[QUOTE="niall077"]mgs2 was AAA mgs3sub was AAA and mgspo was AAAragrdoll21/thread
not quite, Jeff is in charge now. Greg is gone, didnt you notice the difference?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="mistervengeance"]if you have ever played any of the mgs's, you'd obviously know they really deserve a score of 11. Apathetic-Irony
I played MGS2, and I cannot see this game being drastically different from that one. But hey, it's not like PS3 fanboys are bashing any other games for not being drastically different and thus deserving AA :P (Halo)
Not to mention whining about NG2's and DMC4's 'same old' gameplay. Cows, MGS4 is gonna be great, but according to your logic you should be bashing it for looking similar to it's predecessors :o
[QUOTE="Apathetic-Irony"][QUOTE="mistervengeance"]if you have ever played any of the mgs's, you'd obviously know they really deserve a score of 11. ragrdoll21
I played MGS2, and I cannot see this game being drastically different from that one. But hey, it's not like PS3 fanboys are bashing any other games for not being drastically different and thus deserving AA :P (Halo)
Every new MGS is different from the previous one, not just a few new weapons and a new coat of paint.;)They seem quite a bit alike to me, but I do enjoy them. I like Halo better, but MGS3 Sub was one of my favorite games.
Because Snake gets in Metal Gear REX and fights Liquid Ocelot in Metal Gear RAY, duh.TheManOfChoiceTrue, it was sweet seeing MGR back.:)
[QUOTE="ragrdoll21"][QUOTE="Apathetic-Irony"][QUOTE="mistervengeance"]if you have ever played any of the mgs's, you'd obviously know they really deserve a score of 11. kevy619
I played MGS2, and I cannot see this game being drastically different from that one. But hey, it's not like PS3 fanboys are bashing any other games for not being drastically different and thus deserving AA :P (Halo)
Every new MGS is different from the previous one, not just a few new weapons and a new coat of paint.;)They seem quite a bit alike to me, but I do enjoy them. I like Halo better, but MGS3 Sub was one of my favorite games.
With the camo system, survival mode(real survival) and 3rd Person view, that was enough of a deparcher from MGS2.The boss fights where unforgettable but then again the boss fights have always been epic.[QUOTE="Apathetic-Irony"][QUOTE="mistervengeance"]if you have ever played any of the mgs's, you'd obviously know they really deserve a score of 11. Kritical_Strike
I played MGS2, and I cannot see this game being drastically different from that one. But hey, it's not like PS3 fanboys are bashing any other games for not being drastically different and thus deserving AA :P (Halo)
Not to mention whining about NG2's and DMC4's 'same old' gameplay. Cows, MGS4 is gonna be great, but according to your logic you should be bashing it for looking similar to it's predecessors :o
When have "Cows" bashed DMC?You guys had the NG2 bashing coming,remember NG:S?[QUOTE="outbreak201"]MGS4 GOTY 2008 W000T!!!!!!!!!!!kman3002
You spelled Little Big Planet wrong.;)
lmao!!.....no :|
MGS4 has everthing that made MGS3: Subsistence AAA, and it has been streamlined and refined so it's even more intuitive. It has all that and more gameplay elements to keep it up to date to next-gen stealth/shooter standards. does that answer your question?Mordred19
exactly. besides this is the most anticipated game outside of halo and gta. Its been proven to be a great series and is a killer app. why wouldnt it be hyped AAA?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment