has that game and therefore it offers no advantage to the ps3 i.e That multiplatform game could not have contributed to my decision to purchase the ps3 and I therefore based my decision on what makes the ps3 distinctive.oldkingallant
But the 360 has Mass Effect... which is a multiplat... What if you weren't sure about a 360 or PS3, but reaaaallllly wanted Mass Effect? Well you'd prolly choose the 360. Therefore it's possible to make choices based on multiplats.

If it was between the ps3 and 360 ME would be an exclusive for the 360. Multiplat = game that can be played on either console. If it was between pc and 360 then it would not be a factor because in that case it would be multiplat.
Avatar image for treedoor
treedoor

7648

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 treedoor
Member since 2004 • 7648 Posts

Yes. I chose ps3 so I could play ratchet and clank and other exclusives. I did not choose the ps3 because it has say BFBC2. Because the 360 also has that game and therefore it offers no advantage to the ps3 i.e That multiplatform game could not have contributed to my decision to purchase the ps3 and I therefore based my decision on what makes the ps3 distinctive._Cadbury_

But any normal consumer could go into a store, and say "I want a 360, and I also want CoD rehash, Bayonetta, Batman, and Mass Effect"

It doesn't matter if the PS3 or PC has those games. The consumer still chose the 360 for those games.

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#30 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="Silverbond"]

SW says that the whole library counts all of the time.

jg4xchamp
Eh not really. Again it would go further than just overall library, and just overall exclusives. It narrows it down to what games you want to play most. What combination of games matter more. Overall. Value, etc. Not counting exclusives as smething important is silly since they are important. THEY ARE EXCLUSIVE to one platform, but counting them is the end all be all can be a poor way of deciding given the quality multiplatform titles on other platforms, etc.

Exclusive or not should not weigh any more or less on your decision. Look at what games you want, and whatever platform has more of them, get that platform. Really shouldn't be much harder than that.
Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#31 Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

When we choose one system, we basically choose it for it exclusive titles.... right? Multiplathforms are bonuses.

aka_aj03

Pretty much. When comparing the 360 and PS3, if we go by the old philosophy of 'all things being equal' aka multiplats, then the only distinction between the two would be their exclusives. That's why I switched from the 360 to the PS3 last year.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#32 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64057 Posts

[QUOTE="aka_aj03"]

When we choose one system, we basically choose it for it exclusive titles.... right? Multiplathforms are bonuses.

Bigboi500

Pretty much. When comparing the 360 and PS3, if we go by the old philosophy of 'all things being equal' aka multiplats, then the only distinction between the two would be their exclusives. That's why I switched from the 360 to the PS3 last year.

Comparing it as all things equal would discredit Mass Effect 2(yes well aware you don't like the game), Conviction, Left 4 Dead 2, Gears of War, Dead Rising, etc Cancelling out games that the 360 does have that the PS3 doesn't...in a direct comparison of two wouldn't the exclusives only thing be flawed(taking out the part you don't like the games, preference isn't what im arguing).
Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#33 Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]

[QUOTE="aka_aj03"]

When we choose one system, we basically choose it for it exclusive titles.... right? Multiplathforms are bonuses.

jg4xchamp

Pretty much. When comparing the 360 and PS3, if we go by the old philosophy of 'all things being equal' aka multiplats, then the only distinction between the two would be their exclusives. That's why I switched from the 360 to the PS3 last year.

Comparing it as all things equal would discredit Mass Effect 2(yes well aware you don't like the game), Conviction, Left 4 Dead 2, Gears of War, Dead Rising, etc Cancelling out games that the 360 does have that the PS3 doesn't...in a direct comparison of two wouldn't the exclusives only thing be flawed(taking out the part you don't like the games, preference isn't what im arguing).

I understand what you're saying. I guess that never crossed my mind because I'm not interested in those games. Carry on!

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#34 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

For SW it's true, but to me, I mainly play exclusives on PS3 and it collects dust so much because I hardly play any multiplats on it, and while I like a lot of the exclusives I played, honestly a lot aren't even that great and don't have interest in all of them, but you could say that for any system. The Wii to me suffers from this as well.

PC is opposite: I play more multiplats than exclusives on it. I played Crysis, STALKER, etc. though.

360 is well balanced for me because it has exclusives and multiplats, and most multiplats are better on 360 anyways compared to PS3.

Avatar image for _Cadbury_
_Cadbury_

2936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#35 _Cadbury_
Member since 2006 • 2936 Posts

[QUOTE="_Cadbury_"]Yes. I chose ps3 so I could play ratchet and clank and other exclusives. I did not choose the ps3 because it has say BFBC2. Because the 360 also has that game and therefore it offers no advantage to the ps3 i.e That multiplatform game could not have contributed to my decision to purchase the ps3 and I therefore based my decision on what makes the ps3 distinctive.treedoor

But any normal consumer could go into a store, and say "I want a 360, and I also want CoD rehash, Bayonetta, Batman, and Mass Effect"

It doesn't matter if the PS3 or PC has those games. The consumer still chose the 360 for those games.

Well no, then theyd be buying the 360 over the ps3 or pc because of other factors such as cost, online fees, and other features the console offers.
Avatar image for treedoor
treedoor

7648

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 treedoor
Member since 2004 • 7648 Posts

[QUOTE="treedoor"]

[QUOTE="_Cadbury_"]Yes. I chose ps3 so I could play ratchet and clank and other exclusives. I did not choose the ps3 because it has say BFBC2. Because the 360 also has that game and therefore it offers no advantage to the ps3 i.e That multiplatform game could not have contributed to my decision to purchase the ps3 and I therefore based my decision on what makes the ps3 distinctive._Cadbury_

But any normal consumer could go into a store, and say "I want a 360, and I also want CoD rehash, Bayonetta, Batman, and Mass Effect"

It doesn't matter if the PS3 or PC has those games. The consumer still chose the 360 for those games.

Well no, then theyd be buying the 360 over the ps3 or pc because of other factors such as cost, online fees, and other features the console offers.

And who says they'd know anything about the features, or cost?

They could just decide they want an Xbox for no good reason just as they could decide to buy a PS3 for no good reason

You could walk into a store, and see CoD on the shelf, and say "Oh, my friend told me this was good, so I'll get it". Well you got to get a system to play it on right? They could play eeny meeny miney mo, and get the same results. A system that plays CoD just as they wanted.

Avatar image for theseekar
theseekar

1537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 theseekar
Member since 2010 • 1537 Posts

When we choose one system, we basically choose it for it exclusive titles.... right? Multiplathforms are bonuses.

aka_aj03

Xbox 360 plays nearly all PC best games, has the best version of nearly all multipltforms, its own amazing exclusives that et sequels too (unlike Demon Soul that Sony does not care about), best online experience, best controlls and most advanced in Natal etc etc

So, it is definatly all of those reasons that make 360 the best thing, not just exclusives like Fable 3, Mass Effect 3, Gears 3, Rareware games,XBLA gemsetc

Avatar image for _Cadbury_
_Cadbury_

2936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#38 _Cadbury_
Member since 2006 • 2936 Posts
[QUOTE="treedoor"]

[QUOTE="_Cadbury_"][QUOTE="treedoor"]

But any normal consumer could go into a store, and say "I want a 360, and I also want CoD rehash, Bayonetta, Batman, and Mass Effect"

It doesn't matter if the PS3 or PC has those games. The consumer still chose the 360 for those games.

Well no, then theyd be buying the 360 over the ps3 or pc because of other factors such as cost, online fees, and other features the console offers.

And who says they'd know anything about the features, or cost?

They could just decide they want an Xbox for no good reason just as they could decide to buy a PS3 for no good reason

You could walk into a store, and see CoD on the shelf, and say "Oh, my friend told me this was good, so I'll get it". Well you got to get a system to play it on right? They could play eeny meeny miney mo, and get the same results. A system that plays CoD just as they wanted.

Stop putting conditions on it. you'd have to be a fool to buy a console just for the games that you could get on more than one console, and not bother to check the price or other functions of the console you go for. And to add to your story, the person would get the console that their friend has it on most likely (another factor in the decision)
Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#39 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

When we choose one system, we basically choose it for it exclusive titles.... right? Multiplathforms are bonuses.

aka_aj03

It depends on the person. I didn't buy a PS3 for exclusives. I bought it because I believe that the two HD consoles are pretty similar and it was the more reliable system. For the most part, the 360 seems like just as good an experience as the PS3, but RROD made me weary of purchasing one. At the time that I got a HD system, I simply could not overlook RROD. Since it is said that the problem has been addressed, I could probably overlook it now.

Avatar image for treedoor
treedoor

7648

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 treedoor
Member since 2004 • 7648 Posts

[QUOTE="treedoor"]

[QUOTE="_Cadbury_"] Well no, then theyd be buying the 360 over the ps3 or pc because of other factors such as cost, online fees, and other features the console offers._Cadbury_

And who says they'd know anything about the features, or cost?

They could just decide they want an Xbox for no good reason just as they could decide to buy a PS3 for no good reason

You could walk into a store, and see CoD on the shelf, and say "Oh, my friend told me this was good, so I'll get it". Well you got to get a system to play it on right? They could play eeny meeny miney mo, and get the same results. A system that plays CoD just as they wanted.

Stop putting conditions on it. you'd have to be a fool to buy a console just for the games that you could get on more than one console, and not bother to check the price or other functions of the console you go for. And to add to your story, the person would get the console that their friend has it on most likely (another factor in the decision)

People buy things just based on the fact that they know the brand name alone ALL THE TIME.

Unless you're denying this happens? You think all the people that buy iPods only do so after checking out what all the other mp3 players have to offer? No. They buy them because they're iPods, and it's cool to own one.

People can just as easily buy an Xbox because they know what the Xbox is. That's called brand power.

Avatar image for SilentlyMad
SilentlyMad

2093

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 SilentlyMad
Member since 2009 • 2093 Posts

I choose a console with the best games. I do not think well I can buy a gamer PC also so certain games do not matter.

Avatar image for _Cadbury_
_Cadbury_

2936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#42 _Cadbury_
Member since 2006 • 2936 Posts
[QUOTE="treedoor"]

[QUOTE="_Cadbury_"][QUOTE="treedoor"]

And who says they'd know anything about the features, or cost?

They could just decide they want an Xbox for no good reason just as they could decide to buy a PS3 for no good reason

You could walk into a store, and see CoD on the shelf, and say "Oh, my friend told me this was good, so I'll get it". Well you got to get a system to play it on right? They could play eeny meeny miney mo, and get the same results. A system that plays CoD just as they wanted.

Stop putting conditions on it. you'd have to be a fool to buy a console just for the games that you could get on more than one console, and not bother to check the price or other functions of the console you go for. And to add to your story, the person would get the console that their friend has it on most likely (another factor in the decision)

People buy things just based on the fact that they know the brand name alone ALL THE TIME.

Unless you're denying this happens? You think all the people that buy iPods only do so after checking out what all the other mp3 players have to offer? No. They buy them because they're iPods, and it's cool to own one.

People can just as easily buy an Xbox because they know what the Xbox is. That's called brand power.

Ipods cost a lot less than 360s and ps3s do. And Playstation is just as known, if not more well known than the xbox brand. Anyway, do you realise how pointless this conversation is? All I ever said was that if said person is after games that are multiplats then the decision to buy the console comes down to other factors (console cost,features,friends owning that console), not because of those multiplats (as theyre on multiple consoles). And now you're giving me more factors (brand power) to support my point that the decision is not based on multiplats.....
Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts
No I chose 360 for it's library which back in 2007 annihilated the other consoles, and is still arguably better than the other 2 today. Halo 3, Forza 2 and Dead Rising were great exclusive games I got early on. COD4, The Orange Box, Bioshock, Mass Effect and Oblivion were great multiplats I got. I didn't give a **** who else got the games, I was just happy the games I wanted were all gathered on one platform.
Avatar image for donwoogie
donwoogie

3707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#44 donwoogie
Member since 2004 • 3707 Posts

When we choose one system, we basically choose it for it exclusive titles.... right? Multiplathforms are bonuses.

aka_aj03
That, and I like media functionality, hence why my PS3 was my first console this gen.
Avatar image for Sword-Demon
Sword-Demon

7007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 Sword-Demon
Member since 2008 • 7007 Posts

nah, for 1 system, it's about the total library. the systems after that are for the exclusives

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#46 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

When we choose one system, we basically choose it for it exclusive titles.... right? Multiplathforms are bonuses.

aka_aj03
nope, i chose my 360 for PC/360 titles and it was the cheapestmachine.
Avatar image for angelkimne
angelkimne

14037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 angelkimne
Member since 2006 • 14037 Posts

Never.

Whatever platforms you're choosing between, there's gotta be at least a FEW games that are only on one or two of them yet aren't exclusive.

For example, if I was choosing between 360, Ps3 and Wii, 360/Ps3 multiplats would be a massive factor in my decision, along with the few but nonetheless glorious 360/PC games.

Avatar image for LegatoSkyheart
LegatoSkyheart

29733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

#48 LegatoSkyheart
Member since 2009 • 29733 Posts

Of course, if it wasn't for Gears of War, Banjo Kazooie, Perfect Dark, Halo, and Alan Wake I probably would never have gotten a 360.

Avatar image for treedoor
treedoor

7648

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 treedoor
Member since 2004 • 7648 Posts

[QUOTE="treedoor"]

[QUOTE="_Cadbury_"] Stop putting conditions on it. you'd have to be a fool to buy a console just for the games that you could get on more than one console, and not bother to check the price or other functions of the console you go for. And to add to your story, the person would get the console that their friend has it on most likely (another factor in the decision)_Cadbury_

People buy things just based on the fact that they know the brand name alone ALL THE TIME.

Unless you're denying this happens? You think all the people that buy iPods only do so after checking out what all the other mp3 players have to offer? No. They buy them because they're iPods, and it's cool to own one.

People can just as easily buy an Xbox because they know what the Xbox is. That's called brand power.

Ipods cost a lot less than 360s and ps3s do. And Playstation is just as known, if not more well known than the xbox brand. Anyway, do you realise how pointless this conversation is? All I ever said was that if said person is after games that are multiplats then the decision to buy the console comes down to other factors (console cost,features,friends owning that console), not because of those multiplats (as theyre on multiple consoles). And now you're giving me more factors (brand power) to support my point that the decision is not based on multiplats.....

Nor is it based on exclusives.

Avatar image for Kickinurass
Kickinurass

3357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Kickinurass
Member since 2005 • 3357 Posts

I bought my 360 to specifically play L4D.

To this day, I don't own many exclusives, Halo being the sole exception from this gen.