Why do people think Crysis is possible on th ePS3

  • 66 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for turgore
turgore

7859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#51 turgore
Member since 2006 • 7859 Posts
[QUOTE="DoctorBunny"][QUOTE="Not-A-Stalker"][QUOTE="mastershake575"]

it can be done on a console easy its just it would be in direct 9 not direct 10 and you really don't need a really expensive rig to play the game on max im building a pc for about $800 and it will run it on max in direct 10 mode

Meu2k7

And tha fact that the 360 and PS3 have 512mb RAM doesn't change any of your outrageous claim?

Which is at least doubled, now with vista, quadrupled when compared to a pc's amount. on the pc, Most of the ram is used on OS, system resources and such. Why do you think going from xp to vista alone doubles the ram you need to play games. Being a PC gamer, you should know that

My XP with 60 Proscesses running only takes 466 RAM ..., Vista doesnt even double it, about 750. that leaves .. on a standard "Crysis PRepared rig" with 1.2k RAM , not to mention Vista allocated up to 3 GB RAM into all programs, and READY boost with a memory stick.

Crysis would be dumbed down in scale, taking away a good portion of its value on a console, not only that, limited to like 8-12 players online? When its 32 on the PC? I mean cmon reality is, it would be a half-assed game port if anything.

 1 disc for singleplayer. 1 for multiplayer.  Gears of war looks great ,

 

Avatar image for -Sora
-Sora

15152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 -Sora
Member since 2004 • 15152 Posts

After all those Months of reading XBotx saying how XENOS rapes RSX and how the RSX sucks in these forums, and later finding out that Lair almost match's GoWs Graphics and Beats it in some condition while it shouldn't...:evil: (Check this Out)

[QUOTE=""] For Example just took at Lair, its A Sandbox game (huge open environment you can land on and fly 5000 feet in the air, Needs tons of prossing power thx to the HUGE Maps, 36x36 KM ) and just compare it 2 GoW (small inside corridors, small map ) they both almost look the same, and even in some condition's Lairs looks TONS better While lair Shouldn't because sandbox games generally DON'T look better - due to the immense size of the maps. . Just check those High definition pictures and compare lair and Gears and you'll understand what i mean. my Main point is, if the Ps3 is able to do all that using a sandbox game

Sandbox - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandbox_%28video_games%29

naughtydog360

( Took out all the other useless stuff from the quote )

 

 

I FAIL TO BELIEVE ANYONE ANYMORE.. Thinking About How fast the XDR memory in the PS3 just gives me hope that a future game like Crysis is poissible in the PS3 Or Xbox.

Look at the mountains in Lair, they have nothing on them, the water and the dragons are the only things that looks good

Avatar image for khoado
khoado

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 khoado
Member since 2003 • 25 Posts

Why do people think Crysis is possible on the PS3??? Let me tell u this, because its for sure possible on either ps3 or the 360. Of course it would not be crysis cause its never designed for ps2/360, but i m saying that level of graphic could certainly be obtained on ps3/360.

Seriously, u got to be out of your goddamn minds to think that ps3/360 couldnt obtain that level of graphic. The consoles have just been released recently and still fresh out. Their games are just 1st/2nd wave games of the consoles and there is already a game on PC with graphic that they could never obtain???

U really think that the heads of Sony/Microsoft would release such weak consoles like that?? Dude, get some common senses

 

Avatar image for cobrax75
cobrax75

8389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 cobrax75
Member since 2007 • 8389 Posts

Why do people think Crysis is possible on the PS3??? Let me tell u this, because its for sure possible on either ps3 or the 360. Of course it would not be crysis cause its never designed for ps2/360, but i m saying that level of graphic could certainly be obtained on ps3/360.

Seriously, u got to be out of your goddamn minds to think that ps3/360 couldnt obtain that level of graphic. The consoles have just been released recently and still fresh out. Their games are just 1st/2nd wave games of the consoles and there is already a game on PC with graphic that they couldnt obtain???

U really think that the heads of Sony/Microsoft would release such weak consoles like that?? Dude, get some common senses

 

khoado

 

the fact that almost every single multiplat looks better on the PC....especially Oblivion which is much better says no......

 

Get used to it...PC's always overtake consoles within a year.... 

Avatar image for muscleserge
muscleserge

3307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#55 muscleserge
Member since 2005 • 3307 Posts
[QUOTE="muscleserge"][QUOTE="killab2oo5"]T_T PC gamers say you can max Crysis out,DX9 mode,with a 7600GTX,Pentium 4,and 512mb of RAM...but consoles cant?Since Crysis is soooo scaleable,and can easily run on 5 year old PC's and still look good,PS3 nor 360 should have no problem at all running Crysis maxed at DX9,I dont believe Crytek are very lazy devs,the only reason this game wouldnt run on consoles is if they wouldnt take the time to make it run.This is ofcourse if what PC gamers say about Crysis system requirements are true.One minute theyll say Crysis runs beautifully on a 5 year old PC due to high scaleability,then when someone brings up it could be done on a console...they say "consoles could never handle Crysis!".:roll:Rather annoying.killab2oo5
In order to expririance all what Crysis can deliver you need DX10, but with DX9 you can still get most of this experience, I'd estimate 90%. However Crytek will be releasing a number of graphical improvement patches in the future that will only be comaptible with newer harware so the graphics will only get better. to run Crysis on DX9 on high you'll proly need PD 3.0ghz 2gb ram 7800GTX see the consoles lack 2 out of 3, PD>console CPUs, 2gb>512mb obviously, RSX/Xenos=7800GTX. that is why consoles isn't posible on consoles, atleast for now.

>.> Something tells me...you dont really know console vs. pc hardware.I would think even the tri-core,multi-threaded,3.2ghz processer in the 360 is more powerful than a PD 3.0ghz.For one,from a spec standpoint,its better.Another thing is devs can designed their games specifically for the CPU in the 360,so the game will be as optimized as possible,same with the GPU.Example,you could NEVER get the amount of detail running Chaos Theory on any 64mb RAM GPU in a PC as you would on an Xbox because the game was being made on 1 peice of hardware,and Ubi could easily take full advantage of all the power,something on PC that requires 1gb-2b of RAM could be done on the 360.The 360 doesnt have to worry about firewalls,a bulky OS,virus protector,messenger,and everything else your PC runs in the backround(press CTRL+ALT+DEL and see Processes tab),so the RAM can be used MUCH more effeciently by devs.>.> Do you see where im going?

Dude the PD is better than Xenon, it has been proven numerous times. Crytek them selves said that the next gen consoles can't handle the game at the quality they intend. My PC at idle takes up less than 300mb of ram, so I have 1.7gb always available, and even more if demanded due to pagefile.
Avatar image for muscleserge
muscleserge

3307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#56 muscleserge
Member since 2005 • 3307 Posts
[QUOTE="khoado"]

Why do people think Crysis is possible on the PS3??? Let me tell u this, because its for sure possible on either ps3 or the 360. Of course it would not be crysis cause its never designed for ps2/360, but i m saying that level of graphic could certainly be obtained on ps3/360.

Seriously, u got to be out of your goddamn minds to think that ps3/360 couldnt obtain that level of graphic. The consoles have just been released recently and still fresh out. Their games are just 1st/2nd wave games of the consoles and there is already a game on PC with graphic that they couldnt obtain???

U really think that the heads of Sony/Microsoft would release such weak consoles like that?? Dude, get some common senses

cobrax75

the fact that almost every single multiplat looks better on the PC....especially Oblivion which is much better says no......

Get used to it...PC's always overtake consoles within a year....

A year, in 2005 PC has SLI and Crossfire, and SLI 7800GTX>whatever the consoles can bring. So technically consoles were outdated the moment they were out.
Avatar image for Perception1
Perception1

1010

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Perception1
Member since 2006 • 1010 Posts

I don't know, I think PS3 would be able to do Crysis graphics in a few years.

But that's just me. 

Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts

[QUOTE="killab2oo5"][QUOTE="muscleserge"][QUOTE="killab2oo5"]T_T PC gamers say you can max Crysis out,DX9 mode,with a 7600GTX,Pentium 4,and 512mb of RAM...but consoles cant?Since Crysis is soooo scaleable,and can easily run on 5 year old PC's and still look good,PS3 nor 360 should have no problem at all running Crysis maxed at DX9,I dont believe Crytek are very lazy devs,the only reason this game wouldnt run on consoles is if they wouldnt take the time to make it run.This is ofcourse if what PC gamers say about Crysis system requirements are true.One minute theyll say Crysis runs beautifully on a 5 year old PC due to high scaleability,then when someone brings up it could be done on a console...they say "consoles could never handle Crysis!".:roll:Rather annoying.cobrax75

In order to expririance all what Crysis can deliver you need DX10, but with DX9 you can still get most of this experience, I'd estimate 90%. However Crytek will be releasing a number of graphical improvement patches in the future that will only be comaptible with newer harware so the graphics will only get better. to run Crysis on DX9 on high you'll proly need PD 3.0ghz 2gb ram 7800GTX see the consoles lack 2 out of 3, PD>console CPUs, 2gb>512mb obviously, RSX/Xenos=7800GTX. that is why consoles isn't posible on consoles, atleast for now.

>.> Something tells me...you dont really know console vs. pc hardware.I would think even the tri-core,multi-threaded,3.2ghz processer in the 360 is more powerful than a PD 3.0ghz.For one,from a spec standpoint,its better.Another thing is devs can designed their games specifically for the CPU in the 360,so the game will be as optimized as possible,same with the GPU.Example,you could NEVER get the amount of detail running Chaos Theory on any 64mb RAM GPU in a PC as you would on an Xbox because the game was being made on 1 peice of hardware,and Ubi could easily take full advantage of all the power,something on PC that requires 1gb-2b of RAM could be done on the 360.The 360 doesnt have to worry about firewalls,a bulky OS,virus protector,messenger,and everything else your PC runs in the backround(press CTRL+ALT+DEL and see Processes tab),so the RAM can be used MUCH more effeciently by devs.>.> Do you see where im going?

 

Prosesor speeds mean absolutly nothing nowadays....a PD 3.0 can still max out any game easily...Including Oblivion, and need I remind you on what platform Oblivion looks better on? 

Heh...guess you didnt really read what I said,eh?"I would think even the tri-core,multi-threaded,3.2ghz processer in the 360 is more powerful than a PD 3.0ghz.For one,from a spec standpoint,its better."I wonder...for the value,which does Shadowrun and Lost Planet run on best???:roll:Your compare a sloppy bloated PC port...so I throw in some sloppy bloated consoles ports.:roll:Your logic....ftl.
Avatar image for cobrax75
cobrax75

8389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 cobrax75
Member since 2007 • 8389 Posts
[QUOTE="cobrax75"]

[QUOTE="killab2oo5"][QUOTE="muscleserge"][QUOTE="killab2oo5"]T_T PC gamers say you can max Crysis out,DX9 mode,with a 7600GTX,Pentium 4,and 512mb of RAM...but consoles cant?Since Crysis is soooo scaleable,and can easily run on 5 year old PC's and still look good,PS3 nor 360 should have no problem at all running Crysis maxed at DX9,I dont believe Crytek are very lazy devs,the only reason this game wouldnt run on consoles is if they wouldnt take the time to make it run.This is ofcourse if what PC gamers say about Crysis system requirements are true.One minute theyll say Crysis runs beautifully on a 5 year old PC due to high scaleability,then when someone brings up it could be done on a console...they say "consoles could never handle Crysis!".:roll:Rather annoying.killab2oo5

In order to expririance all what Crysis can deliver you need DX10, but with DX9 you can still get most of this experience, I'd estimate 90%. However Crytek will be releasing a number of graphical improvement patches in the future that will only be comaptible with newer harware so the graphics will only get better. to run Crysis on DX9 on high you'll proly need PD 3.0ghz 2gb ram 7800GTX see the consoles lack 2 out of 3, PD>console CPUs, 2gb>512mb obviously, RSX/Xenos=7800GTX. that is why consoles isn't posible on consoles, atleast for now.

>.> Something tells me...you dont really know console vs. pc hardware.I would think even the tri-core,multi-threaded,3.2ghz processer in the 360 is more powerful than a PD 3.0ghz.For one,from a spec standpoint,its better.Another thing is devs can designed their games specifically for the CPU in the 360,so the game will be as optimized as possible,same with the GPU.Example,you could NEVER get the amount of detail running Chaos Theory on any 64mb RAM GPU in a PC as you would on an Xbox because the game was being made on 1 peice of hardware,and Ubi could easily take full advantage of all the power,something on PC that requires 1gb-2b of RAM could be done on the 360.The 360 doesnt have to worry about firewalls,a bulky OS,virus protector,messenger,and everything else your PC runs in the backround(press CTRL+ALT+DEL and see Processes tab),so the RAM can be used MUCH more effeciently by devs.>.> Do you see where im going?

 

Prosesor speeds mean absolutly nothing nowadays....a PD 3.0 can still max out any game easily...Including Oblivion, and need I remind you on what platform Oblivion looks better on?

Heh...guess you didnt really read what I said,eh?"I would think even the tri-core,multi-threaded,3.2ghz processer in the 360 is more powerful than a PD 3.0ghz.For one,from a spec standpoint,its better."I wonder...for the value,which does Shadowrun and Lost Planet run on best???:roll:Your compare a sloppy bloated PC port...so I throw in some sloppy bloated consoles ports.:roll:Your logic....ftl.

 

Since when was Oblivion for the 360 a port?

 

and again....Processor speeds mean absolutly nothing, unless you are comparing CPU;s from the exact same archetechture. 

Avatar image for SergeantSnitch
SergeantSnitch

3692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 SergeantSnitch
Member since 2007 • 3692 Posts
I think at the end of the PS3/360's life, we will see graphics that are similar (not quite as good but close) to that of Crysis.  Maybe not the same amount of physics and awesome features of Crysis but close graphically.
Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts
Dude the PD is better than Xenon, it has been proven numerous times. Crytek them selves said that the next gen consoles can't handle the game at the quality they intend. My PC at idle takes up less than 300mb of ram, so I have 1.7gb always available, and even more if demanded due to pagefile.muscleserge
>.> Ive searched google for the past 10 minuted looking for any info on a Pentium D vs Xenon,and found a few...from the looks of it,PC gamers saying the Pentium D was better because of the out-of-order architecture...and also found 360 gamers saying the 360 cpu was better just because of the 3 cores.T_T Where are you getting your information from?O.o I find it...pretty ignorant that PC gamers say a Pentium 4 can run crysis fine,but Xenon cant.You all act as if the Xenon cant do anything impressive.
Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts
Since when was Oblivion for the 360 a port?

and again....Processor speeds mean absolutly nothing, unless you are comparing CPU;s from the exact same archetechture. 

cobrax75
Eh...I said "from a specs standpoint",meaning technically.Heh...and Oblivion for the 360 was PC port.You thought it was built from the ground up?
Avatar image for cobrax75
cobrax75

8389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 cobrax75
Member since 2007 • 8389 Posts
[QUOTE="cobrax75"]Since when was Oblivion for the 360 a port?

and again....Processor speeds mean absolutly nothing, unless you are comparing CPU;s from the exact same archetechture.

killab2oo5

Eh...I said "from a specs standpoint",meaning technically.Heh...and Oblivion for the 360 was PC port.You thought it was built from the ground up?

 

plz explain to me how Oblivion was a PC port if it still used the original console interface on the PC version?

 

and again....Clock speeds dont matter at all today....they mean absolutly nothing....AMD CPU's always have lower clock speeds then their Intel counterparts, yet performed just as well. 

Avatar image for chubz256
chubz256

171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 chubz256
Member since 2005 • 171 Posts

the cell.purplemidgets

ZOMG! Emotion Engine 2.0!!

Avatar image for c02z
c02z

1840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 c02z
Member since 2005 • 1840 Posts
T_T PC gamers say you can max Crysis out,DX9 mode,with a 7600GTX,Pentium 4,and 512mb of RAM...but consoles cant?Since Crysis is soooo scaleable,and can easily run on 5 year old PC's and still look good,PS3 nor 360 should have no problem at all running Crysis maxed at DX9,I dont believe Crytek are very lazy devs,the only reason this game wouldnt run on consoles is if they wouldnt take the time to make it run.This is ofcourse if what PC gamers say about Crysis system requirements are true.One minute theyll say Crysis runs beautifully on a 5 year old PC due to high scaleability,then when someone brings up it could be done on a console...they say "consoles could never handle Crysis!".:roll:Rather annoying.killab2oo5
agree, this guy answer everything in this thread that everyone need to know.
Avatar image for ish_gibbor
ish_gibbor

1717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#66 ish_gibbor
Member since 2004 • 1717 Posts

I am sure you also though it was impossible for half life 2 to be playable on the xbox. I know I sure did. But it plays pretty well on the regular zbox. The graphics are downgraded, but the physics are fully there. I did not think the regular xbox could handle half life 2 physics but it does.

I think the 360 and ps3 can handle Crysis physics, but I am not sure it can handle all the dynamic lighting and graphics. I bet it can run the game though.

Avatar image for Marka1700
Marka1700

7500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Marka1700
Member since 2003 • 7500 Posts
Dosnt matter how good console CPU's are, or how fast thier RAM is,  They still have the physical limitation of 512MB of Ram.  All those instuction/information just cant be stored in that little bit of RAM.
Avatar image for chaos-SD
chaos-SD

499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 chaos-SD
Member since 2007 • 499 Posts
I'm not going to say that crysis will be ported to the PS3 or 360.  However please check your facts before you infer that the PS3 is equal to the 360.  The fact is it's not very close.  For starters the PS3 has nine processors, and the 360 has three.