Why did you skip out on the Wii U?

  • 102 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for jcrame10
jcrame10

6302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#51 jcrame10
Member since 2014 • 6302 Posts
@charizard1605 said:
@jcrame10 said:
@mesome713 said:
@jcrame10 said:

@trugs26: all those points you made about mario maker are features you get in littlebigplanet....a franchise that's been around for like 8 years. And that part was connected to the main LBP games. I don't understand how nintendo sold a mario level maker stand alone for 60 bucks.

LBP is a poor mans Mario Maker.

that's kind of a hard point to make, considering LBP was around for years before Mario Maker. If anything, MM is the knock off here.

Sure, but Mario Maker is definitively better, that's a fact.

Let's see...

LBP (2008):

Super Mario Maker (2015:)

Define "definitive" because I see the scores as about the same, and the games are 7 years apart. I say it's franchise preference (although LBP offers more content than just a level editor and creator)

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20

82724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#52 deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
Member since 2006 • 82724 Posts

@jcrame10: The scores are the same, but the standards in 2015 are far different than the standards in 2007. Mario Maker is an easier to use, far more accessible and intuitive level creator that benefits from a great input mechanic (the Wii U's touch screen), and some actual, good, honest to goodness platforming mechanics, with a whole four sets that you can swap out between. In return, what you can actually create with SMM is far more limited than LBP.

LBP is far more accomplished as a level creator tool than Mario Maker, I'd be foolish to deny that. But the actual platforming sucks, and the creation UI is nowhere near as seamless as the one in SMM. In the end, actual platforming mechanics trump everything for me when it comes to a platformer, and that's why SMM wins.

Avatar image for Solaryellow
Solaryellow

7373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Solaryellow
Member since 2013 • 7373 Posts

@nyadc said:

I didn't, I'm not some corporate slog who cares how well something is selling or how it's perceived, if it's got stuff I want to play I'm buying it.

The irony of this fallacious logic that people hold being that the console which has the highest sales this generation is bringing me the least satisfaction out of anything.

I just spent $250 on a Virtual Boy to play Wario Land, the Wii U is the least of my concerns.

Speaking of irony, I tend to identify with this entire post. For one, I've been on the lookout for a boxed VB in good condition at a good price and one day will accomplish that search as it is the only readily available Nintendo release, here in the states, I have missed. Two, like I tell people who ask if they see me purchasing a Wii U game, it's a damn good Nintendo console but falters greatly when compared to the competition. The fallacy is not having any games on this console. The games are there but they just so happened to lean greatly towards Nintendo rather than third party.

I've played a Nintendo console for every Christmas since 1986 and I don't plan on stopping unless the company does something completely askew of reality.

Avatar image for jbc7343
jbc7343

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 jbc7343
Member since 2007 • 441 Posts

@charizard1605: How is that a fact? Both LBP and Mario Maker scored a 9 here on Gamespot. They are both good games on their own merits with one not being better than the other, according to Gamespot. Seems like it is, in fact, left to preference, not opinion.

Avatar image for jbc7343
jbc7343

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55  Edited By jbc7343
Member since 2007 • 441 Posts

@charizard1605 said:

@jcrame10: The scores are the same, but the standards in 2015 are far different than the standards in 2007. Mario Maker is an easier to use, far more accessible and intuitive level creator that benefits from a great input mechanic (the Wii U's touch screen), and some actual, good, honest to goodness platforming mechanics, with a whole four sets that you can swap out between. In return, what you can actually create with SMM is far more limited than LBP.

LBP is far more accomplished as a level creator tool than Mario Maker, I'd be foolish to deny that. But the actual platforming sucks, and the creation UI is nowhere near as seamless as the one in SMM. In the end, actual platforming mechanics trump everything for me when it comes to a platformer, and that's why SMM wins.

Wins, to you. Your opinion, and the way you feel regarding such games, doesn't necessarily ring true for everyone else. So, given how you feel Mario Maker is the better the game, doesn't make it fact, just simply your opinion.

Additionally, if the standards are as different as you claim, and I know this a completely different situation, then the likes of Call of Duty and Assassin's Creed would be reviewed much more heavily and harshly. As much as the standards change, it's as much as they stay the same.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20

82724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#56 deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
Member since 2006 • 82724 Posts

@jbc7343: The likes of Call of Duty and Assassin's Creed are rated much more harshly- go look at Unity or Syndicate's Metascore, and compare those to the Metascore for Assassin's Creed Brotherhood or III.

More importantly, the most important and essential thing in a platformer is the platforming mechanics. If a platformer fails at platforming, then everything else can't compensate for it- it's a genre that lives and dies by its mechanics, and LBP's mechanics leave a lot being desired.

Avatar image for jbc7343
jbc7343

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 jbc7343
Member since 2007 • 441 Posts

@charizard1605 said:

@jbc7343: The likes of Call of Duty and Assassin's Creed are rated much more harshly- go look at Unity or Syndicate's Metascore, and compare those to the Metascore for Assassin's Creed Brotherhood or III.

More importantly, the most important and essential thing in a platformer is the platforming mechanics. If a platformer fails at platforming, then everything else can't compensate for it- it's a genre that lives and dies by its mechanics, and LBP's mechanics leave a lot being desired.

Well, of course there are gonna be those games that score higher and/or lower than others' in the series, however, Unity aside, why aren't the other games getting panned as hard? The other games are essentially copy and pasted and yet most every publication will give it 7 or better. How can the standards change if the games themselves, don't? A 72 or 73 will get a game universal acclaim on Metacritic.

With regards to platforming, LBP isn't a perfect game and I never said it was. I simply said that both games are great games on the their own merits, which is true. According to Gamespot, both games are equally as good. My problem lies with you calling your opinion as fact. One could argue that excluding a story mode and multiplayer (even in create mode), which LBP included, leaves a lot to be desired. Because however you slice it, both games are playable. Does one play better than the other? Probably. Does that make one game better than the other? Not in my opinion and not according to Gamespot.

Avatar image for Locutus_Picard
Locutus_Picard

4166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Locutus_Picard
Member since 2004 • 4166 Posts

Because the hardware is garbage. It has nothing going for it and it has this very ugly GamePad controlling it.

If the console was maybe $100 I'd buy it along with some games, but the RPP is quadriple its actual worth (especially in europe). Thus I am waiting for the NX and I hope it's backwards compatible. Buying a console that can barely do 720p with severe jaggies in 2015 is unacceptable.

Avatar image for TheEroica
TheEroica

24539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#59 TheEroica  Moderator
Member since 2009 • 24539 Posts

Price...
Vision...
Very meh on the present franchises theyve thrown their weight behind.

...and honestly, the writing was on the wall before the thing launched, sadly...

Good news is I think they're primed for a comeback... its a gut thing.

Avatar image for quadknight
QuadKnight

12916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 QuadKnight
Member since 2015 • 12916 Posts
  • Shitty hardware
  • No third party support
  • Horrible horrible network infrastructure
  • Overpriced console considering how shitty the hardware already is
  • Gimmicky controller
  • Stale 1st party franchises that no longer appeal to me

Nintendo is completely out of touch with the modern gamer IMO. I hope they are more successful with the NX for the sake of competition but I'm not hopeful based on what I've heard from the rumors about the NX. I probably won't be buying the NX unless Nintendo does something incredible with it.

Avatar image for raugutcon
raugutcon

5576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#61 raugutcon
Member since 2014 • 5576 Posts

I haven´t skipped it yet, I´m just waiting for it to be on clearance or find a really good pre owned unit for around $3,000 MEX, it has enough games ( 15 so far ) that interest me. I purchased a X1 and I have less games for it ( GOW UE, MCC, H5, Sunset Overdrive, BF4 & Titanfall which I purchased dirt cheap, AC BF and AC Unity which were pre installed in the console ).

Avatar image for nini200
nini200

11484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 nini200
Member since 2005 • 11484 Posts

I didn't. It's my most played console this gen so far

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts

Love my Wii U. Only punks skip out on Wii U.

Avatar image for ni6htmare01
ni6htmare01

3990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 ni6htmare01
Member since 2005 • 3990 Posts

I bought it for Bayonetta 2 and hasn't touch it since I beat the game. I'm not going to fall for another Nintendo console unless it show me some really strong 3rd party exclusives!

Avatar image for shellcase86
shellcase86

6890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 shellcase86
Member since 2012 • 6890 Posts

1. Price. I'm a consumer first and gamer second. I don't see the value they are offering for the price of entry. Their platform is overvalued.

2. Confidence. I have no reason to believe Nintendo is able to rally 3rd parties, deliver consistent and timely 1st party support, nor integrate any significant business strategy that will ensure the platform will be around long enough for me to satisfy my gaming desires and recoup my investment.

Avatar image for aia89
aia89

2828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#66  Edited By aia89
Member since 2009 • 2828 Posts
  • Casual gamers switched to mobile gaming.
  • Nowadays' trends revolve around games like Call of Duty and online.
  • Nintendo's lack of third party support.
  • Bad marketing.
  • All its left for Nintendo is its first party exclusives games, which is not enough to compete with the comptetiors' offering.
Avatar image for deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
deactivated-5cd08b1605da1

9317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#67  Edited By deactivated-5cd08b1605da1
Member since 2012 • 9317 Posts

Easy. Not interested in any Nintendo first party offerings whatsoever. Bayonetta 2 was the only thing interesting in it but 300€ for one game? Oh hell NAH

Avatar image for hrt_rulz01
hrt_rulz01

22688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 hrt_rulz01
Member since 2006 • 22688 Posts

I purchased a Wii U early on, and actually enjoyed it for a decent while. It definitely has some good things about it, from a console perspective. And of course has some great games.

But I ended up trading it in because I never played it anymore. But I actually regret it, because there are a bunch of games on it that I really want to play. And I'd probably buy it again if they dropped the price here in Aus... it's still about the same price as when it launched here, which is ridiculous.

Avatar image for jasonredemption
jasonredemption

691

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 17

#69 jasonredemption
Member since 2010 • 691 Posts

@charizard1605 said:

My purchase of the NX is contingent on only one thing- it having games I want to play (the same as any other game system, really). So, let's imagine, in an ideal world, the NX were to launch with Metroid Prime 4, Zelda, and Mario Galaxy 3 on day one. Would I buy it day one? Hell fucking yeah, I want to play those games, and I'll get the system because I do.

Now, as is more likely, let's imagine the NX gets those games over the next few years- then I will buy the NX when those games are all out.

What I want to remind you is that things do not stick in this industry, for good or for bad- Nintendo has the chance to reinvent themselves with savvy marketing and branding, and get another shot with the NX. If they handle it right, they'll get people to buy. If they don't, then they won't (the same as happened with the Wii U). As for me, and most other people in the end, it would be about the games. The day the NX has enough games I want to play, I will buy it. If that happens to be day one? So be it.

^ What this guy said. I waited until Summer 2014 to buy a Wii U because my minimum is five games I want to play and preferably three more games I'll want to play coming out within the first year of owning the console. I have no problem supporting a console based on announced games but there is almost no point in buying a console that has little to no games you want to play right now.

Now that being said, I am leery of Nintendo at the moment, they haven't shown that they really know what gamer's want or what mistakes they've made and with every passing day and month that goes by where they don't correct that I lose faith that they'll ever be relevant in the gaming industry going forward.

Avatar image for paradocs
Paradocs

264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70  Edited By Paradocs
Member since 2015 • 264 Posts

The Wii U was lacking in content that piqued my interest. It finally caught my attention three years into its release with Super Mario Maker and Splatoon, but it still isn't enough to justify me buying a Wii U. So, no, I don't regret my decision.

EDIT: I forgot to add that the Wii U is a non factor in my decision of rather or not to buy the next nintendo console.

Avatar image for NathanDrakeSwag
NathanDrakeSwag

17392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71  Edited By NathanDrakeSwag
Member since 2013 • 17392 Posts

Weak hardware

Dumb tablet controller

Overpriced

No third party support

Not enough compelling exclusives outside of Smash and Mario Kart. They didn't even release a Metroid or exclusive Zelda for it.

Avatar image for gfxpipeline
gfxpipeline

543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#72  Edited By gfxpipeline
Member since 2014 • 543 Posts

I didn't skip the Wii U but I have huge numbers of friends who have been waiting for the 300 dollar 32GB bundles to drop in price and that price drop has never happened.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62039

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#73 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62039 Posts

I didn't... Though it has, by far, the least amount of play-time from all my systems. Still, i'm clocking in 30 hours on Xenoblade X and loving it.

Avatar image for jbc7343
jbc7343

441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 jbc7343
Member since 2007 • 441 Posts

@lundy86_4: I'm so jelly. Darn you. As good as I'm sure the game is, I can't justify a console for one game.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62039

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#75 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62039 Posts

@jbc7343: Personally, I wouldn't even advise someone to do that as much as I love the game. It's just not that level of good, if it's all you'll play.

That being said, if you ever grab a WiiU for more than Xenoblade, it's 100% worth the buy. I'm 30 hours in, and just got my Skell (mech), so i've probably got a bunch of hours left to go :P

Avatar image for Megavideogamer
Megavideogamer

6554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#76 Megavideogamer
Member since 2004 • 6554 Posts

I didn't skip out on the Wii U. Nintendo Skip out on me. I bought the Wii U on Launch day way back in November 18th 2012. Thus far I have only bought 20 games for the Wii U. Nintendo really lost third party support this time. Since as of December 29 2015 there is next to no third party developers supporting the Nintendo Wii U console. Nintendo is scaling down manufacturing the Wii U to just 2 million units worldwide. Nintendo is getting ready the Nintendo NX which is being manufactured at this time for a possible November 2016 launch. But Nintendo has to work on relations with 3rd party game developers in addition to working more closer to indie developers because Nintendo cannot support a console by themselves. The first party games by Nintendo are great. But not enough on there own to keep NX afloat.

So Wii U skipped out on me. The standard "core" gamer, Nintendo also skipped out on Third party game developers and seemed to give indie creators a hard time. leaving the Wii U barren. If Nintendo cannot turn the situation around with NX. Then Nintendo will go extinct.

Avatar image for m3dude1
m3dude1

2334

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77  Edited By m3dude1
Member since 2007 • 2334 Posts

@jbc7343 said:

It's no secret that the Wii U isn't meeting sales expectations and, with that, I wanted to understand what turned off those people that didn't buy one.

For me, I don't trust Nintendo with their home consoles anymore. I was influenced by the rarity and the word of mouth of the Wii to purchase one and I had fun with the three or four games I have for it but then the support seemingly stopped. Nintendo couldn't garner interest for third parties to develop compelling and innovative titles and publishers flocked to the competition despite the Wii holding the lead in sales. Additionally, it's no secret that Nintendo has shown difficulty working with third party companies in the past.

When the Wii U released, I wanted to see how it would fare. Would third parties support it? Would Nintendo continue to support it or would it flounder with a sprinkle of first party titles and then eventually have nothing but shovelware? In the end, the Wii U wasn't supported as Nintendo promised it would be. Yes, they have had, arguably, some of the highest quality first party titles released but they also have zero support from third party developers. Also, with the rumblings of a new console, I can foresee the sales of the Wii U taking an even bigger hit. Why purchase the Wii U now when something bigger and better is on the horizon?

With that said, what were your reasons for not purchasing the Wii U? Do you regret not purchasing and supporting Nintendo's console and will Nintendo's handling of the Wii and Wii U affect your decision to purchase the NX?

controller = shit

hardware = shit

online = shit

software support = shit

so its pretty much shit from every possible angle

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#78  Edited By lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45477 Posts

At first, it wasn't the gimmick of the Wii U pad, it was the fact they were aiming for Xbox 360 and PS3 capabilities to get the same multiplats those consoles were getting, right at the tail end of those console life cycles. It was a waste of time since those consoles capabilities meant third parties were just going to ignore the Wii U, the was further reinforced when their third party line-up was nothing more than late overpriced ports of the same games the Xbox 360 and PS3 had. They relied on 3rd parties that didn't deliver and didn't have an arsenal of first party games or an articulated prospect of them at launch.

I did eventually get one, when they started to show that they had a first party line-up like with games like Wind Waker HD, Wonderful 101, Pikmin 3, the (then) upcoming Mario 3D World, and games on horizon like Mario Kart 8 and Bayonetta 2, and hey delivered a couple more must haves, Super Smash Bros and Hyrule Warriors, unfortunately that was kind of it, his year seemed weak sauce compared to 2013/2014. Splatoon doesn't interest me at its price, nor Mario Maker, they look good I just never fire up my Wii U anymore, nor games like Fatal Frame or Devil's Third which I might get at a lower price point but doubt that'll happen either. Xenoblade Chronicles X might be the only title from this year I pick up, maybe the only game I play as I've really only touched Captain Toad this year.

Anyhow, Nintendo still has games coming that interest me, looking forward to that. I don't regret getting a Wii U in the slightest, I just wish Nintendo would have supported it better with first party content. They have a lot of things they just refuse to do that frustrates me. Refusal to put Metroid Zero Mission on North American Wii U eShop. Refusal to put Fatal Frame on disc in North America but they published a small batch of Devil's Third. Bullshit bullshit bullshit.

Avatar image for AtariKidX
AtariKidX

7166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#79 AtariKidX
Member since 2010 • 7166 Posts

Nintendo franchises no longer appeal to me.

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts
@m3dude1 said:
@jbc7343 said:

It's no secret that the Wii U isn't meeting sales expectations and, with that, I wanted to understand what turned off those people that didn't buy one.

For me, I don't trust Nintendo with their home consoles anymore. I was influenced by the rarity and the word of mouth of the Wii to purchase one and I had fun with the three or four games I have for it but then the support seemingly stopped. Nintendo couldn't garner interest for third parties to develop compelling and innovative titles and publishers flocked to the competition despite the Wii holding the lead in sales. Additionally, it's no secret that Nintendo has shown difficulty working with third party companies in the past.

When the Wii U released, I wanted to see how it would fare. Would third parties support it? Would Nintendo continue to support it or would it flounder with a sprinkle of first party titles and then eventually have nothing but shovelware? In the end, the Wii U wasn't supported as Nintendo promised it would be. Yes, they have had, arguably, some of the highest quality first party titles released but they also have zero support from third party developers. Also, with the rumblings of a new console, I can foresee the sales of the Wii U taking an even bigger hit. Why purchase the Wii U now when something bigger and better is on the horizon?

With that said, what were your reasons for not purchasing the Wii U? Do you regret not purchasing and supporting Nintendo's console and will Nintendo's handling of the Wii and Wii U affect your decision to purchase the NX?

controller = shit

hardware = shit

online = shit

software support = shit

so its pretty much shit from every possible angle

Pro controller = awesome

Hardware,they're all shit

Online is still free and never gets down

Software support = best first party games

Avatar image for m3dude1
m3dude1

2334

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81  Edited By m3dude1
Member since 2007 • 2334 Posts

@MonsieurX said:
@m3dude1 said:
@jbc7343 said:

It's no secret that the Wii U isn't meeting sales expectations and, with that, I wanted to understand what turned off those people that didn't buy one.

For me, I don't trust Nintendo with their home consoles anymore. I was influenced by the rarity and the word of mouth of the Wii to purchase one and I had fun with the three or four games I have for it but then the support seemingly stopped. Nintendo couldn't garner interest for third parties to develop compelling and innovative titles and publishers flocked to the competition despite the Wii holding the lead in sales. Additionally, it's no secret that Nintendo has shown difficulty working with third party companies in the past.

When the Wii U released, I wanted to see how it would fare. Would third parties support it? Would Nintendo continue to support it or would it flounder with a sprinkle of first party titles and then eventually have nothing but shovelware? In the end, the Wii U wasn't supported as Nintendo promised it would be. Yes, they have had, arguably, some of the highest quality first party titles released but they also have zero support from third party developers. Also, with the rumblings of a new console, I can foresee the sales of the Wii U taking an even bigger hit. Why purchase the Wii U now when something bigger and better is on the horizon?

With that said, what were your reasons for not purchasing the Wii U? Do you regret not purchasing and supporting Nintendo's console and will Nintendo's handling of the Wii and Wii U affect your decision to purchase the NX?

controller = shit

hardware = shit

online = shit

software support = shit

so its pretty much shit from every possible angle

Pro controller = awesome

Hardware,they're all shit

Online is still free and never gets down

Software support = best first party games

you mean the controller thats almost a direct rip off of the xbox controller, but not as good? add in the 50 bucks it costs and now your paying the same price for a wii u as a ps4. like omg how is the wii u not flying off the shelves!!! theres a massive difference between the hardware inside ps4 and the wii u. the online has to be free because no one would pay for such shit. nintendo does make some good games, so you can count on 1 or 2 good games on average per year. wow thats some amazing software support there!

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts
@m3dude1 said:
@MonsieurX said:
@m3dude1 said:
@jbc7343 said:

It's no secret that the Wii U isn't meeting sales expectations and, with that, I wanted to understand what turned off those people that didn't buy one.

For me, I don't trust Nintendo with their home consoles anymore. I was influenced by the rarity and the word of mouth of the Wii to purchase one and I had fun with the three or four games I have for it but then the support seemingly stopped. Nintendo couldn't garner interest for third parties to develop compelling and innovative titles and publishers flocked to the competition despite the Wii holding the lead in sales. Additionally, it's no secret that Nintendo has shown difficulty working with third party companies in the past.

When the Wii U released, I wanted to see how it would fare. Would third parties support it? Would Nintendo continue to support it or would it flounder with a sprinkle of first party titles and then eventually have nothing but shovelware? In the end, the Wii U wasn't supported as Nintendo promised it would be. Yes, they have had, arguably, some of the highest quality first party titles released but they also have zero support from third party developers. Also, with the rumblings of a new console, I can foresee the sales of the Wii U taking an even bigger hit. Why purchase the Wii U now when something bigger and better is on the horizon?

With that said, what were your reasons for not purchasing the Wii U? Do you regret not purchasing and supporting Nintendo's console and will Nintendo's handling of the Wii and Wii U affect your decision to purchase the NX?

controller = shit

hardware = shit

online = shit

software support = shit

so its pretty much shit from every possible angle

Pro controller = awesome

Hardware,they're all shit

Online is still free and never gets down

Software support = best first party games

you mean the controller thats almost a direct rip off of the xbox controller, but not as good? add in the 50 bucks it costs and now your paying the same price for a wii u as a ps4. like omg how is the wii u not flying off the shelves!!! theres a massive difference between the hardware inside ps4 and the wii u. the online has to be free because no one would pay for such shit. nintendo does make some good games, so you can count on 1 or 2 good games on average per year. wow thats some amazing software support there!

And I don't see the problem with the regular tablet controller.

Oh yeah,I forgot how slightly less crap > crap. Amazing!

More and better exclusives on the Wii U.

Why so mad?

Avatar image for m3dude1
m3dude1

2334

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83  Edited By m3dude1
Member since 2007 • 2334 Posts

@MonsieurX said:
@m3dude1 said:
@MonsieurX said:
@m3dude1 said:

controller = shit

hardware = shit

online = shit

software support = shit

so its pretty much shit from every possible angle

Pro controller = awesome

Hardware,they're all shit

Online is still free and never gets down

Software support = best first party games

you mean the controller thats almost a direct rip off of the xbox controller, but not as good? add in the 50 bucks it costs and now your paying the same price for a wii u as a ps4. like omg how is the wii u not flying off the shelves!!! theres a massive difference between the hardware inside ps4 and the wii u. the online has to be free because no one would pay for such shit. nintendo does make some good games, so you can count on 1 or 2 good games on average per year. wow thats some amazing software support there!

And I don't see the problem with the regular tablet controller.

Oh yeah,I forgot how slightly less crap > crap. Amazing!

More and better exclusives on the Wii U.

Why so mad?

yes, clearly 10xish the system performance is only slightly better. by that same metric, your pc(if you even have one) is so marginally better than a ps4 it must not even register.

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84  Edited By MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts

@m3dude1 said:
@MonsieurX said:
@m3dude1 said:
@MonsieurX said:
@m3dude1 said:

controller = shit

hardware = shit

online = shit

software support = shit

so its pretty much shit from every possible angle

Pro controller = awesome

Hardware,they're all shit

Online is still free and never gets down

Software support = best first party games

you mean the controller thats almost a direct rip off of the xbox controller, but not as good? add in the 50 bucks it costs and now your paying the same price for a wii u as a ps4. like omg how is the wii u not flying off the shelves!!! theres a massive difference between the hardware inside ps4 and the wii u. the online has to be free because no one would pay for such shit. nintendo does make some good games, so you can count on 1 or 2 good games on average per year. wow thats some amazing software support there!

And I don't see the problem with the regular tablet controller.

Oh yeah,I forgot how slightly less crap > crap. Amazing!

More and better exclusives on the Wii U.

Why so mad?

yes, clearly 10xish the system performance is only slightly better. by that same metric, your pc(if you even have one) is so marginally better than a ps4 it must not even register.

10xish?

It's said the Wii U is running at 352 GFLOPS while the PS4 is 1.82TFLOPS. Less than 5 times.

Still,crap hardware with no exclusives to play

Avatar image for AzatiS
AzatiS

14969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#85  Edited By AzatiS
Member since 2004 • 14969 Posts

@jbc7343:

1) I dont find appealing most of their 1st party titles. I like only Zelda / Paper Mario and Mario main series

2) Which leads to the conclusion : I wont buy a console just for 2-3 games for an entire generation when

3) It misses every single 3rd party game im in love with ( Street Fighter series / Mass Effect series / The Witcher and so many others that will take a while to do the list ) Which again this kind of mess leads to

4) Nintendo consoles premature deaths. We have the same situation , more or less , since Nintendo 64. Nintendo seems to pulling the plug way sooner than competition which value wise that sucks when at the same time ---->

5) They having the freaking price of their products as high as possible even when their products officially heading to their deaths. For example , Wii U as we speak in my country has 250euros when PS4 has 299euros and the only 2 games im interested in are at 60$. Im talking about the almost 3 years old Mario 3D world at 55 euros price tag and the forthcoming Zelda wii U. So ---->

6) I cant find a single reason to buy a Wii U. Its overpriced as hell both software and hardware wise , very limited library overall to keep me busy like forever , no NEW IPs that will make me interested at all and all these craps while system its almost dead!

7) No thnx , Wii U not I.

PS : When Nintendo get serious like they did with SNES i might get interested , till then... i refuse to give a single $ to their ridiculous , middlefingerous approach to their customers when it comes to console gaming the last 17 years at least.

Avatar image for quadknight
QuadKnight

12916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86  Edited By QuadKnight
Member since 2015 • 12916 Posts

@MonsieurX: You're trying too hard dude. The Wiiu's online and hardware are trash, it's one of the main reasons the console is selling horribly. Stop damage controlling for it. You like Nintendo's exclusives and that's fine but there's no need to cover up for that mediocre online and hardware. PS4's hardware is nowhere near as useless as the WiiU's and it actually has an online infrastructure. Nintendo's online never goes down because it's too mediocre for script kiddies to even bother with and it's free because no one in their right mind would pay for such shit.

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts

@quadknight said:

@MonsieurX: You're trying too hard dude. The Wiiu's online and hardware are trash, it's one of the main reasons the console is selling horribly. Stop damage controlling for it. You like Nintendo's exclusives and that's fine but there's no need to cover up for that mediocre online and hardware. PS4's hardware is nowhere near as useless as the WiiU's and it actually has an online infrastructure. Nintendo's online never goes down because it's too mediocre for script kiddies to even bother with and it's free because no one in their right mind would pay for such shit.

X1 and PS4 hardware are shit as well,even when they released. PS4's online infrastructure is exactly the same as the PS3,but now you have to pay. Thanks Sony!Gotta keep those servers up,eh

Avatar image for m3dude1
m3dude1

2334

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88  Edited By m3dude1
Member since 2007 • 2334 Posts

@MonsieurX said:
@m3dude1 said:
@MonsieurX said:
@m3dude1 said:

you mean the controller thats almost a direct rip off of the xbox controller, but not as good? add in the 50 bucks it costs and now your paying the same price for a wii u as a ps4. like omg how is the wii u not flying off the shelves!!! theres a massive difference between the hardware inside ps4 and the wii u. the online has to be free because no one would pay for such shit. nintendo does make some good games, so you can count on 1 or 2 good games on average per year. wow thats some amazing software support there!

And I don't see the problem with the regular tablet controller.

Oh yeah,I forgot how slightly less crap > crap. Amazing!

More and better exclusives on the Wii U.

Why so mad?

yes, clearly 10xish the system performance is only slightly better. by that same metric, your pc(if you even have one) is so marginally better than a ps4 it must not even register.

10xish?

It's said the Wii U is running at 352 GFLOPS while the PS4 is 1.82TFLOPS. Less than 5 times.

Still,crap hardware with no exclusives to play

are you daft? max theoretical tflop numbers arent at all an accurate measure of system performance. wii u's gpu is based on amds old VLIW architecture and the cpu is a tri core OoO power pc architecture. you are utterly clueless

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89  Edited By MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts

@m3dude1 said:
@MonsieurX said:
@m3dude1 said:
@MonsieurX said:
@m3dude1 said:

you mean the controller thats almost a direct rip off of the xbox controller, but not as good? add in the 50 bucks it costs and now your paying the same price for a wii u as a ps4. like omg how is the wii u not flying off the shelves!!! theres a massive difference between the hardware inside ps4 and the wii u. the online has to be free because no one would pay for such shit. nintendo does make some good games, so you can count on 1 or 2 good games on average per year. wow thats some amazing software support there!

And I don't see the problem with the regular tablet controller.

Oh yeah,I forgot how slightly less crap > crap. Amazing!

More and better exclusives on the Wii U.

Why so mad?

yes, clearly 10xish the system performance is only slightly better. by that same metric, your pc(if you even have one) is so marginally better than a ps4 it must not even register.

10xish?

It's said the Wii U is running at 352 GFLOPS while the PS4 is 1.82TFLOPS. Less than 5 times.

Still,crap hardware with no exclusives to play

are you daft? max theoretical tflop numbers arent at all an accurate measure of system performance. wii u's gpu is based on amds old VLIW architecture and the cpu is a tri core OoO power pc architecture. you are utterly clueless

You said 10xish the system performance,have some better source?

Avatar image for m3dude1
m3dude1

2334

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 m3dude1
Member since 2007 • 2334 Posts

@MonsieurX said:
@m3dude1 said:
@MonsieurX said:
@m3dude1 said:
@MonsieurX said:

And I don't see the problem with the regular tablet controller.

Oh yeah,I forgot how slightly less crap > crap. Amazing!

More and better exclusives on the Wii U.

Why so mad?

yes, clearly 10xish the system performance is only slightly better. by that same metric, your pc(if you even have one) is so marginally better than a ps4 it must not even register.

10xish?

It's said the Wii U is running at 352 GFLOPS while the PS4 is 1.82TFLOPS. Less than 5 times.

Still,crap hardware with no exclusives to play

are you daft? max theoretical tflop numbers arent at all an accurate measure of system performance. wii u's gpu is based on amds old VLIW architecture and the cpu is a tri core OoO power pc architecture. you are utterly clueless

You said 10xish the system performance,have some better source?

actual developers that post on beyond3d forums

Avatar image for quadknight
QuadKnight

12916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91  Edited By QuadKnight
Member since 2015 • 12916 Posts

@MonsieurX said:
@quadknight said:

@MonsieurX: You're trying too hard dude. The Wiiu's online and hardware are trash, it's one of the main reasons the console is selling horribly. Stop damage controlling for it. You like Nintendo's exclusives and that's fine but there's no need to cover up for that mediocre online and hardware. PS4's hardware is nowhere near as useless as the WiiU's and it actually has an online infrastructure. Nintendo's online never goes down because it's too mediocre for script kiddies to even bother with and it's free because no one in their right mind would pay for such shit.

X1 and PS4 hardware are shit as well,even when they released. PS4's online infrastructure is exactly the same as the PS3,but now you have to pay. Thanks Sony!Gotta keep those servers up,eh

Reading comprehension, you seriously lack it.

Are PS4's and Xbone's hardware stopping them from playing major third party games like Witcher 3, fallout 4, Assassins Creed, FF15, Street Fighter V, Mass Effect, etc.? No, they are not. Therefore they aren't as useless as the WiiU.

You either being stupid or trolling if you believe PS4's infrastructure is the same as PS3's. Shareplay and party chat alone are enough to put the PS4's online infrastructure head and shoulders above the PS3's.

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts

@m3dude1 said:
@MonsieurX said:
@m3dude1 said:
@MonsieurX said:
@m3dude1 said:

yes, clearly 10xish the system performance is only slightly better. by that same metric, your pc(if you even have one) is so marginally better than a ps4 it must not even register.

10xish?

It's said the Wii U is running at 352 GFLOPS while the PS4 is 1.82TFLOPS. Less than 5 times.

Still,crap hardware with no exclusives to play

are you daft? max theoretical tflop numbers arent at all an accurate measure of system performance. wii u's gpu is based on amds old VLIW architecture and the cpu is a tri core OoO power pc architecture. you are utterly clueless

You said 10xish the system performance,have some better source?

actual developers that post on beyond3d forums

Cool story.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f26ed7cf0697
deactivated-5f26ed7cf0697

7110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#93 deactivated-5f26ed7cf0697
Member since 2002 • 7110 Posts

Honestly, the Tablet GamePad. Completely pointless, in my opinion.

Wii Remote/Nunchuck was a far better concept, and implemented well.

Avatar image for tubbyc
tubbyc

4004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 tubbyc
Member since 2005 • 4004 Posts

I found the Nintendo 64, Gamecube and Wii to be pretty disappointing, so I'm not quick to buy Nintendo consoles anymore. Holding off on buying the Wii U turned out to be the right decision.

I will buy one eventually though once I get my backlog down, because I want to try Fatal Frame: Maiden of Black Water, and then may as well get Bayonetta 2 as well. Hopefully the next Zelda turns out good. Not sure if I'll get a brand new one or used.

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts

How not to? An x360 has more use in 2015 than a WiiU from 2012 to this day... WiiU is like the Vita, useless.

Avatar image for snapcracklenpop
snapcrackleNpop

274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 snapcrackleNpop
Member since 2015 • 274 Posts

PS4 and Xbox One came out and people forgot what a wii u was

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97  Edited By emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7849 Posts

Let's put it this way.

I bought a 3DO and AV Famicom this year when Wii U's can be had for $200. Yes, I'd much rather play on 20+ yr old systems than the Wii U.

I don't need a Wii U to play Mario Kart, Smash Bros, Super Mario Bros, Metroid, Star Fox, F-Zero, or Zelda. I have 7 other Nintendo consoles in my house that can play those games.

The only reason I might purchase a Wii U is if some super limited edition Wii U gets released at the end of its lifespan. Not to play it mind you, but to keep it sealed and eventually sell the thing to some Nintendo fanboy who would be stupid enough to pay me 3x what I paid for it.

Avatar image for judaspete
judaspete

8126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#98 judaspete
Member since 2005 • 8126 Posts

To be honest, I've been having trouble getting excited about this whole generation. Still playing PS3 and Wii. I think what I want is more stuff like Rocket League to come out. Then my feelings could change.

Avatar image for Solaryellow
Solaryellow

7373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 Solaryellow
Member since 2013 • 7373 Posts

@emgesp said:

The only reason I might purchase a Wii U is if some super limited edition Wii U gets released at the end of its lifespan. Not to play it mind you, but to keep it sealed and eventually sell the thing to some Nintendo fanboy who would be stupid enough to pay me 3x what I paid for it.

They are easy to profit on, aren't they?

Avatar image for xantufrog
xantufrog

17898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#100  Edited By xantufrog  Moderator
Member since 2013 • 17898 Posts

I love a good Nintendo IP, but I have limited game time and would like to own a system where I can get as much variety as I can so that I can allocate my time to whatever genre suits my fancy at a given time when making a new purchase. None of the consoles are perfect in that regard, but lacking 3rd party support the Wii U has too narrow a scope for me. I'd buy one if I had more time to game, so I could work in some of its classics to my rotation, but it's simply not a sufficiently appealing investment for me at this time