Why do publishers force in multiplayer modes when....

  • 66 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it.

Avatar image for istreakforfood
istreakforfood

7781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#52 istreakforfood
Member since 2004 • 7781 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

I'll be on a rampage if Just Cause 3 has multiplayer...

For the love of God, don't.

RR360DD

No game franchise is safe sadly, hell who expected GTA4 to have multiplayer?

GTAIV multiplayer was awesome, and RDR even better. I have high hopes for it in GTAV

Wasn't fan of the RDR mp. I've only played it to get that high bounty achievement, which was a pain to get since none of my friends wanted to play it. Had to fend off while raising the bounty by myself. I guess I can praise developers for trying something different with mp, but wasn't my cup of tea.
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts
[QUOTE="Litchie"]Because they think it will make them money. I hate it when they do that for games like Dead Space, BioShock and stuff like that but we'll have to live with it. I'd much rather not have multi-player at all than a crappy multi-player. Spending time on making crappy multi-player = less time spent on making the actual game better.danish-death
Since when did Bioshock or Dead Space suffer because of "tacked on" MP? Can you seriously argue that Dead Space 2 would've been any better or longer without the MP component? The game was great even though it wasn't quite as scary as the first one, but that has nothing to do with the multiplayer. And While Bioshock 2 might not have lived up to the first game, the third installment seems to redeem that.

.....so your answer too bioshock 2 not living up is that infinite remedies this? bioshock 2 from a story standpoint was a rambling mess I just beat it recently and comparing 1 to 2 is literally an insult to 1. 2 cements at every turn that it was a cash in game maybe if 2k had released more content for 1 they would have seen more puchases and less tradeins but no they very nearly destroy the value of the first games story by releasing a direct sequel that concentrated on multiplayer that its single player was nigh worthless.
Avatar image for JayQproductions
JayQproductions

1806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 JayQproductions
Member since 2007 • 1806 Posts

hate to say it but i refuse to buy a game unless it has good multiplayer OR the story takes longer than 8-10 hours to beat because in my opinion a game isn't worth $60 unless it meets at least one of those requirements.

Avatar image for EzcapeTheFate
EzcapeTheFate

1063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 EzcapeTheFate
Member since 2010 • 1063 Posts
I dont mind if the more tradtional single player games do a co-op multiplayer
Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#56 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts
Yeah, I don't like when developers force multiplayer modes into a came that doesn't necessarily need it and won't make the game any better. It really tarnishes the overall product and we know everyone will compare it to other games with much better multiplayer. modes. They should have kept it out and maybe added it later as an add-on or something.
Avatar image for DerekLoffin
DerekLoffin

9095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 47

User Lists: 0

#57 DerekLoffin
Member since 2002 • 9095 Posts

better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it.

CaseyWegner
That assumes that it comes without cost, but it does have a cost. It diverts development time from the SP, or just adds to the game's budget in general. So, no, this simple argument doesn't really work. as adding it can make something that would have worked otherwise not, or make something that would have been profitable potentially non-profitable or at least less profitable.
Avatar image for Demonjoe93
Demonjoe93

9869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 107

User Lists: 0

#58 Demonjoe93
Member since 2009 • 9869 Posts

To deter used game sales.

Avatar image for nutcrackr
nutcrackr

13032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 1

#59 nutcrackr
Member since 2004 • 13032 Posts

Because of random idiots who say "no MP = rent". Next thing we'll have multiplayer in games like Silent Hill.

KiZZo1
pretty much. also it allows them to do online passes, support for cheaply made DLC content
Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts
because it extends the replay of a game. i wont buy games that i can beat in like 7-8 hours. theres no point, thats a waste of money. plus multiplayer can be awesome in unexpected games like assassin's creed and mass effect 3
Avatar image for deu5ka175
deu5ka175

434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 deu5ka175
Member since 2012 • 434 Posts

No idea. I guess they are hoping to catch lightning in a bottle. Props to Starbreeze. At least Syndicate tried something different for example.

Avatar image for 1PMrFister
1PMrFister

3134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#62 1PMrFister
Member since 2010 • 3134 Posts
[QUOTE="KiZZo1"]

Because of random idiots who say "no MP = rent". Next thing we'll have multiplayer in games like Silent Hill.

nutcrackr
pretty much. also it allows them to do online passes, support for cheaply made DLC content

It's not like they can't (and aren't) doing that for single player games already.
Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

49025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 49025 Posts

Another developer spoke on the topic today: Avalanche in an interview with gamespy

Did Avalanche think multiplayer didn't fit in Just Cause 2? In a recent interview, you said that many developers and publishers force multiplayer into games for all the wrong reasons.Gamespy

CS: That is correct, and that is why you see so many games with forced multiplayer modes that are thrown together just as a desperate move to combat second-hand sales. Bad multiplayer modes have become the new bad movie-based games, and are big black holes where developers waste time and publishers waste money. Christofer Sundberg

Avatar image for RyanShazam
RyanShazam

6498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 RyanShazam
Member since 2006 • 6498 Posts

Must multiplayer game modes I dont even touch. I might play them for a couple hours but I have my online games for online gaming. (Halo, Call of Duty)

Mass Effect 3: Didnt play online much. (Beat Campaign)

Uncharted 2 and 3: Didnt play online much (Beat Camapigns)

Bioshock 2: Played more online than actuall campign. (Didnt care for the game)

Grand Theft Auto 4: Played more online than actuall game. (Great game but never finished the story)

Red Dead Redemption: I never played online. (Beat Campaign)

Call of Duty: Played online for days! (Beat all the campaigns also)

Halo: Played onlne for days! (Beat all of the campaigns)

Metal Gear Solid 4: Played MGO for a few hours (Beat the campaign)

Dont like them, dont play them.

Avatar image for ultimate-k
ultimate-k

2348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 ultimate-k
Member since 2010 • 2348 Posts

Publishers dont have any idea how to make games, they just in it for the money, and look at how successful COD is, they want forced MP in their games, so it will be more popular. But its just a waste of resources when you force MP on a mainly SP game. After a month the community will be dead since there a far superior MP games out there, since they are designed for MP. Ye its stupid

Avatar image for DraugenCP
DraugenCP

8486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 69

User Lists: 0

#66 DraugenCP
Member since 2006 • 8486 Posts

Because of random idiots who say "no MP = rent".

KiZZo1



I do think this is a major factor, yes. There are plenty of people out there who won't even play a game if it doesn't have multiplayer.