Why are so many Pro games 30fps or not 4k?

Pro is not poweful enough for 4k with current gen graphics. It should be use to perfect native 1080p games with better effects, higher framerates, etc.

Battlefield 1, Tomb Raider and Infamous are the perfect examplesof how it should be used, imo.

Because it is a budget PC specced console. What did you really expect from a 400 dollar console?

I'm pretty sure that's a horrible, and incorrect excuse for the pro.

More like getting under 16ms of lag. The only thing that matters in regards to frame rates are the dips. Problem is console owners have no real clue what their real time frame rate is per second. All they want to hear is 60fps which is now being used as marketing BS.

The PS4 "Pro" is like two PS4's duct taped together, so of course it's not going to be 60fps and native 4K. Only when the much superior Scorpio hits will we finally see a plethora of native 4K games on a console.

That's objectively wrong, the only thing that matters are dips? Fucking bullshit.

It's objectively better to have a stable 60fps than a stable 30fps, especially when it really comes to count like in hack and slash games and stuff like dark souls.

God of War 3 is objectively better on merit of it's higher settings on ps4 than it was on the ps3.

It is plain simple Sony can not make powerful hardware to save its life

@Commiesdie: Yet they have the most powerful consoles on the market since 2006, so I guess MS is even worse in your eyes?

@vfighter: ps3 is not more powerful then 360 not by a long shot. Ps4 is more powerful then xbox1 but only by a 10% margin

this thread sucks

Looks like Xboners are trying waaaay too hard!

Because is a weak system? I guess you have to wait till next gen to see true 4K and 60 fps..

Cuuuuuuuz the pro sucks lol.

Design decision.

30fps= more cinematic

Also 4k checkerboard = full 4K due to Sony superior engineering, so full 4K is a waste of resources.

necrothread

:P