[QUOTE="Gamersince81"][QUOTE="carljohnson3456"][QUOTE="DaGamingGod"] Don't get me wrong. I love my PS3 console but if you think about it, why would a non-first party developer bother spending a massive budget and a couple of years on creating a game that is only for the PS3 when they can spend less cash and less time creating the same game on the 360? It's not as if the PS3 can output visuals that the 360 can't. Take MGS4 for example. It looks nice but I"m pretty positive that the 360 can output the same visuals. Maybe even better. I'm guessing that down the line, development costs will be down and it won't take as much time to develop on the PS3 but then again, developing on the 360 will cost even less and take less time to create great games. What do you folks think?
Uptown
I dont see how you can say that maybe MGS4 could look better on the 360.
It wouldnt. It would be downgraded by alote. MGS4 isnt GEARS, Bioshock or Mass Effect.,, MGS4 is a complete graphical beast compared to those games. *Spoiler* I dont think the 360 can act 3 chase scene or act 4 metal gear fight scene. MGS4 shows how much more powerful the PS3 is over the 360 from my comparisons of the two.
I wouldnt go that far....but I dont think 360 could streamline MGS4's levels and cutscenes as well as the PS3 did
Keep it real, the 360 will be three years old this November and there is no game on it that does what MGS4 pulled off. just sayin.The 360 has hundreds of games but noy one does what MGS4 did. Maybe GEARS2 will wow me like MGS4 did.
Log in to comment