Why is KZ: SF multiplayer 60fps/1080p, but BF4 is limited to 720p/60fps?

[QUOTE="gpuking"][QUOTE="zeeshanhaider"]

Crysis 2 kicks KZ:SF out of the water. It's not even comparable. And it's expected from a hardware barely matching 570 from 2010. And you are free to counter any of my pointys if you can, but don't forget that 570 GPU.:lol:

zeeshanhaider

:lol:

Digital Foundary disagrees.

Capcom disagrees.

But I can expect anything from a person who has said the things quoted in my post and considers KZ a sandbox game. Let alone Crysis 2, Even a game from 2007 have something KZ:SF doesn't: Scale and Dynamic Physics. Sorry insecureking there's nothing you can do with technology of 2010.:(

Inb4 a paragraph of 'buzz words' without even an idea what any of that means.

(Open in new tab)

vs.

It's not even comparable, SF looks like Borderlands 2 with FXAA and outlines turned off xD

[QUOTE="zeeshanhaider"]

[QUOTE="gpuking"] Crysis 2 looks like antique next to KZ, the models and scale in KZ is at leas a few gens ahead.Riadon2

:lol:

Digital Foundary disagrees.

Capcom disagrees.

But I can expect anything from a person who has said the things quoted in my post and considers KZ a sandbox game. Let alone Crysis 2, Even a game from 2007 have something KZ:SF doesn't: Scale and Dynamic Physics. Sorry insecureking there's nothing you can do with technology of 2010.:(

Inb4 a paragraph of 'buzz words' without even an idea what any of that means.

It's not even comparable, SF looks like Borderlands 2 with FXAA and outlines turned off xD

:lol: However, I've got to admit that Killzone: SF looks much better in motion. Still shots don't do it justice.

[QUOTE="Riadon2"]

[QUOTE="zeeshanhaider"]

:lol:

Digital Foundary disagrees.

Capcom disagrees.

But I can expect anything from a person who has said the things quoted in my post and considers KZ a sandbox game. Let alone Crysis 2, Even a game from 2007 have something KZ:SF doesn't: Scale and Dynamic Physics. Sorry insecureking there's nothing you can do with technology of 2010.:(

Inb4 a paragraph of 'buzz words' without even an idea what any of that means.

BluRayHiDef

It's not even comparable, SF looks like Borderlands 2 with FXAA and outlines turned off xD

:lol: However, I've got to admit that Killzone: SF looks much better in motion. Still shots don't do it justice.

Pretty much any game will look better in motion unless there is terrible aliasing or it is very inconsistent.

I could understand if BF4's visuals were a lot better than KZ:SF for the reason why EA opted for 720p to maintain 60fps, but from what I've seen BF4 doesn't look technically better than KZ:SF visuals in multiplayer.  Is there something BF4 is doing on a higher technical level than KZ:SF?

emgesp

Most of Sony first party offering were always about great graphics in confined and small levels. KZSF is no where near the size of BF4 levels so it can of course have more detailed levels, characters and resolution.

I though Killzone was revealed to be actually 1600x900 and running at a range of 40-60 fps?

I though Killzone was revealed to be actually 1600x900 and running at a range of 40-60 fps?

Link3301

This just gets worse and worse. Maybe I should cancel my preorder and keep my money. I just don't know. :(

I though Killzone was revealed to be actually 1600x900 and running at a range of 40-60 fps?

Link3301

[QUOTE="Riadon2"]

[QUOTE="zeeshanhaider"]

:lol:

Digital Foundary disagrees.

Capcom disagrees.

But I can expect anything from a person who has said the things quoted in my post and considers KZ a sandbox game. Let alone Crysis 2, Even a game from 2007 have something KZ:SF doesn't: Scale and Dynamic Physics. Sorry insecureking there's nothing you can do with technology of 2010.:(

Inb4 a paragraph of 'buzz words' without even an idea what any of that means.

BluRayHiDef

It's not even comparable, SF looks like Borderlands 2 with FXAA and outlines turned off xD

:lol: However, I've got to admit that Killzone: SF looks much better in motion. Still shots don't do it justice.

Like every other game in existence...

[QUOTE="zeeshanhaider"]

[QUOTE="gpuking"] Crysis 2 looks like antique next to KZ, the models and scale in KZ is at leas a few gens ahead.Riadon2

:lol:

Digital Foundary disagrees.

Capcom disagrees.

But I can expect anything from a person who has said the things quoted in my post and considers KZ a sandbox game. Let alone Crysis 2, Even a game from 2007 have something KZ:SF doesn't: Scale and Dynamic Physics. Sorry insecureking there's nothing you can do with technology of 2010.:(

Inb4 a paragraph of 'buzz words' without even an idea what any of that means.

(Open in new tab)

vs.

It's not even comparable, SF looks like Borderlands 2 with FXAA and outlines turned off xD

Just wait. He will come back with lots and lots of 'buzz words' he don't know jack about and call KZ the graphics king. I mean how could someone take him seriously when he has said the dumbest of the things quoted in my sig.

Just wait. He will come back with lots and lots of 'buzz words' he don't know jack about and call KZ the graphics king. I mean how could someone take him seriously when he has said the dumbest of the things quoted in my sig.

zeeshanhaider

Yeah, picking the worst shots of a very old pre alpha build is really helping your case here lol. All I see from the C2 shots are low poly environment assets, over tweaked sunlight and a very last gen brown filter. KZSF burys C2 effortlessly.

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

[QUOTE="zeeshanhaider"]

And the last time that top tier Sony dev coded for PC we all know how that turned out. Shellshock anyone?;) And about multiplat vs single platform, guess what GG also making another title so that equals the playing field, no? And did it occur to you that multiplatform devs may have more resources at work than the single team working on Crapzone: Shadow Fail?

And yeah, only Sony first part knows how to code, all the other devs are idiots right? Cows are the biggest hypocrites they would never give any game its due credit. In the PS3 time only Sony devs knows how to harness the power of teh cell, well guess what, Sony devs never did any development for x86 hardware ever, so what are your excuse now idiots (cows)?. And the devs in question were putting AAA level titles when all of the Sony first party were in their panties making $hit for PS2.

Oh and by the way it sucks to have 2010 level GPU in a consolol I tell you. Wake me up when KZ:SF has anything over a game from 2011.:cool:

zeeshanhaider

It looks better then almost all pc games from 2011 , stop being so but hurt you sound like you were foaming from the mouth when you typed this .

Crysis 2 kicks KZ:SF out of the water. It's not even comparable. And it's expected from a hardware barely matching 570 from 2010. And you are free to counter any of my pointys if you can, but don't forget that 570 GPU.:lol:

In terms of raw Performance a PS4 will kick a 570 square in the nuts. That will be painfully obvious and no crysis 2 doensnt kick KZ:SF out of the water thats just rabbid pc fanboy babble. 

[QUOTE="gpuking"][QUOTE="zeeshanhaider"]

Crysis 2 kicks KZ:SF out of the water. It's not even comparable. And it's expected from a hardware barely matching 570 from 2010. And you are free to counter any of my pointys if you can, but don't forget that 570 GPU.:lol:

zeeshanhaider

:lol:

Digital Foundary disagrees.

Capcom disagrees.

But I can expect anything from a person who has said the things quoted in my post and considers KZ a sandbox game. Let alone Crysis 2, Even a game from 2007 have something KZ:SF doesn't: Scale and Dynamic Physics. Sorry insecureking there's nothing you can do with technology of 2010.:(

Inb4 a paragraph of 'buzz words' without even an idea what any of that means.

Digital Foundry hasnt previewed it since it used placeholder characters.

And Capcom disagrees?  WTF are you talking about?

And you wanna talk about scale?  Crysis 2 had no scale.  KZ:SF looks better then Crysis 2 and Crysis 1 wasnt even THAT BIG. I laugh everytime a hermits act like its this massive sandbox game.  Go out of the mission zone and its game over.  The games scale was nothing special by any means.  You are so rabid with delusion its hillarious.

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

[QUOTE="rjdofu"] Are you one of the sad individuals that think BF3 SP worth a damn? The game is 90% MP focused. rjdofu

If by reading my comments you think I thought BF3 sp was worth a damn then im going to say you are the said individual and you also lack reading comprehension.

Im sorry I guess console gamers have higher standards?  I expect a good Sp expereince its to bad its acceptable for you to buy a product with one thats complete garbage.

Yeah, picking the worst shots of a very old pre alpha build is really helping your case here lol. gpuking

[QUOTE="rjdofu"][QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

If by reading my comments you think I thought BF3 sp was worth a damn then im going to say you are the said individual and you also lack reading comprehension.

AM-Gamer

Im sorry I guess console gamers have higher standards?  I expect a good Sp expereince its to bad its acceptable for you to buy a product with one thats complete garbage.

[QUOTE="gpuking"]Yeah, picking the worst shots of a very old pre alpha build is really helping your case here lol. Magik85

I personally think KZ:SF is the better looking game. They both look gorgeous though.

[QUOTE="Magik85"][QUOTE="gpuking"]Yeah, picking the worst shots of a very old pre alpha build is really helping your case here lol. gpuking

[QUOTE="gpuking"][QUOTE="Magik85"] At least he aint posting PR bullshots.mitu123

He still won't though.

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

[QUOTE="zeeshanhaider"]

And the last time that top tier Sony dev coded for PC we all know how that turned out. Shellshock anyone?;) And about multiplat vs single platform, guess what GG also making another title so that equals the playing field, no? And did it occur to you that multiplatform devs may have more resources at work than the single team working on Crapzone: Shadow Fail?

And yeah, only Sony first part knows how to code, all the other devs are idiots right? Cows are the biggest hypocrites they would never give any game its due credit. In the PS3 time only Sony devs knows how to harness the power of teh cell, well guess what, Sony devs never did any development for x86 hardware ever, so what are your excuse now idiots (cows)?. And the devs in question were putting AAA level titles when all of the Sony first party were in their panties making $hit for PS2.

Oh and by the way it sucks to have 2010 level GPU in a consolol I tell you. Wake me up when KZ:SF has anything over a game from 2011.:cool:

zeeshanhaider

It looks better then almost all pc games from 2011 , stop being so but hurt you sound like you were foaming from the mouth when you typed this .

Crysis 2 kicks KZ:SF out of the water. It's not even comparable. And it's expected from a hardware barely matching 570 from 2010. And you are free to counter any of my pointys if you can, but don't forget that 570 GPU.:lol:

[QUOTE="zeeshanhaider"]

Just wait. He will come back with lots and lots of 'buzz words' he don't know jack about and call KZ the graphics king. I mean how could someone take him seriously when he has said the dumbest of the things quoted in my sig.

gpuking

Yeah, picking the worst shots of a very old pre alpha build is really helping your case here lol. All I see from the C2 shots are low poly environment assets, over tweaked sunlight and a very last gen brown filter. KZSF burys C2 effortlessly.

Even worse comeback. Bullshots with the console Crysis 2 shot. Damn, it must hurt having a barely matching 570 GPU from 2010 in your precious Next-Gen PS4.:lol:

Sorry son, no matter how bad I feel for you but Crysis 2 kicks KZ:Sf's a$$ out of the water. Hell even the original Crysis $hits on KZ:SF in scale and physics dept.:(

destruction, player count

lostrib

[QUOTE="zeeshanhaider"]

[QUOTE="AM-Gamer"]

It looks better then almost all pc games from 2011 , stop being so but hurt you sound like you were foaming from the mouth when you typed this .

AM-Gamer

Crysis 2 kicks KZ:SF out of the water. It's not even comparable. And it's expected from a hardware barely matching 570 from 2010. And you are free to counter any of my pointys if you can, but don't forget that 570 GPU.:lol:

In terms of raw Performance a PS4 will kick a 570 square in the nuts. That will be painfully obvious and no crysis 2 doensnt kick KZ:SF out of the water thats just rabbid pc fanboy babble. 

Already shared you a link how 570 compares with 7850, and I tell you what, 7850 has more RAW performance than 570 yet when it it comes to real world performance in most cases 570 outperforms 7850.:(

And sorry I trust actual developers and professional words over yours. Crysis 2 >>>>>>>>> KZ:SF.:(

[QUOTE="zeeshanhaider"]

[QUOTE="gpuking"] Crysis 2 looks like antique next to KZ, the models and scale in KZ is at leas a few gens ahead.AM-Gamer

:lol:

Digital Foundary disagrees.

Capcom disagrees.

But I can expect anything from a person who has said the things quoted in my post and considers KZ a sandbox game. Let alone Crysis 2, Even a game from 2007 have something KZ:SF doesn't: Scale and Dynamic Physics. Sorry insecureking there's nothing you can do with technology of 2010.:(

Inb4 a paragraph of 'buzz words' without even an idea what any of that means.

Digital Foundry hasnt previewed it since it used placeholder characters.

And Capcom disagrees?  WTF are you talking about?

And you wanna talk about scale?  Crysis 2 had no scale.  KZ:SF looks better then Crysis 2 and Crysis 1 wasnt even THAT BIG. I laugh everytime a hermits act like its this massive sandbox game.  Go out of the mission zone and its game over.  The games scale was nothing special by any means.  You are so rabid with delusion its hillarious.

Deep Down says hi.:D How does it feel that DD is now running at 720p and we don't even know if it was running on PS4 hardware.

And, your opinion being a Sony drone holds no value since you didn't even played any of the Crysis games on PC. No, you did not. Stop lying.

[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="gpuking"] I would not hesitate posting the exact ingame shots of those two parts only if we have available directfeed footage.gpuking

STFU you are using the same 4K bullshots since the time of its announcement.

Why is the story mode only 30fps??????aronaouran

Why is the story mode only 30fps??????aronaouran