Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.KeyWiiBecause consoles are collectible.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.KeyWiiBecause consoles are collectible.
[QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.BioShockOwnza lemming hiding behind the hermit tag, lets be honest you are just a sony hater like most lemmings here, and your thread should be locked cus its a waste of internet space Haha, I own a PS3, 360, and a PC. Try again pal. This argument is fine. Why can't a future-proof console play a game that comes out less then a year after it's launch? Doesn't sound future-proof to me. Why would anyone who owns the PS3 hate on it they way you are? cus hes just a spoiled little brat, mommy buys him everything he asks for, hes probably paris hiltons cousin or something, trust fund baby :lol: Actually I am in college and I have a fiance, and I am far from rich. I am comfortable. No reason for insults. just a joke calm down, how would i really know who you were i dont have interweb-phsycic powas
[QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.Spartan070Because consoles are collectible. No. It's $500 or $600. You don't buy it right out of the gate as a collectible. You let the price drop significantly and then buy it... thats a collectible.
Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.KeyWiiBecause I wanted the Blu-Ray Player for HD movies. :) Glad you got your answer?
[QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.BioShockOwnzBecause I wanted the Blu-Ray Player for HD movies. :) Glad you got your answer? No. You could have bought the HD-DVD addon for your 360. Doesn't add up if you hate the console. But let's say you did buy it to play HD movies, doesn't that contradict your claim that it's not future proof?
[QUOTE="Spartan070"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.KeyWiiBecause consoles are collectible. No. It's $500 or $600. You don't buy it right out of the gate as a collectible. You let the price drop significantly and then buy it... thats a collectible. A Sony Blu-Ray Player....$1,000. A Sony Playstation 3.......$600.
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.Me_Ur_Daddya lemming hiding behind the hermit tag, lets be honest you are just a sony hater like most lemmings here, and your thread should be locked cus its a waste of internet space Haha, I own a PS3, 360, and a PC. Try again pal. This argument is fine. Why can't a future-proof console play a game that comes out less then a year after it's launch? Doesn't sound future-proof to me.different architecture DURRR, your logic fails so hard its sad really, the real question is why cant 360 run it since it has teh "tri-core" and its architecture is identical to PCs, and lemmings say 360 has all the important features of DX10 ? 360 runs Gears of War. Nothing that is out for PS3 looks that good. Your post failed. Fission Mailed. you didnt answer my question so you were owned and you fail, i bet you feel real dumb now huh ?D-D-D-D-D-DURRRRRRRRR.only the character models in gears looks awesome, the environments look like utter **** and the game never has more than a handful of people on screen at a time, and physics are almost non existent especially compared to RFOM Gears of war looks much better then rfom. RFOM is an average looker, but in my opinion has better gameplay. Graphically, gears of war slaughters rfom. But gears of war did have like 4-5 years of development.
[QUOTE="DaddyDC650"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.BioShockOwnzThe PS3 will be around a lot longer than your PC and it's current hardware and it will also have games that will push certain DX 10 cards mainly because they will not be optimized to run on the PC just like Crysis is not optimized to run on the PS3. Well I have a PS3, and I will continue upgrading my PC, so my PC will always be better. Keep blowing hundreds of dollars just to play a few fps games. Btw, Nvidia does not even have a good driver for their DX 10 cards and they've been out for months! PC gaming is always playing catch up and I know this because I've been gaming on my PC for years. The main reason I bought a PS3 is so I wouldn't have to blow hundreds of dollars ever couple of months just because 1 game requires it. One last thing, Vista/DX 10 gaming does not even support surround sound because Creative has not bothered to release a good enough driver. If you want to spend hundreds of dollars every few months and sit through all the pos drivers, be my guest. I know all of this because I own Vista along with an X-Fi sound card and a 7900GTX.
[QUOTE="Spartan070"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.KeyWiiBecause consoles are collectible. No. It's $500 or $600. You don't buy it right out of the gate as a collectible. You let the price drop significantly and then buy it... thats a collectible. True...
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.KeyWiiBecause I wanted the Blu-Ray Player for HD movies. :) Glad you got your answer? No. You could have bought the HD-DVD addon for your 360. Doesn't add up if you hate the console. Nope, I already have the HD-DVD. I have 3 HDTV's, 1 of them is smaller though. I wanted to high def movie players for each of the larger tv's. So now I have HD-DVD and Blu-Ray. Got it?
[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Spartan070"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.BioShockOwnzBecause consoles are collectible. No. It's $500 or $600. You don't buy it right out of the gate as a collectible. You let the price drop significantly and then buy it... thats a collectible. A Sony Blu-Ray Player....$1,000. A Sony Playstation 3.......$600. You are appearing like a fanboy with this post..
[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Spartan070"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.BioShockOwnzBecause consoles are collectible. No. It's $500 or $600. You don't buy it right out of the gate as a collectible. You let the price drop significantly and then buy it... thats a collectible. A Sony Blu-Ray Player....$1,000. A Sony Playstation 3.......$600. You could have spent an extra $200 on your 360 for the HD-DVD addon, instead you chose to spend an extra $300-400 for a "flawed" & "not future-proof" blu-ray player?
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]More Warhawk:
The Cell at work.
chrismunx
That looks a lot better than that last pic you posted. But still...fugly. But who knows what the game looks like now.
What is up with the rock? Everything looks fine besides that rock..[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="DaddyDC650"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.DaddyDC650The PS3 will be around a lot longer than your PC and it's current hardware and it will also have games that will push certain DX 10 cards mainly because they will not be optimized to run on the PC just like Crysis is not optimized to run on the PS3. Well I have a PS3, and I will continue upgrading my PC, so my PC will always be better. Keep blowing hundreds of dollars just to play a few fps games. Btw, Nvidia does not even have a good driver for their DX 10 cards and they've been out for months! PC gaming is always playing catch up and I know this because I've been gaming on my PC for years. The main reason I bought a PS3 is so I wouldn't have to blow hundreds of dollars ever couple of months just because 1 game requires it. One last thing, Vista/DX 10 gaming does not even support surround sound because Creative has not bothered to release a good enough driver. If you want to spend hundreds of dollars every few months and sit through all the pos drivers, be my guest. I know all of this because I own Vista along with an X-Fi sound card and a 7900GT. Wow....ignorance is bliss. Continue....I don't even read more then the first sentence of your post. PC gaming is always on the brink of whats new, while console gaming is always playing catch up. Sure console games usually look good for the first year, but after that the hardware is outdated, and there is no way to upgrade. So your stuck with inferior technology.
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Spartan070"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.nextgengaming18Because consoles are collectible. No. It's $500 or $600. You don't buy it right out of the gate as a collectible. You let the price drop significantly and then buy it... thats a collectible. A Sony Blu-Ray Player....$1,000. A Sony Playstation 3.......$600. You are appearing like a fanboy with this post.. LoL, for 600 bucks you get a great console and THE BEST Blu Ray player according to a lot of reviews. You would have to spend 600+ dollars alone for a stand alone blu ray drive and you're basically saying that the PS3 is a waste? Fanboy plz! LoL!
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Spartan070"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.KeyWiiBecause consoles are collectible. No. It's $500 or $600. You don't buy it right out of the gate as a collectible. You let the price drop significantly and then buy it... thats a collectible. A Sony Blu-Ray Player....$1,000. A Sony Playstation 3.......$600. You could have spent an extra $200 on your 360 for the HD-DVD addon, instead you chose to spend an extra $300-400 for a "flawed" & "not future-proof" blu-ray player? Did you fail to read? I own the HD-DVD Player.
[QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.nextgengaming18a lemming hiding behind the hermit tag, lets be honest you are just a sony hater like most lemmings here, and your thread should be locked cus its a waste of internet space Haha, I own a PS3, 360, and a PC. Try again pal. This argument is fine. Why can't a future-proof console play a game that comes out less then a year after it's launch? Doesn't sound future-proof to me.different architecture DURRR, your logic fails so hard its sad really, the real question is why cant 360 run it since it has teh "tri-core" and its architecture is identical to PCs, and lemmings say 360 has all the important features of DX10 ? 360 runs Gears of War. Nothing that is out for PS3 looks that good. Your post failed. Fission Mailed. you didnt answer my question so you were owned and you fail, i bet you feel real dumb now huh ?D-D-D-D-D-DURRRRRRRRR.only the character models in gears looks awesome, the environments look like utter **** and the game never has more than a handful of people on screen at a time, and physics are almost non existent especially compared to RFOM Gears of war looks much better then rfom. RFOM is an average looker, but in my opinion has better gameplay. Graphically, gears of war slaughters rfom. But gears of war did have like 4-5 years of development. yeah im not sayin RFOM looks better but it has way better physics and has more stuff going on at the same time while still maintaining a stable FR and looking good also, gear has nothing going on really and makes up for it with a chainsaw to make it look like you are getting all kinds of action when they are just covering half the screen with blood
[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Spartan070"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.Spartan070Because consoles are collectible. No. It's $500 or $600. You don't buy it right out of the gate as a collectible. You let the price drop significantly and then buy it... thats a collectible. True...
[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.BioShockOwnzBecause I wanted the Blu-Ray Player for HD movies. :) Glad you got your answer? No. You could have bought the HD-DVD addon for your 360. Doesn't add up if you hate the console. Nope, I already have the HD-DVD. I have 3 HDTV's, 1 of them is smaller though. I wanted to high def movie players for each of the larger tv's. So now I have HD-DVD and Blu-Ray. Got it? I'm sorry -- this just doesn't make sense. Who needs all this? You're a college student?
[QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Spartan070"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.DaddyDC650Because consoles are collectible. No. It's $500 or $600. You don't buy it right out of the gate as a collectible. You let the price drop significantly and then buy it... thats a collectible. A Sony Blu-Ray Player....$1,000. A Sony Playstation 3.......$600. You are appearing like a fanboy with this post.. LoL, for 600 bucks you get a great console and THE BEST Blu Ray player according to a lot of reviews. You would have to spend 600+ dollars alone for a stand alone blu ray drive and you're basically saying that the PS3 is a waste? Fanboy plz! LoL! What? Reading Comprehension FTW! I said I bought the PS3 for the Blu-Ray Player because $600 is a bargain for one.
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.KeyWiiBecause I wanted the Blu-Ray Player for HD movies. :) Glad you got your answer? No. You could have bought the HD-DVD addon for your 360. Doesn't add up if you hate the console. Nope, I already have the HD-DVD. I have 3 HDTV's, 1 of them is smaller though. I wanted to high def movie players for each of the larger tv's. So now I have HD-DVD and Blu-Ray. Got it? I'm sorry -- this just doesn't make sense. Who needs all this? You're a college student? Yeah. A college student with money. My education is paid for by the way. Not by my parents either. I am on a scholarship.
I think that statement is a little...uneducated, maybe? I know the devs said so, and maybe I'm completely wrong, but theres no telling what people are going to be able to do with the hardware in the next few years. So I think its a little ignorant to say that the Ps3 wont be able to run a game that comes out within 6 months of its launch. Theres alot of time, and games that come to Ps3 in 5 years lets say, will be blowing Crysis out of the water. Well, at least they better be.wefferIt is most likely that crytek actually attempted to make this game for ps3, and xbox 360 but, failed. The worse off sttatement is saying that gears of war is not capable on ps3, because that game wasn't even attempted to be created for it.
[QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.Me_Ur_Daddya lemming hiding behind the hermit tag, lets be honest you are just a sony hater like most lemmings here, and your thread should be locked cus its a waste of internet space Haha, I own a PS3, 360, and a PC. Try again pal. This argument is fine. Why can't a future-proof console play a game that comes out less then a year after it's launch? Doesn't sound future-proof to me.different architecture DURRR, your logic fails so hard its sad really, the real question is why cant 360 run it since it has teh "tri-core" and its architecture is identical to PCs, and lemmings say 360 has all the important features of DX10 ? 360 runs Gears of War. Nothing that is out for PS3 looks that good. Your post failed. Fission Mailed. you didnt answer my question so you were owned and you fail, i bet you feel real dumb now huh ?D-D-D-D-D-DURRRRRRRRR.only the character models in gears looks awesome, the environments look like utter **** and the game never has more than a handful of people on screen at a time, and physics are almost non existent especially compared to RFOM Gears of war looks much better then rfom. RFOM is an average looker, but in my opinion has better gameplay. Graphically, gears of war slaughters rfom. But gears of war did have like 4-5 years of development. yeah im not sayin RFOM looks better but it has way better physics and has more stuff going on at the same time while still maintaining a stable FR and looking good also, gear has nothing going on really and makes up for it with a chainsaw to make it look like you are getting all kinds of action when they are just covering half the screen with blood Wow, that is the first post of yours I agree with.
[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.BioShockOwnzBecause I wanted the Blu-Ray Player for HD movies. :) Glad you got your answer? No. You could have bought the HD-DVD addon for your 360. Doesn't add up if you hate the console. Nope, I already have the HD-DVD. I have 3 HDTV's, 1 of them is smaller though. I wanted to high def movie players for each of the larger tv's. So now I have HD-DVD and Blu-Ray. Got it?
[QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.BioShockOwnza lemming hiding behind the hermit tag, lets be honest you are just a sony hater like most lemmings here, and your thread should be locked cus its a waste of internet space Haha, I own a PS3, 360, and a PC. Try again pal. This argument is fine. Why can't a future-proof console play a game that comes out less then a year after it's launch? Doesn't sound future-proof to me.different architecture DURRR, your logic fails so hard its sad really, the real question is why cant 360 run it since it has teh "tri-core" and its architecture is identical to PCs, and lemmings say 360 has all the important features of DX10 ? 360 runs Gears of War. Nothing that is out for PS3 looks that good. Your post failed. Fission Mailed. you didnt answer my question so you were owned and you fail, i bet you feel real dumb now huh ?D-D-D-D-D-DURRRRRRRRR.only the character models in gears looks awesome, the environments look like utter **** and the game never has more than a handful of people on screen at a time, and physics are almost non existent especially compared to RFOM No I am just not responding to your arrogance. You will be gone soon enough anyways. The mods are coming to get you. in other words lamming am owned, or lemming pretending to be a hermit am owned :lol: you have no comeback for my question so you try to sweep it under a rug. seriously why cant 360 run it ? answer me plz, if ps3 is teh suckay then what makes you think 360 can run it ? cus that is obviously what you are alluding to...
[QUOTE="weffer"]I think that statement is a little...uneducated, maybe? I know the devs said so, and maybe I'm completely wrong, but theres no telling what people are going to be able to do with the hardware in the next few years. So I think its a little ignorant to say that the Ps3 wont be able to run a game that comes out within 6 months of its launch. Theres alot of time, and games that come to Ps3 in 5 years lets say, will be blowing Crysis out of the water. Well, at least they better be.nextgengaming18It is most likely that crytek actually attempted to make this game for ps3, and xbox 360 but, failed. The worse off sttatement is saying that gears of war is not capable on ps3, because that game wasn't even attempted to be created for it. Nah Gears of War could run on PS3 since UT3 can.
[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.BioShockOwnzBecause I wanted the Blu-Ray Player for HD movies. :) Glad you got your answer? No. You could have bought the HD-DVD addon for your 360. Doesn't add up if you hate the console. Nope, I already have the HD-DVD. I have 3 HDTV's, 1 of them is smaller though. I wanted to high def movie players for each of the larger tv's. So now I have HD-DVD and Blu-Ray. Got it? I'm sorry -- this just doesn't make sense. Who needs all this? You're a college student? Yeah. A college student with money. My education is paid for by the way. Not by my parents either. I am on a scholarship. Then you should be smart enough to know it's not smart to buy expensive items just to criticize them.
[QUOTE="DaddyDC650"][QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Spartan070"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.BioShockOwnzBecause consoles are collectible. No. It's $500 or $600. You don't buy it right out of the gate as a collectible. You let the price drop significantly and then buy it... thats a collectible. A Sony Blu-Ray Player....$1,000. A Sony Playstation 3.......$600. You are appearing like a fanboy with this post.. LoL, for 600 bucks you get a great console and THE BEST Blu Ray player according to a lot of reviews. You would have to spend 600+ dollars alone for a stand alone blu ray drive and you're basically saying that the PS3 is a waste? Fanboy plz! LoL! What? Reading Comprehension FTW! I said I bought the PS3 for the Blu-Ray Player because $600 is a bargain for one. Then why put down the PS3 if you bought it yourself foolio? Btw, you're not much better than I am since you did not bother reading more than one sentence in my last post.
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.Me_Ur_Daddya lemming hiding behind the hermit tag, lets be honest you are just a sony hater like most lemmings here, and your thread should be locked cus its a waste of internet space Haha, I own a PS3, 360, and a PC. Try again pal. This argument is fine. Why can't a future-proof console play a game that comes out less then a year after it's launch? Doesn't sound future-proof to me.different architecture DURRR, your logic fails so hard its sad really, the real question is why cant 360 run it since it has teh "tri-core" and its architecture is identical to PCs, and lemmings say 360 has all the important features of DX10 ? 360 runs Gears of War. Nothing that is out for PS3 looks that good. Your post failed. Fission Mailed. you didnt answer my question so you were owned and you fail, i bet you feel real dumb now huh ?D-D-D-D-D-DURRRRRRRRR.only the character models in gears looks awesome, the environments look like utter **** and the game never has more than a handful of people on screen at a time, and physics are almost non existent especially compared to RFOM No I am just not responding to your arrogance. You will be gone soon enough anyways. The mods are coming to get you. in other words lamming am owned, or lemming pretending to be a hermit am owned :lol: you have no comeback for my question so you try to sweep it under a rug. seriously why cant 360 run it ? answer me plz, if ps3 is teh suckay then what makes you think 360 can run it ? cus that is obviously what you are alluding to... 360 can't run it at full specs. I never said it could pal.
[QUOTE="chrismunx"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]More Warhawk:
The Cell at work.
nextgengaming18
That looks a lot better than that last pic you posted. But still...fugly. But who knows what the game looks like now.
What is up with the rock? Everything looks fine besides that rock..in any game where you can take the action in the air or on the ground at the same time things cant be very detailed at all times. Take BF2 for example on PC, the game engine is great but the graphics are not that good at all.
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.KeyWiiBecause I wanted the Blu-Ray Player for HD movies. :) Glad you got your answer? No. You could have bought the HD-DVD addon for your 360. Doesn't add up if you hate the console. Nope, I already have the HD-DVD. I have 3 HDTV's, 1 of them is smaller though. I wanted to high def movie players for each of the larger tv's. So now I have HD-DVD and Blu-Ray. Got it? I'm sorry -- this just doesn't make sense. Who needs all this? You're a college student? Yeah. A college student with money. My education is paid for by the way. Not by my parents either. I am on a scholarship. Then you should be smart enough to know it's not smart to buy expensive items just to criticize them. No I like the Blu-Ray, and that is why I bought it. I think it is great as a Blu-Ray Player. As a game console it is flawed thanks to the 2x's drive and the split 256/256 RAM.
[QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="chrismunx"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]More Warhawk:
The Cell at work.
GermanShepard06
That looks a lot better than that last pic you posted. But still...fugly. But who knows what the game looks like now.
What is up with the rock? Everything looks fine besides that rock..in any game where you can take the action in the air or on the ground at the same time things cant be very detailed at all times. Take BF2 for example on PC, the game engine is great but the graphics are not that good at all.
BF2 looks amazing..[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"][QUOTE="Zerostatic0"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]Sony will tell you that the PS3 is so powerful, and it is future-proof, but it can't run Crysis at full specs because it doesn't have DX10.Zerostatic0DirectX 10.0 is programming interface, it doesn't give you special magic abilities, it just makes things easier to do. Most consoles have their own specific programming interfaces that come with dev kits. If Sony (or Microsoft or Nintendo) wanted they could implement the functionality of DirectX 10 into an update of their own API's. I'm tired of people acting like Direct X 10 is something more then a bunch of classes, functions, and variables. That's all it is.
[QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Me_Ur_Daddy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.BioShockOwnza lemming hiding behind the hermit tag, lets be honest you are just a sony hater like most lemmings here, and your thread should be locked cus its a waste of internet space Haha, I own a PS3, 360, and a PC. Try again pal. This argument is fine. Why can't a future-proof console play a game that comes out less then a year after it's launch? Doesn't sound future-proof to me.different architecture DURRR, your logic fails so hard its sad really, the real question is why cant 360 run it since it has teh "tri-core" and its architecture is identical to PCs, and lemmings say 360 has all the important features of DX10 ? 360 runs Gears of War. Nothing that is out for PS3 looks that good. Your post failed. Fission Mailed. you didnt answer my question so you were owned and you fail, i bet you feel real dumb now huh ?D-D-D-D-D-DURRRRRRRRR.only the character models in gears looks awesome, the environments look like utter **** and the game never has more than a handful of people on screen at a time, and physics are almost non existent especially compared to RFOM No I am just not responding to your arrogance. You will be gone soon enough anyways. The mods are coming to get you. in other words lamming am owned, or lemming pretending to be a hermit am owned :lol: you have no comeback for my question so you try to sweep it under a rug. seriously why cant 360 run it ? answer me plz, if ps3 is teh suckay then what makes you think 360 can run it ? cus that is obviously what you are alluding to... 360 can't run it at full specs. I never said it could pal. ok just making sure, now this argument is over.
[QUOTE="DaddyDC650"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="DaddyDC650"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]I am a PC gamer, so I will have it no matter what. I don't need a console version. I just wanted to know how console gamers felt about the PS3 is supposed to be future-proof....when it isn't.BioShockOwnzThe PS3 will be around a lot longer than your PC and it's current hardware and it will also have games that will push certain DX 10 cards mainly because they will not be optimized to run on the PC just like Crysis is not optimized to run on the PS3. Well I have a PS3, and I will continue upgrading my PC, so my PC will always be better. Keep blowing hundreds of dollars just to play a few fps games. Btw, Nvidia does not even have a good driver for their DX 10 cards and they've been out for months! PC gaming is always playing catch up and I know this because I've been gaming on my PC for years. The main reason I bought a PS3 is so I wouldn't have to blow hundreds of dollars ever couple of months just because 1 game requires it. One last thing, Vista/DX 10 gaming does not even support surround sound because Creative has not bothered to release a good enough driver. If you want to spend hundreds of dollars every few months and sit through all the pos drivers, be my guest. I know all of this because I own Vista along with an X-Fi sound card and a 7900GT. Wow....ignorance is bliss. Continue....I don't even read more then the first sentence of your post. PC gaming is always on the brink of whats new, while console gaming is always playing catch up. Sure console games usually look good for the first year, but after that the hardware is outdated, and there is no way to upgrade. So your stuck with inferior technology. What's good about spending hundreds of dollars on new hardware that's obsolete after 3 months+, has no good video drivers, are not able to play games using your surround sound speakers because of the buggy Creative drivers that I mentioned in my earlier post and not being able to play THE BEST games which are almost always on consoles. I mean in the end, it's all about the games so hardware does not even play that big of a role anymore bud.
[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="chrismunx"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]More Warhawk:
The Cell at work.
nextgengaming18
That looks a lot better than that last pic you posted. But still...fugly. But who knows what the game looks like now.
What is up with the rock? Everything looks fine besides that rock..in any game where you can take the action in the air or on the ground at the same time things cant be very detailed at all times. Take BF2 for example on PC, the game engine is great but the graphics are not that good at all.
BF2 looks amazing..dude, i play the game all the time, its not all that.
The engine is very open and it lacks overall detail on everything.
[QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="chrismunx"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]More Warhawk:
The Cell at work.
GermanShepard06
That looks a lot better than that last pic you posted. But still...fugly. But who knows what the game looks like now.
What is up with the rock? Everything looks fine besides that rock..in any game where you can take the action in the air or on the ground at the same time things cant be very detailed at all times. Take BF2 for example on PC, the game engine is great but the graphics are not that good at all.
[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="chrismunx"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]More Warhawk:
The Cell at work.
Bebi_vegeta
That looks a lot better than that last pic you posted. But still...fugly. But who knows what the game looks like now.
What is up with the rock? Everything looks fine besides that rock..in any game where you can take the action in the air or on the ground at the same time things cant be very detailed at all times. Take BF2 for example on PC, the game engine is great but the graphics are not that good at all.
rofl, i play it at 1920x1200 res on my 24inch lcd BenQ monitor.
[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.BioShockOwnzBecause I wanted the Blu-Ray Player for HD movies. :) Glad you got your answer? No. You could have bought the HD-DVD addon for your 360. Doesn't add up if you hate the console. Nope, I already have the HD-DVD. I have 3 HDTV's, 1 of them is smaller though. I wanted to high def movie players for each of the larger tv's. So now I have HD-DVD and Blu-Ray. Got it? I'm sorry -- this just doesn't make sense. Who needs all this? You're a college student? Yeah. A college student with money. My education is paid for by the way. Not by my parents either. I am on a scholarship. Then you should be smart enough to know it's not smart to buy expensive items just to criticize them. No I like the Blu-Ray, and that is why I bought it. I think it is great as a Blu-Ray Player. As a game console it is flawed thanks to the 2x's drive and the split 256/256 RAM. the drive is irrelavent since 2x blu-ray speed is just about the same as 360's dvd speed, and not only that but better since its at a constant speed and not all jumpy like 360 dvd drive, and the spilit could be an advantage in many cases since cpu and gpu dont have to fight for bandwith like they do on 360, and its not like you can use all 512ram for gpu anyways, its only a slight percieved advantage for 360. it all depends on the games and we should let them do the talking.
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="KeyWii"]Why buy a console that you deem flawed and not future-proof? It just doesn't add up... sorry.KeyWiiBecause I wanted the Blu-Ray Player for HD movies. :) Glad you got your answer? No. You could have bought the HD-DVD addon for your 360. Doesn't add up if you hate the console. Nope, I already have the HD-DVD. I have 3 HDTV's, 1 of them is smaller though. I wanted to high def movie players for each of the larger tv's. So now I have HD-DVD and Blu-Ray. Got it? I'm sorry -- this just doesn't make sense. Who needs all this? You're a college student? Yeah. A college student with money. My education is paid for by the way. Not by my parents either. I am on a scholarship. Then you should be smart enough to know it's not smart to buy expensive items just to criticize them. Pwned???
[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="chrismunx"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]More Warhawk:
The Cell at work.
GermanShepard06
That looks a lot better than that last pic you posted. But still...fugly. But who knows what the game looks like now.
What is up with the rock? Everything looks fine besides that rock..in any game where you can take the action in the air or on the ground at the same time things cant be very detailed at all times. Take BF2 for example on PC, the game engine is great but the graphics are not that good at all.
rofl, i play it at 1920x1200 res on my 24inch lcd BenQ monitor.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment