Who is disappointed that Crysis will never be able to run on the PS3....

  • 163 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Spartan070
Spartan070

16497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Spartan070
Member since 2004 • 16497 Posts
Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.KeyWii
Because consoles are collectible.
Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#53 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts
If anyone can do it, it'll be the 360.
Avatar image for Me_Ur_Daddy
Me_Ur_Daddy

155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Me_Ur_Daddy
Member since 2007 • 155 Posts
[QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.BioShockOwnz
a lemming hiding behind the hermit tag, lets be honest you are just a sony hater like most lemmings here, and your thread should be locked cus its a waste of internet space

Haha, I own a PS3, 360, and a PC. Try again pal. This argument is fine. Why can't a future-proof console play a game that comes out less then a year after it's launch? Doesn't sound future-proof to me.

Why would anyone who owns the PS3 hate on it they way you are?

cus hes just a spoiled little brat, mommy buys him everything he asks for, hes probably paris hiltons cousin or something, trust fund baby :lol:

Actually I am in college and I have a fiance, and I am far from rich. I am comfortable. No reason for insults.

just a joke calm down, how would i really know who you were i dont have interweb-phsycic powas
Avatar image for KeyWii
KeyWii

4884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#55 KeyWii
Member since 2006 • 4884 Posts
[QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.Spartan070
Because consoles are collectible.

No. It's $500 or $600. You don't buy it right out of the gate as a collectible. You let the price drop significantly and then buy it... thats a collectible.
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#56 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts
Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.KeyWii
Because I wanted the Blu-Ray Player for HD movies. :) Glad you got your answer?
Avatar image for johnnycoolbreez
johnnycoolbreez

1105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 johnnycoolbreez
Member since 2005 • 1105 Posts
I don't care what it's on, I'll pass.
Avatar image for KeyWii
KeyWii

4884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 KeyWii
Member since 2006 • 4884 Posts
[QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.BioShockOwnz
Because I wanted the Blu-Ray Player for HD movies. :) Glad you got your answer?

No. You could have bought the HD-DVD addon for your 360. Doesn't add up if you hate the console. But let's say you did buy it to play HD movies, doesn't that contradict your claim that it's not future proof?
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#59 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts
[QUOTE="Spartan070"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.KeyWii
Because consoles are collectible.

No. It's $500 or $600. You don't buy it right out of the gate as a collectible. You let the price drop significantly and then buy it... thats a collectible.

A Sony Blu-Ray Player....$1,000. A Sony Playstation 3.......$600.
Avatar image for nextgengaming18
nextgengaming18

2719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#60 nextgengaming18
Member since 2006 • 2719 Posts
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.Me_Ur_Daddy
a lemming hiding behind the hermit tag, lets be honest you are just a sony hater like most lemmings here, and your thread should be locked cus its a waste of internet space

Haha, I own a PS3, 360, and a PC. Try again pal. This argument is fine. Why can't a future-proof console play a game that comes out less then a year after it's launch? Doesn't sound future-proof to me.

different architecture DURRR, your logic fails so hard its sad really, the real question is why cant 360 run it since it has teh "tri-core" and its architecture is identical to PCs, and lemmings say 360 has all the important features of DX10 ?

360 runs Gears of War. Nothing that is out for PS3 looks that good. Your post failed. Fission Mailed.

you didnt answer my question so you were owned and you fail, i bet you feel real dumb now huh ?D-D-D-D-D-DURRRRRRRRR.only the character models in gears looks awesome, the environments look like utter **** and the game never has more than a handful of people on screen at a time, and physics are almost non existent especially compared to RFOM

Gears of war looks much better then rfom. RFOM is an average looker, but in my opinion has better gameplay. Graphically, gears of war slaughters rfom. But gears of war did have like 4-5 years of development.
Avatar image for DaddyDC650
DaddyDC650

1241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 DaddyDC650
Member since 2007 • 1241 Posts
[QUOTE="DaddyDC650"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.BioShockOwnz
The PS3 will be around a lot longer than your PC and it's current hardware and it will also have games that will push certain DX 10 cards mainly because they will not be optimized to run on the PC just like Crysis is not optimized to run on the PS3.

Well I have a PS3, and I will continue upgrading my PC, so my PC will always be better.

Keep blowing hundreds of dollars just to play a few fps games. Btw, Nvidia does not even have a good driver for their DX 10 cards and they've been out for months! PC gaming is always playing catch up and I know this because I've been gaming on my PC for years. The main reason I bought a PS3 is so I wouldn't have to blow hundreds of dollars ever couple of months just because 1 game requires it. One last thing, Vista/DX 10 gaming does not even support surround sound because Creative has not bothered to release a good enough driver. If you want to spend hundreds of dollars every few months and sit through all the pos drivers, be my guest. I know all of this because I own Vista along with an X-Fi sound card and a 7900GTX.
Avatar image for Spartan070
Spartan070

16497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Spartan070
Member since 2004 • 16497 Posts
[QUOTE="Spartan070"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.KeyWii
Because consoles are collectible.

No. It's $500 or $600. You don't buy it right out of the gate as a collectible. You let the price drop significantly and then buy it... thats a collectible.

True...
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#63 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.KeyWii
Because I wanted the Blu-Ray Player for HD movies. :) Glad you got your answer?

No. You could have bought the HD-DVD addon for your 360. Doesn't add up if you hate the console.

Nope, I already have the HD-DVD. I have 3 HDTV's, 1 of them is smaller though. I wanted to high def movie players for each of the larger tv's. So now I have HD-DVD and Blu-Ray. Got it?
Avatar image for chrismunx
chrismunx

3964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 chrismunx
Member since 2003 • 3964 Posts

More Warhawk:

The Cell at work.

BioShockOwnz

That looks a lot better than that last pic you posted. But still...fugly. But who knows what the game looks like now.

Avatar image for nextgengaming18
nextgengaming18

2719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#65 nextgengaming18
Member since 2006 • 2719 Posts
[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Spartan070"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.BioShockOwnz
Because consoles are collectible.

No. It's $500 or $600. You don't buy it right out of the gate as a collectible. You let the price drop significantly and then buy it... thats a collectible.

A Sony Blu-Ray Player....$1,000. A Sony Playstation 3.......$600.

You are appearing like a fanboy with this post..
Avatar image for KeyWii
KeyWii

4884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#66 KeyWii
Member since 2006 • 4884 Posts
[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Spartan070"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.BioShockOwnz
Because consoles are collectible.

No. It's $500 or $600. You don't buy it right out of the gate as a collectible. You let the price drop significantly and then buy it... thats a collectible.

A Sony Blu-Ray Player....$1,000. A Sony Playstation 3.......$600.

You could have spent an extra $200 on your 360 for the HD-DVD addon, instead you chose to spend an extra $300-400 for a "flawed" & "not future-proof" blu-ray player?
Avatar image for nextgengaming18
nextgengaming18

2719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#67 nextgengaming18
Member since 2006 • 2719 Posts
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

More Warhawk:

The Cell at work.

chrismunx

That looks a lot better than that last pic you posted. But still...fugly. But who knows what the game looks like now.

What is up with the rock? Everything looks fine besides that rock..
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#68 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="DaddyDC650"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.DaddyDC650
The PS3 will be around a lot longer than your PC and it's current hardware and it will also have games that will push certain DX 10 cards mainly because they will not be optimized to run on the PC just like Crysis is not optimized to run on the PS3.

Well I have a PS3, and I will continue upgrading my PC, so my PC will always be better.

Keep blowing hundreds of dollars just to play a few fps games. Btw, Nvidia does not even have a good driver for their DX 10 cards and they've been out for months! PC gaming is always playing catch up and I know this because I've been gaming on my PC for years. The main reason I bought a PS3 is so I wouldn't have to blow hundreds of dollars ever couple of months just because 1 game requires it. One last thing, Vista/DX 10 gaming does not even support surround sound because Creative has not bothered to release a good enough driver. If you want to spend hundreds of dollars every few months and sit through all the pos drivers, be my guest. I know all of this because I own Vista along with an X-Fi sound card and a 7900GT.

Wow....ignorance is bliss. Continue....I don't even read more then the first sentence of your post. PC gaming is always on the brink of whats new, while console gaming is always playing catch up. Sure console games usually look good for the first year, but after that the hardware is outdated, and there is no way to upgrade. So your stuck with inferior technology.
Avatar image for DaddyDC650
DaddyDC650

1241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 DaddyDC650
Member since 2007 • 1241 Posts
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Spartan070"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.nextgengaming18
Because consoles are collectible.

No. It's $500 or $600. You don't buy it right out of the gate as a collectible. You let the price drop significantly and then buy it... thats a collectible.

A Sony Blu-Ray Player....$1,000. A Sony Playstation 3.......$600.

You are appearing like a fanboy with this post..

LoL, for 600 bucks you get a great console and THE BEST Blu Ray player according to a lot of reviews. You would have to spend 600+ dollars alone for a stand alone blu ray drive and you're basically saying that the PS3 is a waste? Fanboy plz! LoL!
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#70 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Spartan070"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.KeyWii
Because consoles are collectible.

No. It's $500 or $600. You don't buy it right out of the gate as a collectible. You let the price drop significantly and then buy it... thats a collectible.

A Sony Blu-Ray Player....$1,000. A Sony Playstation 3.......$600.

You could have spent an extra $200 on your 360 for the HD-DVD addon, instead you chose to spend an extra $300-400 for a "flawed" & "not future-proof" blu-ray player?

Did you fail to read? I own the HD-DVD Player.
Avatar image for Me_Ur_Daddy
Me_Ur_Daddy

155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Me_Ur_Daddy
Member since 2007 • 155 Posts
[QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.nextgengaming18
a lemming hiding behind the hermit tag, lets be honest you are just a sony hater like most lemmings here, and your thread should be locked cus its a waste of internet space

Haha, I own a PS3, 360, and a PC. Try again pal. This argument is fine. Why can't a future-proof console play a game that comes out less then a year after it's launch? Doesn't sound future-proof to me.

different architecture DURRR, your logic fails so hard its sad really, the real question is why cant 360 run it since it has teh "tri-core" and its architecture is identical to PCs, and lemmings say 360 has all the important features of DX10 ?

360 runs Gears of War. Nothing that is out for PS3 looks that good. Your post failed. Fission Mailed.

you didnt answer my question so you were owned and you fail, i bet you feel real dumb now huh ?D-D-D-D-D-DURRRRRRRRR.only the character models in gears looks awesome, the environments look like utter **** and the game never has more than a handful of people on screen at a time, and physics are almost non existent especially compared to RFOM

Gears of war looks much better then rfom. RFOM is an average looker, but in my opinion has better gameplay. Graphically, gears of war slaughters rfom. But gears of war did have like 4-5 years of development.

yeah im not sayin RFOM looks better but it has way better physics and has more stuff going on at the same time while still maintaining a stable FR and looking good also, gear has nothing going on really and makes up for it with a chainsaw to make it look like you are getting all kinds of action when they are just covering half the screen with blood
Avatar image for TekkenMaster606
TekkenMaster606

10980

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#72 TekkenMaster606
Member since 2006 • 10980 Posts
[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Spartan070"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.Spartan070
Because consoles are collectible.

No. It's $500 or $600. You don't buy it right out of the gate as a collectible. You let the price drop significantly and then buy it... thats a collectible.

True...



But if the price does not mean anything...

Then go ahead and buy it! I begged for a TurboGrafx in 1989 and picked that over the Genesis. I was happy with it and still own it along with a massive collection of games, import and US. But I lived in NYC as a kid, there were lots of boutiques in the area where you could get that kind of stuff easily.
Avatar image for KeyWii
KeyWii

4884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#73 KeyWii
Member since 2006 • 4884 Posts
[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.BioShockOwnz
Because I wanted the Blu-Ray Player for HD movies. :) Glad you got your answer?

No. You could have bought the HD-DVD addon for your 360. Doesn't add up if you hate the console.

Nope, I already have the HD-DVD. I have 3 HDTV's, 1 of them is smaller though. I wanted to high def movie players for each of the larger tv's. So now I have HD-DVD and Blu-Ray. Got it?

I'm sorry -- this just doesn't make sense. Who needs all this? You're a college student?
Avatar image for weffer
weffer

1004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 weffer
Member since 2004 • 1004 Posts
I think that statement is a little...uneducated, maybe? I know the devs said so, and maybe I'm completely wrong, but theres no telling what people are going to be able to do with the hardware in the next few years. So I think its a little ignorant to say that the Ps3 wont be able to run a game that comes out within 6 months of its launch. Theres alot of time, and games that come to Ps3 in 5 years lets say, will be blowing Crysis out of the water. Well, at least they better be.
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#75 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts
[QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Spartan070"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.DaddyDC650
Because consoles are collectible.

No. It's $500 or $600. You don't buy it right out of the gate as a collectible. You let the price drop significantly and then buy it... thats a collectible.

A Sony Blu-Ray Player....$1,000. A Sony Playstation 3.......$600.

You are appearing like a fanboy with this post..

LoL, for 600 bucks you get a great console and THE BEST Blu Ray player according to a lot of reviews. You would have to spend 600+ dollars alone for a stand alone blu ray drive and you're basically saying that the PS3 is a waste? Fanboy plz! LoL!

What? Reading Comprehension FTW! I said I bought the PS3 for the Blu-Ray Player because $600 is a bargain for one.
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#76 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.KeyWii
Because I wanted the Blu-Ray Player for HD movies. :) Glad you got your answer?

No. You could have bought the HD-DVD addon for your 360. Doesn't add up if you hate the console.

Nope, I already have the HD-DVD. I have 3 HDTV's, 1 of them is smaller though. I wanted to high def movie players for each of the larger tv's. So now I have HD-DVD and Blu-Ray. Got it?

I'm sorry -- this just doesn't make sense. Who needs all this? You're a college student?

Yeah. A college student with money. My education is paid for by the way. Not by my parents either. I am on a scholarship.
Avatar image for nextgengaming18
nextgengaming18

2719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#77 nextgengaming18
Member since 2006 • 2719 Posts
I think that statement is a little...uneducated, maybe? I know the devs said so, and maybe I'm completely wrong, but theres no telling what people are going to be able to do with the hardware in the next few years. So I think its a little ignorant to say that the Ps3 wont be able to run a game that comes out within 6 months of its launch. Theres alot of time, and games that come to Ps3 in 5 years lets say, will be blowing Crysis out of the water. Well, at least they better be.weffer
It is most likely that crytek actually attempted to make this game for ps3, and xbox 360 but, failed. The worse off sttatement is saying that gears of war is not capable on ps3, because that game wasn't even attempted to be created for it.
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#78 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts
[QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.Me_Ur_Daddy
a lemming hiding behind the hermit tag, lets be honest you are just a sony hater like most lemmings here, and your thread should be locked cus its a waste of internet space

Haha, I own a PS3, 360, and a PC. Try again pal. This argument is fine. Why can't a future-proof console play a game that comes out less then a year after it's launch? Doesn't sound future-proof to me.

different architecture DURRR, your logic fails so hard its sad really, the real question is why cant 360 run it since it has teh "tri-core" and its architecture is identical to PCs, and lemmings say 360 has all the important features of DX10 ?

360 runs Gears of War. Nothing that is out for PS3 looks that good. Your post failed. Fission Mailed.

you didnt answer my question so you were owned and you fail, i bet you feel real dumb now huh ?D-D-D-D-D-DURRRRRRRRR.only the character models in gears looks awesome, the environments look like utter **** and the game never has more than a handful of people on screen at a time, and physics are almost non existent especially compared to RFOM

Gears of war looks much better then rfom. RFOM is an average looker, but in my opinion has better gameplay. Graphically, gears of war slaughters rfom. But gears of war did have like 4-5 years of development.

yeah im not sayin RFOM looks better but it has way better physics and has more stuff going on at the same time while still maintaining a stable FR and looking good also, gear has nothing going on really and makes up for it with a chainsaw to make it look like you are getting all kinds of action when they are just covering half the screen with blood

Wow, that is the first post of yours I agree with.
Avatar image for primetime2121
primetime2121

3953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 primetime2121
Member since 2004 • 3953 Posts
[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.BioShockOwnz
Because I wanted the Blu-Ray Player for HD movies. :) Glad you got your answer?

No. You could have bought the HD-DVD addon for your 360. Doesn't add up if you hate the console.

Nope, I already have the HD-DVD. I have 3 HDTV's, 1 of them is smaller though. I wanted to high def movie players for each of the larger tv's. So now I have HD-DVD and Blu-Ray. Got it?


If you have the money for 3 HDTVs as you claim..why on earth would you get the inferior 360 HDDVD player (no HDMI port) and PS3 blu ray player (crap Blu Ray player) ??....I would get high quality stand alone players
Avatar image for Me_Ur_Daddy
Me_Ur_Daddy

155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 Me_Ur_Daddy
Member since 2007 • 155 Posts
[QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.BioShockOwnz
a lemming hiding behind the hermit tag, lets be honest you are just a sony hater like most lemmings here, and your thread should be locked cus its a waste of internet space

Haha, I own a PS3, 360, and a PC. Try again pal. This argument is fine. Why can't a future-proof console play a game that comes out less then a year after it's launch? Doesn't sound future-proof to me.

different architecture DURRR, your logic fails so hard its sad really, the real question is why cant 360 run it since it has teh "tri-core" and its architecture is identical to PCs, and lemmings say 360 has all the important features of DX10 ?

360 runs Gears of War. Nothing that is out for PS3 looks that good. Your post failed. Fission Mailed.

you didnt answer my question so you were owned and you fail, i bet you feel real dumb now huh ?D-D-D-D-D-DURRRRRRRRR.only the character models in gears looks awesome, the environments look like utter **** and the game never has more than a handful of people on screen at a time, and physics are almost non existent especially compared to RFOM

No I am just not responding to your arrogance. You will be gone soon enough anyways. The mods are coming to get you.

in other words lamming am owned, or lemming pretending to be a hermit am owned :lol: you have no comeback for my question so you try to sweep it under a rug. seriously why cant 360 run it ? answer me plz, if ps3 is teh suckay then what makes you think 360 can run it ? cus that is obviously what you are alluding to...
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#81 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts
[QUOTE="weffer"]I think that statement is a little...uneducated, maybe? I know the devs said so, and maybe I'm completely wrong, but theres no telling what people are going to be able to do with the hardware in the next few years. So I think its a little ignorant to say that the Ps3 wont be able to run a game that comes out within 6 months of its launch. Theres alot of time, and games that come to Ps3 in 5 years lets say, will be blowing Crysis out of the water. Well, at least they better be.nextgengaming18
It is most likely that crytek actually attempted to make this game for ps3, and xbox 360 but, failed. The worse off sttatement is saying that gears of war is not capable on ps3, because that game wasn't even attempted to be created for it.

Nah Gears of War could run on PS3 since UT3 can.
Avatar image for KeyWii
KeyWii

4884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#82 KeyWii
Member since 2006 • 4884 Posts
[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.BioShockOwnz
Because I wanted the Blu-Ray Player for HD movies. :) Glad you got your answer?

No. You could have bought the HD-DVD addon for your 360. Doesn't add up if you hate the console.

Nope, I already have the HD-DVD. I have 3 HDTV's, 1 of them is smaller though. I wanted to high def movie players for each of the larger tv's. So now I have HD-DVD and Blu-Ray. Got it?

I'm sorry -- this just doesn't make sense. Who needs all this? You're a college student?

Yeah. A college student with money. My education is paid for by the way. Not by my parents either. I am on a scholarship.

Then you should be smart enough to know it's not smart to buy expensive items just to criticize them.
Avatar image for DaddyDC650
DaddyDC650

1241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 DaddyDC650
Member since 2007 • 1241 Posts
[QUOTE="DaddyDC650"][QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Spartan070"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.BioShockOwnz
Because consoles are collectible.

No. It's $500 or $600. You don't buy it right out of the gate as a collectible. You let the price drop significantly and then buy it... thats a collectible.

A Sony Blu-Ray Player....$1,000. A Sony Playstation 3.......$600.

You are appearing like a fanboy with this post..

LoL, for 600 bucks you get a great console and THE BEST Blu Ray player according to a lot of reviews. You would have to spend 600+ dollars alone for a stand alone blu ray drive and you're basically saying that the PS3 is a waste? Fanboy plz! LoL!

What? Reading Comprehension FTW! I said I bought the PS3 for the Blu-Ray Player because $600 is a bargain for one.

Then why put down the PS3 if you bought it yourself foolio? Btw, you're not much better than I am since you did not bother reading more than one sentence in my last post.
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#84 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.Me_Ur_Daddy
a lemming hiding behind the hermit tag, lets be honest you are just a sony hater like most lemmings here, and your thread should be locked cus its a waste of internet space

Haha, I own a PS3, 360, and a PC. Try again pal. This argument is fine. Why can't a future-proof console play a game that comes out less then a year after it's launch? Doesn't sound future-proof to me.

different architecture DURRR, your logic fails so hard its sad really, the real question is why cant 360 run it since it has teh "tri-core" and its architecture is identical to PCs, and lemmings say 360 has all the important features of DX10 ?

360 runs Gears of War. Nothing that is out for PS3 looks that good. Your post failed. Fission Mailed.

you didnt answer my question so you were owned and you fail, i bet you feel real dumb now huh ?D-D-D-D-D-DURRRRRRRRR.only the character models in gears looks awesome, the environments look like utter **** and the game never has more than a handful of people on screen at a time, and physics are almost non existent especially compared to RFOM

No I am just not responding to your arrogance. You will be gone soon enough anyways. The mods are coming to get you.

in other words lamming am owned, or lemming pretending to be a hermit am owned :lol: you have no comeback for my question so you try to sweep it under a rug. seriously why cant 360 run it ? answer me plz, if ps3 is teh suckay then what makes you think 360 can run it ? cus that is obviously what you are alluding to...

360 can't run it at full specs. I never said it could pal.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f26ed7cf0697
deactivated-5f26ed7cf0697

7110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#85 deactivated-5f26ed7cf0697
Member since 2002 • 7110 Posts

Warhawk:

ROFL!

BioShockOwnz


:lol: vaporware :lol:
Avatar image for GermanShepard06
GermanShepard06

3285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 GermanShepard06
Member since 2006 • 3285 Posts
[QUOTE="chrismunx"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

More Warhawk:

The Cell at work.

nextgengaming18

That looks a lot better than that last pic you posted. But still...fugly. But who knows what the game looks like now.

What is up with the rock? Everything looks fine besides that rock..

in any game where you can take the action in the air or on the ground at the same time things cant be very detailed at all times. Take BF2 for example on PC, the game engine is great but the graphics are not that good at all.

Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#87 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.KeyWii
Because I wanted the Blu-Ray Player for HD movies. :) Glad you got your answer?

No. You could have bought the HD-DVD addon for your 360. Doesn't add up if you hate the console.

Nope, I already have the HD-DVD. I have 3 HDTV's, 1 of them is smaller though. I wanted to high def movie players for each of the larger tv's. So now I have HD-DVD and Blu-Ray. Got it?

I'm sorry -- this just doesn't make sense. Who needs all this? You're a college student?

Yeah. A college student with money. My education is paid for by the way. Not by my parents either. I am on a scholarship.

Then you should be smart enough to know it's not smart to buy expensive items just to criticize them.

No I like the Blu-Ray, and that is why I bought it. I think it is great as a Blu-Ray Player. As a game console it is flawed thanks to the 2x's drive and the split 256/256 RAM.
Avatar image for nextgengaming18
nextgengaming18

2719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#88 nextgengaming18
Member since 2006 • 2719 Posts
[QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="chrismunx"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

More Warhawk:

The Cell at work.

GermanShepard06

That looks a lot better than that last pic you posted. But still...fugly. But who knows what the game looks like now.

What is up with the rock? Everything looks fine besides that rock..

in any game where you can take the action in the air or on the ground at the same time things cant be very detailed at all times. Take BF2 for example on PC, the game engine is great but the graphics are not that good at all.

BF2 looks amazing..
Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts
[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"][QUOTE="Zerostatic0"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]Sony will tell you that the PS3 is so powerful, and it is future-proof, but it can't run Crysis at full specs because it doesn't have DX10.Zerostatic0
DirectX 10.0 is programming interface, it doesn't give you special magic abilities, it just makes things easier to do. Most consoles have their own specific programming interfaces that come with dev kits. If Sony (or Microsoft or Nintendo) wanted they could implement the functionality of DirectX 10 into an update of their own API's. I'm tired of people acting like Direct X 10 is something more then a bunch of classes, functions, and variables. That's all it is.



Funny how microsoft couldnt update Windows Xp Dx9 to Dx10.

You are confusing "couldn't" with "wouldn't." Microsoft could if they wanted to.



But they didnt since it would bring money, same goes for console.
Also, Dx10 requires new hardware to have full potential. So you can update a console API only to a limite of its hardware capabilitys.
With the Nvidia 8800 series, console hardware are already surpassed.
Avatar image for Me_Ur_Daddy
Me_Ur_Daddy

155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 Me_Ur_Daddy
Member since 2007 • 155 Posts
[QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.BioShockOwnz
a lemming hiding behind the hermit tag, lets be honest you are just a sony hater like most lemmings here, and your thread should be locked cus its a waste of internet space

Haha, I own a PS3, 360, and a PC. Try again pal. This argument is fine. Why can't a future-proof console play a game that comes out less then a year after it's launch? Doesn't sound future-proof to me.

different architecture DURRR, your logic fails so hard its sad really, the real question is why cant 360 run it since it has teh "tri-core" and its architecture is identical to PCs, and lemmings say 360 has all the important features of DX10 ?

360 runs Gears of War. Nothing that is out for PS3 looks that good. Your post failed. Fission Mailed.

you didnt answer my question so you were owned and you fail, i bet you feel real dumb now huh ?D-D-D-D-D-DURRRRRRRRR.only the character models in gears looks awesome, the environments look like utter **** and the game never has more than a handful of people on screen at a time, and physics are almost non existent especially compared to RFOM

No I am just not responding to your arrogance. You will be gone soon enough anyways. The mods are coming to get you.

in other words lamming am owned, or lemming pretending to be a hermit am owned :lol: you have no comeback for my question so you try to sweep it under a rug. seriously why cant 360 run it ? answer me plz, if ps3 is teh suckay then what makes you think 360 can run it ? cus that is obviously what you are alluding to...

360 can't run it at full specs. I never said it could pal.

ok just making sure, now this argument is over.
Avatar image for DaddyDC650
DaddyDC650

1241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 DaddyDC650
Member since 2007 • 1241 Posts
[QUOTE="DaddyDC650"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="DaddyDC650"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.BioShockOwnz
The PS3 will be around a lot longer than your PC and it's current hardware and it will also have games that will push certain DX 10 cards mainly because they will not be optimized to run on the PC just like Crysis is not optimized to run on the PS3.

Well I have a PS3, and I will continue upgrading my PC, so my PC will always be better.

Keep blowing hundreds of dollars just to play a few fps games. Btw, Nvidia does not even have a good driver for their DX 10 cards and they've been out for months! PC gaming is always playing catch up and I know this because I've been gaming on my PC for years. The main reason I bought a PS3 is so I wouldn't have to blow hundreds of dollars ever couple of months just because 1 game requires it. One last thing, Vista/DX 10 gaming does not even support surround sound because Creative has not bothered to release a good enough driver. If you want to spend hundreds of dollars every few months and sit through all the pos drivers, be my guest. I know all of this because I own Vista along with an X-Fi sound card and a 7900GT.

Wow....ignorance is bliss. Continue....I don't even read more then the first sentence of your post. PC gaming is always on the brink of whats new, while console gaming is always playing catch up. Sure console games usually look good for the first year, but after that the hardware is outdated, and there is no way to upgrade. So your stuck with inferior technology.

What's good about spending hundreds of dollars on new hardware that's obsolete after 3 months+, has no good video drivers, are not able to play games using your surround sound speakers because of the buggy Creative drivers that I mentioned in my earlier post and not being able to play THE BEST games which are almost always on consoles. I mean in the end, it's all about the games so hardware does not even play that big of a role anymore bud.
Avatar image for KeyWii
KeyWii

4884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#92 KeyWii
Member since 2006 • 4884 Posts
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"] No I like the Blu-Ray, and that is why I bought it. I think it is great as a Blu-Ray Player. As a game console it is flawed thanks to the 2x's drive and the split 256/256 RAM.

In your opinion. Oblivion has benefited big time from PS3's hardware.
Avatar image for GermanShepard06
GermanShepard06

3285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 GermanShepard06
Member since 2006 • 3285 Posts
[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="chrismunx"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

More Warhawk:

The Cell at work.

nextgengaming18

That looks a lot better than that last pic you posted. But still...fugly. But who knows what the game looks like now.

What is up with the rock? Everything looks fine besides that rock..

in any game where you can take the action in the air or on the ground at the same time things cant be very detailed at all times. Take BF2 for example on PC, the game engine is great but the graphics are not that good at all.

BF2 looks amazing..

dude, i play the game all the time, its not all that.

The engine is very open and it lacks overall detail on everything.

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts
[QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="chrismunx"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

More Warhawk:

The Cell at work.

GermanShepard06

That looks a lot better than that last pic you posted. But still...fugly. But who knows what the game looks like now.

What is up with the rock? Everything looks fine besides that rock..

in any game where you can take the action in the air or on the ground at the same time things cant be very detailed at all times. Take BF2 for example on PC, the game engine is great but the graphics are not that good at all.



You should try playing on high settings... more then 1024x768.
Avatar image for GermanShepard06
GermanShepard06

3285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 GermanShepard06
Member since 2006 • 3285 Posts
[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="chrismunx"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

More Warhawk:

The Cell at work.

Bebi_vegeta

That looks a lot better than that last pic you posted. But still...fugly. But who knows what the game looks like now.

What is up with the rock? Everything looks fine besides that rock..

in any game where you can take the action in the air or on the ground at the same time things cant be very detailed at all times. Take BF2 for example on PC, the game engine is great but the graphics are not that good at all.



You should try playing on high settings... more then 1024x768.

rofl, i play it at 1920x1200 res on my 24inch lcd BenQ monitor.

Avatar image for Me_Ur_Daddy
Me_Ur_Daddy

155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 Me_Ur_Daddy
Member since 2007 • 155 Posts
[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.BioShockOwnz
Because I wanted the Blu-Ray Player for HD movies. :) Glad you got your answer?

No. You could have bought the HD-DVD addon for your 360. Doesn't add up if you hate the console.

Nope, I already have the HD-DVD. I have 3 HDTV's, 1 of them is smaller though. I wanted to high def movie players for each of the larger tv's. So now I have HD-DVD and Blu-Ray. Got it?

I'm sorry -- this just doesn't make sense. Who needs all this? You're a college student?

Yeah. A college student with money. My education is paid for by the way. Not by my parents either. I am on a scholarship.

Then you should be smart enough to know it's not smart to buy expensive items just to criticize them.

No I like the Blu-Ray, and that is why I bought it. I think it is great as a Blu-Ray Player. As a game console it is flawed thanks to the 2x's drive and the split 256/256 RAM.

the drive is irrelavent since 2x blu-ray speed is just about the same as 360's dvd speed, and not only that but better since its at a constant speed and not all jumpy like 360 dvd drive, and the spilit could be an advantage in many cases since cpu and gpu dont have to fight for bandwith like they do on 360, and its not like you can use all 512ram for gpu anyways, its only a slight percieved advantage for 360. it all depends on the games and we should let them do the talking.
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#97 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts
[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"] No I like the Blu-Ray, and that is why I bought it. I think it is great as a Blu-Ray Player. As a game console it is flawed thanks to the 2x's drive and the split 256/256 RAM.

In your opinion. Oblivion has benefited big time from PS3's hardware.

I think it's a bottleneck. Blu-Ray is great for games. I won't argue that. The 2x's drive is a problem, but they have let you choose to download a portion of the game to remedy the problem. But the 256/256 split RAM is where they will run into problems.
Avatar image for DaddyDC650
DaddyDC650

1241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 DaddyDC650
Member since 2007 • 1241 Posts
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.KeyWii
Because I wanted the Blu-Ray Player for HD movies. :) Glad you got your answer?

No. You could have bought the HD-DVD addon for your 360. Doesn't add up if you hate the console.

Nope, I already have the HD-DVD. I have 3 HDTV's, 1 of them is smaller though. I wanted to high def movie players for each of the larger tv's. So now I have HD-DVD and Blu-Ray. Got it?

I'm sorry -- this just doesn't make sense. Who needs all this? You're a college student?

Yeah. A college student with money. My education is paid for by the way. Not by my parents either. I am on a scholarship.

Then you should be smart enough to know it's not smart to buy expensive items just to criticize them.

Pwned???
Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts
[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="chrismunx"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

More Warhawk:

The Cell at work.

GermanShepard06

That looks a lot better than that last pic you posted. But still...fugly. But who knows what the game looks like now.

What is up with the rock? Everything looks fine besides that rock..

in any game where you can take the action in the air or on the ground at the same time things cant be very detailed at all times. Take BF2 for example on PC, the game engine is great but the graphics are not that good at all.



You should try playing on high settings... more then 1024x768.

rofl, i play it at 1920x1200 res on my 24inch lcd BenQ monitor.



Unless you have a hack, you cant play on that resolution for Bf2.
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#100 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts
[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"] No I like the Blu-Ray, and that is why I bought it. I think it is great as a Blu-Ray Player. As a game console it is flawed thanks to the 2x's drive and the split 256/256 RAM.

In your opinion. Oblivion has benefited big time from PS3's hardware.

I will have to wait to play it in person. Some reports say it does, while others say it doesn't. We will have to wait and see. They better have fixed the issues with the extra year they had to work on it.