Wii makes a great secondary console. But of course, 360 or PS3 make the best primary consoles.
Plus the Wii is cheap and has some great games so it's fun.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="shoeman12"]maybe the games are fun?Khansoul
That is in no way the reason it can't be since they stink. I have to say its because non gamers are making up the majority of its consumer base. I cannot imagine many gamers truly being happy with a Wii, I hated mine!
i enjoy games like tp, mp3, nmh, smg, and brawl and i'm a gamer.
[QUOTE="evilross"][QUOTE="shoeman12"]maybe the games are fun?metroidfood
This argument from Wii fans is getting so old and tired. The "gameplay > graphics", and "fun" defense when talking about the Wii has no logic behind it what-so-ever.
Guess what?
The 360, PS3, and PC all have FUN games with great GAMEPLAY. Actually, if you want to go by scores, then all 3 of the other gaming platforms have far MORE games rated above 75% then the the Wii. These fun games also have great graphics, cutting edge technology and physics, HD resolutions, online multiplayer that actually works, and online friends lists and leader boards. The other gameplayers can play play movies, even in High Def (PS3 via Blu-Ray, 360 via Download, PC by either), have HDD's that can store and access pictures, movies and video, and have the processing power that allows them to play the top of the line multi-plats made by veteran 3rd party companys, like Bioshock, COD4, and RE5.
So, with Wii, you get fun games... ok... I agree. But with PS3, 360, or PC, you get fun games, and much, much, more.
Ever thought that people had different tastes in games?You can't just label an entire library as "fun games." I can't find games like SMG, SSBB, MP3 and BWII on any other console, or even on the PC.
On an unrelated note, yay for acronyms!
Of course people do, and thats where the Wii fails. You opinion of fun games may be different from my opinion of fun games, but that doesn't change the fact that the Wii has the most limited library of games, that mostly are garbage, and are tailored to non-gamers. The "fun" Nintindo first party games are quality games, without a doubt, but what if you dont like the dated Nintindo style gameplay? You see... gameplay and fun are subjective. Just because you love Nintendo style games doesnt mean they are better then any other game. And being that fun is subjective, if a game is technically superior, and just as fun, then Nintendo loses.
So its in the best interest of Nintindo to keep games as simple as possible, and if you cant keep games simple, then you mass market your product and keep the public consumer dumbed down.
[QUOTE="evilross"]You get gamepad control with the 360, gamepad + motion + kb/m with the PS3 and PC. Whats your point?
VC games are just that, games, and old ones. Also, being that i own a PC, I can play 99% of everything on VC right now for free if I wanted. So again, whats the point?
Snowboarder99
Because people have a different preference in games and would rather play the games offered on the Wii. And if you are so ignorant that you can't see that, no one here can help you.
Thanks for calling me ignorant. I just love logging into a website to be insulted by some fanboy after I post a fact in a thread that makes them mad. Get over it.
And the next time you want to talk about people having a preference, and preferring something that you don't, instead of calling them "ignorant" for not agreeing with you, you may want to post some FACTS like I did in the the post that owned you so much that you had to resort to petty name calling and insulting to make yourself feel better.
It is always nice to see people put so much effort into stuffing their opinions down other people's throats.Of course people do, and thats where the Wii fails. You opinion of fun games may be different from my opinion of fun games, but that doesn't change the fact that the Wii has the most limited library of games, that mostly are garbage, and are tailored to non-gamers. The "fun" Nintindo first party games are quality games, without a doubt, but what if you dont like the dated Nintindo style gameplay? You see... gameplay and fun are subjective. Just because you love Nintendo style games doesnt mean they are better then any other game. And being that fun is subjective, if a game is technically superior, and just as fun, then Nintendo loses.
So its in the best interest of Nintindo to keep games as simple as possible, and if you cant keep games simple, then you mass market your product and keep the public consumer dumbed down.
evilross
[QUOTE="evilross"]It is always nice to see people put so much effort into stuffing their opinions down other people's throats.Of course people do, and thats where the Wii fails. You opinion of fun games may be different from my opinion of fun games, but that doesn't change the fact that the Wii has the most limited library of games, that mostly are garbage, and are tailored to non-gamers. The "fun" Nintindo first party games are quality games, without a doubt, but what if you dont like the dated Nintindo style gameplay? You see... gameplay and fun are subjective. Just because you love Nintendo style games doesnt mean they are better then any other game. And being that fun is subjective, if a game is technically superior, and just as fun, then Nintendo loses.
So its in the best interest of Nintindo to keep games as simple as possible, and if you cant keep games simple, then you mass market your product and keep the public consumer dumbed down.
taker42
If you have the ability to read, then you would see that opinion is the point of the whole post. Noone is stuffing an opinion down your throat expect the Nintendo fans that would have you believe that games are more fun because that have a Mario, Zelda, or other random Nintendo franchise character in the title.
The point is that there alot of fun games, with alot of new, different, and challenging gameplay types, that are FUN. And those games also have top notch graphics, AI, physics, sound, online, and a host of other NEW features that Nintendo does not offer.
So its always a matter of opinion end the end, as to what you personally enjoy the most. But, by just stating the facts of the matter you can see where its in the best intrest of Nintendo to keep the gaming market focuses on casual games, known franchises, and the games-for-kids mindset, rather then follow the path of Sony and Microsoft and moving gaming on to the next level, where it can compete with TV and Music,as a legitimate pass-time for adults.
oh but you are, I can read :)If you have the ability to read, then you would see that opinion is the point of the whole post. Noone is stuffing an opinion down your throat evilross
except the Nintendo fans that would have you believe that games are more fun because that have a Mario, Zelda, or other random Nintendo franchise character in the title.evilrossNo one said that in this thread, if you have learn how to read, they were saying they support Nintendo because the Wii is fun, not more fun, nor less fun, but plain old fun
No disagreement here. But the Wii itself also offers features not found on other consoles, just like the PS3, just like the 360.The point is that there alot of fun games, with alot of new, different, and challenging gameplay types, that are FUN. And those games also have top notch graphics, AI, physics, sound, online, and a host of other NEW features that Nintendo does not offer.evilross
Couldn't agree more.So its always a matter of opinion end the end, as to what you personally enjoy the most. .evilross
But, by just stating the facts of the matter you can see where its in the best intrest of Nintendo to keep the gaming market focuses on casual games, known franchises, and the games-for-kids mindset, rather then follow the path of Sony and Microsoft and moving gaming on to the next level, where it can compete with TV and Music,as a legitimate pass-time for adults.evilross
Erm while it's the best interest of Nintendo to make money, there are alot of casual games that are not made by them. To say that's their fault is like blaming Sony for making the PS2 so casualized. Heck Sony started the damn casual thing on their playstation. As for known franchises, the most popular games on other consoles are franchises (i.e MGS4, Halo 3, GTA4). As for "legitimate pass-time for adults", I'm sorry you feel gaming is not "legitimate", I'm also sorry I don't give a rat's ass what society thinks of gaming. Heck the day society thinks gaming is a "legitimate pass-time", it basically means casuals have taken over. Isn't that very thing you accuse Nintendo of? :?
[QUOTE="BuryMe"]It's not a Game Cube. It is deffinately more powerful than the GC was. The controller gives some cool new gameplay features that weren't there before, either.
Granted, the online is terrible, but that's about the only problem with it.
There's enough great games to play that it's an easy purchase.
asyrian758
Yeah thats the only problem with it :roll:
Well what else have you in mind that is wrong with the Wii?
Graphics? 'Mature' games?
[QUOTE="metroidfood"][QUOTE="evilross"][QUOTE="shoeman12"]maybe the games are fun?evilross
This argument from Wii fans is getting so old and tired. The "gameplay > graphics", and "fun" defense when talking about the Wii has no logic behind it what-so-ever.
Guess what?
The 360, PS3, and PC all have FUN games with great GAMEPLAY. Actually, if you want to go by scores, then all 3 of the other gaming platforms have far MORE games rated above 75% then the the Wii. These fun games also have great graphics, cutting edge technology and physics, HD resolutions, online multiplayer that actually works, and online friends lists and leader boards. The other gameplayers can play play movies, even in High Def (PS3 via Blu-Ray, 360 via Download, PC by either), have HDD's that can store and access pictures, movies and video, and have the processing power that allows them to play the top of the line multi-plats made by veteran 3rd party companys, like Bioshock, COD4, and RE5.
So, with Wii, you get fun games... ok... I agree. But with PS3, 360, or PC, you get fun games, and much, much, more.
Ever thought that people had different tastes in games?You can't just label an entire library as "fun games." I can't find games like SMG, SSBB, MP3 and BWII on any other console, or even on the PC.
On an unrelated note, yay for acronyms!
Of course people do, and thats where the Wii fails. You opinion of fun games may be different from my opinion of fun games, but that doesn't change the fact that the Wii has the most limited library of games, that mostly are garbage, and are tailored to non-gamers. The "fun" Nintindo first party games are quality games, without a doubt, but what if you dont like the dated Nintindo style gameplay? You see... gameplay and fun are subjective. Just because you love Nintendo style games doesnt mean they are better then any other game. And being that fun is subjective, if a game is technically superior, and just as fun, then Nintendo loses.
So its in the best interest of Nintindo to keep games as simple as possible, and if you cant keep games simple, then you mass market your product and keep the public consumer dumbed down.
Who the hell are you to tel me what I find fun and find to be "superior?" (Superior being such a stupid elitist term) Here is a list of games I have for the wii that to this day I still play and have fun with more than the big epic games on the PS3/360/PC
Wii sports
Wii play
SMG
MP3
DQ swords
Endless Ocean
Zack and Wiki
Smash
Trauma Center
MoH
Bwii
Umbrealla Cronicles
No More Heroes
Monkey Ball
Warioware
Rayman raving rabbids
Big Brain Academy
I don't like big epic scifi or military games with huge explosions or HD graphpics and surround sound. I just want a simple game. I support the wii because unlike the PS3 and 360, it has the games I want.
DEAL WITH IT!
Don't we all like our consoles because of the games. Your statement makes perfect sense, people support the Wii because of it's games. Unless you support consoles for other reasons?
Back on topic
People don't buy the Wii for graphics, you miss the point. People don't judge Super Smash Bros. Brawl by it's graphics. Hey, don't you know that we only get to see games like Super Smash Bros. Brawl once every few years, I have seen so many FPS, that's the same thing we get every year. Face it buddy, your topic failed and sucks!I just don't understand it's just a gamecude with a diff controller they have given us the same great games. But besides that nothing sure glaxy,zelda etc. but after you beat those games there nothing to do (and it dosen't take longer than a week)
The online is terrible most games don't even have online and yes ssbb dose but it's horrible also no voice chat and friend codes that are 25 characters long
all they have given us is more of the same poor graphics (yes i noe ssbb looks great but any cartoon type looking game can look great not that hard there 's no games where ppl actually look good) poor online, great gameplay but same exact game with same story for 20 years *cough* mario *cough* so my question is why do so many ppl support a system that doesn't really offer anything?
thatdanmgood10x
Don't we all like our consoles because of the games. Your statement makes perfect sense, people support the Wii because of it's games. Unless you support consoles for other reasons?coz its cool to say "i have a wii" .... seriously i dont know why people support wii, SMG, SSBB, Metroid Prime 3 and 1 or 2 other games...those are the only reasons someone would like wii...other then that i have no idea
mingo123
Back on topic
People don't buy the Wii for graphics, you miss the point. People don't judge Super Smash Bros. Brawl by it's graphics. Hey, don't you know that we only get to see games like Super Smash Bros. Brawl once every few years, I have seen so many FPS, that's the same thing we get every year. Face it buddy, your topic failed to change our minds!I just don't understand it's just a gamecude with a diff controller they have given us the same great games. But besides that nothing sure glaxy,zelda etc. but after you beat those games there nothing to do (and it dosen't take longer than a week)
The online is terrible most games don't even have online and yes ssbb dose but it's horrible also no voice chat and friend codes that are 25 characters long
all they have given us is more of the same poor graphics (yes i noe ssbb looks great but any cartoon type looking game can look great not that hard there 's no games where ppl actually look good) poor online, great gameplay but same exact game with same story for 20 years *cough* mario *cough* so my question is why do so many ppl support a system that doesn't really offer anything?
thatdanmgood10x
I just don't understand it's just a gamecude with a diff controller they have given us the same great games. But besides that nothing sure glaxy,zelda etc. but after you beat those games there nothing to do (and it dosen't take longer than a week)
The online is terrible most games don't even have online and yes ssbb dose but it's horrible also no voice chat and friend codes that are 25 characters long
all they have given us is more of the same poor graphics (yes i noe ssbb looks great but any cartoon type looking game can look great not that hard there 's no games where ppl actually look good) poor online, great gameplay but same exact game with same story for 20 years *cough* mario *cough* so my question is why do so many ppl support a system that doesn't really offer anything?
thatdanmgood10x
:|
[QUOTE="evilross"][QUOTE="metroidfood"][QUOTE="evilross"][QUOTE="shoeman12"]maybe the games are fun?goblaa
This argument from Wii fans is getting so old and tired. The "gameplay > graphics", and "fun" defense when talking about the Wii has no logic behind it what-so-ever.
Guess what?
The 360, PS3, and PC all have FUN games with great GAMEPLAY. Actually, if you want to go by scores, then all 3 of the other gaming platforms have far MORE games rated above 75% then the the Wii. These fun games also have great graphics, cutting edge technology and physics, HD resolutions, online multiplayer that actually works, and online friends lists and leader boards. The other gameplayers can play play movies, even in High Def (PS3 via Blu-Ray, 360 via Download, PC by either), have HDD's that can store and access pictures, movies and video, and have the processing power that allows them to play the top of the line multi-plats made by veteran 3rd party companys, like Bioshock, COD4, and RE5.
So, with Wii, you get fun games... ok... I agree. But with PS3, 360, or PC, you get fun games, and much, much, more.
Ever thought that people had different tastes in games?You can't just label an entire library as "fun games." I can't find games like SMG, SSBB, MP3 and BWII on any other console, or even on the PC.
On an unrelated note, yay for acronyms!
Of course people do, and thats where the Wii fails. You opinion of fun games may be different from my opinion of fun games, but that doesn't change the fact that the Wii has the most limited library of games, that mostly are garbage, and are tailored to non-gamers. The "fun" Nintindo first party games are quality games, without a doubt, but what if you dont like the dated Nintindo style gameplay? You see... gameplay and fun are subjective. Just because you love Nintendo style games doesnt mean they are better then any other game. And being that fun is subjective, if a game is technically superior, and just as fun, then Nintendo loses.
So its in the best interest of Nintindo to keep games as simple as possible, and if you cant keep games simple, then you mass market your product and keep the public consumer dumbed down.
Who the hell are you to tel me what I find fun and find to be "superior?" (Superior being such a stupid elitist term) Here is a list of games I have for the wii that to this day I still play and have fun with more than the big epic games on the PS3/360/PC
Wii sports
Wii play
SMG
MP3
DQ swords
Endless Ocean
Zack and Wiki
Smash
Trauma Center
MoH
Bwii
Umbrealla Cronicles
No More Heroes
Monkey Ball
Warioware
Rayman raving rabbids
Big Brain Academy
I don't like big epic scifi or military games with huge explosions or HD graphpics and surround sound. I just want a simple game. I support the wii because unlike the PS3 and 360, it has the games I want.
DEAL WITH IT!
I dont care what you find fun or dont find fun. if you like simple games, then thats your opinion, and your welcome to it.
The fact is that Nintindo fans argue with their opinion, and pretend that is if fact, and anyone that disagrees with that opinion gets called names, and flamed.
The fact is that many people dont find Nintindo games fun, just as that many people do. The fact is also that many people find PS3, PC, and Xbox 360 games fun. and the fact is that games on the PC, PS3, and 360 are technically superior to Wii games in terms of graphics, size, scope, A.I, physics, online multiplayer, freinds lists, HDD storage, high def display, and multi-media interactivity as well as other areas.
You can say you dont care about any of that stuff, and thats perfectly fine, its your opinion. But the fact is the same that the Wii is lacking in many areas compared to other gaming platforms. the other platforms are superior.
You may enjoy playing your Nintendo console more, but that doesnt change anything. I'm not saying you must play games on other gaming platforms. Play whatever you enjoy. But dont come in here debating fact with your opinion.
fact > opinion.
as you so eloquently put :
deal with it.
Because the PS3 and Xbox 360 are both very good consoles but, They aren't that different to their predecessors, they are improved with better graphics, better online etc. But it's still the same thing. The difference between the GC and Wii is so much, The Wii has separated itself with a unique controller never used before in gaming and bringing in so many more people, That had no interest in gaming at all beforehand, into the gaming world.
The 360 and PS3 don't compare with the Wii in terms of being innovative, Although they are great consoles in their own right.
Of course people do, and thats where the Wii fails. You opinion of fun games may be different from my opinion of fun games, but that doesn't change the fact that the Wii has the most limited library of games, that mostly are garbage, and are tailored to non-gamers. The "fun" Nintindo first party games are quality games, without a doubt, but what if you dont like the dated Nintindo style gameplay? You see... gameplay and fun are subjective. Just because you love Nintendo style games doesnt mean they are better then any other game. And being that fun is subjective, if a game is technically superior, and just as fun, then Nintendo loses.
So its in the best interest of Nintindo to keep games as simple as possible, and if you cant keep games simple, then you mass market your product and keep the public consumer dumbed down.
evilross
so 360/ps3 lose to PC games?
technically speaking, console games are dated compared to PC games, so by your logic why play consoles in the first place since they are technically inferior?
thank god very few have your opinion, it would have killed console gaming
The fact is that many people dont find Nintindo games fun, just as that many people do. The fact is also that many people find PS3, PC, and Xbox 360 games fun. and the fact is that games on the PC, PS3, and 360 are technically superior to Wii games in terms of graphics, size, scope, A.I, physics, online multiplayer, freinds lists, HDD storage, high def display, and multi-media interactivity as well as other areas.You can say you dont care about any of that stuff, and thats perfectly fine, its your opinion. But the fact is the same that the Wii is lacking in many areas compared to other gaming platforms. the other platforms are superior.
You may enjoy playing your Nintendo console more, but that doesnt change anything. I'm not saying you must play games on other gaming platforms. Play whatever you enjoy. But dont come in here debating fact with your opinion.
fact > opinion.
as you so eloquently put :
deal with it.evilross
You forget that this is an entertainment industry. All that technological superiority doesn't matter a bit unless it creates additional entertainment value for the user. And since that's based in opinion, you're sadly wrong. In this instance, opinion > fact.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment