Who here is content with actual next gen graphics?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for slystallion26
slystallion26

819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 slystallion26
Member since 2005 • 819 Posts

i remember that first madden video shown in 2005 and well madden came no where near that target render

And yes i am playing on an hdtv

Gears of war looks good and all but is no where near realistic or what i expected from next gen graphics....

crysis might be the closest thing to my expectations...but pc gaming requires so much upkeep

Avatar image for confucioussayyo
confucioussayyo

2521

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 confucioussayyo
Member since 2007 • 2521 Posts

i remember that first madden video shown in 2005 and well madden came no where near that target render

And yes i am playing on an hdtv

Gears of war looks good and all but is no where near realistic or what i expected from next gen graphics....

crysis might be the closest thing to my expectations...but pc gaming requires so much upkeep

slystallion26
Is there a point to this thread? What are we talking about?
Avatar image for spinecaton
spinecaton

8986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 spinecaton
Member since 2003 • 8986 Posts
If I want perfect realism, I'll go outside. I just want to be entertained both mentally(gameplay) and visually(graphics). As long as games don't revert back to N64 graphics, I could really care less.
Avatar image for frankeyser
frankeyser

5667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#4 frankeyser
Member since 2004 • 5667 Posts

personally i was happy with n-64 graphics. i was fine with last gens graphics and i am fine with this gens graphics. i am blown away when i see things like finaly fantasy advent children a cg movie that will take a couple more generations of consoles to reach. but i dont want games to ever look like real life because... i live in real life... i can see it all day long. if i want to do something in real life i will. in a game i see it as a fantasy world. a place to escape real life. so i am fine with how graphics are.

Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#5 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts

I don't want photo realism. Crysis looks amazing, but does not look photo realistic to me when actually playing the beta.

Anyways, I prefer the artistic style of games like Eternal Sonata.

Avatar image for Newnab
Newnab

3081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#6 Newnab
Member since 2006 • 3081 Posts
Gears of War/Halo 3/Mass Effect graphics are fine by me...
Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#7 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts
you expected too much.
Avatar image for gromit007
gromit007

3024

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 gromit007
Member since 2006 • 3024 Posts
Graphics are the LEAST important part in making a game fun. Sure, they can make games more interesting, but they are hardly necessary.
Avatar image for NECR0CHILD313
NECR0CHILD313

7025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 NECR0CHILD313
Member since 2006 • 7025 Posts

I personally think realistic styles are a crappy way to go. It basically puts a big expiration date on the game and it starts looking crappy in comparison to other games rather quickly.

I'd be happier if they pump the resources into lighting and the like. Somewhat cartoonish styles such as the Blizzard games and the upcoming TF2 is what I prefer, Starcraft 1 may be horribly dated but it's not like it's an eyesore when you go back and play it, unlike more realistically styled games where you find yourself nitpicking when you fire it back up.

Avatar image for Elektrik-Blu
Elektrik-Blu

335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Elektrik-Blu
Member since 2007 • 335 Posts
I agree with most people here, the graphics are fine. They aren't really important or just not as important as everything else, unless of course you happen to be a Playstation 3 fan, then I guess it means the world to you.
Avatar image for cooldude855
cooldude855

209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 cooldude855
Member since 2007 • 209 Posts
I think the graphics sucks iam very dissapointed with this gen.
Avatar image for confucioussayyo
confucioussayyo

2521

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 confucioussayyo
Member since 2007 • 2521 Posts
I agree with most people here, the graphics are fine. They aren't really important or just not as important as everything else, unless of course you happen to be a Playstation 3 fan, then I guess it means the world to you. Elektrik-Blu
I smell an uninformed biased idiot... :) Anywho, I get it now. Graphics are always second to gameplay. You could have the shiniest piece of crap in the world, and I would still play the ugly game that is fun.
Avatar image for hopedead
hopedead

232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 hopedead
Member since 2006 • 232 Posts
Im happy with the graphics. Although some of the videos from pre-next gen were much more impressive.
Avatar image for ocdog45
ocdog45

9072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 143

User Lists: 0

#14 ocdog45
Member since 2005 • 9072 Posts

while they do look better, not one game looks real to me. the only thing that goning to come clsoe is grand tourismo 5.

i remember that first madden video shown in 2005 and well madden came no where near that target render

And yes i am playing on an hdtv

Gears of war looks good and all but is no where near realistic or what i expected from next gen graphics....

crysis might be the closest thing to my expectations...but pc gaming requires so much upkeep

slystallion26
Avatar image for sadikovic
sadikovic

3868

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#15 sadikovic
Member since 2004 • 3868 Posts

Im affraid you got reiled in with the bait that companys hooked on with their march of "my system is powerfuller then yours" mumbo jumbu that happens during each E3 before the console is released.

As long as the graphics are better than last gen Im happy which they are so im :) but I guess if you wanted CGI go watch toystory and move the controller around... hey who knows maybe youll be tricked as easily as you where by those videos.

Avatar image for slystallion26
slystallion26

819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 slystallion26
Member since 2005 • 819 Posts

Im affraid you got reiled in with the bait that companys hooked on with their march of "my system is powerfuller then yours" mumbo jumbu that happens during each E3 before the console is released.

As long as the graphics are better than last gen Im happy which they are so im :) but I guess if you wanted CGI go watch toystory and move the controller around... hey who knows maybe youll be tricked as easily as you where by those videos.

sadikovic

Thanks for the insult by the way...but you can't help but look at game like gran turismo prologue and be mesmerized....I know i can't be the only that expected more...

it sounds like you guys are drinking the kool-aid or something. The graphics don't have to be photorealistic though maybe have a higher depth of vision that is more realistic to how we see

Avatar image for OGTiago
OGTiago

6546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#17 OGTiago
Member since 2005 • 6546 Posts
Me.
Avatar image for ken_gamer
ken_gamer

7522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#18 ken_gamer
Member since 2003 • 7522 Posts
Realism is not my thing to be honest. I'm playing Okami now and it looks amazing. I got headaches from playing Half-Life 2 cos it looked a bit too real and the boat rocking didn't do me any favours. So I'd say I'm content with next-gen graphics now.
Avatar image for dream431ca
dream431ca

10165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 dream431ca
Member since 2003 • 10165 Posts
IMO it will be very hard to differentiate the graphics from games right now to games coming out in the next 5 years. It's mostly about advanced shader and animation effects now. Textures are gonna remain relatively the same from game to game.
Avatar image for USSJAndrew
USSJAndrew

5042

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#20 USSJAndrew
Member since 2004 • 5042 Posts
Halo 3 graphics are exactly what I wanted. Perfect mix of technical and art to me. Killzone 2 looks nice and so does mass effect.
Avatar image for elite_ferns1
elite_ferns1

1232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 elite_ferns1
Member since 2006 • 1232 Posts

I don't want photo realism. Crysis looks amazing, but does not look photo realistic to me when actually playing the beta.

Anyways, I prefer the artistic style of games like Eternal Sonata.

BioShockOwnz

same, if a game has uninspiring art, it could have photorealistic graphics and i still won't like it is the graphics department. That is why i consoder halo and es the best games of this gen graphically

Avatar image for BuryMe
BuryMe

22017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 104

User Lists: 0

#22 BuryMe
Member since 2004 • 22017 Posts
No. While games look techinically good, they have little to no artistic appeal. I would rather look at ratchet and clank than GeoW
Avatar image for Always-Honest
Always-Honest

11261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Always-Honest
Member since 2007 • 11261 Posts

gears isn't meant to be realistic. This gen game are good looking enough to enjoy.

you're expectations are too hight. Interactivity requiers so much more power and labour than just movies..

Avatar image for myke2010
myke2010

2747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 myke2010
Member since 2002 • 2747 Posts
This gen's graphics are fine. If you think there's not a big enough leap form last gen just go look at some of the titles that came out for the first year or so of the last gen consoles. They honestly look like trash compared to today's games. What so many people fail to realize is graphics typically slowly improve over time, so it's sometimes easy to overlook just how big an improvement there's really been in the last 5 years. The same thing will happen again next gen.
Avatar image for mattyomo99
mattyomo99

3915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 mattyomo99
Member since 2005 • 3915 Posts

graphics is not what gaming is about. graphics give the wow factor, andallow for the progression of games.

in the 2d gen, FPS where not possible

in the 64/ps gen voice acting wasnt possible

in the ps2/GC/xbox gen games took a huge step into becoming more realistic

and now this gen we have better graphics which allow for games to be almost life like. excluding the wii of course there still last gen graphics