Why is Halo Reach so bad?

I highly doubt Halo 4 would be as good as the originals. One of the reason is it is a new company and it becoming more CoD like. The thing I enjoyed most about Halo was it's uniqueness (if that is a word).

http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/halo-reach

http://www.gamespot.com/halo-reach/

Halo Reach is ffrom bad.

Mkavanaugh77

In the words of Stan Lee, "nuff said"

http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/halo-reach

http://www.gamespot.com/halo-reach/

Halo Reach is ffrom bad.

Mkavanaugh77

/thread

bc you touch yourself at night. mrmusicman247

The reason for all the evils in the world

ARMOR LOCK

the lack of the chief

No battle rifle

Horrible multiplayer maps

Invasion.....meh

The story was good, but not good enough.

i disliked it and im long term halo fan

bought xbox just for halo 1 and enjoyed it with my friends

played the living crap out halo 2

same with halo 3

very much enjoyed odst. kinda wish a odst 2 come

but reach i played the game about month and was pretty much done with it. i don't even have the disc no more if Microsoft didn't give me free copy on my gamertag i wouldn't touch it. and even then i only touch once in the blue moon when one my friends convince me to come then i dont even play the game. just goof off in zombies or something. very much dislike the mp

Like other Halo's its for people new at shooters, extremely noobish.

ARMOR LOCK - agree

the lack of the chief - I'm glad they expanded the Halo universe, such that it doesn't revolve just around him (also look at ODST and Halo Wars)

No battle rifle - DMR is your friend

Horrible multiplayer maps - Seeing updated versions of Ascension and Ivory Tower was glorious

Invasion.....meh - It's a fun new multiplayer mode, just bad when it lacks team work, and players that miss the objectives

The story was good, but not good enough.

MercenaryMafia

I agree with Armor lock, the rest not so much

I enjoyed Firefight a ton. I personally agree that Reach maps seemed pretty bland though.

Like other Halo's its for people new at shooters, extremely noobish.

Jankarcop

[QUOTE="Jankarcop"]

Like other Halo's its for people new at shooters, extremely noobish.

mems_1224

Someones upset his game of chioce has an extremely low skill ceiling.:cool:

I felt that Reach was a very good game. The story was pretty good, the gameplay was great, and the multiplayer was fun and had many different playlists.

[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="Jankarcop"]

Like other Halo's its for people new at shooters, extremely noobish.

Jankarcop

Someones upset his game of chioce has an extremely low skill ceiling.:cool:

[QUOTE="Jankarcop"]

Like other Halo's its for people new at shooters, extremely noobish.

mems_1224

Someones upset his game of chioce has an extremely low skill ceiling.:cool:

I highly doubt Halo 4 would be as good as the originals. One of the reason is it is a new company and it becoming more CoD like. The thing I enjoyed most about Halo was it's uniqueness (if that is a word).

sherman-tank1

[QUOTE="sherman-tank1"]

I highly doubt Halo 4 would be as good as the originals. One of the reason is it is a new company and it becoming more CoD like. The thing I enjoyed most about Halo was it's uniqueness (if that is a word).

soapandbubbles

agree. i will never understand it.

everything gets compared to cod or WoW for some reason.

[QUOTE="MercenaryMafia"]

ARMOR LOCK - agree

the lack of the chief - I'm glad they expanded the Halo universe, such that it doesn't revolve just around him (also look at ODST and Halo Wars)

No battle rifle - DMR is your friend

Horrible multiplayer maps - Seeing updated versions of Ascension and Ivory Tower was glorious

Invasion.....meh - It's a fun new multiplayer mode, just bad when it lacks team work, and players that miss the objectives

The story was good, but not good enough.

AdobeArtist

I agree with Armor lock, the rest not so much

reach is th ebest halo game.

[QUOTE="sherman-tank1"]

I highly doubt Halo 4 would be as good as the originals. One of the reason is it is a new company and it becoming more CoD like. The thing I enjoyed most about Halo was it's uniqueness (if that is a word).

soapandbubbles

reach is th ebest halo game.

pc-ps360

[QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]

[QUOTE="MercenaryMafia"]

ARMOR LOCK - agree

the lack of the chief - I'm glad they expanded the Halo universe, such that it doesn't revolve just around him (also look at ODST and Halo Wars)

No battle rifle - DMR is your friend

Horrible multiplayer maps - Seeing updated versions of Ascension and Ivory Tower was glorious

Invasion.....meh - It's a fun new multiplayer mode, just bad when it lacks team work, and players that miss the objectives

The story was good, but not good enough.

MercenaryMafia

I agree with Armor lock, the rest not so much

The only thing I don't like about the game is armor lock, and that's not even an option in many modes.

[QUOTE="MercenaryMafia"]

[QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]

I agree with Armor lock, the rest not so much

Sonysosupreme

[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="Jankarcop"] word, its like how the pc is a casual system and for people who dont actually know what good games areinb4uall

Someones upset his game of chioce has an extremely low skill ceiling.:cool:

But hey if you're having fun with your kiddy-mode, more power to you.

I made a similar thread about how bad the Reach campaign was, it was well thought out with good arguments, and all I got was a bunch of butt hurt super Lems who just called me a Sony fanboy and didn't even try to refute my points.

Your going to get the same thing, don't let it bother you, if they can't argue back then their opinion doesn't matter much to begin with now does it?

The problem with the Reach campaign was how reptitive it was, it was literally kill a few enemies then walk/drive over to this point and turn on/off this switch, or defend this area, then walk again and kill more enemies.

The characters have no depth to them, they are just as bad as the Killzone characters are, they have zero personality and die in stupid ways (one of them just walks off to no where and leaves the game because he was so boring, Jung if I recall).

On top of this never do you once get the feeling of having this massive invasion, it feels like a joke.

Only good thing about Reach is the MP and it's full list of features, it dwarfs every other FPS out there in those terms. However it's game play is not as refined and it lacks the finess of other FPS out there like Killzone or BF or COD ect...It's game play feels outdated is another way of putting it.

But it's still a fun game to play with friends.

So in short, Halo Reach = bad SP, but good MP. If you don't have XBL the game is worthless, if you do it's fun. Overall I would give the game about an 8.

I made a similar thread about how bad the Reach campaign was, it was well thought out with good arguments, and all I got was a bunch of butt hurt super Lems who just called me a Sony fanboy and didn't even try to refute my points.

Your going to get the same thing, don't let it bother you, if they can't argue back then their opinion doesn't matter much to begin with now does it?

The problem with the Reach campaign was how reptitive it was, it was literally kill a few enemies then walk/drive over to this point and turn on/off this switch, or defend this area, then walk again and kill more enemies.

The characters have no depth to them, they are just as bad as the Killzone characters are, they have zero personality and die in stupid ways (one of them just walks off to no where and leaves the game because he was so boring, Jung if I recall).

On top of this never do you once get the feeling of having this massive invasion, it feels like a joke.

Only good thing about Reach is the MP and it's full list of features, it dwarfs every other FPS out there in those terms. However it's game play is not as refined and it lacks the finess of other FPS out there like Killzone or BF or COD ect...It's game play feels outdated is another way of putting it.

But it's still a fun game to play with friends.

So in short, Halo Reach = bad SP, but good MP. If you don't have XBL the game is worthless, if you do it's fun. Overall I would give the game about an 8.

ShadowMoses900

I made a similar thread about how bad the Reach campaign was, it was well thought out with good arguments, and all I got was a bunch of butt hurt super Lems who just called me a Sony fanboy and didn't even try to refute my points.

Your going to get the same thing, don't let it bother you, if they can't argue back then their opinion doesn't matter much to begin with now does it?

The problem with the Reach campaign was how reptitive it was, it was literally kill a few enemies then walk/drive over to this point and turn on/off this switch, or defend this area, then walk again and kill more enemies.

The characters have no depth to them, they are just as bad as the Killzone characters are, they have zero personality and die in stupid ways (one of them just walks off to no where and leaves the game because he was so boring, Jung if I recall). On top of this never do you once get the feeling of having this massive invasion, it feels like a joke.

Only good thing about Reach is the MP and it's full list of features, it dwarfs every other FPS out there in those terms. However it's game play is not as refined and it lacks the finess of other FPS out there like Killzone or BF or COD ect...It's game play feels outdated is another way of putting it. But it's still a fun game to play with friends.

So in short, Halo Reach = bad SP, but good MP. If you don't have XBL the game is worthless, if you do it's fun. Overall I would give the game about an 8.

ShadowMoses900

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

I made a similar thread about how bad the Reach campaign was, it was well thought out with good arguments, and all I got was a bunch of butt hurt super Lems who just called me a Sony fanboy and didn't even try to refute my points.

Your going to get the same thing, don't let it bother you, if they can't argue back then their opinion doesn't matter much to begin with now does it?

The problem with the Reach campaign was how reptitive it was, it was literally kill a few enemies then walk/drive over to this point and turn on/off this switch, or defend this area, then walk again and kill more enemies.

The characters have no depth to them, they are just as bad as the Killzone characters are, they have zero personality and die in stupid ways (one of them just walks off to no where and leaves the game because he was so boring, Jung if I recall).

On top of this never do you once get the feeling of having this massive invasion, it feels like a joke.

Only good thing about Reach is the MP and it's full list of features, it dwarfs every other FPS out there in those terms. However it's game play is not as refined and it lacks the finess of other FPS out there like Killzone or BF or COD ect...It's game play feels outdated is another way of putting it.

But it's still a fun game to play with friends.

So in short, Halo Reach = bad SP, but good MP. If you don't have XBL the game is worthless, if you do it's fun. Overall I would give the game about an 8.

k2theswiss

I own an Xbox bro, it's a 20GB 360 model. I got it day 1 with COD2 for it (which I now have for PC), I mainly got it for Oblivion which wasn't out at the time, but when I got it I played the hell out of it.

Got about 60 hours or so into it but then my 360 RROD on me and I sent it in to them, during this time I just played my PS2 and Gamecube. Got it back played Oblivion some more, got a free XBL trial thing with it, but I mostly just played Oblivion so the free month trial was a waste.

I also bought Gears, Halo 3, Left 4 Dead, Mass Effect 1, Batman, AC, GTA4, and a few other other games. But then it RROD on me again and I had to send it in, which was frustrating because I also had to get a new Oblivion copy as the disc got scratched in the middle, no joke it made it unplayable.

Got tired of waiting and I said fvck it, got a PS3 instead and when my 360 RROD on me a 3rd time I never bothered replacing it. Rebought my 360 multiplats on PS3, did not see a difference between the two versions, play online for free, and the games that sealed the deal for me were MGS4 and Uncharted 2.

Got my PS3 around 2008-2009ish and that's where I've been ever since. I can actually fix my 360, but it will only last for a day or so and then it RROD again, so I just don't bother fixing it anymore.

But whatever, doesn't matter what you think. You can believe whatever makes you happy. I would take a 360 if someone gave it to me, but I wouldn't play it much, aside from Gears I don't really like most 360 exclusives, so what would be the point? Just sell it and make some cash off of it.

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

I made a similar thread about how bad the Reach campaign was, it was well thought out with good arguments, and all I got was a bunch of butt hurt super Lems who just called me a Sony fanboy and didn't even try to refute my points.

Your going to get the same thing, don't let it bother you, if they can't argue back then their opinion doesn't matter much to begin with now does it?

The problem with the Reach campaign was how reptitive it was, it was literally kill a few enemies then walk/drive over to this point and turn on/off this switch, or defend this area, then walk again and kill more enemies.

The characters have no depth to them, they are just as bad as the Killzone characters are, they have zero personality and die in stupid ways (one of them just walks off to no where and leaves the game because he was so boring, Jung if I recall). On top of this never do you once get the feeling of having this massive invasion, it feels like a joke.

Only good thing about Reach is the MP and it's full list of features, it dwarfs every other FPS out there in those terms. However it's game play is not as refined and it lacks the finess of other FPS out there like Killzone or BF or COD ect...It's game play feels outdated is another way of putting it. But it's still a fun game to play with friends.

So in short, Halo Reach = bad SP, but good MP. If you don't have XBL the game is worthless, if you do it's fun. Overall I would give the game about an 8.

cainetao11

You can believe whatever you want, I don't care. These were just my honest opinions which I even said I gave the game an 8, that's a good score. Sorry I didn't give it a perfect 10 like you wanted it, some people have different opinions and I don't think halo is the messiah of FPS games like you do. Funny you talk about me not being open minded when you arn't open minded yourself to handle someone else's opinion.

I have played every Halo game, aside from the RTS one. Best is CE, worst is ODST but I admit it has best atmosphere, but I paid $60 for it and it was too short to justify that purchase. To me SP is more important than MP, and Halo sucks in SP experiences this gen, and it's not the best MP out there either IMO. It has a lot of features, but more features doesn't mean more quality, Killzone, BF, COD ect...all have much better game play to me than Halo.

And lol at Sony loyalty, they are a giant corporation, I'm not loyal to them because I'm not a fascist nor do I own stock. Why would I be loyal to Sony? lol. I don't care what system a game is on, if I enjoy it I enjoy it, if not oh well. There are some PS3 games I don't like and some I do, that's how it is for every system.

Some people couldn't learn how to counter the AA's and this complain about it.

[QUOTE="Jankarcop"]

Like other Halo's its for people new at shooters, extremely noobish.

mems_1224

but somehow managed to snag more high scoring exclusives this generation alone than all three consoles combined.

I made a similar thread about how bad the Reach campaign was, it was well thought out with good arguments, and all I got was a bunch of butt hurt super Lems who just called me a Sony fanboy and didn't even try to refute my points.

Your going to get the same thing, don't let it bother you, if they can't argue back then their opinion doesn't matter much to begin with now does it?

The problem with the Reach campaign was how reptitive it was, it was literally kill a few enemies then walk/drive over to this point and turn on/off this switch, or defend this area, then walk again and kill more enemies.

The characters have no depth to them, they are just as bad as the Killzone characters are, they have zero personality and die in stupid ways (one of them just walks off to no where and leaves the game because he was so boring, Jung if I recall).

On top of this never do you once get the feeling of having this massive invasion, it feels like a joke.

Only good thing about Reach is the MP and it's full list of features, it dwarfs every other FPS out there in those terms. However it's game play is not as refined and it lacks the finess of other FPS out there like Killzone or BF or COD ect...It's game play feels outdated is another way of putting it.

But it's still a fun game to play with friends.

So in short, Halo Reach = bad SP, but good MP. If you don't have XBL the game is worthless, if you do it's fun. Overall I would give the game about an 8.

ShadowMoses900

CE>>Reach>>2>>3 IMO walkingdream