Who do you trust in Maximizing the PS3? Crytek, Id Software, Sony first party

  • 72 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for fend_oblivion
fend_oblivion

6760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#51 fend_oblivion
Member since 2006 • 6760 Posts

Damn... that's a hard choice. Imagine if all these people worked together. The result would be amazing.

Avatar image for Anastasia1997
Anastasia1997

641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Anastasia1997
Member since 2010 • 641 Posts

[QUOTE="johny300"][QUOTE="J-WOW"]You know what I dont get? Crytek said that "the 360 and PS3 are equally as powerfull" BUT then they say" the PS3 version of Crisis 2 is the lowest denominator", does that make any sense? IF they are equal in power, why cant your game the same for both platforms? Crytek is just going to take the easy way out and give us a bad port. Yeah I get it, the PS3 is harder to develop, but isnt Crytek like the best at maxing out anything and going in deep in tech?ferret-gamer

Good question.

PS3 requires more coding work to achieve the same level of fidelity. Thats why they consider it the lowest common denominatior

Ya, but 1st party titles from SONY look much better than C2 on consoles

Avatar image for windsquid9000
windsquid9000

3206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 windsquid9000
Member since 2009 • 3206 Posts

I'm going with Crytek. They say that CryEngine 3 came from their attempt to use C2 on consoles (and failing miserably) so they optimized the engine (all the while adding new features) to the point that it became a new engine entirely. They boast it's scalability and that it can get almost double the frame rate at comparable visual fidelity in CryEngine 2 and that it can take full advantage of whatever hardware it's run on.

Ya, but 1st party titles from SONY look much better than C2 on consoles

Anastasia1997

Cuz weve seen a gud representation of C2 on consoles, rite?

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#55 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]

[QUOTE="johny300"] Good question.Anastasia1997

PS3 requires more coding work to achieve the same level of fidelity. Thats why they consider it the lowest common denominatior

Ya, but 1st party titles from SONY look much better than C2 on consoles

Not really from what i have seen.

Avatar image for Pug-Nasty
Pug-Nasty

8508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#56 Pug-Nasty
Member since 2009 • 8508 Posts

I don't even trust Crytek or Id to make aiming feel good on analog sticks. Sony's first party is second to none in quality.

Avatar image for tagyhag
tagyhag

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 tagyhag
Member since 2007 • 15874 Posts

I'm going to go with Sony's first party. They don't have to divide their resources amongst multiple platforms and can focus 100% on the PS3. I Think when Naughty Dog announces Uncharted 3 and shows some gameplay we will see the pinnacle of graphics for this gen of consoles.

If not them, than i'd go with Crytek

BPoole96
Agreed.
Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

I'm going with Crytek. They say that CryEngine 3 came from their attempt to use C2 on consoles (and failing miserably) so they optimized the engine (all the while adding new features) to the point that it became a new engine entirely. They boast it's scalability and that it can get almost double the frame rate at comparable visual fidelity in CryEngine 2 and that it can take full advantage of whatever hardware it's run on.

[QUOTE="Anastasia1997"]

Ya, but 1st party titles from SONY look much better than C2 on consoles

windsquid9000

Cuz weve seen a gud representation of C2 on consoles, rite?

We'll see. Crysis and warhead had some things like memory leaks and rendering issues that they never fixed.

Can't afford to be that sloppy on a console.

Avatar image for Kokuro_Kun
Kokuro_Kun

2339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Kokuro_Kun
Member since 2009 • 2339 Posts
Valve.ferret-gamer
Joke. because Valve hasn't worked on the PS3 and released a game.
Avatar image for Kokuro_Kun
Kokuro_Kun

2339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 Kokuro_Kun
Member since 2009 • 2339 Posts

[QUOTE="Anastasia1997"]

[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"] PS3 requires more coding work to achieve the same level of fidelity. Thats why they consider it the lowest common denominatior

ferret-gamer

Ya, but 1st party titles from SONY look much better than C2 on consoles

Not really from what i have seen.

You should see more.
Avatar image for hd5870corei7
hd5870corei7

1612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#61 hd5870corei7
Member since 2010 • 1612 Posts

Naughty Dawg.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#62 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts
[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"]

[QUOTE="Anastasia1997"] Ya, but 1st party titles from SONY look much better than C2 on consoles

Kokuro_Kun

Not really from what i have seen.

You should see more.

then tell me what sony first party looks much better than crysis 2 on console?
Avatar image for J-WOW
J-WOW

3105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 J-WOW
Member since 2010 • 3105 Posts

Square Enix!

AznKSor
You cant be serious. SE dun goof'ed up this gen, they have been pretty bad so far
Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#64 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

[QUOTE="Kokuro_Kun"][QUOTE="ferret-gamer"] Not really from what i have seen.

ferret-gamer

You should see more.

then tell me what sony first party looks much better than crysis 2 on console?

I can say this, no one can answer that particular query since Crysis 2 hasn't been released on consoles.

We can't analyze the Finished product of Crysis 2, sadly. That day will come, for sure though. Rest assured though, Crysis 2 will be released and scrutinized.

Many in SW probably have been down this road before, looking at bullshots, PR shots, causing confusion regarding Alan Wake, Metro 2033, and even GeoW2. People saw PC grabs, polished unfinished games and tried to make declarations only to find the Finished game looked good, but not what they initially thought.

Companies can hide and selectively release screens and videos...that why we wait until the game is released from the companies to see what is real and what is not.

Unfortunately, that is one of many reasons why we can only ACCURATELY compare finished products to each other.:P

Avatar image for soulitane
soulitane

15091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#65 soulitane
Member since 2010 • 15091 Posts
[QUOTE="AznKSor"]

Square Enix!

J-WOW
You cant be serious. SE dun goof'ed up this gen, they have been pretty bad so far

At making great graphical games they have goofed up?
Avatar image for GTSaiyanjin2
GTSaiyanjin2

6018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#66 GTSaiyanjin2
Member since 2005 • 6018 Posts

Well I dont trust Crytec considering how badly optimized the 1st Crysis was compared to Warhead. So yeah I go with Sony 1st party then id Softwear.

Avatar image for GTSaiyanjin2
GTSaiyanjin2

6018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#67 GTSaiyanjin2
Member since 2005 • 6018 Posts

[QUOTE="J-WOW"][QUOTE="AznKSor"]

Square Enix!

soulitane

You cant be serious. SE dun goof'ed up this gen, they have been pretty bad so far

At making great graphical games they have goofed up?

yeah FF13 is one of the best looking games on both consoles, even the 360 version that was 540p looked great :o

Avatar image for tagyhag
tagyhag

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 tagyhag
Member since 2007 • 15874 Posts

Well I dont trust Crytec considering how badly optimized the 1st Crysis was compared to Warhead. So yeah I go with Sony 1st party then id Softwear.

GTSaiyanjin2
I played both and honestly, I saw no difference in fps. :P
Avatar image for soulitane
soulitane

15091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#69 soulitane
Member since 2010 • 15091 Posts

[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="J-WOW"] You cant be serious. SE dun goof'ed up this gen, they have been pretty bad so farGTSaiyanjin2

At making great graphical games they have goofed up?

yeah FF13 is one of the best looking games on both consoles, even the 360 version that was 540p looked great :o

That's what I was thinking :P
Avatar image for GTSaiyanjin2
GTSaiyanjin2

6018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70 GTSaiyanjin2
Member since 2005 • 6018 Posts

[QUOTE="GTSaiyanjin2"]

Well I dont trust Crytec considering how badly optimized the 1st Crysis was compared to Warhead. So yeah I go with Sony 1st party then id Softwear.

tagyhag

I played both and honestly, I saw no difference in fps. :P

I played both about a month ago, and I can run Warhead at 60+ fps at enthusiast settings. And on the original Crysis at really High, i think thats what the max setting is called I could only get 35-45 fps, compare to warhead it was not smooth at all.

Avatar image for tagyhag
tagyhag

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 tagyhag
Member since 2007 • 15874 Posts

[QUOTE="tagyhag"][QUOTE="GTSaiyanjin2"]

Well I dont trust Crytec considering how badly optimized the 1st Crysis was compared to Warhead. So yeah I go with Sony 1st party then id Softwear.

GTSaiyanjin2

I played both and honestly, I saw no difference in fps. :P

I played both about a month ago, and I can run Warhead at 60+ fps at enthusiast settings. And on the original Crysis at really High, i think thats what the max setting is called I could only get 35-45 fps, compare to warhead it was not smooth at all.

That's weird. Maybe it was because I play Crysis modded. :D
Avatar image for yodogpollywog
yodogpollywog

267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 yodogpollywog
Member since 2010 • 267 Posts
sony sad part is you cant even trust anyone to maximize 360's hardware not even microsoft.