Why does Halo 3: ODST get no love again?

  • 106 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for -Ninja_Dog-
-Ninja_Dog-

4197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 -Ninja_Dog-
Member since 2005 • 4197 Posts

Bungie fails becuase while they make quality games , there just not exciting enough.

See the first Halo was cool because it had originally ment to be an RTS and then change to third person and the First person so it had an awesome feeling. Then Halo 2 and Halo 3 came it out and it was strictly linear FPS. Boring.

The ultimate shooting game would be a cross between an RTS game and FPS. Epic battles and confrontations you set up and then primary and secondary missions you perform to assist the bigger battle in FPS.

But back to Bungie and Halo:ODST lets hope Bungie gets "that 30 seconds of fun back" with ODST.

Avatar image for Iheartrpgsalot
Iheartrpgsalot

117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Iheartrpgsalot
Member since 2009 • 117 Posts

[QUOTE="Iheartrpgsalot"][QUOTE="angry_fork"]Because it's just another Halo game. I love Halo: CE, but Halo 2 and 3 are just blah. I'd love to see Bungie do something else OTHER then Halo, it's just the most obvious cash-in, I know they're talented dev's and I wish I could see them do a new IP.angry_fork

how is this in any way a cash in? a cash in is slapping the halo name on a crap game. This is called fanservice....

Real fan service would be giving the fans something new. Halo needs to be finished already, it's not that great of a series, it's just good in my opinion.

I know a lot of people like it but Bungie should move on and show their talents on a new IP, I'd really like to see what else they can do, it's like they're a 1 trick clown or something.

No, fan service is called giving a game of what people on bungie.net asked for. And bungie is making other games. They said that one of them will be announced later this year and it's coming out in 2010 (granted they put this into words of the schedule goes to 2010, but you sort of get it from that)
Avatar image for angelkimne
angelkimne

14037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 angelkimne
Member since 2006 • 14037 Posts
We haven't had any proper info for quite a while...
Avatar image for Fire-of-Njozi
Fire-of-Njozi

468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Fire-of-Njozi
Member since 2009 • 468 Posts
[QUOTE="Fire-of-Njozi"]It gets no love because we've not seen so much as a screenshot of the game. How do you expect anyone to have any kind of anticipation for a game they haven't even seen in motion? Especially for a tangential game.Iheartrpgsalot
God of War 3 Infamous before the gameplay Final Fantasy Versus But ODST is coming out before 2/3 of those games...

we just need to see something about it. we don't know much of anything at all about the game. with Final Fantasy and God of War, we know what we're getting before we get it. with InFamous, we've seen plenty of gameplay videos. But what have we seen with ODST? a CG viral video? we need much more than that. I do, at least.
Avatar image for Iheartrpgsalot
Iheartrpgsalot

117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Iheartrpgsalot
Member since 2009 • 117 Posts
[QUOTE="Iheartrpgsalot"][QUOTE="Fire-of-Njozi"]It gets no love because we've not seen so much as a screenshot of the game. How do you expect anyone to have any kind of anticipation for a game they haven't even seen in motion? Especially for a tangential game.Fire-of-Njozi
God of War 3 Infamous before the gameplay Final Fantasy Versus But ODST is coming out before 2/3 of those games...

we just need to see something about it. we don't know much of anything at all about the game. with Final Fantasy and God of War, we know what we're getting before we get it. with InFamous, we've seen plenty of gameplay videos. But what have we seen with ODST? a CG viral video? we need much more than that. I do, at least.

how is versus different from ODST? II do understand GOW, but this is sort of the same as versus.
Avatar image for Avian005
Avian005

4112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 51

User Lists: 0

#56 Avian005
Member since 2009 • 4112 Posts

There needs to be gameplay footage that looks fun and has good graphics to get any hype right now.

Avatar image for one_on_one
one_on_one

2368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 208

User Lists: 0

#57 one_on_one
Member since 2008 • 2368 Posts
No gameplay yet, not much info yet, and I believe 360 owners don't really get excited and hype announcements and trailers, compared to other owners.
Avatar image for joopyme
joopyme

2598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 joopyme
Member since 2008 • 2598 Posts
[QUOTE="habkeinbock"]

[QUOTE="king23_"]I'm just expecting it to be another generic First-Person Shooter. Nothing exciting about that.Zoso-8

too many shooters on that system.

Agreed. Every year it seems the game that is hyped most on the 360 is a shooter. Need something new.

THIS.

AND we've barely seen any vidz/pics to justify the game needs SW attention.lol

Avatar image for Iheartrpgsalot
Iheartrpgsalot

117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Iheartrpgsalot
Member since 2009 • 117 Posts
^ isn't halo and bungie enough? Killzone 2 got hype based off a crappy developer and a flop
Avatar image for iesexywarden
iesexywarden

723

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#60 iesexywarden
Member since 2005 • 723 Posts

It seems like on these forums, whenever someone talks about the ODST, people don't seem to treat it like it's there. While the 360 fans surely a hyped for it, everyone else is pretty much pretending it doesn't exist. So what gives?

Halo 3 is the most played xbox game and one of the highest rated games, and here comes along a sort of expansion (kind of) that's going to bring a new campaign that's rather different from the halo norm, some new multiplayer maps, as well as some other good stuff according to bungie.

I'd understand if that 5 hour number ended up being the full story, but it was debunked- bungie said they it was 5 hours for the one side of gameplay and then we find out that it's going to use a hub and spoke level design (think platformers) for a first person shooter and no one is even caring? What the heck?

And it is a bungie game. This should give us an idea of what they can pull of besides halo as well. Ahh... but they'll have announced their 2010 game by then according to their podcast.

Come on guys, it's freaking Halo

Maybe it's because this game is basically fanservice for the halo 3 fans, and most of you guys only care about is that 9.5

Iheartrpgsalot

Heres the quick and easy answer. On the ps3 side, noone cares about halo. Theres no more "man i wish we had that shooter". Theres plenty of good shooters and plenty more coming. So missing ODST isnt huge...Noone cares...ITs just another game for 360 that fans of halo will play..

Thats all it really is. Many will enjoy it, i myself wont really care to play it (has i dislike halo due to regen, quick run and gun and i dislike strats of the game" However many like it and it sells alot..

w.e

Avatar image for Master-Thief-09
Master-Thief-09

2534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#61 Master-Thief-09
Member since 2009 • 2534 Posts
Okay, I put a gif in my sig for hype. Hopefully we see something at GDC.
Avatar image for Iheartrpgsalot
Iheartrpgsalot

117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Iheartrpgsalot
Member since 2009 • 117 Posts
did you really just say people who have a ps3 don't like halo? Most people on the ps3 who don't care simply havent played halo
Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26712 Posts
[QUOTE="Iheartrpgsalot"]

It seems like on these forums, whenever someone talks about the ODST, people don't seem to treat it like it's there. While the 360 fans surely a hyped for it, everyone else is pretty much pretending it doesn't exist. So what gives?

Halo 3 is the most played xbox game and one of the highest rated games, and here comes along a sort of expansion (kind of) that's going to bring a new campaign that's rather different from the halo norm, some new multiplayer maps, as well as some other good stuff according to bungie.

I'd understand if that 5 hour number ended up being the full story, but it was debunked- bungie said they it was 5 hours for the one side of gameplay and then we find out that it's going to use a hub and spoke level design (think platformers) for a first person shooter and no one is even caring? What the heck?

And it is a bungie game. This should give us an idea of what they can pull of besides halo as well. Ahh... but they'll have announced their 2010 game by then according to their podcast.

Come on guys, it's freaking Halo

Maybe it's because this game is basically fanservice for the halo 3 fans, and most of you guys only care about is that 9.5

iesexywarden

Heres the quick and easy answer. On the ps3 side, noone cares about halo. Theres no more "man i wish we had that shooter". Theres plenty of good shooters and plenty more coming. So missing ODST isnt huge...Noone cares...ITs just another game for 360 that fans of halo will play..

Thats all it really is. Many will enjoy it, i myself wont really care to play it (has i dislike halo due to regen, quick run and gun and i dislike strats of the game" However many like it and it sells alot..

w.e

You think Halo has quick run and gun? Man, I always thought you moved so slow in any Halo game compared to most first person shooters..

Sure the game is run and gun mostly, but it's far from quick. :P

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26712 Posts
[QUOTE="Iheartrpgsalot"]did you really just say people who have a ps3 don't like halo? Most people on the ps3 who don't care simply havent played halo

Actually, I own Halo 3, and I don't really care about this expansion all that much. lol
Avatar image for deactivated-652663614c5e5
deactivated-652663614c5e5

2271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 deactivated-652663614c5e5
Member since 2005 • 2271 Posts
there are other, bigger things coming out this year which im more focused on.
Avatar image for Zerocrossings
Zerocrossings

7988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#66 Zerocrossings
Member since 2006 • 7988 Posts
Im pretty sick of FPS tbh. Except L4D..
Avatar image for Syferonik
Syferonik

3060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Syferonik  Online
Member since 2006 • 3060 Posts
Because 3h single player gameplay is a big WTF? and they should totaly delete BRUTES from Halo games...that enemie is wasting space and are damn fugly. That why 1st halo will always bet the best NO DAMN BROWN BRUTES
Avatar image for dthach614
dthach614

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#68 dthach614
Member since 2008 • 804 Posts

because halo 3 is barely a next gen game. just look at that game! what so next gen about it? What giant leap did it improve on it? comepare halo 2 and 3.

and from the looks of halo 3 odst will be the same

Avatar image for Eyezonmii
Eyezonmii

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#69 Eyezonmii
Member since 2008 • 2145 Posts
bungie blew it with Halo 3....its Halo 1 in HD. Gameplay-wise that is.
Avatar image for dthach614
dthach614

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#70 dthach614
Member since 2008 • 804 Posts

Because it's just another Halo game. I love Halo: CE, but Halo 2 and 3 are just blah. I'd love to see Bungie do something else OTHER then Halo, it's just the most obvious cash-in, I know they're talented dev's and I wish I could see them do a new IP.angry_fork

imo bungie is overrated. they made one great AAA game and just casualize it with every sequal.

Avatar image for Eyezonmii
Eyezonmii

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#71 Eyezonmii
Member since 2008 • 2145 Posts

[QUOTE="angry_fork"]Because it's just another Halo game. I love Halo: CE, but Halo 2 and 3 are just blah. I'd love to see Bungie do something else OTHER then Halo, it's just the most obvious cash-in, I know they're talented dev's and I wish I could see them do a new IP.dthach614

imo bungie is overrated. they made one great AAA game and just casualize it with every sequal.

i agree and the core gameplay in Halo 3 is the same as Halo 1...run shoot, grenade, melee....ride vehicle....repeat. Why don't bungie progress more and introduce new gameplay elements to deepen the experience?
Avatar image for angelkimne
angelkimne

14037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 angelkimne
Member since 2006 • 14037 Posts
No gameplay yet, not much info yet, and I believe 360 owners don't really get excited and hype announcements and trailers, compared to other owners.one_on_one
Alan Wake?
Avatar image for angelkimne
angelkimne

14037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 angelkimne
Member since 2006 • 14037 Posts
[QUOTE="dthach614"]

[QUOTE="angry_fork"]Because it's just another Halo game. I love Halo: CE, but Halo 2 and 3 are just blah. I'd love to see Bungie do something else OTHER then Halo, it's just the most obvious cash-in, I know they're talented dev's and I wish I could see them do a new IP.Eyezonmii

imo bungie is overrated. they made one great AAA game and just casualize it with every sequal.

i agree and the core gameplay in Halo 3 is the same as Halo 1...run shoot, grenade, melee....ride vehicle....repeat. Why don't bungie progress more and introduce new gameplay elements to deepen the experience?

Equipment with Halo 3, Dual Wielding with Halo 2...
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
Probably because its an expansion with not a bar of gameplay footage. Honestly i'm not surprised; its like Crysis Warhead, and STALKER Clear Sky. There is only so much you can hype an expansion/stand alone, next to a full title like Halo Wars or Killzone 2. Design wise, i was hoping it was going to be something different, though from what I have read... its more traditional Halo ish... which is a bit of a letdown.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
[QUOTE="Eyezonmii"][QUOTE="dthach614"]

imo bungie is overrated. they made one great AAA game and just casualize it with every sequal.

angelkimne
i agree and the core gameplay in Halo 3 is the same as Halo 1...run shoot, grenade, melee....ride vehicle....repeat. Why don't bungie progress more and introduce new gameplay elements to deepen the experience?

Equipment with Halo 3, Dual Wielding with Halo 2...

Well in all due respect those two mentions, arent really major progressive gameplay changers..... even the design revamp of the shield in 2..... Not too say the sequals are not good.
Avatar image for angelkimne
angelkimne

14037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 angelkimne
Member since 2006 • 14037 Posts
[QUOTE="angelkimne"][QUOTE="Eyezonmii"] i agree and the core gameplay in Halo 3 is the same as Halo 1...run shoot, grenade, melee....ride vehicle....repeat. Why don't bungie progress more and introduce new gameplay elements to deepen the experience? skrat_01
Equipment with Halo 3, Dual Wielding with Halo 2...

Well in all due respect those two mentions, arent really major progressive gameplay changers..... even the design revamp of the shield in 2..... Not too say the sequals are not good.

I know, I know. But they did exactly what he said, introduce new gameplay elements to deepen the experience.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
I know, I know. But they did exactly what he said, introduce new gameplay elements to deepen the experience.angelkimne
I guess, indeed... too a degree. I think what he is arguing is how much these deepened the experience - that its a bit more shallow in this regard too other sequals.
Avatar image for Eyezonmii
Eyezonmii

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#78 Eyezonmii
Member since 2008 • 2145 Posts
[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="angelkimne"]Equipment with Halo 3, Dual Wielding with Halo 2...angelkimne
Well in all due respect those two mentions, arent really major progressive gameplay changers..... even the design revamp of the shield in 2..... Not too say the sequals are not good.

I know, I know. But they did exactly what he said, introduce new gameplay elements to deepen the experience.

you call that much an improvement to deepen the experience? Very little. We should be having so much more destructability, more melees, some form of cover system or dodge mechanic..etc.
Avatar image for HappyAppe
HappyAppe

1543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#79 HappyAppe
Member since 2003 • 1543 Posts
[QUOTE="angelkimne"][QUOTE="skrat_01"]Well in all due respect those two mentions, arent really major progressive gameplay changers..... even the design revamp of the shield in 2..... Not too say the sequals are not good.Eyezonmii
I know, I know. But they did exactly what he said, introduce new gameplay elements to deepen the experience.

you call that much an improvement to deepen the experience? Very little. We should be having so much more destructability, more melees, some form of cover system or dodge mechanic..etc.

They are trying to introduce new things while keeping with the Halo identity. Those things would change the gameplay so drastically, it wouldn't feel like Halo.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
[QUOTE="Eyezonmii"][QUOTE="angelkimne"]I know, I know. But they did exactly what he said, introduce new gameplay elements to deepen the experience.HappyAppe
you call that much an improvement to deepen the experience? Very little. We should be having so much more destructability, more melees, some form of cover system or dodge mechanic..etc.

They are trying to introduce new things while keeping with the Halo identity. Those things would change the gameplay so drastically, it wouldn't feel like Halo.

Yep, precisely. However thats not too say Bungie could not have expanded on their games design in a bit more radical way than adding extras ontop of itself.
Avatar image for Eyezonmii
Eyezonmii

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#81 Eyezonmii
Member since 2008 • 2145 Posts
[QUOTE="Eyezonmii"][QUOTE="angelkimne"]I know, I know. But they did exactly what he said, introduce new gameplay elements to deepen the experience.HappyAppe
you call that much an improvement to deepen the experience? Very little. We should be having so much more destructability, more melees, some form of cover system or dodge mechanic..etc.

They are trying to introduce new things while keeping with the Halo identity. Those things would change the gameplay so drastically, it wouldn't feel like Halo.

thats BULL...the core gameplay of shooting moving and grenading will stay intact..how would that change it dramatically? just keep in in FPS view.
Avatar image for HappyAppe
HappyAppe

1543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#82 HappyAppe
Member since 2003 • 1543 Posts
[QUOTE="Eyezonmii"][QUOTE="HappyAppe"][QUOTE="Eyezonmii"] you call that much an improvement to deepen the experience? Very little. We should be having so much more destructability, more melees, some form of cover system or dodge mechanic..etc.

They are trying to introduce new things while keeping with the Halo identity. Those things would change the gameplay so drastically, it wouldn't feel like Halo.

thats BULL...the core gameplay of shooting moving and grenading will stay intact..how would that change it dramatically? just keep in in FPS view.

Bungie knows how to make a good game. They concentrate on a few key concepts (grenading, shooting) and nail them. Unless they were made perfect and an integral part of the game, they would never put in destructible environments or a cover system. Halo is about running and shooting. Not stop and pop, or destroying you environment. It would lose its Halo feel, and thats what makes it great.
Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#83 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts
The moment I heard about the uber short campaign (they claimed 5 hours which means it will actually be 2-3hrs) I lost all interest :(
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
The moment I heard about the uber short campaign (they claimed 5 hours which means it will actually be 2-3hrs) I lost all interest :(II_Seraphim_II
Doesn't mean it wont be great. Look at HL2 Episode 2. Its short and sweet. Same with campaigns like COD4.... Even Portal.
Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#85 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts
[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"]The moment I heard about the uber short campaign (they claimed 5 hours which means it will actually be 2-3hrs) I lost all interest :(skrat_01
Doesn't mean it wont be great. Look at HL2 Episode 2. Its short and sweet. Same with campaigns like COD4.... Even Portal.

Oh i know. It just that I dont condone games like that. I never bought the HL2 episodes, I played them on my friends computers, because I dont support this type of milkage. Make a full game or dont make one at all. HL episodes are such a rip off. Why not just make 3-4 episodes, they put them together into 1 game? And yes, I NEVER buy DLC on consoles. I just use my friends PSN ID to get them because its extreme milkage. It might still be a great game, but it will never be worth the amount of money I spent on it :(
Avatar image for Eyezonmii
Eyezonmii

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#86 Eyezonmii
Member since 2008 • 2145 Posts
[QUOTE="HappyAppe"][QUOTE="Eyezonmii"][QUOTE="HappyAppe"] They are trying to introduce new things while keeping with the Halo identity. Those things would change the gameplay so drastically, it wouldn't feel like Halo.

thats BULL...the core gameplay of shooting moving and grenading will stay intact..how would that change it dramatically? just keep in in FPS view.

Bungie knows how to make a good game. They concentrate on a few key concepts (grenading, shooting) and nail them. Unless they were made perfect and an integral part of the game, they would never put in destructible environments or a cover system. Halo is about running and shooting. Not stop and pop, or destroying you environment. It would lose its Halo feel, and thats what makes it great.

its not about stop and shoot..the game is also about hide and shoot, how else do you avoid dying? or need to reload? Just keep the core gameplay the same and add more gameplay additions.... destructibility would go great if some camp or hide behind things....and add to the experience.
Avatar image for GundamGuy0
GundamGuy0

10970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 GundamGuy0
Member since 2003 • 10970 Posts
Halo jumped the shark and isn't ultra cool anymore?
Avatar image for Eyezonmii
Eyezonmii

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#88 Eyezonmii
Member since 2008 • 2145 Posts
Halo jumped the shark and isn't ultra cool anymore? GundamGuy0
since 07...pretty much...to much of the same. Story became to causalized and shallow..gameplay didn't progress enough..etc.
Avatar image for Iheartrpgsalot
Iheartrpgsalot

117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Iheartrpgsalot
Member since 2009 • 117 Posts
[QUOTE="GundamGuy0"]Halo jumped the shark and isn't ultra cool anymore? Eyezonmii
since 07...pretty much...to much of the same. Story became to causalized and shallow..gameplay didn't progress enough..etc.

wow, that's basically the "insert generic complaints that show you have no idea here" post
Avatar image for Postal_Guy
Postal_Guy

2643

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 Postal_Guy
Member since 2006 • 2643 Posts

why cant halo or cod die already?

they just keep making games because they will know people are gonna buy it.
if it has Halo in the title, milions of people are gonna buy it...

i hope this game flops so hard, that would be a good laugh

Avatar image for HappyAppe
HappyAppe

1543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#91 HappyAppe
Member since 2003 • 1543 Posts
There are only 3 Halo games, all of which are AAA. Why does the series need to die? And all Infinity W. COD games have been great. I don't understand why a series needs to die if they are still producing great games? And Halo's gameplay has progressed just fine. Sure they've added only minor tweaks here and there, but the gameplay was what made the first game so great. Minor changes is all that was needed, as can be seen by the fact that Halo 3 is still XBL's #1 played game. ODST will again tweak the gameplay, and be a great expansion.
Avatar image for angelkimne
angelkimne

14037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 angelkimne
Member since 2006 • 14037 Posts
[QUOTE="GundamGuy0"]Halo jumped the shark and isn't ultra cool anymore? Eyezonmii
since 07...pretty much...to much of the same. Story became to causalized and shallow..gameplay didn't progress enough..etc.

Yep, that's exactly with hundreds of thousands of people still play it everyday, and why it was the most played Live game in 08...
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"]The moment I heard about the uber short campaign (they claimed 5 hours which means it will actually be 2-3hrs) I lost all interest :(II_Seraphim_II
Doesn't mean it wont be great. Look at HL2 Episode 2. Its short and sweet. Same with campaigns like COD4.... Even Portal.

Oh i know. It just that I dont condone games like that. I never bought the HL2 episodes, I played them on my friends computers, because I dont support this type of milkage. Make a full game or dont make one at all. HL episodes are such a rip off. Why not just make 3-4 episodes, they put them together into 1 game? And yes, I NEVER buy DLC on consoles. I just use my friends PSN ID to get them because its extreme milkage. It might still be a great game, but it will never be worth the amount of money I spent on it :(

Well tbh, they reallly arent a ripoff, for the experience they deliver per price. Games like Crysis Warhead especially. Though episode wise, sure you can buy bundles - look at Siren Blood Curse.

still if you dont like the idea of smaller downloadable games, well thats fair enough.

Avatar image for pi3m4ster
pi3m4ster

522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 pi3m4ster
Member since 2008 • 522 Posts
[QUOTE="Eyezonmii"][QUOTE="HappyAppe"][QUOTE="Eyezonmii"] thats BULL...the core gameplay of shooting moving and grenading will stay intact..how would that change it dramatically? just keep in in FPS view.

Bungie knows how to make a good game. They concentrate on a few key concepts (grenading, shooting) and nail them. Unless they were made perfect and an integral part of the game, they would never put in destructible environments or a cover system. Halo is about running and shooting. Not stop and pop, or destroying you environment. It would lose its Halo feel, and thats what makes it great.

its not about stop and shoot..the game is also about hide and shoot, how else do you avoid dying? or need to reload? Just keep the core gameplay the same and add more gameplay additions.... destructibility would go great if some camp or hide behind things....and add to the experience.

no no no it wouldn't. EVERYTHING about halo 3 gameplay is incredibly precisely jigsawed together. It looks simple at a glance but boy it's not and things that randomize such as destructability would simply not fit. Look at the halo 3 maps for example. They are pretty "plain" - no seeders pop up like in that gears 2 map, no killer rain, there are no fancy intricate things at all, yet they are some of the greatest maps ever because they fit the halo gameplay so tightly. And everybody starts off with the EXACT same weapon every round because the smallest thing has far reaching consequences. No perks or anything that makes things "random". There is even a 120 page long thread about the "BR spread" Hell you don't even see a deployable cover in matchmaking because unlike a bubble shield/regen/power drain it only works for the team that deployed it. and i have 3000 games of halo 3 to back my claims, whereas you are a sony fanboy
Avatar image for OhSnapitz
OhSnapitz

19282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 OhSnapitz
Member since 2002 • 19282 Posts
Halo ODST sounds like a really great concept, however there's very little info release about the actual game. No screens, No gameplay, Nothing.. If this were Halo 4 you'd seen the internet flooded with opinions but this is just an expansion pack(lets be honest here).
Avatar image for Ross_the_B0SS
Ross_the_B0SS

1210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#96 Ross_the_B0SS
Member since 2008 • 1210 Posts
I'm excited for it, not because of the game's name but because of the developer's name
Avatar image for Ross_the_B0SS
Ross_the_B0SS

1210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#97 Ross_the_B0SS
Member since 2008 • 1210 Posts

why cant halo or cod die already?

they just keep making games because they will know people are gonna buy it.
if it has Halo in the title, milions of people are gonna buy it...

i hope this game flops so hard, that would be a good laugh

Postal_Guy

Why does it bother you so much if you don't have to play it? Halo CE, Halo 2, and Halo 3 are all great games imo. Halo Wars is looking good for a console RTS and Halo ODST will probably be good too considering the developer is Bungie. If the games are good, why stop making them? So you can have a "good laugh"? Same goes for Call of Duty.

Avatar image for sonicmj1
sonicmj1

9130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#98 sonicmj1
Member since 2003 • 9130 Posts

[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"]The moment I heard about the uber short campaign (they claimed 5 hours which means it will actually be 2-3hrs) I lost all interest :(II_Seraphim_II
Doesn't mean it wont be great. Look at HL2 Episode 2. Its short and sweet. Same with campaigns like COD4.... Even Portal.

Oh i know. It just that I dont condone games like that. I never bought the HL2 episodes, I played them on my friends computers, because I dont support this type of milkage. Make a full game or dont make one at all. HL episodes are such a rip off. Why not just make 3-4 episodes, they put them together into 1 game? And yes, I NEVER buy DLC on consoles. I just use my friends PSN ID to get them because its extreme milkage. It might still be a great game, but it will never be worth the amount of money I spent on it :(

Since the episodes are generally half-priced compared to retail products, you're getting something worth the money you're spending. It's not like you're spending $60 on it.

I'm personally a big fan of really tight shorter games, such as the Half-Life episodes.

Avatar image for ASK_Story
ASK_Story

11455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 ASK_Story
Member since 2006 • 11455 Posts
No gameplay footage but also, it's just a expansion. If it was Halo 4, than that'd be a different story.
Avatar image for dthach614
dthach614

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#100 dthach614
Member since 2008 • 804 Posts
[QUOTE="dthach614"]

[QUOTE="angry_fork"]Because it's just another Halo game. I love Halo: CE, but Halo 2 and 3 are just blah. I'd love to see Bungie do something else OTHER then Halo, it's just the most obvious cash-in, I know they're talented dev's and I wish I could see them do a new IP.Eyezonmii

imo bungie is overrated. they made one great AAA game and just casualize it with every sequal.

i agree and the core gameplay in Halo 3 is the same as Halo 1...run shoot, grenade, melee....ride vehicle....repeat. Why don't bungie progress more and introduce new gameplay elements to deepen the experience?

dont ever cosign me again