Which game consle devloper is better nintendo, sony, or microsoft?

[QUOTE="JLF1"]

[QUOTE="charizard1605"]

Good, keep at it. Not many would agree with you. And I stand by what I said. If you can make ridiculous claims about Nintendo having lower standards, I can make equally ridiculous claims about Nintendo having HIGHER standards.

charizard1605

This generation Nintendo has been pretty uneven with their games.

You have everything from SMG2 to Wii music (which is crap).

We all know that Nintendo can push their games to incredible high levels. That is why so many of their games have been disappointments this generation.

Animal Crossing: Lets go to the City
Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn
Disaster: Day of Crisis
Pokemon: Battle Revolution
New Super Mario Bros Wii (great game but could have been so much more)
Wii Music

EDIT:

And MP3

I'm only talking about Wii games.

[QUOTE="charizard1605"]

[QUOTE="JLF1"]

This generation Nintendo has been pretty uneven with their games.

You have everything from SMG2 to Wii music (which is crap).

We all know that Nintendo can push their games to incredible high levels. That is why so many of their games have been disappointments this generation.

JLF1

Animal Crossing: Lets go to the City
Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn
Disaster: Day of Crisis
Pokemon: Battle Revolution
New Super Mario Bros Wii (great game but could have been so much more)
Wii Music

EDIT:

And MP3

I'm only talking about Wii games.

[QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"] So Alice in Wonderland was a landmark of the Action Adventure genre?

gamebreakerz__

First off, that's because GS commits reviewers to NO system, it's not like IGN here. Secondly, handheld games don't get GotY because they might not be the best games released that year. You know, one 9.5 can be better than another 9.5, right? Yeah, that way.

Finally, you don't like Chinatown Wars so its rubbish? Oh, sound logic there.

[QUOTE="charizard1605"]

[QUOTE="JLF1"]

This generation Nintendo has been pretty uneven with their games.

You have everything from SMG2 to Wii music (which is crap).

We all know that Nintendo can push their games to incredible high levels. That is why so many of their games have been disappointments this generation.

JLF1

Animal Crossing: Lets go to the City
Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn
Disaster: Day of Crisis
Pokemon: Battle Revolution
New Super Mario Bros Wii (great game but could have been so much more)
Wii Music

EDIT:

And MP3

I'm only talking about Wii games.

[QUOTE="charizard1605"] Again, I ask: what shovelware did Nintendo make? Quite a few people seem to allege that Nintendo makes shovelware, but when you ask them that, they either refuse to answer, or go ahead and sig a part of your post entirely out of context.

[QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"][QUOTE="charizard1605"] Or maybe just an extremely GOOD action adventure... That ever occur to you? Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it appeals to no one. Stop being narrow minded.charizard1605

First off, that's because GS commits reviewers to NO system, it's not like IGN here. Secondly, handheld games don't get GotY because they might not be the best games released that year. You know, one 9.5 can be better than another 9.5, right? Yeah, that way.

Finally, you don't like Chinatown Wars so its rubbish? Oh, sound logic there.

[QUOTE="JLF1"]

[QUOTE="charizard1605"] I would agree the Wii series games might not appeal to everybody (although the Wii Sports games are pretty good). But apart from those, which Nintendo games failed to live up to what we expect of them? Of course, I recognize that varying people might have varying opinions and varying expectations, so your answer might not be the same as mine.

gamebreakerz__

Animal Crossing: Lets go to the City
Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn
Disaster: Day of Crisis
Pokemon: Battle Revolution
New Super Mario Bros Wii (great game but could have been so much more)
Wii Music

EDIT:

And MP3

I'm only talking about Wii games.

[QUOTE="JLF1"]

Animal Crossing: Lets go to the City
Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn
Disaster: Day of Crisis
Pokemon: Battle Revolution
New Super Mario Bros Wii (great game but could have been so much more)
Wii Music

EDIT:

And MP3

I'm only talking about Wii games.

gamebreakerz__

First off, GS don't even commit good reviewers to the DS, they have randoms. GTA CTW got a 9.5 on the DS and PSP, I played it and it's rubbish, if a console game gets a 9.5 it's usually GOTY or almost GOTY, why will a handheld game never get GOTY? Because there are different standards.gamebreakerz__

First off, that's because GS commits reviewers to NO system, it's not like IGN here. Secondly, handheld games don't get GotY because they might not be the best games released that year. You know, one 9.5 can be better than another 9.5, right? Yeah, that way.

Finally, you don't like Chinatown Wars so its rubbish? Oh, sound logic there.

[QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"]

[QUOTE="JLF1"]

Animal Crossing: Lets go to the City
Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn
Disaster: Day of Crisis
Pokemon: Battle Revolution
New Super Mario Bros Wii (great game but could have been so much more)
Wii Music

EDIT:

And MP3

I'm only talking about Wii games.

charizard1605

[QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="mysterj"] I can think of Wii music and Wii play.

mysterj

Microsoft's game developers are so-so but they make excellent console features, Sony's SCE developers are probably the best in the talent area, but there's plenty of more talented 3rd party devs IMO, Nintendo's devs make crap games of big name games that sell because they're big names people have known for 20+ yearslamprey263

[QUOTE="charizard1605"]

[QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"]
Don't forget wii sport, wii sport resort, wii carnival, wii fit, the fact that Nintendo give random developers the use of mario (mario at the olympics etc.).

gamebreakerz__

[QUOTE="lamprey263"]Microsoft's game developers are so-so but they make excellent console features, Sony's SCE developers are probably the best in the talent area, but there's plenty of more talented 3rd party devs IMO, Nintendo's devs make crap games of big name games that sell because they're big names people have known for 20+ yearscharizard1605

[QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="lamprey263"]Microsoft's game developers are so-so but they make excellent console features, Sony's SCE developers are probably the best in the talent area, but there's plenty of more talented 3rd party devs IMO, Nintendo's devs make crap games of big name games that sell because they're big names people have known for 20+ yearsmysterj

Not exactly sure what the TC means, but am gonna go with the one that has the best NEW IPs

No way, Sony much better at making console. mysterj

[QUOTE="charizard1605"]

[QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"] First off, GS don't even commit good reviewers to the DS, they have randoms. GTA CTW got a 9.5 on the DS and PSP, I played it and it's rubbish, if a console game gets a 9.5 it's usually GOTY or almost GOTY, why will a handheld game never get GOTY? Because there are different standards.gamebreakerz__

First off, that's because GS commits reviewers to NO system, it's not like IGN here. Secondly, handheld games don't get GotY because they might not be the best games released that year. You know, one 9.5 can be better than another 9.5, right? Yeah, that way.

Finally, you don't like Chinatown Wars so its rubbish? Oh, sound logic there.

[QUOTE="mysterj"]No way, Sony much better at making console. khoofia_pika

[QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"] So Alice in Wonderland was a landmark of the Action Adventure genre?

gamebreakerz__

The DS does NOT get random reviewers.

Mario and Luigi: Bowser's Inside Story- Ricardo Torres

Shin Megami Tensei: Devil Survivor- Lark Anderson

Final Fantasy IV- Lark Anderson

New Super Mario Bros.- Jeff Gerstmann

Grand Theft Auto: Chinatown Wars- Justin Calvert

Mario Kart DS- Justin Calvert

I wouldn't say those are 'random reviewers'. Also, no, handheld games and console games do not have different standards. If a handheld game is good, it gets nominated for GotY, but a console game would win only because it's better, not because it's a console game.

[QUOTE="khoofia_pika"][QUOTE="mysterj"]No way, Sony much better at making console. mysterj

[QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"][QUOTE="scoop_dawg"]

No way dude nintendo has a bigger game library than sony, and I think sony got their motion thing from nintendo haha. And plus nintendo has great consoles.

oldkingallant

You may think nintendo is the best (so as I) but most people prefer Sony because of its free online gameplay(which nintendo has),excellent graphics, and excellent games.(and nintendo has good graphics as well but not as good as sony) Unlike the 360 to me its low class. So right now its between sony and nintendo. So how is it easy while both systems and developers have good sides to both of it?

For all of you who do not understand what I meant was out of those three consoles/devolpers which is the best console/developer? And my awnser to that was nintendo all the way.

[QUOTE="oldkingallant"][QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"] Worst, argument, ever. 99% of nintendos library is shovelware, motion controls suck, period. Oh wait, your last argument killed mine, I simply can't argue with the huge amount of evidence and detailed descriptions that last statement showed....scoop_dawg

You may think nintendo is the best (so as I) but most people prefer Sony because of its free online gameplay(which nintendo has),excellent graphics, and excellent games.(and nintendo has good graphics as well but not as good as sony) Unlike the 360 to me its low class. So right now its between sony and nintendo. So how is it easy while both systems and developers have good sides to both of it?

Sony has made the best console 3 times in a row already. although nintendo has the best in house game devs

Sony has made the best console 3 times in a row already. although nintendo has the best in house game devs

tutt3r

[QUOTE="tutt3r"]

Sony has made the best console 3 times in a row already. although nintendo has the best in house game devs

khoofia_pika

[QUOTE="scoop_dawg"]

[QUOTE="oldkingallant"] Hahahaha 99% of it is shovelware. Nintendo has never once released shovelware themselves. You're quickly becoming one of the jokes of System Wars. Nintendo has made more AAA and AA games than any other dev this gen, EASILY.khoofia_pika

You may think nintendo is the best (so as I) but most people prefer Sony because of its free online gameplay(which nintendo has),excellent graphics, and excellent games.(and nintendo has good graphics as well but not as good as sony) Unlike the 360 to me its low class. So right now its between sony and nintendo. So how is it easy while both systems and developers have good sides to both of it?

Opinion.

"...TO ME its low class."

[QUOTE="charizard1605"] Wait, what? 99% of Nintendo's library is shovelware? So Zelda, Pokemon, Mario, Metroid, Golden Sun, Fire Emblem, Advance Wars, Donkey Kong, Kirby, Mario Kart, Star Fox, F-Zero, Professor Layton, Super Smash Bros, Sin and Punishment, Animal Crossing, Pikmin, Kid Icarus... that's all shovelware, right? HelloMoto56

you mean just like Halo 3, Halo 3: ODST, Halo: Wars, Halo: REACH, GEOW1, GEOW2, GEOW3, PGR3, PGR4, Forza 2, Forza 3, Fable 2, Fable 3 do i need to go on with the list?

[QUOTE="khoofia_pika"][QUOTE="scoop_dawg"]

You may think nintendo is the best (so as I) but most people prefer Sony because of its free online gameplay(which nintendo has),excellent graphics, and excellent games.(and nintendo has good graphics as well but not as good as sony) Unlike the 360 to me its low class. So right now its between sony and nintendo. So how is it easy while both systems and developers have good sides to both of it?

mgs_freak91

Opinion.

"...TO ME its low class."

This gen its pretty much neck and neck between Ninty and Sony with regards quality releases.

Although Nintendo has the history and the heritage, whereas SCE has just come into its own this gen imo.

Nintendo have the best build quality, best first party support with games that appeal to a much wider age range, constantly evolving peripherals and imo have always been better for gathering around with friends (sadly every other platform wants to kill local multi it seems sometimes). Sure they didn't jump into online with both feet but as a parent its nice to know my kids can't end up in a room with some of the sad excuse for human beings I have heard mouthing off over xbox live.

I would say Nintendo

I'm saying Nintendo they have great games and their consoles are always reliable. Sony makes great games but their hardware isn't as reliable as Nintendo's but both are better then Microsoft in the hardware and software department.

Me. :)

Me. :)

Cruxis27

Nintendo first(although I don´t like their games).

Sony second and MS third.