I have a ps3 and I love it. IT makes a great blu rya player. But there's no game graphically better than what's on ps3
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Lair?Wanderer5
Liar does look good, but its no Gears of War. Gears of war's draw distance is alot better. And the wave effects on Liar arent so good. If you watch the new gameplay footage for it you'll know what I'm talking about. Yes Liar does look great, but Gears looks better.
[QUOTE="Wanderer5"]Lair?vidiofreak
Liar does look good, but its no Gears of War. Gears of war's draw distance is alot better. And the wave effects on Liar arent so good. If you watch the new gameplay footage for it you'll know what I'm talking about. Yes Liar does look great, but Gears looks better.
And whats great is that Lair is still in its Alpha stage
[QUOTE="Wanderer5"]Lair?vidiofreak
Liar does look good, but its no Gears of War. Gears of war's draw distance is alot better. And the wave effects on Liar arent so good. If you watch the new gameplay footage for it you'll know what I'm talking about. Yes Liar does look great, but Gears looks better.
bad wave effects? lair as the best wave effects on any CONSOLE. how could gears have better draw distances? lair has enormous enviroments with no pop up form what i can tell. ontopic it already is competing and will start surpassing soon
PS3 GPU is better than 360. Do you know why PS3 GPU is 256MB ? because 8 cells can help the GPU and it can be like 1GB GPU. MGS 4 and Lair will show the power25-Automatic
WTF....? are u serious? first of all 360 gpu > ps3, 1gbGPU? do u know how a gpu works? my god...
[QUOTE="vidiofreak"][QUOTE="Wanderer5"]Lair?BackFlip101
Liar does look good, but its no Gears of War. Gears of war's draw distance is alot better. And the wave effects on Liar arent so good. If you watch the new gameplay footage for it you'll know what I'm talking about. Yes Liar does look great, but Gears looks better.
And whats great is that Lair is still in its Alpha stage
Rofl no it's not.
[QUOTE="Wanderer5"]Lair?vidiofreak
Liar does look good, but its no Gears of War. Gears of war's draw distance is alot better. And the wave effects on Liar arent so good. If you watch the new gameplay footage for it you'll know what I'm talking about. Yes Liar does look great, but Gears looks better.
Are you serious? Maybe there's something I've been missing out on.PS3 GPU is better than 360. Do you know why PS3 GPU is 256MB ? because 8 cells can help the GPU and it can be like 1GB GPU. MGS 4 and Lair will show the power25-AutomaticWoW :? dude the 360's GPU is more powerful. Cows tell your fellow cow that he's really wrong. :P
Resistance looks better than Call of Duty IMO. And also, I don't understand why people don't think Heavenly Sword looks amazing. I just don't get it. The animations, effects, physics, textures, everything.CR00K
Thats call of duty 2, but COD3>Resistance (Except multiplayer)
[QUOTE="BackFlip101"][QUOTE="vidiofreak"][QUOTE="Wanderer5"]Lair?MTBare
Liar does look good, but its no Gears of War. Gears of war's draw distance is alot better. And the wave effects on Liar arent so good. If you watch the new gameplay footage for it you'll know what I'm talking about. Yes Liar does look great, but Gears looks better.
And whats great is that Lair is still in its Alpha stage
Rofl no it's not.
rofl yes it is
[QUOTE="vidiofreak"][QUOTE="Wanderer5"]Lair?BackFlip101
Liar does look good, but its no Gears of War. Gears of war's draw distance is alot better. And the wave effects on Liar arent so good. If you watch the new gameplay footage for it you'll know what I'm talking about. Yes Liar does look great, but Gears looks better.
And whats great is that Lair is still in its Alpha stage
A game coming in 8 weeks alpha?... pretty fishy.
[QUOTE="BackFlip101"][QUOTE="vidiofreak"][QUOTE="Wanderer5"]Lair?MTBare
Liar does look good, but its no Gears of War. Gears of war's draw distance is alot better. And the wave effects on Liar arent so good. If you watch the new gameplay footage for it you'll know what I'm talking about. Yes Liar does look great, but Gears looks better.
And whats great is that Lair is still in its Alpha stage
Rofl no it's not.
Yeah, you're right. The devs are lying to us.[QUOTE="MTBare"][QUOTE="BackFlip101"][QUOTE="vidiofreak"][QUOTE="Wanderer5"]Lair?CR00K
Liar does look good, but its no Gears of War. Gears of war's draw distance is alot better. And the wave effects on Liar arent so good. If you watch the new gameplay footage for it you'll know what I'm talking about. Yes Liar does look great, but Gears looks better.
And whats great is that Lair is still in its Alpha stage
Rofl no it's not.
Yeah, you're right. The devs are lying to us.Link me to where the devs are saying that lair is still in it's alpha stage. If it indeed is in it's alpha stage, then you're definitely not going to be seeing that game released in two months..
[QUOTE="BackFlip101"][QUOTE="vidiofreak"][QUOTE="Wanderer5"]Lair?-KinGz-
Liar does look good, but its no Gears of War. Gears of war's draw distance is alot better. And the wave effects on Liar arent so good. If you watch the new gameplay footage for it you'll know what I'm talking about. Yes Liar does look great, but Gears looks better.
And whats great is that Lair is still in its Alpha stage
A game coming in 8 weeks alpha?... pretty fishy.
Well maybe there are some HUGE finishing touches they will be doing that we don't know about. You never know. We'll just have to see when the game comes I suppose.PS3 GPU is better than 360. Do you know why PS3 GPU is 256MB ? because 8 cells can help the GPU and it can be like 1GB GPU. MGS 4 and Lair will show the power25-Automatic
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
Here...let your blindness be cured
[QUOTE="Wanderer5"]Lair?vidiofreak
Liar does look good, but its no Gears of War. Gears of war's draw distance is alot better. And the wave effects on Liar arent so good. If you watch the new gameplay footage for it you'll know what I'm talking about. Yes Liar does look great, but Gears looks better.
You have no idea what you're talking about.PS3 GPU is better than 360. Do you know why PS3 GPU is 256MB ? because 8 cells can help the GPU and it can be like 1GB GPU. MGS 4 and Lair will show the power25-Automatic
Wow, you have no idea what you're talking about. The Cell helping out the GPU won't allow it to act as if it has any more memory. At all. Ghz and GBs are two completely different things.
[QUOTE="CR00K"][QUOTE="MTBare"][QUOTE="BackFlip101"][QUOTE="vidiofreak"][QUOTE="Wanderer5"]Lair?MTBare
Liar does look good, but its no Gears of War. Gears of war's draw distance is alot better. And the wave effects on Liar arent so good. If you watch the new gameplay footage for it you'll know what I'm talking about. Yes Liar does look great, but Gears looks better.
And whats great is that Lair is still in its Alpha stage
Rofl no it's not.
Yeah, you're right. The devs are lying to us.Link me to where the devs are saying that lair is still in it's alpha stage. If it indeed is in it's alpha stage, then you're definitely not going to be seeing that game released in two months..
I didn't feel like looking for it but you can see clearly in this link that it was said.Well, given time, PS3 games will look surpass what X360 has to offer, you can't look at graphics just by taking a look at a screenshot.
Graphics depend on how big a level is, what is going on, AI, this and that, physics, etc. Of course, you can have one single room rendered with AMAZING graphics, but that is cramming the potential of a fair looking bigger map.
And when someone says X360 GPU > PS3 GPU, you do know that that is only for games that use certain technologies (nvidia vs ati)? If we just switched it to a Nvidia specific game, the PS3 GPU would render something better than an ATi GPU.
Overall, we can't compare GPUs, nor graphics. Programming is too different. Hardware is different. Games are different.
Live and learn. /thread
[QUOTE="MTBare"][QUOTE="CR00K"][QUOTE="MTBare"][QUOTE="BackFlip101"][QUOTE="vidiofreak"][QUOTE="Wanderer5"]Lair?CR00K
Liar does look good, but its no Gears of War. Gears of war's draw distance is alot better. And the wave effects on Liar arent so good. If you watch the new gameplay footage for it you'll know what I'm talking about. Yes Liar does look great, but Gears looks better.
And whats great is that Lair is still in its Alpha stage
Rofl no it's not.
Yeah, you're right. The devs are lying to us.Link me to where the devs are saying that lair is still in it's alpha stage. If it indeed is in it's alpha stage, then you're definitely not going to be seeing that game released in two months..
I didn't feel like looking for it but you can see clearly in this link that it was said.Lol no I can't.. That's just talking about random pictures. Lair is not in it's alpha stage.
[QUOTE="25-Automatic"]PS3 GPU is better than 360. Do you know why PS3 GPU is 256MB ? because 8 cells can help the GPU and it can be like 1GB GPU. MGS 4 and Lair will show the powerTheSystemLord1
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
Here...let your blindness be cured
The Inquirer is a terrible source, and Evil Avatar is a forum. Provide better links next time. Some with actual specified engineers talking big--oh wait, they don't. They know forums are nonsense.
[QUOTE="CR00K"][QUOTE="MTBare"][QUOTE="BackFlip101"][QUOTE="vidiofreak"][QUOTE="Wanderer5"]Lair?MTBare
Liar does look good, but its no Gears of War. Gears of war's draw distance is alot better. And the wave effects on Liar arent so good. If you watch the new gameplay footage for it you'll know what I'm talking about. Yes Liar does look great, but Gears looks better.
And whats great is that Lair is still in its Alpha stage
Rofl no it's not.
Yeah, you're right. The devs are lying to us.Link me to where the devs are saying that lair is still in it's alpha stage. If it indeed is in it's alpha stage, then you're definitely not going to be seeing that game released in two months..
http://www.psu.com/node/9743
Teh ownage!!1!
wow thats some awful screens you showing.lol..im glad ps3 is more capable of doin better..a million times better..i remember when lemming got owned when oblivion for the ps3 runs and look better then 360 version..oh yeah and kameo sucks lol
elementz28
If there were a game for the PS3, that came out on the 360 a year later. If it didnt look better on the 360, I'd be dissapointed. Oblivion was in the works for the PS3 a year longer. Im glad it looks better on the PS3. Its had more time.
[QUOTE="CR00K"][QUOTE="MTBare"][QUOTE="CR00K"][QUOTE="MTBare"][QUOTE="BackFlip101"][QUOTE="vidiofreak"][QUOTE="Wanderer5"]Lair?MTBare
Liar does look good, but its no Gears of War. Gears of war's draw distance is alot better. And the wave effects on Liar arent so good. If you watch the new gameplay footage for it you'll know what I'm talking about. Yes Liar does look great, but Gears looks better.
And whats great is that Lair is still in its Alpha stage
Rofl no it's not.
Yeah, you're right. The devs are lying to us.Link me to where the devs are saying that lair is still in it's alpha stage. If it indeed is in it's alpha stage, then you're definitely not going to be seeing that game released in two months..
I didn't feel like looking for it but you can see clearly in this link that it was said.Lol no I can't.. That's just talking about random pictures. Lair is not in it's alpha stage.
From IGN:
One of the biggest lingering questions about Lair right now is its current status and expected release date, so we'll get that right out of the way. The version we saw was an alpha build, but it sounds like the game is pretty close to making it to beta. Factor 5 says that its development process makes for a quick progression from the "first alpha" to the final finished form, and that we can expect to see Lair on store shelves this July. Indeed, dragon battles on our PlayStation 3s are a mere three months away.
http://ps3.ign.com/articles/780/780120p1.html
It does already. Game corporations are too lazy to understand how to adapt their games to the Cell Broadband Engine. Look at the Sony games and PlayStation exclusives, their graphics own XBOX 360 by a milestone! It's just a matter of time for the multi-platform guys to get the graphics better.
Remember the graphics of the first PS2 games? Compare them to the later PS2 games. Exactly. They keep getting better! Now take the XBOX 360 which was realeased a year before the PS3... Even as the graphics are getting better on XBOX 360 since it's realease, the PS3's lauch titles outperformed the XBOX 360 graphics and sound one year after its realease. The problem is Blu-Ray. Adapting games to Blu-Ray is very expensive AT THE MOMENT, so many game have to be multi-platform in order for the video game corporations to actually make profits. Eventually, on the long run, PS3 will beat XBOX 360, no doubt about it. Remember PS2 vs. Dreamcast a decade ago? Everyone was getting the Dreamcast but eventually the PS2 "boomed" its sales.
Nintendo has a complete different market than Microsoft and Sony. PS3 will surpass XBOX 360 before 2010 for sure. People like games with technological gameplay advancements, which the 7 alternate processors of the PS3 can support. Blu-ray will gain more market share also over HD-DVD becausae companies like Apple, Sony, Panasonic, Paramount, Universal (music), MGM, Alliance Atlantis, and many more are supporting the technology. HD-DVD is only supported by Microsoft and Toshiba.
Ps3 is obviously not easy to program for, SO when they spend a whole lot of time with it, it will most likely get better. But who other than first party software will want to do that if the Ps3 don't start selling more.
Motorstorm is not a awful looking game, but it gets boring pretty quicky as do Resistance and it looks like Lair will be the same. There obviously is more of a learning curve involved with making for the PS3 than the 360.
It does already. Game corporations are too lazy to understand how to adapt their games to the Cell Broadband Engine. Look at the Sony games and PlayStation exclusives, their graphics own XBOX 360 by a milestone! It's just a matter of time for the multi-platform guys to get the graphics better.
Remember the graphics of the first PS2 games? Compare them to the later PS2 games. Exactly. They keep getting better! Now take the XBOX 360 which was realeased a year before the PS3... Even as the graphics are getting better on XBOX 360 since it's realease, the PS3's lauch titles outperformed the XBOX 360 graphics and sound one year after its realease. The problem is Blu-Ray. Adapting games to Blu-Ray is very expensive AT THE MOMENT, so many game have to be multi-platform in order for the video game corporations to actually make profits. Eventually, on the long run, PS3 will beat XBOX 360, no doubt about it. Remember PS2 vs. Dreamcast a decade ago? Everyone was getting the Dreamcast but eventually the PS2 "boomed" its sales.
Nintendo has a complete different market than Microsoft and Sony. PS3 will surpass XBOX 360 before 2010 for sure. People like games with technological gameplay advancements, which the 7 alternate processors of the PS3 can support. Blu-ray will gain more market share also over HD-DVD becausae companies like Apple, Sony, Panasonic, Paramount, Universal (music), MGM, Alliance Atlantis, and many more are supporting the technology. HD-DVD is only supported by Microsoft and Toshiba.
iMacBot
Thank you.
wow thats some awful screens you showing.lol..im glad ps3 is more capable of doin better..a million times better..i remember when lemming got owned when oblivion for the ps3 runs and look better then 360 version..oh yeah and kameo sucks lol
elementz28
[QUOTE="jsnepo"]Ratchet and Clank Tools of Destruction comes to mind. Add to that Lair, Heavenly Sword, GTHD, and of course MGS4.CR00KAgreed. Especially MGS4.
Which aren't games that aren't out, go figure, and GTHD is a demo, I see no point adding it,by the time those come out 360 will have better looking games already, and Lair doesn't look better than those game, neither heavenly sword, but then again they aren't out and MGS4 is not even ready to show itself I can't count it in either.
It does already. Game corporations are too lazy to understand how to adapt their games to the Cell Broadband Engine. Look at the Sony games and PlayStation exclusives, their graphics own XBOX 360 by a milestone! It's just a matter of time for the multi-platform guys to get the graphics better.
Remember the graphics of the first PS2 games? Compare them to the later PS2 games. Exactly. They keep getting better! Now take the XBOX 360 which was realeased a year before the PS3... Even as the graphics are getting better on XBOX 360 since it's realease, the PS3's lauch titles outperformed the XBOX 360 graphics and sound one year after its realease. The problem is Blu-Ray. Adapting games to Blu-Ray is very expensive AT THE MOMENT, so many game have to be multi-platform in order for the video game corporations to actually make profits. Eventually, on the long run, PS3 will beat XBOX 360, no doubt about it. Remember PS2 vs. Dreamcast a decade ago? Everyone was getting the Dreamcast but eventually the PS2 "boomed" its sales.
Nintendo has a complete different market than Microsoft and Sony. PS3 will surpass XBOX 360 before 2010 for sure. People like games with technological gameplay advancements, which the 7 alternate processors of the PS3 can support. Blu-ray will gain more market share also over HD-DVD becausae companies like Apple, Sony, Panasonic, Paramount, Universal (music), MGM, Alliance Atlantis, and many more are supporting the technology. HD-DVD is only supported by Microsoft and Toshiba.
iMacBot
Well the PS3's launch wasnt good at all. And the PS3 vs Xbox 360 is alot different than the PS2 vs Dreamcast. The 360 has better graphics so far. And better games. Developers are going Multiplatform because staying with the PS3 wouldnt be good for the game. Not dissing the PS3, because I will eventually get one when it goes down in price. But right now, it is getting beat by the 360 and the wii.
It does already. Game corporations are too lazy to understand how to adapt their games to the Cell Broadband Engine. Look at the Sony games and PlayStation exclusives, their graphics own XBOX 360 by a milestone! It's just a matter of time for the multi-platform guys to get the graphics better.
Remember the graphics of the first PS2 games? Compare them to the later PS2 games. Exactly. They keep getting better! Now take the XBOX 360 which was realeased a year before the PS3... Even as the graphics are getting better on XBOX 360 since it's realease, the PS3's lauch titles outperformed the XBOX 360 graphics and sound one year after its realease. The problem is Blu-Ray. Adapting games to Blu-Ray is very expensive AT THE MOMENT, so many game have to be multi-platform in order for the video game corporations to actually make profits. Eventually, on the long run, PS3 will beat XBOX 360, no doubt about it. Remember PS2 vs. Dreamcast a decade ago? Everyone was getting the Dreamcast but eventually the PS2 "boomed" its sales.
Nintendo has a complete different market than Microsoft and Sony. PS3 will surpass XBOX 360 before 2010 for sure. People like games with technological gameplay advancements, which the 7 alternate processors of the PS3 can support. Blu-ray will gain more market share also over HD-DVD becausae companies like Apple, Sony, Panasonic, Paramount, Universal (music), MGM, Alliance Atlantis, and many more are supporting the technology. HD-DVD is only supported by Microsoft and Toshiba.
iMacBot
360 will always have a year over the ps3, and no playstation or sony games look better than the games listed, and by the way Kameo and PDZ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Resistance. (graphic wise)
Agreed. Especially MGS4.[QUOTE="CR00K"][QUOTE="jsnepo"]Ratchet and Clank Tools of Destruction comes to mind. Add to that Lair, Heavenly Sword, GTHD, and of course MGS4.-KinGz-
Which aren't games that aren't out, go figure, and GTHD is a demo, I see no point adding it,by the time those come out 360 will have better looking games already, and Lair doesn't look better than those game, neither heavenly sword, but then again they aren't out and MGS4 is not even ready to show itself I can't count it in either.
Metal Gear Soilid 4: guns of the patriots gameplay was already shown and looks better than mostly anything out on either PS3 or 360.
So you can definately count it.
[QUOTE="-KinGz-"]Agreed. Especially MGS4.[QUOTE="CR00K"][QUOTE="jsnepo"]Ratchet and Clank Tools of Destruction comes to mind. Add to that Lair, Heavenly Sword, GTHD, and of course MGS4.Adrian_Cloud
Which aren't games that aren't out, go figure, and GTHD is a demo, I see no point adding it,by the time those come out 360 will have better looking games already, and Lair doesn't look better than those game, neither heavenly sword, but then again they aren't out and MGS4 is not even ready to show itself I can't count it in either.
Metal Gear Soilid 4: guns of the patriots gameplay was already shown and looks better than mostly anything out on either PS3 or 360.
So you can definately count it.
It doesn't, are telling me that looks better thn GeOW?, it probably WILL but right now I can't count it in cuz it lookslike CRAP.
It does already. Game corporations are too lazy to understand how to adapt their games to the Cell Broadband Engine. Look at the Sony games and PlayStation exclusives, their graphics own XBOX 360 by a milestone! It's just a matter of time for the multi-platform guys to get the graphics better.
Remember the graphics of the first PS2 games? Compare them to the later PS2 games. Exactly. They keep getting better! Now take the XBOX 360 which was realeased a year before the PS3... Even as the graphics are getting better on XBOX 360 since it's realease, the PS3's lauch titles outperformed the XBOX 360 graphics and sound one year after its realease. The problem is Blu-Ray. Adapting games to Blu-Ray is very expensive AT THE MOMENT, so many game have to be multi-platform in order for the video game corporations to actually make profits. Eventually, on the long run, PS3 will beat XBOX 360, no doubt about it. Remember PS2 vs. Dreamcast a decade ago? Everyone was getting the Dreamcast but eventually the PS2 "boomed" its sales.
Nintendo has a complete different market than Microsoft and Sony. PS3 will surpass XBOX 360 before 2010 for sure. People like games with technological gameplay advancements, which the 7 alternate processors of the PS3 can support. Blu-ray will gain more market share also over HD-DVD becausae companies like Apple, Sony, Panasonic, Paramount, Universal (music), MGM, Alliance Atlantis, and many more are supporting the technology. HD-DVD is only supported by Microsoft and Toshiba.
iMacBot
Isn't it wonderful to have a opinion?
[QUOTE="Adrian_Cloud"][QUOTE="-KinGz-"]Agreed. Especially MGS4.[QUOTE="CR00K"][QUOTE="jsnepo"]Ratchet and Clank Tools of Destruction comes to mind. Add to that Lair, Heavenly Sword, GTHD, and of course MGS4.-KinGz-
Which aren't games that aren't out, go figure, and GTHD is a demo, I see no point adding it,by the time those come out 360 will have better looking games already, and Lair doesn't look better than those game, neither heavenly sword, but then again they aren't out and MGS4 is not even ready to show itself I can't count it in either.
Metal Gear Soilid 4: guns of the patriots gameplay was already shown and looks better than mostly anything out on either PS3 or 360.
So you can definately count it.
It doesn't, are telling me that looks better thn GeOW?, it probably WILL but right now I can't count it in cuz it lookslike CRAP.
Better texture, better character models, greater destrucatable enviroments, as time goes on so will the list in where MGS4 passes Gears. Regardelss of which one looks better, thos graphics are a ten; no doubt about it. Those screens are alpha, just like Lair and they already crush the major competition on Ps3 and 360. I'm sorry, buts its not really a competition when games that are just alpha look just as good, or come very close to matching 360 graphical show piece.
Maybe when Alan Wake comes out then this topic will be valid.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment