Why is Almost Every Multiplat Better on the Xbox 360?

What the hell happened?

Lack of Rams?

Lack of Good GPU?

XMB OS eating up Rams 96MB?

What the hell happened?

Lack of Rams?

Lack of Good GPU?

Transfering7

PS3 is newer, but the word every is wrong. Oblivion and The Darkness were better on PS3, or so they say. I played teh 360 version's though.

Almost every is the right phrase, although, I think in time the PS3 will have the advantage.

yea the 360 has more ram and a bettr grafix cardfileman3

as well as the great option of scratching the supposedly better running multiplats

awesome!

[QUOTE="Transfering7"]

What the hell happened?

Lack of Rams?

Lack of Good GPU?

XTy

PS3 is newer, but the word every is wrong. Oblivion and The Darkness were better on PS3, or so they say. I played teh 360 version's though.

Almost every is the right phrase, although, I think in time the PS3 will have the advantage.

When? I think the cows deserve an anwser. I would be pissed having paided more and getting second best.

Depends which is the primary version, ports almost always look worse. Also 360 is easier to develop for and has better dev tools those things mught be factors.

I blame this on the developers mostly.kingpoopa84

Can't blame the developers all the time.

I hear that the Firmware update 2.0 will reduce Ram usage by the PS3 OS

to 32MB instead of 96MB.

That alone should make a difference.

When? I think the cows deserve an anwser. I would be pissed having paided more and getting second best. Transfering7

I Agree. I'd rather pay less and get a defective product. :D

[QUOTE="kingpoopa84"]I blame this on the developers mostly.Transfering7

Can't blame the developers all the time.

I hear that the Firmware update 2.0 will reduce Ram usage by the PS3 OS

to 32MB instead of 96MB.

That alone should make a difference.

Bear in mind, the pretties Xbox game right now is Gears of War, and it took a year to get that from Epic. I think a thread like this would be perfect after we give the PS3 that year we gave Xbox.

[QUOTE="Transfering7"]

[QUOTE="kingpoopa84"]I blame this on the developers mostly.XTy

Can't blame the developers all the time.

I hear that the Firmware update 2.0 will reduce Ram usage by the PS3 OS

to 32MB instead of 96MB.

That alone should make a difference.

Bear in mind, the pretties Xbox game right now is Gears of War, and it took a year to get that from Epic. I think a thread like this would be perfect after we give the PS3 that year we gave Xbox.

Absolute crap. Sony had an extra year of tech and $200 price premium. The console damn well should look better then the 360 at launch.

Absolute crap. Sony had an extra year of tech and $200 price premium. The console damn well should look better then the 360 at launch.

Cali3350

If we're going to play that game, MS had an extra year to iron out the hardware woes and added a $100 premium to their Elite unit. The console damn well better perform flawlessly.

Oh wait.

:roll:

[QUOTE="XTy"][QUOTE="Transfering7"]

[QUOTE="kingpoopa84"]I blame this on the developers mostly.Cali3350

Can't blame the developers all the time.

I hear that the Firmware update 2.0 will reduce Ram usage by the PS3 OS

to 32MB instead of 96MB.

That alone should make a difference.

Bear in mind, the pretties Xbox game right now is Gears of War, and it took a year to get that from Epic. I think a thread like this would be perfect after we give the PS3 that year we gave Xbox.

Absolute crap. Sony had an extra year of tech and $200 price premium. The console damn well should look better then the 360 at launch.

It can't it has a less advance GPU. And Massive OS overhead Ram usage.

If Sony had used there $$$ to invest in 1GB of Ram and a DX10 GPU+

There be no question of which is more powerful

[QUOTE="XTy"][QUOTE="Transfering7"]

[QUOTE="kingpoopa84"]I blame this on the developers mostly.Cali3350

Can't blame the developers all the time.

I hear that the Firmware update 2.0 will reduce Ram usage by the PS3 OS

to 32MB instead of 96MB.

That alone should make a difference.

Bear in mind, the pretties Xbox game right now is Gears of War, and it took a year to get that from Epic. I think a thread like this would be perfect after we give the PS3 that year we gave Xbox.

Absolute crap. Sony had an extra year of tech and $200 price premium. The console damn well should look better then the 360 at launch.

Yeah, okay. I guess you said the same thing about the 360 in 2005 when people were buying GUN, and TONY HAWK. Sure buddy. You must be NEW to how consoles work. The PS2 got FFX and MGS2 one year later, that's HOW IT GOES. man, i don't understand why this is so hard to fathom.

[QUOTE="Cali3350"]

Absolute crap. Sony had an extra year of tech and $200 price premium. The console damn well should look better then the 360 at launch.

beckhambender

If we're going to play that game, MS had an extra year to iron out the hardware woes and added a $100 premium to their Elite unit. The console damn well better perform flawlessly.

Oh wait.

:roll:

Wow, great point. That is true, but he didn't really think out his statement so well.

What the hell happened?

Lack of Rams?

Lack of Good GPU?

XMB OS eating up Rams 96MB?

Transfering7

lem answer: BCZ THE 360 IS BETTER THAN PS3 -false

cow answer: THE GAMES ARE NOT-false too

truth, it is all up to the devs most devs have little expearince with the PS3 and the new tech /OS running on the CELL

[QUOTE="XTy"][QUOTE="Transfering7"]

[QUOTE="kingpoopa84"]I blame this on the developers mostly.Cali3350

Can't blame the developers all the time.

I hear that the Firmware update 2.0 will reduce Ram usage by the PS3 OS

to 32MB instead of 96MB.

That alone should make a difference.

Bear in mind, the pretties Xbox game right now is Gears of War, and it took a year to get that from Epic. I think a thread like this would be perfect after we give the PS3 that year we gave Xbox.

Absolute crap. Sony had an extra year of tech and $200 price premium. The console damn well should look better then the 360 at launch.

I second that!8)

[QUOTE="Cali3350"]

[QUOTE="XTy"][QUOTE="Transfering7"]

[QUOTE="kingpoopa84"]I blame this on the developers mostly.Art_424

Can't blame the developers all the time.

I hear that the Firmware update 2.0 will reduce Ram usage by the PS3 OS

to 32MB instead of 96MB.

That alone should make a difference.

Bear in mind, the pretties Xbox game right now is Gears of War, and it took a year to get that from Epic. I think a thread like this would be perfect after we give the PS3 that year we gave Xbox.

Absolute crap. Sony had an extra year of tech and $200 price premium. The console damn well should look better then the 360 at launch.

I second that!8)

Well it doesn't..... :x

What **** now?

Fission Mailed? :cry:

Tired of games getting either delayed or have lowered FPS.

[QUOTE="Cali3350"]

[QUOTE="XTy"][QUOTE="Transfering7"]

[QUOTE="kingpoopa84"]I blame this on the developers mostly.XTy

Can't blame the developers all the time.

I hear that the Firmware update 2.0 will reduce Ram usage by the PS3 OS

to 32MB instead of 96MB.

That alone should make a difference.

Bear in mind, the pretties Xbox game right now is Gears of War, and it took a year to get that from Epic. I think a thread like this would be perfect after we give the PS3 that year we gave Xbox.

Absolute crap. Sony had an extra year of tech and $200 price premium. The console damn well should look better then the 360 at launch.

Yeah, okay. I guess you said the same thing about the 360 in 2005 when people were buying GUN, and TONY HAWK. Sure buddy. You must be NEW to how consoles work. The PS2 got FFX and MGS2 one year later, that's HOW IT GOES. man, i don't understand why this is so hard to fathom.

Nothing you said has any relevance AT ALL with what i said. Sony had a year and a price premium, and almost one year after this still cant match the 360. Its sad, and pathetic.

[QUOTE="XTy"][QUOTE="Cali3350"]

[QUOTE="XTy"][QUOTE="Transfering7"]

[QUOTE="kingpoopa84"]I blame this on the developers mostly.Cali3350

Can't blame the developers all the time.

I hear that the Firmware update 2.0 will reduce Ram usage by the PS3 OS

to 32MB instead of 96MB.

That alone should make a difference.

Bear in mind, the pretties Xbox game right now is Gears of War, and it took a year to get that from Epic. I think a thread like this would be perfect after we give the PS3 that year we gave Xbox.

Absolute crap. Sony had an extra year of tech and $200 price premium. The console damn well should look better then the 360 at launch.

Yeah, okay. I guess you said the same thing about the 360 in 2005 when people were buying GUN, and TONY HAWK. Sure buddy. You must be NEW to how consoles work. The PS2 got FFX and MGS2 one year later, that's HOW IT GOES. man, i don't understand why this is so hard to fathom.

Nothing you said has any relevance AT ALL with what i said. Sony had a year and a price premium, and almost one year after this still cant match the 360. Its sad, and pathetic.

bu bu but teh Shoddy Devs!! :cry:

Or maybe the GPU is really just garbage and so is the Ram Allocation... :idea:

What the hell happened?

Lack of Rams?

Lack of Good GPU?

XMB OS eating up Rams 96MB?

Transfering7

[QUOTE="Transfering7"]

What the hell happened?

Lack of Rams?

Lack of Good GPU?

XMB OS eating up Rams 96MB?

JAMES_L_BROOKS

lem answer: BCZ THE 360 IS BETTER THAN PS3 -false

cow answer: THE GAMES ARE NOT-false too

truth, it is all up to the devs most devs have little expearince with the PS3 and the new tech /OS running on the CELL

[QUOTE="JAMES_L_BROOKS"][QUOTE="Transfering7"]

What the hell happened?

Lack of Rams?

Lack of Good GPU?

XMB OS eating up Rams 96MB?

snoz_dawg

lem answer: BCZ THE 360 IS BETTER THAN PS3 -false

cow answer: THE GAMES ARE NOT-false too

truth, it is all up to the devs most devs have little expearince with the PS3 and the new tech /OS running on the CELL

[QUOTE="snoz_dawg"][QUOTE="JAMES_L_BROOKS"][QUOTE="Transfering7"]

What the hell happened?

Lack of Rams?

Lack of Good GPU?

XMB OS eating up Rams 96MB?

WOWZORS

lem answer: BCZ THE 360 IS BETTER THAN PS3 -false

cow answer: THE GAMES ARE NOT-false too

truth, it is all up to the devs most devs have little expearince with the PS3 and the new tech /OS running on the CELL

Well Xbox 1 had better looking games from the beginning, at launch compared to recent PS2 games at the same time.

So it the PS3 was more powerful wouldn't that power show at launch?