Who said Spiderman movie was no good ?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for 25-Automatic
25-Automatic

285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 25-Automatic
Member since 2007 • 285 Posts

Xbox 360 fanboys are really angry.

 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0413300/

7.3/10

10,117 votes

Remember in IMDB.com +5 movies are the best.

300 movie got

7.9/10

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0416449/

Titanic got 7/10

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120338/

So for sure Spider man is a good movie and PS3 + blu-ray won again.

Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts
Uhhh... wrong forum? >_>
Avatar image for Tiefster
Tiefster

14639

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

#3 Tiefster
Member since 2005 • 14639 Posts
Enough with the Spiderman BS around here.  Sony Motion Pictures and Sony Computer Entertainment are not run by the same people aside from Stringer presiding over the whole of Sony.  Phil Harrison did not make Spiderman 3 suck, look up reps from SMP and blame it on that division.  I don't sit here and rant about J. Allard and the guys at Microsoft Game Studios ruined Windows on me.
Avatar image for Wanderer5
Wanderer5

25727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#4 Wanderer5
Member since 2006 • 25727 Posts
Wrong forum, but yeah it was a good movie IMO.
Avatar image for AvIdGaMeR444
AvIdGaMeR444

7031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 AvIdGaMeR444
Member since 2004 • 7031 Posts
You forgot to mention it has the lowest critics rating and lowest IMDB rating of any Spider-Man movie.  It was at 8.2 on IMDB 2 days ago and is now at 7.3 and dropping FAST!  Boxofficemojo also has people on there commenting and disliking the movie. 
Avatar image for Redmoonxl2
Redmoonxl2

11059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Redmoonxl2
Member since 2003 • 11059 Posts
[spoiler]
  • Gwen Stacy didn't die.
  • Peter goes all despicably emo.
  • Venom lacks his sexy long tongue and his multiple personality ****of speech.
  • Stan Lee yet again forces himself into another awkward guest appearance.

[/spoiler]

Fail.

Avatar image for jwmakoto
jwmakoto

787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 jwmakoto
Member since 2004 • 787 Posts
Heh yeah... Stan Lee.... I respect the guy and all, but being in bigger and bigger cameo's every time there's a new Marvel movie is getting old.
Avatar image for AvIdGaMeR444
AvIdGaMeR444

7031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 AvIdGaMeR444
Member since 2004 • 7031 Posts
Character development and good storytelling will always outweigh the greatness of CGI.  ALWAYS!  Battlestar Galactica on television is proof of this.  It is an outstanding show with good character development and storytelling...with CGI taking the backseat.   Bigger stunts, bigger explosions, bigger fights never subsititute great characters, character development, and great storytelling.   Spider-Man 3 may be one of the most expensive movies ever made...doesn't mean it is in anyway better because "teh CGI is teh awesomeness!"  Spider-Man 3 is falling into the trappings of other big budget sequels....less character development, story, plot...more CGI!  People are smarter than this and see right through it.  I fully expect Spider-Man 3 to have a higher dropoff in the boxoffice in its 2nd weekend than previously expected.  Bad word of mouth will be rampant. 
Avatar image for krp008
krp008

4341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 krp008
Member since 2006 • 4341 Posts
Just got back from watching SM3 for the second time with some friends.... The movie was the best of the trilogy! Best movie of the year as well along with 300. The only people hating on the movie are Spider-man comic book nerds with no lives that find one thing wrong with the film and go nuts. The movie was amazing, despite what the nerds say
Avatar image for rykaziel
rykaziel

1149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 rykaziel
Member since 2003 • 1149 Posts

It was the worst Spiderman movie, and simply a bad movie.  Hard to take a movie seriously when the theatre laughs everytime the main character cries.  The movie, I think, and from my buddies watching with me, failed completely in delivering a compelling finale.

 

The action was good, but the movie was too long, lacked direction, and honestly I lost interest after the first hour, and as soon as I saw spidey walking down Soho pointing at random women I was ready to walk out of the theatre.  I thought the movie was terrible.  The bright spots : loved the maitre'd at the restaurant, Jameson was great as usual, and I actually thought Franco did a great job with what he had to work with.   

Avatar image for MTBare
MTBare

5176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 MTBare
Member since 2006 • 5176 Posts

ZOMG! Spiderman 3 is a good movie!!!! Spiderman 3 has the same font as PS3!!!! Spiderman 3 font make spiderman 3 a success, so the PS3 will be a success also!!!!

Is that the thought process you had TC?

Avatar image for Redmoonxl2
Redmoonxl2

11059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Redmoonxl2
Member since 2003 • 11059 Posts

Mark my words: Pirates: At World's End will make more money than Spiderman 3.

In my opinion, this movie will be the best movie of the month:

Avatar image for MTBare
MTBare

5176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 MTBare
Member since 2006 • 5176 Posts
Oh, and IMO until MJ gets naked all spiderman movies will be awful.
Avatar image for Redmoonxl2
Redmoonxl2

11059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Redmoonxl2
Member since 2003 • 11059 Posts
Oh and Sam Raimi needs to stop whoring Spiderman and bring back Evil Dead.
Avatar image for Homesrfan
Homesrfan

5192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#15 Homesrfan
Member since 2006 • 5192 Posts

Personally, it was my favorite movie in the trilogy. Everyone is saying bad things about it. Yeah - there were some weird parts, but the movie was still awesome.

But this shouldn't be in system wars. 

Avatar image for LINKloco
LINKloco

14514

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 LINKloco
Member since 2004 • 14514 Posts
Spiderman for the Wii is pretty good. Graphics to. Don't let blind fanboys tell you otherwise.
Avatar image for KrazyKenKutarag
KrazyKenKutarag

1905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 KrazyKenKutarag
Member since 2007 • 1905 Posts
Spiderman 3 was the worst of the trilogy IMO. Venom seemed so tacked-on and the character development was awful.
Avatar image for DXGreat1_HGL
DXGreat1_HGL

7543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#18 DXGreat1_HGL
Member since 2003 • 7543 Posts

Character development and good storytelling will always outweigh the greatness of CGI.  ALWAYS!  Battlestar Galactica on television is proof of this.  It is an outstanding show with good character development and storytelling...with CGI taking the backseat.   Bigger stunts, bigger explosions, bigger fights never subsititute great characters, character development, and great storytelling.   Spider-Man 3 may be one of the most expensive movies ever made...doesn't mean it is in anyway better because "teh CGI is teh awesomeness!"  Spider-Man 3 is falling into the trappings of other big budget sequels....less character development, story, plot...more CGI!  People are smarter than this and see right through it.  I fully expect Spider-Man 3 to have a higher dropoff in the boxoffice in its 2nd weekend than previously expected.  Bad word of mouth will be rampant.  AvIdGaMeR444

 Like I said in a similer thread, Shrek the Third will bump it, 28 Weeks Later will take a huge chunk from it and then Pirates will kill it off.

Avatar image for AvIdGaMeR444
AvIdGaMeR444

7031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 AvIdGaMeR444
Member since 2004 • 7031 Posts

Just got back from watching SM3 for the second time with some friends.... The movie was the best of the trilogy! Best movie of the year as well along with 300. The only people hating on the movie are Spider-man comic book nerds with no lives that find one thing wrong with the film and go nuts. The movie was amazing, despite what the nerds saykrp008

I can find entertainment in movies with very little character development, some cheesy dialog, and some storytelling that is off.  I find movies that have good character development, good dialog, and good storytelling to be more compelling.  Matrix Revolutions IMO was far worse than the original Matrix.  Revolutions had more CGI, more explosions, a couple of HUGE fight scenes, but it was ultimately lacking the surreal atmosphere of the original and had far worse storytelling and character analysis.  Spider-Man 3 IMO is just like The Matrix Revolutions....bigger CGI, less of everything else that made the 1st 2 Spider-Mans great achievements. 

Avatar image for wooopz
wooopz

476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 wooopz
Member since 2005 • 476 Posts

Mark my words: Pirates: At World's End will make more money than Spiderman 3.

In my opinion, this movie will be the best movie of the month:

Redmoonxl2

i hope 28 weeks is good

i loved 28 days later

 

and as for tc, gget a life dude, i doubt xbox fanboys even care if sm3 is made by sony and are trying to sabotage imdb ratings

u fanboys are seriously taking this to far