on full specs?
To me it is a little disappointing.
Sony will tell you that the PS3 is so powerful, and it is future-proof, but it can't run Crysis at full specs because it doesn't have DX10.
I guess PS3 isn't built for the next 10 years. :(
This topic is locked from further discussion.
on full specs?
To me it is a little disappointing.
Sony will tell you that the PS3 is so powerful, and it is future-proof, but it can't run Crysis at full specs because it doesn't have DX10.
I guess PS3 isn't built for the next 10 years. :(
At least PS3 can run Oblivion like a high-end PC.... unlike some other console we know.KeyWiiIt can run a 1 year old port. Wow. That must be amazing.
At least PS3 can run Oblivion like a high-end PC.... unlike some other console we know.KeyWii
1) No it can't. The PC still slaughters it.
2) Even if it did, an extra year of development time will do that for ya. :wink:
Sony will tell you that the PS3 is so powerful, and it is future-proof, but it can't run Crysis at full specs because it doesn't have DX10.BioShockOwnzDirectX 10.0 is programming interface, it doesn't give you special magic abilities, it just makes things easier to do. Most consoles have their own specific programming interfaces that come with dev kits. If Sony (or Microsoft or Nintendo) wanted they could implement the functionality of DirectX 10 into an update of their own API's. I'm tired of people acting like Direct X 10 is something more then a bunch of classes, functions, and variables. That's all it is.
I hate to point out the obvious, but the 360 can't run Crysis in DX10 either. While the 360 does have *some* of the unified shader features of DX10, it still doesn't have DX10. Just suck it up and buy/build a good gaming PC, I am. Why? Because I'm a hardcore gamer, not a fanboy.I build my own PC's and I am upgrading it as soon as DX10 releases. Also 360 never claimed to be future-proofed for the next 10 years....that was PS3. This is why I brought it up to PS3 gamers. The console is already dated once Crysis and DX10 arrives.
bullfrogj3
Im more curious why 90% of your posts are anti PS3 yet you claim to be a proud owner of the PS3 in your sig. If you hate it so much why dont you sell it and buy games for the systems you dont hate?echelonNo I have plenty of pro PS3 posts, you just miss those ones.
At least PS3 can run Oblivion like a high-end PC.... unlike some other console we know.KeyWii
[QUOTE="bullfrogj3"]I hate to point out the obvious, but the 360 can't run Crysis in DX10 either. While the 360 does have *some* of the unified shader features of DX10, it still doesn't have DX10. Just suck it up and buy/build a good gaming PC, I am. Why? Because I'm a hardcore gamer, not a fanboy.I build my own PC's and I am upgrading it as soon as DX10 releases. Also 360 never claimed to be future-proofed for the next 10 years....that was PS3. This is why I brought it up to PS3 gamers. The console is already dated once Crysis and DX10 arrives.
BioShockOwnz
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="bullfrogj3"]I hate to point out the obvious, but the 360 can't run Crysis in DX10 either. While the 360 does have *some* of the unified shader features of DX10, it still doesn't have DX10. Just suck it up and buy/build a good gaming PC, I am. Why? Because I'm a hardcore gamer, not a fanboy.I build my own PC's and I am upgrading it as soon as DX10 releases. Also 360 never claimed to be future-proofed for the next 10 years....that was PS3. This is why I brought it up to PS3 gamers. The console is already dated once Crysis and DX10 arrives.
bullfrogj3
[QUOTE="KeyWii"]At least PS3 can run Oblivion like a high-end PC.... unlike some other console we know.bullfrogj3
So not having horse armor makes the game suck now? Where have I missed this?
At least PS3 can run Oblivion like a high-end PC.... unlike some other console we know.KeyWii
It's not so much a PS3 thing, as a console thing. Each generation the PC pulls away and just can't be followed.Exactly. Ken Kutaragi called it a "super computer". It is supposed to be future-proof, and last 10 years. I guess it's outdated by the end of 2007 then. Once again the PC is proven to be better.
However, Sony did say the PS3 would replace PCs, yet similar hype was around for the Emotion Engine and the PS2.
Danm_999
[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]PS3 = OPEN GL
PC and X360 = DX
Devs can simulate any kind of visual effects in the game for PS3.
useLOGIC
link?
the new Warhawk game for ps3 is using ray tracing effects...
That still looks better than Halo 3.KeyWiiI don't care. I'm a PC gamer first and foremost, so I will always be playing better games then on console.
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]Warhawk:
ROFL!
chrismunx
Okay. That got me to laugh. lol. You serious? That's ground fight Warhawk? What the crap happened with that game anyway? It just vaporware now?
This is what the multiplayer will look like.[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]Sony will tell you that the PS3 is so powerful, and it is future-proof, but it can't run Crysis at full specs because it doesn't have DX10.Zerostatic0DirectX 10.0 is programming interface, it doesn't give you special magic abilities, it just makes things easier to do. Most consoles have their own specific programming interfaces that come with dev kits. If Sony (or Microsoft or Nintendo) wanted they could implement the functionality of DirectX 10 into an update of their own API's. I'm tired of people acting like Direct X 10 is something more then a bunch of classes, functions, and variables. That's all it is.
I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.BioShockOwnza lemming hiding behind the hermit tag, lets be honest you are just a sony hater like most lemmings here, and your thread should be locked cus its a waste of internet space
[QUOTE="KeyWii"]That still looks better than Halo 3.BioShockOwnzIsn't the Cell future-proof? Guess not. Despite that being a really bad screenshot, obviously taken off-screen with a camera, I had never seen it before. Looks like garbage there, but the game is still in development.
I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.BioShockOwnzThe PS3 will be around a lot longer than your PC and it's current (already obsolete) Â hardware and it will also have games that will push certain DX 10 cards mainly because they will not be optimized to run on the PC just like Crysis is not optimized to run on the PS3.
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.Me_Ur_Daddya lemming hiding behind the hermit tag, lets be honest you are just a sony hater like most lemmings here, and your thread should be locked cus its a waste of internet space Haha, I own a PS3, 360, and a PC. Try again pal. This argument is fine. Why can't a future-proof console play a game that comes out less then a year after it's launch? Doesn't sound future-proof to me.
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]That still looks better than Halo 3.KeyWiiIsn't the Cell future-proof? Guess not. Despite that being a really bad screenshot, obviously taken off-screen with a camera, I had never seen it before. Looks like garbage there, but the game is still in development. http://ps3.qj.net/Havok-4-5-Enjoy-ALL-your-SPUs-in-FULL-PS3/pg/49/aid/80351
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.DaddyDC650The PS3 will be around a lot longer than your PC and it's current hardware and it will also have games that will push certain DX 10 cards mainly because they will not be optimized to run on the PC just like Crysis is not optimized to run on the PS3. Directx 10 isn't the only reason Crysis can't run on a PS3. The austere RAM and HDD are another factor.
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.DaddyDC650The PS3 will be around a lot longer than your PC and it's current hardware and it will also have games that will push certain DX 10 cards mainly because they will not be optimized to run on the PC just like Crysis is not optimized to run on the PS3. Well I have a PS3, and I will continue upgrading my PC, so my PC will always be better.
[QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.BioShockOwnza lemming hiding behind the hermit tag, lets be honest you are just a sony hater like most lemmings here, and your thread should be locked cus its a waste of internet space Haha, I own a PS3, 360, and a PC. Try again pal. This argument is fine. Why can't a future-proof console play a game that comes out less then a year after it's launch? Doesn't sound future-proof to me. Why would anyone who owns the PS3 hate on it they way you are?
[QUOTE="Zerostatic0"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]Sony will tell you that the PS3 is so powerful, and it is future-proof, but it can't run Crysis at full specs because it doesn't have DX10.Bebi_vegetaDirectX 10.0 is programming interface, it doesn't give you special magic abilities, it just makes things easier to do. Most consoles have their own specific programming interfaces that come with dev kits. If Sony (or Microsoft or Nintendo) wanted they could implement the functionality of DirectX 10 into an update of their own API's. I'm tired of people acting like Direct X 10 is something more then a bunch of classes, functions, and variables. That's all it is.
[QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.BioShockOwnza lemming hiding behind the hermit tag, lets be honest you are just a sony hater like most lemmings here, and your thread should be locked cus its a waste of internet space Haha, I own a PS3, 360, and a PC. Try again pal. This argument is fine. Why can't a future-proof console play a game that comes out less then a year after it's launch? Doesn't sound future-proof to me.different architecture DURRR, your logic fails so hard its sad really, the real question is why cant 360 run it since it has teh "tri-core" and its architecture is identical to PCs, and lemmings say 360 has all the important features of DX10 ?
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.KeyWiia lemming hiding behind the hermit tag, lets be honest you are just a sony hater like most lemmings here, and your thread should be locked cus its a waste of internet space Haha, I own a PS3, 360, and a PC. Try again pal. This argument is fine. Why can't a future-proof console play a game that comes out less then a year after it's launch? Doesn't sound future-proof to me. Why would anyone who owns the PS3 hate on it they way you are? Because I work for the darkside, haha. No, I am just being honest here, and not hiding the facts that it is a flawed console and isn't built for the future.
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.Me_Ur_Daddya lemming hiding behind the hermit tag, lets be honest you are just a sony hater like most lemmings here, and your thread should be locked cus its a waste of internet space Haha, I own a PS3, 360, and a PC. Try again pal. This argument is fine. Why can't a future-proof console play a game that comes out less then a year after it's launch? Doesn't sound future-proof to me.different architecture DURRR, your logic fails so hard its sad really, the real question is why cant 360 run it since it has teh "tri-core" and its architecture is identical to PCs, and lemmings say 360 has all the important features of DX10 ? 360 runs Gears of War. Nothing that is out for PS3 looks that good. Your post failed. Fission Mailed.
[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.Me_Ur_Daddya lemming hiding behind the hermit tag, lets be honest you are just a sony hater like most lemmings here, and your thread should be locked cus its a waste of internet space Haha, I own a PS3, 360, and a PC. Try again pal. This argument is fine. Why can't a future-proof console play a game that comes out less then a year after it's launch? Doesn't sound future-proof to me. Why would anyone who owns the PS3 hate on it they way you are? cus hes just a spoiled little brat, mommy buys him everything he asks for, hes probably paris hiltons cousin or something, trust fund baby :lol: Actually I am in college and I have a fiance, and I am far from rich. I am comfortable. No reason for insults.
Edit: Soon to be Fiance come Valentine's Day. :)
[QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.BioShockOwnza lemming hiding behind the hermit tag, lets be honest you are just a sony hater like most lemmings here, and your thread should be locked cus its a waste of internet space Haha, I own a PS3, 360, and a PC. Try again pal. This argument is fine. Why can't a future-proof console play a game that comes out less then a year after it's launch? Doesn't sound future-proof to me.different architecture DURRR, your logic fails so hard its sad really, the real question is why cant 360 run it since it has teh "tri-core" and its architecture is identical to PCs, and lemmings say 360 has all the important features of DX10 ? 360 runs Gears of War. Nothing that is out for PS3 looks that good. Your post failed. Fission Mailed. Gears of War had 5 years of development. This was expected for xbox.
[QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.BioShockOwnza lemming hiding behind the hermit tag, lets be honest you are just a sony hater like most lemmings here, and your thread should be locked cus its a waste of internet space Haha, I own a PS3, 360, and a PC. Try again pal. This argument is fine. Why can't a future-proof console play a game that comes out less then a year after it's launch? Doesn't sound future-proof to me.different architecture DURRR, your logic fails so hard its sad really, the real question is why cant 360 run it since it has teh "tri-core" and its architecture is identical to PCs, and lemmings say 360 has all the important features of DX10 ? 360 runs Gears of War. Nothing that is out for PS3 looks that good. Your post failed. Fission Mailed. you didnt answer my question so you were owned and you fail, i bet you feel real lost;) now huh ?D-D-D-D-D-DURRRRRRRRR.only the character models in gears looks awesome, the environments look like utter **** and the game never has more than a handful of people on screen at a time, and physics are almost non existent especially compared to RFOM
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.Me_Ur_Daddya lemming hiding behind the hermit tag, lets be honest you are just a sony hater like most lemmings here, and your thread should be locked cus its a waste of internet space Haha, I own a PS3, 360, and a PC. Try again pal. This argument is fine. Why can't a future-proof console play a game that comes out less then a year after it's launch? Doesn't sound future-proof to me.different architecture DURRR, your logic fails so hard its sad really, the real question is why cant 360 run it since it has teh "tri-core" and its architecture is identical to PCs, and lemmings say 360 has all the important features of DX10 ? Crytek's lead developer seems to think it has something to do with it's inadequate power. http://www.joystiq.com/2006/08/30/crytek-says-360-and-ps3-cant-handle-crysis/ Also, why do you keep falling back on the "attack Lemmings" defense? We aren't talking about Lemmings here. We're talking about the PS3 and it's supposed status as a 10 year potential console, that will replace the PC.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment