Why do people say that Uncharted "isn't a shooter"?

  • 124 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for UnrealLegend
UnrealLegend

5888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#1 UnrealLegend
Member since 2009 • 5888 Posts

I don't understand this. Shooting is the main part of the game. You get a gun, point it at the enemy, and shoot them. Adding some half-assed platforming and puzzles doesn't take way the shooting aspects.

Half Life 2 has puzzles and driving sections, but we still call that a shooter.

So what's up with this? Is it embarassing to be called a shooter or something?

Avatar image for MicrosoftRules
MicrosoftRules

835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 MicrosoftRules
Member since 2012 • 835 Posts

It's story driven with a more action/ adventure appeal. It has puzzles and whatnot plus the multiplayer isn't legit. We don't consider it a shooter the same way we don't consider Mass Effect 3, Red Dead Redemption, or Max Payne 3 a shooter.

Avatar image for DeadMan1290
DeadMan1290

15754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#3 DeadMan1290
Member since 2005 • 15754 Posts

It's a shooter that's it.

Avatar image for tagyhag
tagyhag

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 tagyhag
Member since 2007 • 15874 Posts

It's like when people that call Mass Effect an RPG. :o

People seem to care when a game is called a particular genre, those people are just insecure and shouldn't give a sh*t.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#5 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts
Because shooter is apparently a label that means "bad game" or "lesser game" on this board. And people want to pretend it's more an adventure game, even though if you judged it by adventure game standards it would be a pretty sh1tty game because the puzzle and platforming side of things are designed for dimwits. It's also why Bioware fans never came to terms with the fact that Mass Effect is, has, and will forever be a shooter, a third person shooter, and if you really just want to use a broad term a f*cking action game. Which newsflash is also what Uncharted is. An action game.
Avatar image for inb4uall
inb4uall

6564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 inb4uall
Member since 2012 • 6564 Posts

It's story driven with a more action/ adventure appeal. It has puzzles and whatnot plus the multiplayer isn't legit. We don't consider it a shooter the same way we don't consider Mass Effect 3, Red Dead Redemption, or Max Payne 3 a shooter.

MicrosoftRules

i hste his name but yeah he's pretty much spot on.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#7 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

It's story driven with a more action/ adventure appeal. It has puzzles and whatnot plus the multiplayer isn't legit. We don't consider it a shooter the same way we don't consider Mass Effect 3, Red Dead Redemption, or Max Payne 3 a shooter.

MicrosoftRules
lol all those games are action games.
Avatar image for Nike_Air
Nike_Air

19737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Nike_Air
Member since 2006 • 19737 Posts

It's story driven with a more action/ adventure appeal. It has puzzles and whatnot plus the multiplayer isn't legit. We don't consider it a shooter the same way we don't consider Mass Effect 3, Red Dead Redemption, or Max Payne 3 a shooter.

MicrosoftRules

Fail on the multiplayer part , but +1 on the other points.

Avatar image for Tikeio
Tikeio

5332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Tikeio
Member since 2011 • 5332 Posts

It's story driven with a more action/ adventure appeal. It has puzzles and whatnot plus the multiplayer isn't legit. We don't consider it a shooter the same way we don't consider Mass Effect 3, Red Dead Redemption, or Max Payne 3 a shooter.

MicrosoftRules

really.gif

Avatar image for MicrosoftRules
MicrosoftRules

835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 MicrosoftRules
Member since 2012 • 835 Posts

[QUOTE="MicrosoftRules"]

It's story driven with a more action/ adventure appeal. It has puzzles and whatnot plus the multiplayer isn't legit. We don't consider it a shooter the same way we don't consider Mass Effect 3, Red Dead Redemption, or Max Payne 3 a shooter.

jg4xchamp

lol all those games are action games.

No; each has their own identity. Max Payne 3 is referred to as bullet-time or slow-mo, Mass Effect 3 is considered RPG (as you role play by choosing classes in the beginning), Red Dead Redemption is free roam.

Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#11 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11699 Posts

It is a shooter. What do you do 90% of the time you are playing Uncharted? Shooting THINGS!

Avatar image for MicrosoftRules
MicrosoftRules

835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 MicrosoftRules
Member since 2012 • 835 Posts

[QUOTE="MicrosoftRules"]

It's story driven with a more action/ adventure appeal. It has puzzles and whatnot plus the multiplayer isn't legit. We don't consider it a shooter the same way we don't consider Mass Effect 3, Red Dead Redemption, or Max Payne 3 a shooter.

Nike_Air

Fail on the multiplayer part , but +1 on the other points.

Sorry about that, it has good multiplayer. I just don't believe people buy it for multiplayer as it is truly story driven.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#13 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="MicrosoftRules"]

It's story driven with a more action/ adventure appeal. It has puzzles and whatnot plus the multiplayer isn't legit. We don't consider it a shooter the same way we don't consider Mass Effect 3, Red Dead Redemption, or Max Payne 3 a shooter.

MicrosoftRules

lol all those games are action games.

No; each has their own identity. Max Payne 3 is referred to as bullet-time or slow-mo, Mass Effect 3 is considered RPG (as you role play by choosing classes in the beginning), Red Dead Redemption is free roam.

Gimmicks and structure doesn't change the fact that the primary source of gameplay in those games is combat, and the primary form of combat in those game is shooting sh1t. Admittedly sure RDR falls into another subgenre like sandbox games(GTA, Saints, Ass Creed), but mechanics wise it's a shooter inside of a sandbox environment. The Mass Effect argument I'd rather avoid like the plague, and nothing about slow-mo would make Max Payne 3 any less of a shooter. By that logic FEAR isn't a FPS.
Avatar image for MicrosoftRules
MicrosoftRules

835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 MicrosoftRules
Member since 2012 • 835 Posts

It is a shooter. What do you do 90% of the time you are playing Uncharted? Shooting THINGS!

ShadowDeathX

I don't see your point as you shoot things in adventure, free roam, and bullet-time games as well. I don't think shooting alone makes a genre, but more of how it plays. I wouldn't consider L.A. Noire a shooter, would you?

Avatar image for Shirokishi_
Shirokishi_

11206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Shirokishi_
Member since 2009 • 11206 Posts

Its a third person shooter. Fact.

Avatar image for soulitane
soulitane

15091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 soulitane
Member since 2010 • 15091 Posts
[QUOTE="MicrosoftRules"]

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"] lol all those games are action games. jg4xchamp

No; each has their own identity. Max Payne 3 is referred to as bullet-time or slow-mo, Mass Effect 3 is considered RPG (as you role play by choosing classes in the beginning), Red Dead Redemption is free roam.

Gimmicks and structure doesn't change the fact that the primary source of gameplay in those games is combat, and the primary form of combat in those game is shooting sh1t. Admittedly sure RDR falls into another subgenre like sandbox games(GTA, Saints, Ass Creed), but mechanics wise it's a shooter inside of a sandbox environment. The Mass Effect argument I'd rather avoid like the plague, and nothing about slow-mo would make Max Payne 3 any less of a shooter. By that logic FEAR isn't a FPS.

I honestly cannot fathom how Max Payne could fall into any other genre than shooter :?
Avatar image for inb4uall
inb4uall

6564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 inb4uall
Member since 2012 • 6564 Posts

It is a shooter. What do you do 90% of the time you are playing Uncharted? Shooting THINGS!

ShadowDeathX

so what do you cal GTA then a shooter? no its sandbox/open world

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#18 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts
[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="MicrosoftRules"]

No; each has their own identity. Max Payne 3 is referred to as bullet-time or slow-mo, Mass Effect 3 is considered RPG (as you role play by choosing classes in the beginning), Red Dead Redemption is free roam.

soulitane
Gimmicks and structure doesn't change the fact that the primary source of gameplay in those games is combat, and the primary form of combat in those game is shooting sh1t. Admittedly sure RDR falls into another subgenre like sandbox games(GTA, Saints, Ass Creed), but mechanics wise it's a shooter inside of a sandbox environment. The Mass Effect argument I'd rather avoid like the plague, and nothing about slow-mo would make Max Payne 3 any less of a shooter. By that logic FEAR isn't a FPS.

I honestly cannot fathom how Max Payne could fall into any other genre than shooter :?

Apparently bullet time and slow mo is a genre now
Avatar image for MicrosoftRules
MicrosoftRules

835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 MicrosoftRules
Member since 2012 • 835 Posts

[QUOTE="MicrosoftRules"]

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"] lol all those games are action games. jg4xchamp

No; each has their own identity. Max Payne 3 is referred to as bullet-time or slow-mo, Mass Effect 3 is considered RPG (as you role play by choosing classes in the beginning), Red Dead Redemption is free roam.

Gimmicks and structure doesn't change the fact that the primary source of gameplay in those games is combat, and the primary form of combat in those game is shooting sh1t. Admittedly sure RDR falls into another subgenre like sandbox games(GTA, Saints, Ass Creed), but mechanics wise it's a shooter inside of a sandbox environment. The Mass Effect argument I'd rather avoid like the plague, and nothing about slow-mo would make Max Payne 3 any less of a shooter. By that logic FEAR isn't a FPS.

I think you're beginning to get it. We call Dead Space survival/horror and most of us won't consider Alan Wake a shooter either, more survival (that's just how it plays to us).

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#20 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"]

It is a shooter. What do you do 90% of the time you are playing Uncharted? Shooting THINGS!

inb4uall

so what do you cal GTA then a shooter? no its sandbox/open world

The sandbox/open world is just a structure choice, and really the genre only came about because so many games started working from GTA 3s formula. That said yeah GTA is every bit a shooter. That games entire design and its missions are tied to its shooting mechanics. Them not being good, and how that's been forgiven for so long is another matter entirely.
Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#21 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11699 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"]

It is a shooter. What do you do 90% of the time you are playing Uncharted? Shooting THINGS!

inb4uall

so what do you cal GTA then a shooter? no its sandbox/open world

And who said shooters can't be open world? Uncharted is a Third Person Shooter Linear Action Cinematic Story-Driven game.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#22 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="MicrosoftRules"]

No; each has their own identity. Max Payne 3 is referred to as bullet-time or slow-mo, Mass Effect 3 is considered RPG (as you role play by choosing classes in the beginning), Red Dead Redemption is free roam.

MicrosoftRules

Gimmicks and structure doesn't change the fact that the primary source of gameplay in those games is combat, and the primary form of combat in those game is shooting sh1t. Admittedly sure RDR falls into another subgenre like sandbox games(GTA, Saints, Ass Creed), but mechanics wise it's a shooter inside of a sandbox environment. The Mass Effect argument I'd rather avoid like the plague, and nothing about slow-mo would make Max Payne 3 any less of a shooter. By that logic FEAR isn't a FPS.

I think you're beginning to get it. We call Dead Space survival/horror and most of us won't consider Alan Wake a shooter either, more survival (that's just how it plays to us).

Except those 2 games are still action game with a horror aesthetic. Resource management and limited supplies isn't really a thing in either game so I fail to see them as survival games, and the horror side of things is entirely presentation and tone. The gameplay is still that of an action game. Acting like it isn't is just being silly.
Avatar image for inb4uall
inb4uall

6564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 inb4uall
Member since 2012 • 6564 Posts

[QUOTE="inb4uall"]

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"]

It is a shooter. What do you do 90% of the time you are playing Uncharted? Shooting THINGS!

jg4xchamp

so what do you cal GTA then a shooter? no its sandbox/open world

The sandbox/open world is just a structure choice, and really the genre only came about because so many games started working from GTA 3s formula. That said yeah GTA is every bit a shooter. That games entire design and its missions are tied to its shooting mechanics. Them not being good, and how that's been forgiven for so long is another matter entirely.

do you call fallout 3 a shooter then too? because you shoot in 95% of the fights

Avatar image for Nike_Air
Nike_Air

19737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Nike_Air
Member since 2006 • 19737 Posts

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="MicrosoftRules"]

No; each has their own identity. Max Payne 3 is referred to as bullet-time or slow-mo, Mass Effect 3 is considered RPG (as you role play by choosing classes in the beginning), Red Dead Redemption is free roam.

soulitane

Gimmicks and structure doesn't change the fact that the primary source of gameplay in those games is combat, and the primary form of combat in those game is shooting sh1t. Admittedly sure RDR falls into another subgenre like sandbox games(GTA, Saints, Ass Creed), but mechanics wise it's a shooter inside of a sandbox environment. The Mass Effect argument I'd rather avoid like the plague, and nothing about slow-mo would make Max Payne 3 any less of a shooter. By that logic FEAR isn't a FPS.

I honestly cannot fathom how Max Payne could fall into any other genre than shooter :?

Gimmicky bullet-time disqualifies it from shooter status:P

Avatar image for GD1551
GD1551

9645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 GD1551
Member since 2011 • 9645 Posts

Because games on the internet have attatched a negative mindset in regards to shooters. So they want to distance their favourite franchises from it one way or the other.

Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#26 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11699 Posts

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="inb4uall"]so what do you cal GTA then a shooter? no its sandbox/open world

inb4uall

The sandbox/open world is just a structure choice, and really the genre only came about because so many games started working from GTA 3s formula. That said yeah GTA is every bit a shooter. That games entire design and its missions are tied to its shooting mechanics. Them not being good, and how that's been forgiven for so long is another matter entirely.

do you call fallout 3 a shooter then too? because you shoot in 95% of the fights

Yeah why not? It is a Role-Playing Shooting game.

The only thing I wouldn't call a shooter would be Mirror's Edge since the focus is clearly not even on shooting things. Most people don't even know ME has guns.

Avatar image for MicrosoftRules
MicrosoftRules

835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 MicrosoftRules
Member since 2012 • 835 Posts

[QUOTE="MicrosoftRules"]

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"] Gimmicks and structure doesn't change the fact that the primary source of gameplay in those games is combat, and the primary form of combat in those game is shooting sh1t. Admittedly sure RDR falls into another subgenre like sandbox games(GTA, Saints, Ass Creed), but mechanics wise it's a shooter inside of a sandbox environment. The Mass Effect argument I'd rather avoid like the plague, and nothing about slow-mo would make Max Payne 3 any less of a shooter. By that logic FEAR isn't a FPS.jg4xchamp

I think you're beginning to get it. We call Dead Space survival/horror and most of us won't consider Alan Wake a shooter either, more survival (that's just how it plays to us).

Except those 2 games are still action game with a horror aesthetic. Resource management and limited supplies isn't really a thing in either game so I fail to see them as survival games, and the horror side of things is entirely presentation and tone. The gameplay is still that of an action game. Acting like it isn't is just being silly.

I guess action would be a better term then, either way we won't consider them shooters.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#28 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="inb4uall"]so what do you cal GTA then a shooter? no its sandbox/open world

inb4uall

The sandbox/open world is just a structure choice, and really the genre only came about because so many games started working from GTA 3s formula. That said yeah GTA is every bit a shooter. That games entire design and its missions are tied to its shooting mechanics. Them not being good, and how that's been forgiven for so long is another matter entirely.

do you call fallout 3 a shooter then too? because you shoot in 95% of the fights

I call Fallout 3 sh1t. Horrible choice. But yeah if we're getting into that is "blah blah a RPG" discussion. I'd say Fallout 3 barely fits the bill when compared to how a game like Planescape or the first 2 fallout games did business. Hell even compared New Vegas.
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#29 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="MicrosoftRules"]

I think you're beginning to get it. We call Dead Space survival/horror and most of us won't consider Alan Wake a shooter either, more survival (that's just how it plays to us).

MicrosoftRules

Except those 2 games are still action game with a horror aesthetic. Resource management and limited supplies isn't really a thing in either game so I fail to see them as survival games, and the horror side of things is entirely presentation and tone. The gameplay is still that of an action game. Acting like it isn't is just being silly.

I guess action would be a better term then, either way we won't consider them shooters.

Shooters are nothing more than action games. It's a glorified sub genre. and no matter how you spin it all those games are tied to their shooting, and how the game was developed around the shooting. Killing things and taking part in the games set pieces tend to be where majority of the satisfaction comes from these games.
Avatar image for MicrosoftRules
MicrosoftRules

835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 MicrosoftRules
Member since 2012 • 835 Posts

Because games on the internet have attatched a negative mindset in regards to shooters. So they want to distance their favourite franchises from it one way or the other.

GD1551

No, no. It really has to do with whether it is multiplayer driven or story driven, that's really how I think most people see it. I like both types of games, but I still won't consider certain ones a shooter depending on how I feel they play.

Avatar image for MicrosoftRules
MicrosoftRules

835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 MicrosoftRules
Member since 2012 • 835 Posts

[QUOTE="MicrosoftRules"]

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"] Except those 2 games are still action game with a horror aesthetic. Resource management and limited supplies isn't really a thing in either game so I fail to see them as survival games, and the horror side of things is entirely presentation and tone. The gameplay is still that of an action game. Acting like it isn't is just being silly. jg4xchamp

I guess action would be a better term then, either way we won't consider them shooters.

Shooters are nothing more than action games. It's a glorified sub genre. and no matter how you spin it all those games are tied to their shooting, and how the game was developed around the shooting. Killing things and taking part in the games set pieces tend to be where majority of the satisfaction comes from these games.

How? I can play through Mass Effect 3 and beat it using Vanguard without shooting a single weapon. It's a role-playing game hence the fact that I choose a role to play in the beginning.

Avatar image for soulitane
soulitane

15091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 soulitane
Member since 2010 • 15091 Posts
[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="jg4xchamp"] Gimmicks and structure doesn't change the fact that the primary source of gameplay in those games is combat, and the primary form of combat in those game is shooting sh1t. Admittedly sure RDR falls into another subgenre like sandbox games(GTA, Saints, Ass Creed), but mechanics wise it's a shooter inside of a sandbox environment. The Mass Effect argument I'd rather avoid like the plague, and nothing about slow-mo would make Max Payne 3 any less of a shooter. By that logic FEAR isn't a FPS.

I honestly cannot fathom how Max Payne could fall into any other genre than shooter :?

Apparently bullet time and slow mo is a genre now

Starting to sound like metal if people want to add meaningless subgenres :P
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#33 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

No, no. It really has to do with whether it is multiplayer driven

MicrosoftRules

tumblr_lswm29xsXE1qlnzg0o7_400.gif

Being multiplayer driven doesn't make a game a shooter

Avatar image for UnrealLegend
UnrealLegend

5888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#34 UnrealLegend
Member since 2009 • 5888 Posts

I wonder how long it will be until LoosingEnds pops in to say "It's not a shooter; it's a 5 hour movie." :P

Avatar image for tagyhag
tagyhag

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 tagyhag
Member since 2007 • 15874 Posts

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="MicrosoftRules"]

I guess action would be a better term then, either way we won't consider them shooters.

MicrosoftRules

Shooters are nothing more than action games. It's a glorified sub genre. and no matter how you spin it all those games are tied to their shooting, and how the game was developed around the shooting. Killing things and taking part in the games set pieces tend to be where majority of the satisfaction comes from these games.

How? I can play through Mass Effect 3 and beat it using Vanguard without shooting a single weapon. It's a role-playing game hence the fact that I choose a role to play in the beginning.

You can go through Halo CE without shooting your gun and just meleeing aliens to death, guess it's a brawler.

Avatar image for MicrosoftRules
MicrosoftRules

835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 MicrosoftRules
Member since 2012 • 835 Posts

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="soulitane"] I honestly cannot fathom how Max Payne could fall into any other genre than shooter :?soulitane
Apparently bullet time and slow mo is a genre now

Starting to sound like metal if people want to add meaningless subgenres :P

I may give you Max Payne 3, but you both purposely the weakest to pick at. Max Payne 3 has a big emphasis on story with tacked on multiplayer and the people that I play with will just call it bullet-time as that is the central theme of the game.

Avatar image for soulitane
soulitane

15091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 soulitane
Member since 2010 • 15091 Posts

[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="jg4xchamp"] Apparently bullet time and slow mo is a genre nowMicrosoftRules

Starting to sound like metal if people want to add meaningless subgenres :P

I may give you Max Payne 3, but you both purposely the weakest to pick at. Max Payne 3 has a big emphasis on story with tacked on multiplayer and the people that I play with will just call it bullet-time as that is the central theme of the game.

Show me somewhere where someone calls the genre it is in bullet time, and not some random post on a forum.
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#38 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="MicrosoftRules"]

I guess action would be a better term then, either way we won't consider them shooters.

MicrosoftRules

Shooters are nothing more than action games. It's a glorified sub genre. and no matter how you spin it all those games are tied to their shooting, and how the game was developed around the shooting. Killing things and taking part in the games set pieces tend to be where majority of the satisfaction comes from these games.

How? I can play through Mass Effect 3 and beat it using Vanguard without shooting a single weapon. It's a role-playing game hence the fact that I choose a role to play in the beginning.

Bullsh1t, at most you'll be able to do is spam one attack over and over again, and even then it's an action based attack is it is. That game is an action game.
Avatar image for MicrosoftRules
MicrosoftRules

835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 MicrosoftRules
Member since 2012 • 835 Posts

[QUOTE="MicrosoftRules"]

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"] Shooters are nothing more than action games. It's a glorified sub genre. and no matter how you spin it all those games are tied to their shooting, and how the game was developed around the shooting. Killing things and taking part in the games set pieces tend to be where majority of the satisfaction comes from these games. tagyhag

How? I can play through Mass Effect 3 and beat it using Vanguard without shooting a single weapon. It's a role-playing game hence the fact that I choose a role to play in the beginning.

You can go through Halo CE without shooting your gun and just meleeing aliens to death, guess it's a brawler.

That's not the same.

Avatar image for MicrosoftRules
MicrosoftRules

835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 MicrosoftRules
Member since 2012 • 835 Posts

[QUOTE="MicrosoftRules"]

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"] Shooters are nothing more than action games. It's a glorified sub genre. and no matter how you spin it all those games are tied to their shooting, and how the game was developed around the shooting. Killing things and taking part in the games set pieces tend to be where majority of the satisfaction comes from these games. jg4xchamp

How? I can play through Mass Effect 3 and beat it using Vanguard without shooting a single weapon. It's a role-playing game hence the fact that I choose a role to play in the beginning.

Bullsh1t, at most you'll be able to do is spam one attack over and over again, and even then it's an action based attack is it is. That game is an action game.

Okay.. How is Mass Effect an action game now? It's an RPG as that is the central theme of the game, you role-play.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#41 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="MicrosoftRules"]

How? I can play through Mass Effect 3 and beat it using Vanguard without shooting a single weapon. It's a role-playing game hence the fact that I choose a role to play in the beginning.

MicrosoftRules

Bullsh1t, at most you'll be able to do is spam one attack over and over again, and even then it's an action based attack is it is. That game is an action game.

Okay.. How is Mass Effect an action game now? It's an RPG as that is the central theme of the game, you role-play.

Because your only solution to every mission in that game is combat. Be it Noveria in ME1, Be it tuchanka in ME2, or even when you get all the way to Earth in ME3. You spend a grand chunk of that game taking part in missions where you go forward and have to clear out the room of enemies. You get to pick a cIass, but that's just another flavor of abilities you get to kill things. Every decision you make is just their for a plot that takes you from one instance to another where you are tasked with to kill things.

On the flip side in a game like Planescape you can kill everyone in the game, or you can play that game and honestly never engage in combat and talk your way through things, and there are even stealthy approaches. Not mass effects brand of "stealth" for the right to kill some more. The presentation maybe be built with this idea that you have choice and get to dictate the story(a facade, because reality is you're still playing Bioware's story, and not your own), but the actual gameplay is that of a typical third person cover shooter.

It's only real area where it sticks out among third person cover shooters is that the writing is usually fairly good(save some noteworthy f*ck ups), and stuff like biotic/tech powers. But none of that changes that it's an action game.

Avatar image for soulitane
soulitane

15091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 soulitane
Member since 2010 • 15091 Posts
By the way, would that make crysis's genre; superly awesome suit with powers?
Avatar image for MicrosoftRules
MicrosoftRules

835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 MicrosoftRules
Member since 2012 • 835 Posts

[QUOTE="MicrosoftRules"]

[QUOTE="soulitane"] Starting to sound like metal if people want to add meaningless subgenres :Psoulitane

I may give you Max Payne 3, but you both purposely the weakest to pick at. Max Payne 3 has a big emphasis on story with tacked on multiplayer and the people that I play with will just call it bullet-time as that is the central theme of the game.

Show me somewhere where someone calls the genre it is in bullet time, and not some random post on a forum.

It's not an offical genre (exactly), but that's how we see it. I'm not trying to say that this is anything other than culture and how we respond to games. Sheesh.

Avatar image for Tikeio
Tikeio

5332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Tikeio
Member since 2011 • 5332 Posts

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="MicrosoftRules"]

How? I can play through Mass Effect 3 and beat it using Vanguard without shooting a single weapon. It's a role-playing game hence the fact that I choose a role to play in the beginning.

MicrosoftRules

Bullsh1t, at most you'll be able to do is spam one attack over and over again, and even then it's an action based attack is it is. That game is an action game.

Okay.. How is Mass Effect an action game now? It's an RPG as that is the central theme of the game, you role-play.

You play a role in pretty much EVERY game. :|

Avatar image for soulitane
soulitane

15091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 soulitane
Member since 2010 • 15091 Posts

[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="MicrosoftRules"]

I may give you Max Payne 3, but you both purposely the weakest to pick at. Max Payne 3 has a big emphasis on story with tacked on multiplayer and the people that I play with will just call it bullet-time as that is the central theme of the game.

MicrosoftRules

Show me somewhere where someone calls the genre it is in bullet time, and not some random post on a forum.

It's not an offical genre (exactly), but that's how we see it. I'm not trying to say that this is anything other than culture and how we respond to games. Sheesh.

Who is we? You're the only one saying this :?
Avatar image for MicrosoftRules
MicrosoftRules

835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 MicrosoftRules
Member since 2012 • 835 Posts

By the way, would that make crysis's genre; superly awesome suit with powers?soulitane

I'm done. I'm talking to several people at once who only want to mock. I tried to help you understand how we see the games, but you are stuck in your mindset of official terms or otherwise different ideas than ours. This is just how we see the games, it is how we view them.

Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts
shooting is easily the worst part of those games. idk why they make you do it so much.
Avatar image for tagyhag
tagyhag

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 tagyhag
Member since 2007 • 15874 Posts

[QUOTE="tagyhag"]

[QUOTE="MicrosoftRules"]

How? I can play through Mass Effect 3 and beat it using Vanguard without shooting a single weapon. It's a role-playing game hence the fact that I choose a role to play in the beginning.

MicrosoftRules

You can go through Halo CE without shooting your gun and just meleeing aliens to death, guess it's a brawler.

That's not the same.

Sure it is, I'm roleplaying a Spartan who's a dumbass and doesn't know how to shoot a gun, therefore he has to bash the sh*t out of all the aliens to win the game.So I guess Halo is a RPG after all.
Avatar image for MicrosoftRules
MicrosoftRules

835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 MicrosoftRules
Member since 2012 • 835 Posts

[QUOTE="MicrosoftRules"]

[QUOTE="soulitane"] Show me somewhere where someone calls the genre it is in bullet time, and not some random post on a forum.soulitane

It's not an offical genre (exactly), but that's how we see it. I'm not trying to say that this is anything other than culture and how we respond to games. Sheesh.

Who is we? You're the only one saying this :?

Everyone who doesn't consider certain games shooters. I'm not the only one who thinks this. Look at the title and read through the posts from where this discussion originally started. Some people just don't consider certain games with one idea of gun in hand or not.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#50 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts
shooting is easily the worst part of those games. idk why they make you do it so much.mems_1224
Shooting is hardly the worst part in Uncharted. Frankly it's somewhere between solid and pretty good.