Which one would you buy? Call of Duty Black Ops 2 or Medal of Honor Wafighter

[QUOTE="Cheleman"]

LoosingENDS is a cow now!?

:D

JohnnyCageMK

Now that would be funny.

However, you gotta admit that lemmings were silly when they've been raving about a couple of Kinect shovelware getting an 8.5.

Neither,save your cash(or give it to me)MonsieurX

This is the correct answer. But if someone held a gun to my head and forced me to choose, I'd go with BLOPS2.

The studio making Warfighter has NEVER made a multiplayer shooter. The last medal of honor, they only did the single player campaign. And even having to only focus on single player they still managed to make a patheticly short 3 hour campaign. That 3 hours wasn't TERRIBLE, but it was still a bit glitchy and scripted. In this game that same studio is making the whole thing. Based on what they did previously (their proven record), and the fact the beta was suppesed to be a terrible mess, the safer choice for a game that actually works (and won't be a ghost town within weeks/months) is BLOPS 2.

Where's the option to flush both of them down my toilet?

Call of Duty:Black Ops 2 over MoH:Warfighter.....Halo 4 over them both anyday of the week.Can't wait,two and a half weeks left.:P

Forza Horizon.

Black Ops 2. No question.

I was going to buy neither, but I gave in and bought MoHW because it's 50% off for Battlefield 3 premium players. Hopefully the 50% price cut before launch is not a sign of desperation, but it probably is. But for $30, it's hard to dismiss MoH. Even if it is a blatant CoD rip off nowadays. I should still get enough entertainment out of it to make the price worth it.

Knowing me I'll end up with both. Why? I'm a whore for shooters.

Neither.

Definitely BO2 as it doesn't look quite as generic and dull and there seems to be some nice improvements for zombie mode. Still won't be getting it through.

Black Ops 2. I will play MoH eventually, but I know it won't be worth $60.

I'm getting Black Ops 2, but why are you letting other people decide for you?

I would pick MOH but that's because I don't game online and I enjoyed the story to the last MOH more than I did on most COD Games after 4.

Medal of Honor looks way better than that Black Ops Dlc. Wont be buying either of them though.

Medal of Honor is playing Catch up. The campaign gameplay looked so absolutely terrible and average that I really couldn't believe they were actually making the game.

I enjoy military FPS, so I'm betting both.

BO2 definitely

Warfighter has a better chance of having a good campaign, judging from the relative quality of BLOPS 1 and MOH 1.

Contrary to all the noise about how BLOPS was the "true successor to COD4", I found that MOH had a lot more of COD4's good points than any of the later COD games. It was still not a great game, but it was at least going in the right direction.

decision already made- cod bo 2 wii u preordered and paid in full

Neither. They both look sh*tty.DragonfireXZ95

then what would you prefer?

Warfighter has a better chance of having a good campaign, judging from the relative quality of BLOPS 1 and MOH 1.

Contrary to all the noise about how BLOPS was the "true successor to COD4", I found that MOH had a lot more of COD4's good points than any of the later COD games. It was still not a great game, but it was at least going in the right direction.

Cherokee_Jack

That was absolutely true, in terms ofthe Call of Duty series, though.

I'd go so far as to say, since World At War, Treyarch has been straight-up embarrassing Infinity Ward/Sledgehammer.

I'm personally going for Warfighter on PC. Blops had a lot of technical issues and I hated the level designs. Too close in, too many corners and too fast. Just means that running around and shooting people in the back was what most of the gameplay devolved into.

MOH had some issues, but the "scorechains" that you could use as offensive attacks or help your teammates out with body armour or different ammo types n such was pretty interesting, and the objective-based missions were fun to play. Some of the map designs had issues of their own, but overall I really enjoyed the pace and feel of the game.

I also like the sound of Warfighter's new buddy mechanic in MP games, where you will be teamed up within a team with either a friend or a random player, and you'll be able to spawn off them, heal them, provide extra ammo, and they will be able to do the same for you. I think it'll end up creating an interesting duo mechanic within team-based battles.

I'm gonna get both because I like both franchises.

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"]Neither. They both look sh*tty.CKYguy25

then what would you prefer?

[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"]

Warfighter has a better chance of having a good campaign, judging from the relative quality of BLOPS 1 and MOH 1.

Contrary to all the noise about how BLOPS was the "true successor to COD4", I found that MOH had a lot more of COD4's good points than any of the later COD games. It was still not a great game, but it was at least going in the right direction.

DarkLink77

That was absolutely true, in terms ofthe Call of Duty series, though.

Well I think we've been through this song and dance before.

I'll just say that I thought BLOPS had much more in common with MW2 than COD4, and I still don't understand why one could hate MW2 and love BLOPS. But the point is, I liked MOH better than BLOPS.

Did you start playing MOH yet? I'd recommend playing on Hard.

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="CKYguy25"]

then what would you prefer?

SNIPER4321

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="CKYguy25"]

then what would you prefer?

SNIPER4321

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="CKYguy25"]

then what would you prefer?

SNIPER4321

I'm not looking forward to these games and the only fps i'm getting this year is Far Cry 3.

sukraj

yeah at least that game doesn't completely rip off COD like MOH does. The singleplayer seems somewhat original.

Definitely picking up Black Ops 2, and don't think I'll be getting Medal of Honor.

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"]

[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"]

Warfighter has a better chance of having a good campaign, judging from the relative quality of BLOPS 1 and MOH 1.

Contrary to all the noise about how BLOPS was the "true successor to COD4", I found that MOH had a lot more of COD4's good points than any of the later COD games. It was still not a great game, but it was at least going in the right direction.

Cherokee_Jack

That was absolutely true, in terms ofthe Call of Duty series, though.

Well I think we've been through this song and dance before.

I'll just say that I thought BLOPS had much more in common with MW2 than COD4, and I still don't understand why one could hate MW2 and love BLOPS. But the point is, I liked MOH better than BLOPS.

Did you start playing MOH yet? I'd recommend playing on Hard.