Which is the greater GAME DEVELOPER.....BUNGIE vs NAUGHTY DOG.

  • 132 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#51 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64057 Posts
I like Bungie more. That said if we go by what have you done for me lately. Uncharted 2 was fantastic. Halo 3 and it's Expansion were extremely good as well, but Uncharted 2 is the superior work overall.
Avatar image for Persistantthug
Persistantthug

1420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Persistantthug
Member since 2009 • 1420 Posts

[QUOTE="Persistantthug"]

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"] Marathon, Myth and Oni disagree with you. They weren't a household name before Halo, but they were still an incredibly important dev house. I could say that Naughty Dog wasn't recognized until they were bought by Sony.DarkLink77

You pretty much said all that needed to be said right there.

NAUGHTY DOG created CRASH BANDICOOT and their many other IP's before they were "bought" by Sony?

They created Crash, which was their only major IP before being acquired. Bungie had Marathon, Myth, and Oni to a lesser extent before being acquired by MS.

Marathon and Myth....While I've heard of those, very few people have...Same with Oni.

Naughty dog has just as many little thought about oldies just like that, including RING OF POWER (cult underground RPG).

Fact is, Naughty Dog's done severl different genres, more than Bungie, has more critical acclaim, and has been around many years before Bungie was even formed.

Sorry...Naughty Dog takes the win.

Avatar image for rogerjak
rogerjak

14950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#53 rogerjak
Member since 2004 • 14950 Posts

For me Naughty Dog. I love them to bits.

Avatar image for Aboogie5
Aboogie5

1118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Aboogie5
Member since 2008 • 1118 Posts

Jak and Daxter>Halo2!!!!

Avatar image for Lionheart08
Lionheart08

15814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#55 Lionheart08
Member since 2005 • 15814 Posts

Based off of critical reception of Games, Bungie has the better track record, consistently as well. Personally however, I vastly prefer Naughty Dog. In fact, I'd go as far as to say Naughty Dog are my favorite devs period.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#56 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64057 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="Persistantthug"]

You pretty much said all that needed to be said right there.

NAUGHTY DOG created CRASH BANDICOOT and their many other IP's before they were "bought" by Sony?

Persistantthug

They created Crash, which was their only major IP before being acquired. Bungie had Marathon, Myth, and Oni to a lesser extent before being acquired by MS.

Marathon and Myth....While I've heard of those, very few people have...Same with Oni.

Naughty dog has just as many little thought about oldies just like that, including RING OF POWER (cult underground RPG).

Fact is, Naughty Dog's done severl different genres, more than Bungie, has more critical acclaim, and has been around many years before Bungie was even formed.

Sorry...Naughty Dog takes the win.

Popularity does not discredit Bungie's quality long before Halo. Halo was just their breakout hit, but Marathon and Myth is when they solidified themselves as a good-great developer. Halo just iced it and put them on the map. But to be fair in a 10 year span Bungie has done Halo In a 10 year span Naughty Dog has done Jak 1-3 and Uncharted 1 and 2. So If we go by what have you done for me lately. Naughty Dog has given us more variety.
Avatar image for chicagodon
chicagodon

909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 chicagodon
Member since 2008 • 909 Posts

bungie is great but naughty dog has a longer and greater track record with a larger selection of games. uncharted is the best franchise this generation. so i have to go with naughty dog

Avatar image for Aboogie5
Aboogie5

1118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Aboogie5
Member since 2008 • 1118 Posts

guys guys....Halo Reach>>>>anything naughty dog has made. enough said

Revolution316

you know this cuz u played the beta before all of us right?

Avatar image for MUSH_IS_PWNs
MUSH_IS_PWNs

1213

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 MUSH_IS_PWNs
Member since 2009 • 1213 Posts
Not a Halo or Crash Bandicoot fan but Uncharted 2 was the 2nd best game I have ever played (not my favorite though). Based on just that Naughty Dog gets my vote plus Jak 2()the only one i played) is quite fun. I find the Halo's to be quite bad. I hate the linear levels, and awkward controls (my opinion). Oh ya, Crash Bash was a heck of a lot of fun too but not sure if that was developed internally by Nuaght Dog though.
Avatar image for chicagodon
chicagodon

909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 chicagodon
Member since 2008 • 909 Posts

[QUOTE="Persistantthug"]

[QUOTE="HarlockJC"]

Bungie has done a lot more for the gaming institution has a whole.

Kickinurass

Bungie was basically made by Microsoft.

Naughty Dog was creating games as far back as the SEGA GENESIS, and even before that on Apple IIGS's.

Naughty Dog has won more Critical Acclaim, and has sold many millions of copies of lucrative franchises (Crash Bandicoot for example).

Bungies most acclaimed game is Halo. Yes it is popular, but like I said, they were made by Microsoft.

I'd argue its the other way around. Halo CE had little to no backing at the time - hell I thought my dad would bring home Max Payne which is what everyone seemed to be talking about at the time. Yet it released and blew up way beyond what anyone could have expected.

Then Halo 2 and set a the bar for online console gaming.

I'd say Halo made the Xbox, if anything.

halo made the xbox and crash was the icon of the ps1

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#61 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts
[QUOTE="Persistantthug"]

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"] They created Crash, which was their only major IP before being acquired. Bungie had Marathon, Myth, and Oni to a lesser extent before being acquired by MS.jg4xchamp

Marathon and Myth....While I've heard of those, very few people have...Same with Oni.

Naughty dog has just as many little thought about oldies just like that, including RING OF POWER (cult underground RPG).

Fact is, Naughty Dog's done severl different genres, more than Bungie, has more critical acclaim, and has been around many years before Bungie was even formed.

Sorry...Naughty Dog takes the win.

Popularity does not discredit Bungie's quality long before Halo. Halo was just their breakout hit, but Marathon and Myth is when they solidified themselves as a good-great developer. Halo just iced it and put them on the map. But to be fair in a 10 year span Bungie has done Halo In a 10 year span Naughty Dog has done Jak 1-3 and Uncharted 1 and 2. So If we go by what have you done for me lately. Naughty Dog has given us more variety.

More critical acclaim is iffy. The only way to judge that would be to line up the MC (or GR) averages of all their games, and see who's got a higher score. However, there are obvious problems with that. And how long a dev house has been around doesn't mean anything in terms of what they make, just how much.
Avatar image for walkingdream
walkingdream

4883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 walkingdream
Member since 2009 • 4883 Posts

Naughty Dog have released more and Better IPs but i think it's stupid how people are saying Bungie are **** they aren't very good....all i can say is are you guys on drugs? Seriously.

I prefer Bungie as a developer (let's be honest they are awesome with there community) But naughty dog over time have been more consistant.

Avatar image for oldkingallant
oldkingallant

4958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 oldkingallant
Member since 2010 • 4958 Posts
Naughty Dog quite easily. Bungie is a master of multiplayer but the single player could use work. Naughty Dog has made some of my favorite platformers and my favorite third person shooter, excellent single player experiences and pretty damn good multiplayer ones, so them. Bungie is a good dev though.
Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#64 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12869 Posts
Bungie because they are amazing. They made Halo ..... one of the greatest/most successful franchises of all time. Halo is still very much top dog FPS when it comes to features. Also people saying Bungie never made a game other than Halo ..... thats because MS wouldn't let them.
Avatar image for Persistantthug
Persistantthug

1420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 Persistantthug
Member since 2009 • 1420 Posts

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="Persistantthug"]

Marathon and Myth....While I've heard of those, very few people have...Same with Oni.

Naughty dog has just as many little thought about oldies just like that, including RING OF POWER (cult underground RPG).

Fact is, Naughty Dog's done severl different genres, more than Bungie, has more critical acclaim, and has been around many years before Bungie was even formed.

Sorry...Naughty Dog takes the win.

DarkLink77

Popularity does not discredit Bungie's quality long before Halo. Halo was just their breakout hit, but Marathon and Myth is when they solidified themselves as a good-great developer. Halo just iced it and put them on the map. But to be fair in a 10 year span Bungie has done Halo In a 10 year span Naughty Dog has done Jak 1-3 and Uncharted 1 and 2. So If we go by what have you done for me lately. Naughty Dog has given us more variety.

More critical acclaim is iffy. The only way to judge that would be to line up the MC (or GR) averages of all their games, and see who's got a higher score. However, there are obvious problems with that. And how long a dev house has been around doesn't mean anything in terms of what they make, just how much.

I disagree.

It isn't the most critical factor, but "length of time" does count for something. You don't get to stay in business for over 20 years for being crappy.

Avatar image for XanderZane
XanderZane

5174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#66 XanderZane
Member since 2006 • 5174 Posts

This poll is complete with quick "research" cliff notes for your convienience and personal viewing pleasure, brought to you by our sponsers, WIKIPEDIA. ;)

BUNGIE

NAUGHTY DOG

Persistantthug
I have to say Naughty Dog. Mainly because they have created more memorable titles then Bungie. The only games Bungie will be remembered for are Halo, Marathon, Myth and Oni. Only Halo was a big hit. Where as Naughty Dog did Rings of Power (Genesis), Way of the Warrior (3DO) Crash Bandicoot, Jax & Daxter and of course the Uncharted games. Besides Way of the Warrior, all the other games were good to great. I was lucky enough to interview Jason Rubin and Andy Gavin while they were doing Way of the Warrior. Even got to play the game before it was released. The control wasn't great mainly because the 3DO controllers sucked hard. The game felt like a Mortal Kombat knock off. Anyway, Jason and Andy were great guys and very talented developers back then and still are today. So I vote for Naughty Dog.
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#67 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64057 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="jg4xchamp"] Popularity does not discredit Bungie's quality long before Halo. Halo was just their breakout hit, but Marathon and Myth is when they solidified themselves as a good-great developer. Halo just iced it and put them on the map. But to be fair in a 10 year span Bungie has done Halo In a 10 year span Naughty Dog has done Jak 1-3 and Uncharted 1 and 2. So If we go by what have you done for me lately. Naughty Dog has given us more variety. Persistantthug

More critical acclaim is iffy. The only way to judge that would be to line up the MC (or GR) averages of all their games, and see who's got a higher score. However, there are obvious problems with that. And how long a dev house has been around doesn't mean anything in terms of what they make, just how much.

I disagree.

It isn't the most critical factor, but "length of time" does count for something. You don't get to stay in business for over 20 years for being crappy.

In which case Bungie clearly isn't crappy considering they stayed in business for a decade before Halo, and another decade with halo, and are set for a new decade without halo.
Avatar image for djsifer01
djsifer01

7238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#68 djsifer01
Member since 2005 • 7238 Posts

guys guys....Halo Reach>>>>anything naughty dog has made. enough said

Revolution316
Is that what you crystal ball says? It must be nice to play games several months before they release.
Avatar image for SaudiFury
SaudiFury

8709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 1

#69 SaudiFury
Member since 2007 • 8709 Posts

I like Uncharted series a lot more then i like Halo.

however with that said....

I say

Bungie in the multiplayer department. It is exremely hard to get the formula down right for general audience to really like.

Naughty Dog in the single-player department.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#70 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64057 Posts
[QUOTE="Persistantthug"]

This poll is complete with quick "research" cliff notes for your convienience and personal viewing pleasure, brought to you by our sponsers, WIKIPEDIA. ;)

BUNGIE

NAUGHTY DOG

XanderZane
I have to say Naughty Dog. Mainly because they have created more memorable titles then Bungie. The only games Bungie will be remembered for are Halo, Marathon, Myth and Oni. Only Halo was a big hit. Where as Naughty Dog did Rings of Power (Genesis), Way of the Warrior (3DO) Crash Bandicoot, Jax & Daxter and of course the Uncharted games. Besides Way of the Warrior, all the other games were good to great. I was lucky enough to interview Jason Rubin and Andy Gavin while they were doing Way of the Warrior. Even got to play the game before it was released. The control wasn't great mainly because the 3DO controllers sucked hard. The game felt like a Mortal Kombat knock off. Anyway, Jason and Andy were great guys and very talented developers back then and still are today. So I vote for Naughty Dog.

Ico was not a big hit compared to what other Sony First party titles do, and many will remember that game. I fail to see how Marathon and Myth won't be remembered by the Bungie faithful, and people who remember the old mac days.
Avatar image for djsifer01
djsifer01

7238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#71 djsifer01
Member since 2005 • 7238 Posts
Bungie because they are amazing. They made Halo ..... one of the greatest/most successful franchises of all time. Halo is still very much top dog FPS when it comes to features. Also people saying Bungie never made a game other than Halo ..... thats because MS wouldn't let them. Nonstop-Madness
What features are you referring 2? Halo has the most bland online component out of any FPS ive played.
Avatar image for MJPK
MJPK

3360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#72 MJPK
Member since 2006 • 3360 Posts

Naughty dog

They made Crash, Jak, and Uncharted

toast_burner

This

Avatar image for XanderZane
XanderZane

5174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#73 XanderZane
Member since 2006 • 5174 Posts
Thats way to easy, Naughty Dog by a long shot. Bungie is not a very good developer IMHO and are now with the Hitler of video game publishers.djsifer01
Not a very good developer? What are you smoking? lol!! Halo has sold over 20million copies in their series. If you can make a series that sells that many copies you are definitely a VERY GOOD DEVELOPER. That would be like saying Rockstar or Bioware aren't very good developers. Give respect where respect is due.
Avatar image for SgtKevali
SgtKevali

5763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#74 SgtKevali
Member since 2009 • 5763 Posts

So you're basically asking "are you a PS3 fanoy or 360 fanboy." Because that's what it'll boil down to. I don't get why we have to compare them, they're both great.

Avatar image for VendettaRed07
VendettaRed07

14012

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#75 VendettaRed07
Member since 2007 • 14012 Posts

as much as I love naughty dog, bungie all the way

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#76 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64057 Posts
[QUOTE="Nonstop-Madness"]Bungie because they are amazing. They made Halo ..... one of the greatest/most successful franchises of all time. Halo is still very much top dog FPS when it comes to features. Also people saying Bungie never made a game other than Halo ..... thats because MS wouldn't let them. djsifer01
What features are you referring 2? Halo has the most bland online component out of any FPS ive played.

you may not enjoy the multiplayer, but from a feature set it pretty much owns the console FPS space in that department. Forge/Theatre/Bungie.net A highly customizable MP to the point where you can have your serious game modes ala slayer, CTF, team swat, etc. But you have the more fun game modes like griffball, rocket race, dodgeball, boxing, team stickies, etc On top of that Halo 3 had a pretty well done campaign(although schizo in quality) with 4 player coop to boot. It's a game that still has splitscreen multiplayer and system link. As far as feature sets go, few games gave you bang for your buck like Halo 3 did. The price of the game couldn't really be questioned to be honest, only the overall quality. Which to you is bad, and to me is good. Which is fine, to each his own. But the feature set can't be denied in this case, compared to this generations shooters Halo 3 was pretty content loaded when it came out and only one other game really sticks out for content and customizability.
Avatar image for Kickinurass
Kickinurass

3357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 Kickinurass
Member since 2005 • 3357 Posts

[QUOTE="Nonstop-Madness"]Bungie because they are amazing. They made Halo ..... one of the greatest/most successful franchises of all time. Halo is still very much top dog FPS when it comes to features. Also people saying Bungie never made a game other than Halo ..... thats because MS wouldn't let them. djsifer01
What features are you referring 2? Halo has the most bland online component out of any FPS ive played.

He was probably referring to Theatre, Forge,Custom Games, 4 player campaign (Really seems like we're losing the co-op this gen... WTF) the metagame scoring, and B.net integration.

Suprisingly, playing through Perfect Dark has made me realize how feature packed that game was for its time as well. Shame so little of it caught on.

Avatar image for Persistantthug
Persistantthug

1420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 Persistantthug
Member since 2009 • 1420 Posts

[QUOTE="Persistantthug"]

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"] More critical acclaim is iffy. The only way to judge that would be to line up the MC (or GR) averages of all their games, and see who's got a higher score. However, there are obvious problems with that. And how long a dev house has been around doesn't mean anything in terms of what they make, just how much.jg4xchamp

I disagree.

It isn't the most critical factor, but "length of time" does count for something. You don't get to stay in business for over 20 years for being crappy.

In which case Bungie clearly isn't crappy considering they stayed in business for a decade before Halo, and another decade with halo, and are set for a new decade without halo.

Ok...fair enough. :)

Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#79 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12869 Posts
[QUOTE="Nonstop-Madness"]Bungie because they are amazing. They made Halo ..... one of the greatest/most successful franchises of all time. Halo is still very much top dog FPS when it comes to features. Also people saying Bungie never made a game other than Halo ..... thats because MS wouldn't let them. djsifer01
What features are you referring 2? Halo has the most bland online component out of any FPS ive played.

Forge, Theater Mode, Co-Op, Bungie.net are all great extra features that improve upon the main online experience that very few if any can replicate.
Avatar image for XanderZane
XanderZane

5174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#80 XanderZane
Member since 2006 • 5174 Posts
[QUOTE="XanderZane"][QUOTE="Persistantthug"]

This poll is complete with quick "research" cliff notes for your convienience and personal viewing pleasure, brought to you by our sponsers, WIKIPEDIA. ;)

BUNGIE

NAUGHTY DOG

jg4xchamp
I have to say Naughty Dog. Mainly because they have created more memorable titles then Bungie. The only games Bungie will be remembered for are Halo, Marathon, Myth and Oni. Only Halo was a big hit. Where as Naughty Dog did Rings of Power (Genesis), Way of the Warrior (3DO) Crash Bandicoot, Jax & Daxter and of course the Uncharted games. Besides Way of the Warrior, all the other games were good to great. I was lucky enough to interview Jason Rubin and Andy Gavin while they were doing Way of the Warrior. Even got to play the game before it was released. The control wasn't great mainly because the 3DO controllers sucked hard. The game felt like a Mortal Kombat knock off. Anyway, Jason and Andy were great guys and very talented developers back then and still are today. So I vote for Naughty Dog.

Ico was not a big hit compared to what other Sony First party titles do, and many will remember that game. I fail to see how Marathon and Myth won't be remembered by the Bungie faithful, and people who remember the old mac days.

I didn't even know what Marathon was when I first heard the name of the game and I have been gaming before Pong. lol!! Didn't even know it was a shooter. I had heard of Myth and I may even have a copy of that game somewhere. Don't get me wrong, both were good games, but you think gamers will remember those games more-so then Crash Bandicoot or Jax & Daxter? I do think so. Rings of Power was good too, but I know many gamers don't remember that game either. Naughty did other games before those as well.
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#81 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64057 Posts
[QUOTE="XanderZane"][QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="XanderZane"] I have to say Naughty Dog. Mainly because they have created more memorable titles then Bungie. The only games Bungie will be remembered for are Halo, Marathon, Myth and Oni. Only Halo was a big hit. Where as Naughty Dog did Rings of Power (Genesis), Way of the Warrior (3DO) Crash Bandicoot, Jax & Daxter and of course the Uncharted games. Besides Way of the Warrior, all the other games were good to great. I was lucky enough to interview Jason Rubin and Andy Gavin while they were doing Way of the Warrior. Even got to play the game before it was released. The control wasn't great mainly because the 3DO controllers sucked hard. The game felt like a Mortal Kombat knock off. Anyway, Jason and Andy were great guys and very talented developers back then and still are today. So I vote for Naughty Dog.

Ico was not a big hit compared to what other Sony First party titles do, and many will remember that game. I fail to see how Marathon and Myth won't be remembered by the Bungie faithful, and people who remember the old mac days.

I didn't even know what Marathon was when I first heard the name of the game and I have been gaming before Pong. lol!! Didn't even know it was a shooter. I had heard of Myth and I may even have a copy of that game somewhere. Don't get me wrong, both were good games, but you think gamers will remember those games more-so then Crash Bandicoot or Jax & Daxter? I do think so. Rings of Power was good too, but I know many gamers don't remember that game either. Naughty did other games before those as well.

Will it be remembered as much? No but quality is quality, and at the end of the day that's really what dictates a good developer is no? But I understand where you are coming from. Naugthy Dog has the commercial success to go along with the critical success for 3 franchises. Where as Bungie only has it for one franchise.
Avatar image for batman_is_aweso
batman_is_aweso

2762

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 batman_is_aweso
Member since 2009 • 2762 Posts

Naughty dog, halo and uncharted are even even both having their best game that was exclusive scoring a 9.5

but Jak and daxter tilts the scale to naughty dog for me but keep in mind ive never played the myth/oni stuff by bungie

Avatar image for Dataleak
Dataleak

1737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Dataleak
Member since 2010 • 1737 Posts

Not a fan of either of them. They both make cliche'd, non existent innovation, subpar games in my opinion.

Avatar image for hexashadow13
hexashadow13

5157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 hexashadow13
Member since 2010 • 5157 Posts
I would vote Bungie but now that they're partnered with Activision... Naughty Dog FTW!!!
Avatar image for Solid_Tango
Solid_Tango

8609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 Solid_Tango
Member since 2009 • 8609 Posts
ND hands down
Avatar image for coltsfan4ever
coltsfan4ever

2628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 coltsfan4ever
Member since 2006 • 2628 Posts

Both are great but I give a very very slight edge to ND. The Uncharted games are some of my favorites of all time.

Avatar image for Sh4nk3r
Sh4nk3r

282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 Sh4nk3r
Member since 2010 • 282 Posts
lol? 3 great series are better than a company that makes the SAME game 4 times, with better graphics. Crash, Jak, Uncharted series > Halo. by a longshot.
Avatar image for Persistantthug
Persistantthug

1420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 Persistantthug
Member since 2009 • 1420 Posts

lol? 3 great series are better than a company that makes the SAME game 4 times, with better graphics. Crash, Jak, Uncharted series > Halo. by a longshot.Sh4nk3r

:lol:

This is funny because it's ultimately true.

And sometimes........

sometimes they didn't even bother to do better graphics.

:lol:

lol

Avatar image for Persistantthug
Persistantthug

1420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Persistantthug
Member since 2009 • 1420 Posts

lol's aside, though....

I would like to submit, for fairness and honesty's sake,

MYTH was a critically acclaimed RTS series in the late 90's.

Bungie gets "points" for that.

Fair is fair...and truth is truth.

:)

Avatar image for richsena
richsena

435

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 richsena
Member since 2007 • 435 Posts

I voted for Naughty Dog and I don't think it's really close. Bungie caught fire in a bottle with the Halo series but I'm not confident in their ability to create another quality franchise. The last non-Halo game I played from Bungie was Oni, and that was a very mediocre (at best) game. Naughty Dog has delivered quality titles ever since Playstation with Crash Bandicoot. The Jak series prooved the devoloper was more than a one trick pony, churning out another top notch series. The Uncharted series speaks for itself this generation and in my opinion Bungie as a way to go to catch up to Naughty Dog.

Avatar image for Dataleak
Dataleak

1737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 Dataleak
Member since 2010 • 1737 Posts

lol? 3 great series are better than a company that makes the SAME game 4 times, with better graphics. Crash, Jak, Uncharted series > Halo. by a longshot.Sh4nk3r

I lol'd.

Avatar image for Boomshaffted
Boomshaffted

721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 Boomshaffted
Member since 2009 • 721 Posts
Oh good, I was wondering what the ratio of Cows to Lemmings in the forum was.
Avatar image for Persistantthug
Persistantthug

1420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 Persistantthug
Member since 2009 • 1420 Posts

I voted for Naughty Dog and I don't think it's really close. Bungie caught fire in a bottle with the Halo series but I'm not confident in their ability to create another quality franchise. The last non-Halo game I played from Bungie was Oni, and that was a very mediocre (at best) game. Naughty Dog has delivered quality titles ever since Playstation with Crash Bandicoot. The Jak series prooved the devoloper was more than a one trick pony, churning out another top notch series. The Uncharted series speaks for itself this generation and in my opinion Bungie as a way to go to catch up to Naughty Dog.

richsena

THIS

is what you call sound logic

However, like I said though, MYTH shouldn't be dismissed. It was being released around the Crash Bandicoot era....fair is fair, afterall. ;)

Avatar image for Sh4nk3r
Sh4nk3r

282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 Sh4nk3r
Member since 2010 • 282 Posts

[QUOTE="Sh4nk3r"]lol? 3 great series are better than a company that makes the SAME game 4 times, with better graphics. Crash, Jak, Uncharted series > Halo. by a longshot.Dataleak

I lol'd.

Its jak not jax..

Avatar image for _Fabrick_
_Fabrick_

512

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 _Fabrick_
Member since 2007 • 512 Posts

[QUOTE="Sh4nk3r"]lol? 3 great series are better than a company that makes the SAME game 4 times, with better graphics. Crash, Jak, Uncharted series > Halo. by a longshot.Dataleak

I lol'd.

lol

Avatar image for shadow8585
shadow8585

2947

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 shadow8585
Member since 2006 • 2947 Posts
Bungie did one thing great. ND has done multiple things very very good. I will say I dont think naughty dog is worth what Bungie is (as in they wont be getting the deal Bungie did from Activision anytime soon)
Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts
[QUOTE="Fightingfan"][QUOTE="Evz0rz"] Bungie made some really great games before Halo too...just saying. Personally I can't decide :PDarkLink77
Name them? Bungie only has had 5 IPs in 10 years and unless you're a hardcore mac fan you won't be able to name 3.

Gnop, Myth, Oni, Marathon, and teh Halos.

Cookie for you, did you do that your self or A LA Google?
Avatar image for Ravensmash
Ravensmash

13862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 Ravensmash
Member since 2010 • 13862 Posts

Not a fan of either of them. They both make cliche'd, non existent innovation, subpar games in my opinion.

Dataleak
...Bungie made a game that (IMO) threw online console gaming into the big time, they have a game from 3 years ago which still tops the charts in terms of 'most played'. And ND made Crash Bandicoot, I can't fault them for that :P Plus Uncharted 2 is fantastic from what I've played at a friends. Also...subpar games don't get huge amounts of critical praise, or threads like this.
Avatar image for Persistantthug
Persistantthug

1420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 Persistantthug
Member since 2009 • 1420 Posts

Bungie did one thing great. ND has done multiple things very very good. I will say I dont think naughty dog is worth what Bungie is (as in they wont be getting the deal Bungie did from Activision anytime soon)shadow8585

Lets be clear, because I have a feeling you are a bit misinformed...

UNCHARTED 2 is considered one of THE GREATEST games of alltime...right now.

Also, why would Naughty Dog go looking for a deal with Activision? They weren't foolish enough to sign with someone stiffling and uncreative in the first place (Microsoft), and they surely wouldn't back that up and sign with someone as greedy, stiffling as Activision...seriously....Sony's much better than both for game developers.

But out of curiosity, Why wouldn't Naughty Dog be worth as much if not more than Bungie? They are fresh off one of THE GREATEST games of alltime, with a very distinguished track record...more distinguished than Bungie...that's for sure.

Avatar image for jon_cia
jon_cia

680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 jon_cia
Member since 2004 • 680 Posts

Naughty Dog, Uncharted/Jak and Daxter/Crash bandicoot vs Halo and ................... Halo

3 AAA series vs 1 AAA

its no contest really