Which company has the best first party: Sony, Nintendo, or MS?

Which of the two has the best first party developers in the business? I vote Nintendo myself, I grew up with their franchises and Nintendo games and they still remain some of the best today.

I prefer Sony's myself.

Sony all the way

Nintendo, hands down. Talented divisions in there.

.

Nintendo. Sony is also amazing. Microsoft's=meh. You can't expect too much from them if they reduce some of their best devs to making sports games.

I'm going to go with Sony

Why are people voting Nintendo? Most of what they have done is wii sports resort and other simple games.

Pre-1996 Nintendo.

Sony, towards my personal tastes.

Nintendo are also fantastic.

Microsoft is a needs improvement.

Microsoft. Red dead redemption is AWESOME

BioDogshock

RDR is multiplat, how would it be a first party game?

Microsoft. Red dead redemption is AWESOME

sony sucks uncharted 2 is worst game

Nintendo zelda sucks too

BioDogshock

[QUOTE="BioDogshock"]

Microsoft. Red dead redemption is AWESOME

Yangire

RDR is multiplat, how would it be a first party game?

Why are people voting Nintendo? Most of what they have done is wii sports resort and other simple games.

RadecSupreme

Nintendo>>Sony>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>MS.

Just look at Rare.

[QUOTE="Yangire"]

[QUOTE="BioDogshock"]

Microsoft. Red dead redemption is AWESOME

BioDogshock

RDR is multiplat, how would it be a first party game?

He thinks its an ms first party game because he bought the box that has green stuff on it which says Xbox360... LMAO :lol:

[QUOTE="RadecSupreme"]

Why are people voting Nintendo? Most of what they have done is wii sports resort and other simple games.

OreoMilkshake

Atleast a shooter has a storyline, setting, important characters, and a fun and interactive experience. I'd prefer that over a simple Wii sports resort. I like to support developers who put more time and effort into their games.

[QUOTE="OreoMilkshake"]

[QUOTE="RadecSupreme"]

Why are people voting Nintendo? Most of what they have done is wii sports resort and other simple games.

RadecSupreme

Atleast a shooter has a storyline, setting, important characters, and a fun and interactive experience. I'd prefer that over a simple Wii sports resort. I like to support developers who put more time and effort into their games.

[QUOTE="RadecSupreme"]

[QUOTE="OreoMilkshake"]All Sony does is shooters. :roll:

OreoMilkshake

Atleast a shooter has a storyline, setting, important characters, and a fun and interactive experience. I'd prefer that over a simple Wii sports resort. I like to support developers who put more time and effort into their games.

They do, but its not enough to warrant a vote when there are companies who dedicate more to their 1st party and have much more done.

it depends are you referring to review wise,sale wise or my personal preference.

review wise sale wise=nintendo

what i prefer is nintend then sony closely

[QUOTE="OreoMilkshake"]

[QUOTE="RadecSupreme"]

Why are people voting Nintendo? Most of what they have done is wii sports resort and other simple games.

RadecSupreme

Atleast a shooter has a storyline, setting, important characters, and a fun and interactive experience. I'd prefer that over a simple Wii sports resort. I like to support developers who put more time and effort into their games.

i would watch a movie or read a book because video game stories suck so hard. its crazy how modern video games are now and days

Pre-1996 Nintendo.

Yangire

Nintendo, because:

Nintendo, because:

kansasdude2009

:O

The characters can.... grow!

No longer midgets for the entire game!

I agree with Kansasdude. I say Nintendo>>Sony>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Microsoft.

Microsoft might be closer but they keep closing developers and look what they are doing to Rare. Rare made some good games but Microsoft is making them make Kinect games like Kinect Sports.

[QUOTE="OreoMilkshake"][QUOTE="RadecSupreme"]

Atleast a shooter has a storyline, setting, important characters, and a fun and interactive experience. I'd prefer that over a simple Wii sports resort. I like to support developers who put more time and effort into their games.

RadecSupreme

They do, but its not enough to warrant a vote when there are companies who dedicate more to their 1st party and have much more done.

I can tell from your post count you spend alot of time on gamespot, so you must know how well nintendo's first party franchises (mario, zelda, metriod, smash bros, kirby, ect) have been historically. (hell, the two most critically acclaimed games of this generation belong to the man in the red hat). To say that wii sports represents nintendo's first party games can only be interpreted as a desire to remain ignorant.

Nintendo.

WOW A majority think Nintendo? Nintendo's 1st party studios are so overrated.. Its just the same games generation after generation.. Sony By far hands down has the best 1st party support.

[QUOTE="RadecSupreme"]

[QUOTE="OreoMilkshake"]Then it's a good thing Nintendo has more than Wii Sports Resort eh?the_wet_mop

They do, but its not enough to warrant a vote when there are companies who dedicate more to their 1st party and have much more done.

I can tell from your post count you spend alot of time on gamespot, so you must know how well nintendo's first party franchises (mario, zelda, metriod, smash bros, kirby, ect) have been historically. (hell, the two most critically acclaimed games of this generation belong to the man in the red hat). To say that wii sports represents nintendo's first party games can only be interpreted as a desire to remain ignorant.

yea way too much time...

Pre-E3: Sony

After E3: Nintendo

[QUOTE="OreoMilkshake"]

[QUOTE="RadecSupreme"]

Why are people voting Nintendo? Most of what they have done is wii sports resort and other simple games.

RadecSupreme

Atleast a shooter has a storyline, setting, important characters, and a fun and interactive experience. I'd prefer that over a simple Wii sports resort. I like to support developers who put more time and effort into their games.

You do understand that there are more franchises by Nintendo right? At least I hope you do.

For me, I pick Nintendo (Shocking). I also perfer Sony's 1st party development also. Microsoft has absolutely no in-house talent. All they do is buy other companies to do their games for them and for exclusive things like DLC what not. And when they've had their fun they toss them to the side of the road (See: Rare, Ensemble Studios) to find their next victim. A buisness strategy I like to call....the Activision complex. :o!

Nintendo has it hands down. This coming from a owner of a 360 and ps3. Nintendo games are the only reason to have every Nintendo system since the The N64. Are any third party games even worth having on the Wii? Mario, Zelda,Metroid, Smash Brothers, Kirby, Donkey Kong, F-Zero, Mario Kart, Punch Out, Pokemon, Star Fox.... that just off the top of my head.

Hard choice between Nintendo and Sony for me, been with the both of them forever and have played most of their first party games. I think Sony though, by a hair.

I put sony, i like how some of the stuff they are trying is new ip's, they don't really tickle my fancy though, nintendo is too much of the same, mario galaxy 2 might be mario perfection buuuut its still mario, saving the princess again...

and ms has some new stuff, i love some of the stuff, but there needs to be MOAR

[QUOTE="RadecSupreme"]

[QUOTE="OreoMilkshake"]Then it's a good thing Nintendo has more than Wii Sports Resort eh?the_wet_mop

They do, but its not enough to warrant a vote when there are companies who dedicate more to their 1st party and have much more done.

I can tell from your post count you spend alot of time on gamespot, so you must know how well nintendo's first party franchises (mario, zelda, metriod, smash bros, kirby, ect) have been historically. (hell, the two most critically acclaimed games of this generation belong to the man in the red hat). To say that wii sports represents nintendo's first party games can only be interpreted as a desire to remain ignorant.

The only MS first party studio with games over 90 is Turn10. Ninty has EAD Tokyo and Retro. Sony has Santa Monca, Naughty Dog, Media Molecule, and Guerilla. The numbers don't lie, Sony clearly has the stronger first party, both in number of AAA studios, and number of AAA games being put out.

I'd have to say Sony. Though I love Nintendo's first party titles and Microsoft's first party titles. It's the reason why I own all systems. Sony just brings out quality title after quality title and in more volume. Nintendo brings out quality titles as well but not in as large of a volume. Microsoft has some quality titles but they need to have more first party support for the 360.

Microsoft. Red dead redemption is AWESOME

sony sucks uncharted 2 is worst game

Nintendo zelda sucks too

BioDogshock

Red Dead is also on the PS3. Yeah Zelda games do suck hard, I mean ocarina of time did not get any award and isnt classifies as the highest rated game of all time or anything like that........:roll: