Who are the big 3?

I voted for number 4. :D

Nintendo wii,ps3 and xbox 360

pc isnt popular to the casuals.

big three are NINTENDO,NINTENDO,NINTENDO

Quite obviously, it's Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft.

Whoever thinks Atari and Sega still belong in the big 3 must be stuck anywhere between 1985 and 1993.

Joseph Stalin,Franklin D. Roosevelt and Winston Churchill

None of those options.... why are you mixing game companies and platforms?

The big three are Sony, Nintendo and Microsoft.

Not Nintendo, PlayStation and Xbox. :roll:

PC, Sony and Nintendo.

I didn't know PC was a company.

I didn't know PC was a company.

sonicare

Neither is Playstation or Xbox. :|

None of those options.... why are you mixing game companies and platforms?

The big three are Sony, Nintendo and Microsoft.

Not Nintendo, PlayStation and Xbox. :roll:

NeonNinja

pc isnt popular to the casuals.

free_milk

[QUOTE="free_milk"]

pc isnt popular to the casuals.

Theverydeepend

[QUOTE="Theverydeepend"][QUOTE="free_milk"]

pc isnt popular to the casuals.

After_Math

Other is the only correct answer. Why? Simply because xbox and playstation are not companies, they are products from companies.

There should be a poll option for "Nintendo, Sony, Microsoft."

[QUOTE="After_Math"][QUOTE="Theverydeepend"] farmville and the thousand random crap games say otherwiseTheverydeepend

and Snake! you cant forget Snake !! :D

i voted for 4, xbox is downtrodden bulls***.. Playstation, Nintendo Wii and the PC are the future..

[QUOTE="Theverydeepend"][QUOTE="After_Math"] In that case, PC Wii and iOS.I_am_a_PS3_FB

and Snake! you cant forget Snake !! :D

i voted for 4, xbox is downtrodden bulls***.. Playstation, Nintendo Wii and the PC are the future..

How is wii better than 360? In fact how is ps3 better than 360, everything ps3 has was copied from xbox.

Sega, Nintendo, and PC.

[QUOTE="I_am_a_PS3_FB"]

[QUOTE="Theverydeepend"] more like ios, pc, and originial dsarsenal262

and Snake! you cant forget Snake !! :D

i voted for 4, xbox is downtrodden bulls***.. Playstation, Nintendo Wii and the PC are the future..

How is wii better than 360? In fact how is ps3 better than 360, everything ps3 has was copied from xbox.

lol, keep telling yourself that.

PC < PS3 and Wii < Xbox

and thats like saying the first mobile is better than a iphone, sure both do the same thing but the iphone does it better..

the xbox is ancient crap, the PS3 is somewhat ancient good-crap that can hold its own even in 2011 without relying on like 100,000,000 + shooter franchises

Doesn't MS kinda go with PC also? I mean some games when you install them say "microsoft games" and also another clue would be some pc exclusives are being stolen and ported to the xbox after their success.

[QUOTE="NeonNinja"]

None of those options.... why are you mixing game companies and platforms?

The big three are Sony, Nintendo and Microsoft.

Not Nintendo, PlayStation and Xbox. :roll:

dkdk999

lol becuz i like giving people a hard time for basic mistakes they shouldn't make. duh.

[QUOTE="arsenal262"]

[QUOTE="I_am_a_PS3_FB"]

and Snake! you cant forget Snake !! :D

i voted for 4, xbox is downtrodden bulls***.. Playstation, Nintendo Wii and the PC are the future..

I_am_a_PS3_FB

How is wii better than 360? In fact how is ps3 better than 360, everything ps3 has was copied from xbox.

lol, keep telling yourself that.

PC < PS3 and Wii < Xbox

and thats like saying the first mobile is better than a iphone, sure both do the same thing but the iphone does it better..

the xbox is ancient crap, the PS3 is somewhat ancient good-crap that can hold its own even in 2011 without relying on like 100,000,000 + shooter franchises

The PS3 has more exclusive shooter franchises than the Xbox 360.

The difference is that Xbox 360's shooters don't suck.

[QUOTE="arsenal262"]

[QUOTE="I_am_a_PS3_FB"]

and Snake! you cant forget Snake !! :D

i voted for 4, xbox is downtrodden bulls***.. Playstation, Nintendo Wii and the PC are the future..

I_am_a_PS3_FB

How is wii better than 360? In fact how is ps3 better than 360, everything ps3 has was copied from xbox.

lol, keep telling yourself that.

PC < PS3 and Wii < Xbox

and thats like saying the first mobile is better than a iphone, sure both do the same thing but the iphone does it better..

the xbox is ancient crap, the PS3 is somewhat ancient good-crap that can hold its own even in 2011 without relying on like 100,000,000 + shooter franchises

Pc is the best for graphics, agreed. Xbox had much better online, is much easier to develop on, has a much better gpu, faster read speeds, the list goes on. PS3 just has better media, thats pretty much it.:)

[QUOTE="I_am_a_PS3_FB"]

[QUOTE="arsenal262"]

How is wii better than 360? In fact how is ps3 better than 360, everything ps3 has was copied from xbox.

arsenal262

lol, keep telling yourself that.

PC < PS3 and Wii < Xbox

and thats like saying the first mobile is better than a iphone, sure both do the same thing but the iphone does it better..

the xbox is ancient crap, the PS3 is somewhat ancient good-crap that can hold its own even in 2011 without relying on like 100,000,000 + shooter franchises

Pc is the best for graphics, agreed. Xbox had much better online, is much easier to develop on, has a much better gpu, faster read speeds, the list goes on. PS3 just has better media, thats pretty much it.:)

and yet the ps3 is outselling the xbox, its far more popular worldwide.. face it people can toss around words like "GPU" "READ SPEED" "much easier to develop on" but nobody cares, I havent seen one gamer (who is also a socially/mentally normal person) who cares whether you could develop games easier for it or whether the crappy DVD drive turns faster.

grow up, Playstation is the stronger brand by far, in many countries xbox is virtually unknown (sorta like MS zune).

[QUOTE="arsenal262"]

[QUOTE="I_am_a_PS3_FB"]

lol, keep telling yourself that.

PC < PS3 and Wii < Xbox

and thats like saying the first mobile is better than a iphone, sure both do the same thing but the iphone does it better..

the xbox is ancient crap, the PS3 is somewhat ancient good-crap that can hold its own even in 2011 without relying on like 100,000,000 + shooter franchises

I_am_a_PS3_FB

Pc is the best for graphics, agreed. Xbox had much better online, is much easier to develop on, has a much better gpu, faster read speeds, the list goes on. PS3 just has better media, thats pretty much it.:)

and yet the ps3 is outselling the xbox, its far more popular worldwide.. face it people can toss around words like "GPU" "READ SPEED" "much easier to develop on" but nobody cares, I havent seen one gamer (who is also a socially/mentally normal person) who cares whether you could develop games easier for it or whether the crappy DVD drive turns faster.

grow up, Playstation is the stronger brand by far, in many countries xbox is virtually unknown (sorta like MS zune).

Um, dude the 360 has sold several millions more units than ps3. The fact that that 360 is easier to develop on means that mutiplats are created on 360 and then ported to ps3, meaning 360 has a superior version. So, yep that worked for you didnt it.

Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft.

PC isn't a company :O

Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft.

PC isn't a company :O

One Piece, Naruto and Bleach

[QUOTE="arsenal262"]

[QUOTE="I_am_a_PS3_FB"]

lol, keep telling yourself that.

PC < PS3 and Wii < Xbox

and thats like saying the first mobile is better than a iphone, sure both do the same thing but the iphone does it better..

the xbox is ancient crap, the PS3 is somewhat ancient good-crap that can hold its own even in 2011 without relying on like 100,000,000 + shooter franchises

I_am_a_PS3_FB

Pc is the best for graphics, agreed. Xbox had much better online, is much easier to develop on, has a much better gpu, faster read speeds, the list goes on. PS3 just has better media, thats pretty much it.:)

and yet the ps3 is outselling the xbox, its far more popular worldwide.. face it people can toss around words like "GPU" "READ SPEED" "much easier to develop on" but nobody cares, I havent seen one gamer (who is also a socially/mentally normal person) who cares whether you could develop games easier for it or whether the crappy DVD drive turns faster.

grow up, Playstation is the stronger brand by far, in many countries xbox is virtually unknown (sorta like MS zune).

[QUOTE="dkdk999"][QUOTE="NeonNinja"]

None of those options.... why are you mixing game companies and platforms?

The big three are Sony, Nintendo and Microsoft.

Not Nintendo, PlayStation and Xbox. :roll:

NeonNinja

lol becuz i like giving people a hard time for basic mistakes they shouldn't make. duh.

This gen:

Nintendo, Sony, and Microsoft

really, no duh

All time:

Nintendo, Sega, and Sony.

All had several highlly succesul generations, massive IPs, and been on several platforms.(consoles + handhelds)

Companies like Atari started it, but really were more one hit wonders of sorts, these^ 3 are the companies that defined gaming

Microsoft may replace Sega on that list in future, but predicting the future of gaming's tricky to say the least

This gen:

Nintendo, Sony, and Microsoft

really, no duh

All time:

Nintendo, Sega, and Sony.

All had several highlly succesul generations, massive IPs, and been on several platforms.(consoles + handhelds)

Companies like Atari started it, but really were more one hit wonders of sorts, these^ 3 are the companies that defined gaming

Microsoft may replace Sega on that list in future, but predicting the future of gaming's tricky to say the least

dercoo

[QUOTE="dercoo"]

This gen:

Nintendo, Sony, and Microsoft

really, no duh

All time:

Nintendo, Sega, and Sony.

All had several highlly succesul generations, massive IPs, and been on several platforms.(consoles + handhelds)

Companies like Atari started it, but really were more one hit wonders of sorts, these^ 3 are the companies that defined gaming

Microsoft may replace Sega on that list in future, but predicting the future of gaming's tricky to say the least

Aquaunitpatrol

Those 3 are much more important in defining modern gaming than Attarui

Nintendo, don't need to explain

Sony: PS2 alone means Sony>>>>>>Atari

Sega:Genis,Saturn,Dreamcast, + Sega IPs > Pong, 2600, 5200

Atari only had 2 huge consoles(only one if you don't count pong as its just 1 game)

[QUOTE="Aquaunitpatrol"]

[QUOTE="dercoo"]

This gen:

Nintendo, Sony, and Microsoft

really, no duh

All time:

Nintendo, Sega, and Sony.

All had several highlly succesul generations, massive IPs, and been on several platforms.(consoles + handhelds)

Companies like Atari started it, but really were more one hit wonders of sorts, these^ 3 are the companies that defined gaming

Microsoft may replace Sega on that list in future, but predicting the future of gaming's tricky to say the least

dercoo

Those 3 are much more important in defining modern gaming than Attarui

Nintendo, don't need to explain

Sony: PS2 alone means Sony>>>>>>Atari

Sega:Genis,Saturn,Dreamcast, + Sega IPs > Pong, 2600, 5200

Atari only had 2 huge consoles(only one if you don't count pong as its just 1 game)

[QUOTE="dercoo"]

[QUOTE="Aquaunitpatrol"] Elaborate one hit wonders, and elaborate it carefully.

Aquaunitpatrol

Those 3 are much more important in defining modern gaming than Attarui

Nintendo, don't need to explain

Sony: PS2 alone means Sony>>>>>>Atari

Sega:Genis,Saturn,Dreamcast, + Sega IPs > Pong, 2600, 5200

Atari only had 2 huge consoles(only one if you don't count pong as its just 1 game)

Nintendo defined the modern gaming company, revig the industry Atari almost destroyed

Sony redefined it with the PS1 & 2( never said becuase of sales, its because of quaility. PS2 had a jugernaught library of fanominal games)

Both have systems vying for best console ever (PS2 & SNES hover/jump between #1 & 2)

Both companies have huge collection of IPs, that still exist and thrive.

[QUOTE="Aquaunitpatrol"]

[QUOTE="dercoo"]

Those 3 are much more important in defining modern gaming than Attarui

Nintendo, don't need to explain

Sony: PS2 alone means Sony>>>>>>Atari

Sega:Genis,Saturn,Dreamcast, + Sega IPs > Pong, 2600, 5200

Atari only had 2 huge consoles(only one if you don't count pong as its just 1 game)

Nintendo defined the modern gaming company, revig the industry Atari almost destroyed

Sony redefined it with the PS1 & 2( never said becuase of sales, its because of quaility. PS2 had a jugernaught library of fanominal games)

Both have systems vying for best console ever (PS2 & SNES hover/jump between #1 & 2)

Both companies have huge collection of IPs, that still exist and thrive.

big three are NINTENDO,NINTENDO,NINTENDO

zeldisco2009

[QUOTE="dercoo"]

[QUOTE="Aquaunitpatrol"] Nintendo does need explaining. Because as of now, Atari has made more innovation hardware wise then Nintendo. PS2 sales equal defining of gaming? Sales don't define gaming, I guess Bieber defines music. If you think all Atari had pong 26, and 52 you're wrong. So I guess the Lynx wasn't huge and I also guess those highly successful Atari PC's (all models) don't exist?

Aquaunitpatrol

Nintendo defined the modern gaming company, revig the industry Atari almost destroyed

Sony redefined it with the PS1 & 2( never said becuase of sales, its because of quaility. PS2 had a jugernaught library of fanominal games)

Both have systems vying for best console ever (PS2 & SNES hover/jump between #1 & 2)

Both companies have huge collection of IPs, that still exist and thrive.

Every game made by 1st party, is game made by that company. A Naighty Dog game is a Sony game. Same applies for sucker Punch, Team Ico, so on

Nintendo set the mold for a modern gaming company. I not going to waste my time on a blind fanboy or troll that won't reconize what Nintendo done for the industry.

Unfortunately it ain't number four because we can't ignore Microsoft and the Xbox. Consoles have more popularity then pc's (because people are dumb.. just kidding)

[QUOTE="Aquaunitpatrol"][QUOTE="dercoo"]

Nintendo defined the modern gaming company, revig the industry Atari almost destroyed

Sony redefined it with the PS1 & 2( never said becuase of sales, its because of quaility. PS2 had a jugernaught library of fanominal games)

Both have systems vying for best console ever (PS2 & SNES hover/jump between #1 & 2)

Both companies have huge collection of IPs, that still exist and thrive.

Every game made by 1st party, is game made by that company. A Naighty Dog game is a Sony game. Same applies for sucker Punch, Team Ico, so on

Nintendo set the mold for a modern gaming company. I not going to waste my time on a blind fanboy or troll that won't reconize what Nintendo done for the industry.

Kreator, Sodom and Destruction.

This gen it's Nintendo, Sony and MS. And since Windows is a MS brand, PC goes under MS as well.

[QUOTE="dercoo"]

[QUOTE="Aquaunitpatrol"] Despite the word on the street Atari did not almost kill the industry, the people trying to beat Atari did or just thought pong was still relevant at the time. Which was not true. So those 10% OF PLAYABLE GAMES in the PS1 and Ps2 ridiculously arge library''s (Which again are full of crap.) equals redefining? Same can be said for the 2600. 2600 is on quite a few lists, not as many yeah, but I bet if I never but Dark Souls on a list for best game of all time years from now I's probably be punced on by fanboys. Atari has Ips that still exist as well. The problem with this is are you talking about IPS from the company or by the developers on the System, because if it's by the company itself Sony has barely made any games at all (Naughty Dogg is owned by Sony but Sony didn't make the game.) Describe how Nintendo defined the modern gaming company. Last I checked their methods at the time were illegal and the "Hardware innovations" people keep thinking they made are pure bs.Aquaunitpatrol

Every game made by 1st party, is game made by that company. A Naighty Dog game is a Sony game. Same applies for sucker Punch, Team Ico, so on

Nintendo set the mold for a modern gaming company. I not going to waste my time on a blind fanboy or troll that won't reconize what Nintendo done for the industry.

I simple don't wish to waste 30min typeing a history of Nintendo showing how they changed gaming for an unimportant low post count troll

Its like Windows fanboys refusing to archeology Steve Jobs as a revolutionary figure.

Hell, I won't waste my time on you when I could be using it to regine my college project,

but what hell. Here's an article for you if you want why

http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/article/367375/how_nintendo_nes_console_changed_gaming/