when will the ps3 compete graphically with the 360

  • 135 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for BrownWalrus
BrownWalrus

3467

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#101 BrownWalrus
Member since 2005 • 3467 Posts

[QUOTE="BrownWalrus"]Hasn't the PS3 already proven to be extremely powerfull with Oblivion/Lair? Especially considering that it has still only been out for a couple of months. vidiofreak

 

Well if your saying that Lair shows off the PS3's power. Than the PS3 isnt very powerful. Gears of War looks so much better than Lair. And Yes Oblivion does look amazing, but its also been in the works for a year longer than the 360 version. And with the update that came out for the 360, they are about even now. Your saying lair shows off the PS3 power. No one has played it yet. PS3 fanboys used that arguiment with Motorstorm. "OMG LOOK AT THE VIDEOS, PS3 OWNS 360's GRAPHICS!!!". After motorstorm came out, The fanboys stopped talking about it because it wasnt that great of a game. PS3 fanboys make me very angry because their arguiments are always so wrong

 

And for the xbox 360 fanboys who said MGS4 looks like crap. yeah, your also an idiot. Those screens arent as good as Gears of War. But even if the game isnt the greatest game graphically, the storyline will be insane. Gears of war didnt even have that in depth of a storyline. Yes GOW's story and single player was crazy. But compare it to he storyline of MGS. Doesnt stand a chance.

 

See, I'll argue with what I dont agree with. I cant stand fanboys. You have to be open minded about everything. If I said Lair looks like crap. I'd be lying. But if I said Lair's graphics were better than Gears. I would be lying. If Lair has a great story behind its single player. Then it'll probably be better than Gears. Gears was an amazing game. But single player lacked an amazing story.

 

Oblivion looked amazing because the developers actually tried making a decent port on the PS3. That's why it looked amazing.

Also, look at Lair technically, it's amazing. It may not be quite up to par graphiclly with GeoW yet, but then again, it is in alpha stage and it is getting pretty damn close already. If i remember correctly, people were moaning about GeoW in alpha stage too, and look how it came out. Also, developers aren't taking full advantage of the PS3's capabilites yet, they are just rushing to release games for the PS3 since it is lacking in that department. Keep in mind that the PS3 is much more difficult to develop for, especially this early in it's life. The PS3 is complex, the 360 is very straightforward, that's why it's so easy to take advantage of it's graphic capabilities faster. Also, it's been out for over a year now.  As for multiplats? If developers actually tried, then they would look just like the 360 versions or better. That's why it would be better to develop multiplats first for the PS3 then easily port them to the 360.

Avatar image for ASKLEIPIOS
ASKLEIPIOS

44

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 ASKLEIPIOS
Member since 2006 • 44 Posts
[QUOTE="vidiofreak"]

[QUOTE="BrownWalrus"]Hasn't the PS3 already proven to be extremely powerfull with Oblivion/Lair? Especially considering that it has still only been out for a couple of months. BrownWalrus

 

Well if your saying that Lair shows off the PS3's power. Than the PS3 isnt very powerful. Gears of War looks so much better than Lair. And Yes Oblivion does look amazing, but its also been in the works for a year longer than the 360 version. And with the update that came out for the 360, they are about even now. Your saying lair shows off the PS3 power. No one has played it yet. PS3 fanboys used that arguiment with Motorstorm. "OMG LOOK AT THE VIDEOS, PS3 OWNS 360's GRAPHICS!!!". After motorstorm came out, The fanboys stopped talking about it because it wasnt that great of a game. PS3 fanboys make me very angry because their arguiments are always so wrong

 

And for the xbox 360 fanboys who said MGS4 looks like crap. yeah, your also an idiot. Those screens arent as good as Gears of War. But even if the game isnt the greatest game graphically, the storyline will be insane. Gears of war didnt even have that in depth of a storyline. Yes GOW's story and single player was crazy. But compare it to he storyline of MGS. Doesnt stand a chance.

 

See, I'll argue with what I dont agree with. I cant stand fanboys. You have to be open minded about everything. If I said Lair looks like crap. I'd be lying. But if I said Lair's graphics were better than Gears. I would be lying. If Lair has a great story behind its single player. Then it'll probably be better than Gears. Gears was an amazing game. But single player lacked an amazing story.

 

Oblivion looked amazing because the developers actually tried making a decent port on the PS3. That's why it looked amazing.

Also, look at Lair technically, it's amazing. It may not be quite up to par graphiclly with GeoW yet, but then again, it is in alpha stage and it is getting pretty damn close already. If i remember correctly, people were moaning about GeoW in alpha stage too, and look how it came out. Also, developers aren't taking full advantage of the PS3's capabilites yet, they are just rushing to release games for the PS3 since it is lacking in that department. Keep in mind that the PS3 is much more difficult to develop for, especially this early in it's life. The PS3 is complex, the 360 is very straightforward, that's why it's so easy to take advantage of it's graphic capabilities faster. Also, it's been out for over a year now.  As for multiplats? If developers actually tried, then they would look just like the 360 versions or better. That's why it would be better to develop multiplats first for the PS3 then easily port them to the 360.

ps3 has a last gen gpu and that means that devs know how to take full advantge of the rsx power while the USA arch in xenos is new and they will have to try and learn how to use it correctly.It's just like cell into the ps3 it will take sometime to anderstand how to use it.even MASS EFFECT is nothing infront of what we are going to see in the future from both consoles.

 

Avatar image for -KinGz-
-KinGz-

5232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#103 -KinGz-
Member since 2006 • 5232 Posts

PS3 GPU is better than 360. Do you know why PS3 GPU is 256MB ? because 8 cells can help the GPU and it can be like 1GB GPU. MGS 4 and Lair will show the power25-Automatic

I still laugh at this :lol: 

Avatar image for venture00
venture00

1060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 venture00
Member since 2004 • 1060 Posts
[QUOTE="vidiofreak"]

[QUOTE="BrownWalrus"]Hasn't the PS3 already proven to be extremely powerfull with Oblivion/Lair? Especially considering that it has still only been out for a couple of months. BrownWalrus

 

Well if your saying that Lair shows off the PS3's power. Than the PS3 isnt very powerful. Gears of War looks so much better than Lair. And Yes Oblivion does look amazing, but its also been in the works for a year longer than the 360 version. And with the update that came out for the 360, they are about even now. Your saying lair shows off the PS3 power. No one has played it yet. PS3 fanboys used that arguiment with Motorstorm. "OMG LOOK AT THE VIDEOS, PS3 OWNS 360's GRAPHICS!!!". After motorstorm came out, The fanboys stopped talking about it because it wasnt that great of a game. PS3 fanboys make me very angry because their arguiments are always so wrong

 

And for the xbox 360 fanboys who said MGS4 looks like crap. yeah, your also an idiot. Those screens arent as good as Gears of War. But even if the game isnt the greatest game graphically, the storyline will be insane. Gears of war didnt even have that in depth of a storyline. Yes GOW's story and single player was crazy. But compare it to he storyline of MGS. Doesnt stand a chance.

 

See, I'll argue with what I dont agree with. I cant stand fanboys. You have to be open minded about everything. If I said Lair looks like crap. I'd be lying. But if I said Lair's graphics were better than Gears. I would be lying. If Lair has a great story behind its single player. Then it'll probably be better than Gears. Gears was an amazing game. But single player lacked an amazing story.

 

Oblivion looked amazing because the developers actually tried making a decent port on the PS3. That's why it looked amazing.

Also, look at Lair technically, it's amazing. It may not be quite up to par graphiclly with GeoW yet, but then again, it is in alpha stage and it is getting pretty damn close already. If i remember correctly, people were moaning about GeoW in alpha stage too, and look how it came out. Also, developers aren't taking full advantage of the PS3's capabilites yet, they are just rushing to release games for the PS3 since it is lacking in that department. Keep in mind that the PS3 is much more difficult to develop for, especially this early in it's life. The PS3 is complex, the 360 is very straightforward, that's why it's so easy to take advantage of it's graphic capabilities faster. Also, it's been out for over a year now. As for multiplats? If developers actually tried, then they would look just like the 360 versions or better. That's why it would be better to develop multiplats first for the PS3 then easily port them to the 360.



For a extra year of development and a supposed ''More powefull hardware'' Oblivion should look better than the Highend pc version, but i doesn't it just looks a bit better than the xbox360 version, and not even close to the medium setting on pc.
Avatar image for General909
General909

541

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 General909
Member since 2007 • 541 Posts

[QUOTE="25-Automatic"]PS3 GPU is better than 360. Do you know why PS3 GPU is 256MB ? because 8 cells can help the GPU and it can be like 1GB GPU. MGS 4 and Lair will show the power-KinGz-

I still laugh at this :lol:

 

I'm with you man, LOL hahahahahahaha 

Avatar image for carsales
carsales

1143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 carsales
Member since 2006 • 1143 Posts

more pics

Avatar image for carsales
carsales

1143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 carsales
Member since 2006 • 1143 Posts
sorry for the bad picture quality.
Avatar image for WOWZORS
WOWZORS

484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 WOWZORS
Member since 2004 • 484 Posts
Okay i read a post saying Gears of War draw distance is better then lair's, this may be true. I laugh to see how horribly Gears of War would lag with more then 10 people in the same spot shooting.
Avatar image for vidiofreak
vidiofreak

427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 vidiofreak
Member since 2003 • 427 Posts

Okay i read a post saying Gears of War draw distance is better then lair's, this may be true. I laugh to see how horribly Gears of War would lag with more then 10 people in the same spot shooting.WOWZORS

 

This is true, And I made this point. If 100 enemies shot at the same time on Gears, the game would crash. But keep in mind, The characted model in Gears is more detailed. Meaning.. Better graphics = less carnage on the screen at once.

If your playing a flash game, Depending on your compaute, if u set the quality all the way up, and alot happens on the screen, it lags. You set the quality all the way down, and alot happens. Its fine.

And someone stated that the developers arent trying to make games look better on the PS3. I dont know if thats accurate. And one more thing, Yes Lair will most likely not use all of the PS3's power, Rumor has it, and this Rumor comes from Epic. Gears of War only uses 50% of the 360's total power. Tell me that doesnt give 360 owners something to look forward to in coming years.

Avatar image for vidiofreak
vidiofreak

427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 vidiofreak
Member since 2003 • 427 Posts

[QUOTE="WOWZORS"]Okay i read a post saying Gears of War draw distance is better then lair's, this may be true. I laugh to see how horribly Gears of War would lag with more then 10 people in the same spot shooting.vidiofreak

 

This is true, And I made this point. If 100 enemies shot at the same time on Gears, the game would crash. But keep in mind, The characted model in Gears is more detailed. Meaning.. Better graphics = less carnage on the screen at once.

If your playing a flash game, Depending on your compaute, if u set the quality all the way up, and alot happens on the screen, it lags. You set the quality all the way down, and alot happens. Its fine.

And someone stated that the developers arent trying to make games look better on the PS3. I dont know if thats accurate. And one more thing, Yes Lair will most likely not use all of the PS3's power, Rumor has it, and this Rumor comes from Epic. Gears of War only uses 50% of the 360's total power. Tell me that doesnt give 360 owners something to look forward to in coming years.

My bad, I believe it was around 40%. Im not sure, ill try 2 find the article.

Avatar image for anshuk20002
anshuk20002

3523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#111 anshuk20002
Member since 2004 • 3523 Posts
[QUOTE="MTBare"][QUOTE="BackFlip101"][QUOTE="vidiofreak"]

[QUOTE="Wanderer5"]Lair?AsadMahdi59

 

Liar does look good, but its no Gears of War. Gears of war's draw distance is alot better. And the wave effects on Liar arent so good. If you watch the new gameplay footage for it you'll know what I'm talking about. Yes Liar does look great, but Gears looks better.

And whats great is that Lair is still in its Alpha stage

Rofl no it's not.

rofl yes it is

the new gameplay that all those sites and ppl played and showed is alpha stage gameplay.  the game is currently not in alpha only the recent gameplay vids were alpha 

Avatar image for theboxmike
theboxmike

2615

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#112 theboxmike
Member since 2005 • 2615 Posts
Agreed with with tc.................and TBH Resistance looks pretty bad so far....i just go it today
Avatar image for Stumpt25
Stumpt25

1482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#113 Stumpt25
Member since 2006 • 1482 Posts

haha! there are tonnes of lemm fanboys on this thread with Halo avatars....

dont pay any attention to this thread, its just filled with lemm bias and irrationality.

lair shows off PS3? PS3 aint powerful then.

 wtf... Lair looks WAYYYYYYY better than GeOW... no competition

Avatar image for amourkiss
amourkiss

1751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#114 amourkiss
Member since 2003 • 1751 Posts
PS3 already surpass X360's graphics
Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#115 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
I have both, and, as far as I'm concerned, the PS3 has the better graphics. I own GeOW, but I think Resistance is just as good, and Motorstorm is a beautiful game to look at. Genji, although not a great game, is still very impressive in terms of visuals. Bearing in mind that the PS3 was released after the 360, I think it's fair to say that it's going to end up as the console with better graphics.
Avatar image for venture00
venture00

1060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 venture00
Member since 2004 • 1060 Posts
PS3 already surpass X360's graphicsamourkiss


Link??????
Avatar image for Warp_2567
Warp_2567

11701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#117 Warp_2567
Member since 2004 • 11701 Posts
it already has
GT:HD looks better than most 360 games, and its only an upscaled PS2 game!!!
Avatar image for venture00
venture00

1060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 venture00
Member since 2004 • 1060 Posts
it already has
GT:HD looks better than most 360 games, and its only an upscaled PS2 game!!!Warp_2567


haha GT:HD? The backgrounds are pre-rendered = pictures, only the cards are 3D
Avatar image for Warp_2567
Warp_2567

11701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#119 Warp_2567
Member since 2004 • 11701 Posts
[QUOTE="Warp_2567"]it already has
GT:HD looks better than most 360 games, and its only an upscaled PS2 game!!!venture00


haha GT:HD? The backgrounds are pre-rendered = pictures, only the cards are 3D

no they are not pictures
its been proven time and time again that those mountains in the backgrounds are 3D



Avatar image for darthogre
darthogre

5082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 darthogre
Member since 2006 • 5082 Posts

[QUOTE="Wanderer5"]Lair?vidiofreak

 

 

Liar does look good, but its no Gears of War. Gears of war's draw distance is alot better. And the wave effects on Liar arent so good. If you watch the new gameplay footage for it you'll know what I'm talking about. Yes Liar does look great, but Gears looks better.

What I find funny is you are comparing a game that has been released and a game that is just to come out of alpha stage in developement (it was stated so by the devs when listening to the new videos)

Can you not see the flaw in your arguement already?  No one knows how Lair will look when it is released.  People are saying wait till Lair or Heavenly Sword to judge the PS3 power.......don't you think it's fair to wait considering you are using a title that was released after the X360 was a year old?  At least give the PS3 games the same chance.

Avatar image for Mystery_Writer
Mystery_Writer

8351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#121 Mystery_Writer
Member since 2004 • 8351 Posts
Nothing from the console space I've seen on the horizon that looks as good as Gears
Avatar image for Prid3r
Prid3r

8643

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#122 Prid3r
Member since 2004 • 8643 Posts

PS3 GPU is better than 360. Do you know why PS3 GPU is 256MB ? because 8 cells can help the GPU and it can be like 1GB GPU. MGS 4 and Lair will show the power25-Automatic

:lol: fanboys :roll: !

Avatar image for venture00
venture00

1060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 venture00
Member since 2004 • 1060 Posts
[QUOTE="venture00"][QUOTE="Warp_2567"]it already has
GT:HD looks better than most 360 games, and its only an upscaled PS2 game!!!Warp_2567


haha GT:HD? The backgrounds are pre-rendered = pictures, only the cards are 3D

no they are not pictures
its been proven time and time again that those mountains in the backgrounds are 3D




link??
Avatar image for Runningflame570
Runningflame570

10388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#124 Runningflame570
Member since 2005 • 10388 Posts
If you've seen the latest Gametrailers Lair videos you would know it already more than does so. Same with the Ratchet and Clank Future media.
Avatar image for proof11102
proof11102

1080

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 proof11102
Member since 2007 • 1080 Posts
lol :P looks like this thread died,  Off to the gym.
Avatar image for johngmills
johngmills

4349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#127 johngmills
Member since 2005 • 4349 Posts
I think that the PS3 is competing with the 360 graphically the only problem that I'm having is that after resistance there is much I want to play on it.
Avatar image for vidiofreak
vidiofreak

427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 vidiofreak
Member since 2003 • 427 Posts

haha! there are tonnes of lemm fanboys on this thread with Halo avatars....

dont pay any attention to this thread, its just filled with lemm bias and irrationality.

lair shows off PS3? PS3 aint powerful then.

 wtf... Lair looks WAYYYYYYY better than GeOW... no competition

Stumpt25

Please let non fanboys do the debating, your an idiot, and your a fanboy. Yes I have Halo 2 as my avatar, and an XBL gamertag in my sig. But Im not biased. Saying Lair looks way better than GeOW.. .and thats all.. makes you an idiot. You should go back and read our arguiments, maybe itll change your distorted fanboy opinion.

Avatar image for vidiofreak
vidiofreak

427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 vidiofreak
Member since 2003 • 427 Posts

I have both, and, as far as I'm concerned, the PS3 has the better graphics. I own GeOW, but I think Resistance is just as good, and Motorstorm is a beautiful game to look at. Genji, although not a great game, is still very impressive in terms of visuals. Bearing in mind that the PS3 was released after the 360, I think it's fair to say that it's going to end up as the console with better graphics.SolidSnake35

 

This is what I was saying when that guy said graphics is all about opinion. Some people who favor the PS3, will come into a discussion and claim to have both, and think the PS3 is better. GeOW should not be compared to anything. Theres no game like it. And every review states that this is the best looking game of all time. Resistance should be compared to CoD2. And in that case, I believe Call of Duty 2's graphics are sharper and less cartoony.. But Resistance does a great job in keeping the game looking good and still having alot going on at once.

 This topic was a very good topic. But I guess the PS3 fanboys saw it. Im not taking about you Solid. But the people who came in saying "meh GeOW sucks, PS3 is so much better", when the arguiment is stupid. If I wanted to be a fanboy, I would say, "GEARS OF WAR LOOKS BETTER THAN LAIR, LAIR SUCKS". But Im not. Im just saying, Gears looks better in terms of draw distance and player models. Yes Lair is in Alpha. But if they graphically improve so much that the player models can compare with GeOW. That would be some feat.

Avatar image for afmsquid
afmsquid

1623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 afmsquid
Member since 2006 • 1623 Posts

PS3 GPU is better than 360. Do you know why PS3 GPU is 256MB ? because 8 cells can help the GPU and it can be like 1GB GPU. MGS 4 and Lair will show the power25-Automatic

 Can we nominate this for System Wars quote of the year?

Avatar image for AvIdGaMeR444
AvIdGaMeR444

7031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 AvIdGaMeR444
Member since 2004 • 7031 Posts

PS3 GPU is better than 360. Do you know why PS3 GPU is 256MB ? because 8 cells can help the GPU and it can be like 1GB GPU. MGS 4 and Lair will show the power25-Automatic

I'm a cow...but you just owned yourself.  Xbox 360 GPU >>> than PS3 GPU...fact! 

Avatar image for ROCK303
ROCK303

282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 ROCK303
Member since 2007 • 282 Posts
PS3 GPU is better than 360. Do you know why PS3 GPU is 256MB ? because 8 cells can help the GPU and it can be like 1GB GPU. MGS 4 and Lair will show the power25-Automatic
according to Insomniac your wrong. And they are considered sony's baby. they even stated the 360's GPU is "slightly" better. But of course he would say " slightly" cause it's the competition.
Avatar image for ROCK303
ROCK303

282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 ROCK303
Member since 2007 • 282 Posts

[QUOTE="25-Automatic"]PS3 GPU is better than 360. Do you know why PS3 GPU is 256MB ? because 8 cells can help the GPU and it can be like 1GB GPU. MGS 4 and Lair will show the powerAvIdGaMeR444

I'm a cow...but you just owned yourself.  Xbox 360 GPU >>> than PS3 GPU...fact! 

yeah the bottom line is the PS3 uses a gpu that requires the artist to make a decision on every pass. to use one shader or the other. The 360 can use both on any pass and can switch on and off for both at anytime. that means the 360 basically can use twice the shader options as the PS3. but if it's any consolation the cpu in the PS3 is kick booty. And I like me some cell. Id like to get one for my PC.
Avatar image for carsales
carsales

1143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 carsales
Member since 2006 • 1143 Posts
i have yet to buy my 2nd ps3 game.
Avatar image for carsales
carsales

1143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 carsales
Member since 2006 • 1143 Posts
[QUOTE="-KinGz-"]

[QUOTE="CR00K"][QUOTE="jsnepo"]Ratchet and Clank Tools of Destruction comes to mind. Add to that Lair, Heavenly Sword, GTHD, and of course MGS4.Adrian_Cloud

Agreed. Especially MGS4.

 

Which aren't games that aren't out, go figure, and GTHD is a demo, I see no point adding it,by the time those come out 360 will have better looking games already, and Lair doesn't look better than those game, neither heavenly sword, but then again they aren't out and MGS4 is not even ready to show itself I can't count it in either.

Metal Gear Soilid 4: guns of the patriots gameplay was already shown and looks better than mostly anything out on either PS3 or 360.

So you can definately count it.

graw on 360 looks better than mgs4
Avatar image for SambaLele
SambaLele

5552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 SambaLele
Member since 2004 • 5552 Posts

[QUOTE="25-Automatic"]PS3 GPU is better than 360. Do you know why PS3 GPU is 256MB ? because 8 cells can help the GPU and it can be like 1GB GPU. MGS 4 and Lair will show the powerAvIdGaMeR444

I'm a cow...but you just owned yourself. Xbox 360 GPU >>> than PS3 GPU...fact!

 

more like the 360's GPU > PS3's... if it's more than that, if both are the same, it's arguable.

but everyone knows the Cell is a lot superior than 360's CPU. This isn't arguable. So to me, the PS3 has the edge... i prefer a better hardware in general than a better hardware only in the graphics department.

Avatar image for blacktorn
blacktorn

8299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#137 blacktorn
Member since 2004 • 8299 Posts
Ratchet and clank on the ps3 should be able to compete with Kameo
Avatar image for omarguy01
omarguy01

8139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 omarguy01
Member since 2004 • 8139 Posts
wasnt ps2 cpu superior to xbox's? i think i read that somewhere..
Avatar image for caribo2222
caribo2222

1181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#139 caribo2222
Member since 2006 • 1181 Posts

wasnt ps2 cpu superior to xbox's? i think i read that somewhere..omarguy01

One word.....NO

Avatar image for ASKLEIPIOS
ASKLEIPIOS

44

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 ASKLEIPIOS
Member since 2006 • 44 Posts
[QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]

[QUOTE="25-Automatic"]PS3 GPU is better than 360. Do you know why PS3 GPU is 256MB ? because 8 cells can help the GPU and it can be like 1GB GPU. MGS 4 and Lair will show the powerSambaLele

I'm a cow...but you just owned yourself. Xbox 360 GPU >>> than PS3 GPU...fact!

 

more like the 360's GPU > PS3's... if it's more than that, if both are the same, it's arguable.

but everyone knows the Cell is a lot superior than 360's CPU. This isn't arguable. So to me, the PS3 has the edge... i prefer a better hardware in general than a better hardware only in the graphics department.

everyone knows that xenos is way better.Only cows say that their the same.xenos is better than rsx in every way but cell is better in some while xenon in others.oh,and don't make post aaaaaaaagain some facts that cows dont understand and admit.

also the same goes for the games in the future we will see games that run better in ps3 and some in 360.At the end of the day everybody sould understand that either lems or cows didn't bought a weak console it's console have advantages and disadvantages.