This topic is locked from further discussion.
Personally, I think all shooters are better with cool blood effects, but I wouldn't turn my back on a good game if it didn't have them, (Call of Duty for example). ColoradoKindBud
that goes without saying
Personally, I think all shooters are better with cool blood effects, but I wouldn't turn my back on a good game if it didn't have them, (Call of Duty for example). ColoradoKindBud
Thank you for saying that. I always hated the damn blood spray from call of duty. Sometimes blood comes out, sometimes it doesnt, and their is no splatter....WTF...NO SPLATTER?!?!?!
you may see it realistic... but check it... these hellghast have complete body armour... iron helmets... and blood just squirts outso much with these crappy machine guns ... but say your hit and your bleeding like a hellghast with hardly any armour no mask... you sit in a corner and magically fully renew yourself... no realism
[QUOTE="ColoradoKindBud"]Personally, I think all shooters are better with cool blood effects, but I wouldn't turn my back on a good game if it didn't have them, (Call of Duty for example). mohammad112388
Thank you for saying that. I always hated the damn blood spray from call of duty. Sometimes blood comes out, sometimes it doesnt, and their is no splatter....WTF...NO SPLATTER?!?!?!
like real life i guess.....
You are confusing a graphical gimmick with actual gameplay.you may see it realistic... but check it... these hellghast have complete body armour... iron helmets... and blood just squirts outso much with these crappy machine guns ... but say your hit and your bleeding like a hellghast with hardly any armour no mask... you sit in a corner and magically fully renew yourself... no realism
hobbit93
your talking about realistic shots and blood, and injuries, becuase its only been possible on the next gen I would assumesimulation
hahaha noooo... soldier of fortune.
I don't care about blood. I want the gameplay, not a graphical effect that has nothing to do with the gameplay. Once a developer hammers down some good gameplay, then they can focus on the meaningless graphical effects. If Killzone 2 has awesome blood effects but horrible gameplay, I will cry.Wasdie
[QUOTE="Wasdie"]I don't care about blood. I want the gameplay, not a graphical effect that has nothing to do with the gameplay. Once a developer hammers down some good gameplay, then they can focus on the meaningless graphical effects. If Killzone 2 has awesome blood effects but horrible gameplay, I will cry.hot114
Don't worry, I am not one of those guys who is all gameplay>>>>graphics. I am just saying, shooters need to focus on rock solid gameplay before they bother with graphical effects. The market is flooded with shooters that are all flash and no substance. Even though graphics do enhance gameplay, it seems that shooters fall prey to the whole graphics making up for shallow gameplay.
Personally, I think all shooters are better with cool blood effects, but I wouldn't turn my back on a good game if it didn't have them, (Call of Duty for example). ColoradoKindBud
Agreed. Like the Gears blood was kinda corny, but it still looked better than lots of blood on the other games. I think shooters need to have MORE STORY. That's what I want. Gimme some story elements like Half Life does and it'll re-energize the genre.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment