Why is the heck is Xbox 360 still $199 and it's 2015?

  • 76 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for c_smithii
c_smithii

1505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 c_smithii
Member since 2003 • 1505 Posts

This system is almost 10 years old and it only went down $100 in price since its core launch price of $299 in 2005.

Here I am spending money on cables and tools to replace my DVD drive on my aged Arcade 360 because it stopped reading games. When I would have been happy to just replace the console but hell Microsoft offers no value asking for $150 to repair a 360 or $200 for the new 4GB 360.

The Xbox 360 should have been $99 two years ago, and yet you can only see that deal in a blue-moon, doorbuster-midnight-black Friday only moment.

What has happened to gaming? Nintendo and SEGA when they were the top dogs, they never let an old system run this long at a premium price tag.

Avatar image for Netret0120
Netret0120

3594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#2 Netret0120
Member since 2013 • 3594 Posts

Because it is M$

Avatar image for top_lel
top_lel

886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#3 top_lel
Member since 2014 • 886 Posts

LOL

Avatar image for FreedomFreeLife
FreedomFreeLife

3948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 FreedomFreeLife
Member since 2013 • 3948 Posts

Because people keep buying and Microsoft earns billion profit. So why would you lower your price when its almost same powerful as Wii U but with more games, better games and better online?

Avatar image for c_smithii
c_smithii

1505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 c_smithii
Member since 2003 • 1505 Posts

@FreedomFreeLife said:

Because people keep buying and Microsoft earns billion profit. So why would you lower your price when its almost same powerful as Wii U but with more games, better games and better online?

because a marked down price would increase sales.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#6 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38077 Posts

@FreedomFreeLife said:

Because people keep buying and Microsoft earns billion profit. So why would you lower your price when its almost same powerful as Wii U but with more games, better games and better online?

And that's all she wrote. Bad business to lower the price based on what happened in the past instead of what the current consumer market is dictating. Obviously the console is still selling enough at $199.

Avatar image for aroxx_ab
aroxx_ab

13236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 aroxx_ab
Member since 2005 • 13236 Posts

How do think MS can afford the massive Xboner pricecuts?

Avatar image for FreedomFreeLife
FreedomFreeLife

3948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 FreedomFreeLife
Member since 2013 • 3948 Posts

@c_smithii said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

Because people keep buying and Microsoft earns billion profit. So why would you lower your price when its almost same powerful as Wii U but with more games, better games and better online?

because a marked down price would increase sales.

We don´t know that if that increase sales. 50 dollar cut wouldnt increase sales since most people already owns system, and who will buy Xbox 360 will buy anyway xbox 360 without looking is this 150 or 200 dollars. Lower price can MAYBE increase sales a little bit but then profit is a lot lower.

Avatar image for c_smithii
c_smithii

1505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By c_smithii
Member since 2003 • 1505 Posts

@cainetao11 said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

Because people keep buying and Microsoft earns billion profit. So why would you lower your price when its almost same powerful as Wii U but with more games, better games and better online?

And that's all she wrote. Bad business to lower the price based on what happened in the past instead of what the current consumer market is dictating. Obviously the console is still selling enough at $199.

but its not.

http://www.gamespot.com/articles/gamestop-we-d-love-to-see-xbox-360-ps3-price-cuts/1100-6423751/

Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17951

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#10 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17951 Posts

There IS a $179 SKU which can be cheaper when you trade games.

I agree it should be cheaper, but this is how Sony and MS are making money right now.

The PS3 is even more expensive than 360.

You can get both used with a warranty for 99-199 respectively

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

Still good consoles, but at those prices games should be easier to find. It is as if they stop the presses shortly after release. A big release like Metal Gear Legacy Collection should be easy to find if the console is still priced as something being supported.

Avatar image for blamix99
blamix99

2685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#12 blamix99
Member since 2011 • 2685 Posts

@Netret0120 said:

Because it is M$

Avatar image for b4x
B4X

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#13  Edited By B4X
Member since 2014 • 5660 Posts

@c_smithii: $299...? Where did you buy your X360 at launch? I think you forgot $100 dollars some where.

I paid like $429 after tax.

Avatar image for SolidGame_basic
SolidGame_basic

47673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 SolidGame_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 47673 Posts

Obviously it's doing well enough at that price point that they don't need to go lower.

Avatar image for c_smithii
c_smithii

1505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15  Edited By c_smithii
Member since 2003 • 1505 Posts

@b4x said:

@c_smithii: $299...? Where did you buy your X360 at launch? I think you forgot $100 dollars some where.

I paid like $429 after tax.

There were originally two SKUs, the core SKU that came with no hard drive sold for $299, the other SKU that came with a 20GB drive sold for $399 as the Premium.

If you didn't buy any game at launch I'd imagine $429 would be just about right if your bought the Premium SKU with tax.

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16  Edited By silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts

Its the question i've been asking myself since 2012 when last gen became an irrelevant POS. Sure the answer is always "to make money LOLOLOL" but it doesn't make any fking sense that these kind of relics are still priced this high (you don't even get a bluray player on 360...). MS/Sony sees how dumb most gamers are with their usual 'specs are not important, games is what matters *implying there's games on last gen now lol*' and abuse consoles popularity to sell em at a premium when shit grade specs like these should be given for free with a purchase of a game for ps4/x1 lol.

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts

@FreedomFreeLife said:

Because people keep buying and Microsoft earns billion profit. So why would you lower your price when its almost same powerful as Wii U but with more games, better games and better online?

Better online?

Besides the recent games most of them would dead

Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18  Edited By Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

@c_smithii said:

This system is almost 10 years old and it only went down $100 in price since its core launch price of $299 in 2005.

Here I am spending money on cables and tools to replace my DVD drive on my aged Arcade 360 because it stopped reading games. When I would have been happy to just replace the console but hell Microsoft offers no value asking for $150 to repair a 360 or $200 for the new 4GB 360.

The Xbox 360 should have been $99 two years ago, and yet you can only see that deal in a blue-moon, doorbuster-midnight-black Friday only moment.

What has happened to gaming? Nintendo and SEGA when they were the top dogs, they never let an old system run this long at a premium price tag.

Because they can.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#19 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38077 Posts

@c_smithii said:

@cainetao11 said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

Because people keep buying and Microsoft earns billion profit. So why would you lower your price when its almost same powerful as Wii U but with more games, better games and better online?

And that's all she wrote. Bad business to lower the price based on what happened in the past instead of what the current consumer market is dictating. Obviously the console is still selling enough at $199.

but its not.

http://www.gamespot.com/articles/gamestop-we-d-love-to-see-xbox-360-ps3-price-cuts/1100-6423751/

So gamestop decides at what level MS is satisfied with the sales of the 360? Always makes sense to let another company dictate what your company does.............sure.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#20 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62044 Posts

If it's selling decently, then they won't lower the price. The PS3 is still $200-$250.

Avatar image for Gue1
Gue1

12171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#21 Gue1
Member since 2004 • 12171 Posts

because

@silversix_ said:

Its the question i've been asking myself since 2012 when last gen became an irrelevant POS. Sure the answer is always "to make money LOLOLOL" but it doesn't make any fking sense that these kind of relics are still priced this high (you don't even get a bluray player on 360...). MS/Sony sees how dumb most gamers are with their usual 'specs are not important, games is what matters *implying there's games on last gen now lol*' and abuse consoles popularity to sell em at a premium when shit grade specs like these should be given for free with a purchase of a game for ps4/x1 lol.

Avatar image for raugutcon
raugutcon

5576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#22 raugutcon
Member since 2014 • 5576 Posts

200 bones ? not bad, excellent opportunity to grab a brand new console, just pull your old HDD and install it in the new one, transfer your licenses and you are ready to enjoy a new console for 4 - 6 years more with tons of reduced Price games newand used.

Avatar image for c_smithii
c_smithii

1505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 c_smithii
Member since 2003 • 1505 Posts

@cainetao11 said:

@c_smithii said:

@cainetao11 said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

Because people keep buying and Microsoft earns billion profit. So why would you lower your price when its almost same powerful as Wii U but with more games, better games and better online?

And that's all she wrote. Bad business to lower the price based on what happened in the past instead of what the current consumer market is dictating. Obviously the console is still selling enough at $199.

but its not.

http://www.gamespot.com/articles/gamestop-we-d-love-to-see-xbox-360-ps3-price-cuts/1100-6423751/

So gamestop decides at what level MS is satisfied with the sales of the 360? Always makes sense to let another company dictate what your company does.............sure.

Gamestop is a retailer, MS relies on it's retailers to move its units. If a retailer reports that their sales for a system has been poorly and believe a price drop would light a fire in the buy of a slow selling product, yes that would dictate that perhaps the manufacture should listen to its retailer.

Avatar image for b4x
B4X

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#24 B4X
Member since 2014 • 5660 Posts

@c_smithii said:

@b4x said:

@c_smithii: $299...? Where did you buy your X360 at launch? I think you forgot $100 dollars some where.

I paid like $429 after tax.

There were originally two SKUs, the core SKU that came with no hard drive sold for $299, the other SKU that came with a 20GB drive sold for $399 as the Premium.

If you didn't buy any game at launch I'd imagine $429 would be just about right if your bought the Premium SKU with tax.

That's right. I forgot about that. Selective memory I guess. Probably because I would never buy the core. My bad. :p

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#26 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38077 Posts

@c_smithii said:

@cainetao11 said:

@c_smithii said:

@cainetao11 said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

Because people keep buying and Microsoft earns billion profit. So why would you lower your price when its almost same powerful as Wii U but with more games, better games and better online?

And that's all she wrote. Bad business to lower the price based on what happened in the past instead of what the current consumer market is dictating. Obviously the console is still selling enough at $199.

but its not.

http://www.gamespot.com/articles/gamestop-we-d-love-to-see-xbox-360-ps3-price-cuts/1100-6423751/

So gamestop decides at what level MS is satisfied with the sales of the 360? Always makes sense to let another company dictate what your company does.............sure.

Gamestop is a retailer, MS relies on it's retailers to move its units. If a retailer reports that their sales for a system has been poorly and believe a price drop would light a fire in the buy of a slow selling product, yes that would dictate that perhaps the manufacture should listen to its retailer.

In theory? Sure. But as I said to begin with, I guess MS is satisfied with the numbers they have been seeing. If they haven't been, they would have dropped the price by now. But what am I saying, its not like its a multi billion dollar corporation with teams of market analysts. We here at SW definitely know better.

Avatar image for kingjugganott
KingJuggaNott

200

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#27 KingJuggaNott
Member since 2013 • 200 Posts

Because it's an awesome console with tons of value still left in the tank. It has a great library and plus the entertainment value is awesome as well. I still have it.

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60833 Posts

MS trying hard to control industry and save face form abortion of X1 reveal.

Avatar image for c_smithii
c_smithii

1505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 c_smithii
Member since 2003 • 1505 Posts

@cainetao11 said:

@c_smithii said:

@cainetao11 said:

@c_smithii said:

@cainetao11 said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

Because people keep buying and Microsoft earns billion profit. So why would you lower your price when its almost same powerful as Wii U but with more games, better games and better online?

And that's all she wrote. Bad business to lower the price based on what happened in the past instead of what the current consumer market is dictating. Obviously the console is still selling enough at $199.

but its not.

http://www.gamespot.com/articles/gamestop-we-d-love-to-see-xbox-360-ps3-price-cuts/1100-6423751/

So gamestop decides at what level MS is satisfied with the sales of the 360? Always makes sense to let another company dictate what your company does.............sure.

Gamestop is a retailer, MS relies on it's retailers to move its units. If a retailer reports that their sales for a system has been poorly and believe a price drop would light a fire in the buy of a slow selling product, yes that would dictate that perhaps the manufacture should listen to its retailer.

In theory? Sure. But as I said to begin with, I guess MS is satisfied with the numbers they have been seeing. If they haven't been, they would have dropped the price by now. But what am I saying, its not like its a multi billion dollar corporation with teams of market analysts. We here at SW definitely know better.

Slightly off-topic, but since you want to go there. MS being a multi-billion dollar corporation with market analyst as you put it doesn't mean that said company will make all the correct decisions, as in this case not taking advantage of a fruitful opportunity with a price drop of its xbox 360 as one of its retailer Gamespot has pointed out.

Secondly a multi-billion dollar generally ends up losing its main product focus, alienates its consumer base, and sometimes ends up flopping big.

Microsoft made a slue of these mistakes in recent years, one with its Xbox One launch, its mis-mangement exclusive games for the Xbox 360 in it's later years are just two that come to mind that I can go deeper on but we really would be reaming off topic.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#30 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38077 Posts

@c_smithii said:

@cainetao11 said:

@c_smithii said:

@cainetao11 said:

@c_smithii said:

@cainetao11 said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

Because people keep buying and Microsoft earns billion profit. So why would you lower your price when its almost same powerful as Wii U but with more games, better games and better online?

And that's all she wrote. Bad business to lower the price based on what happened in the past instead of what the current consumer market is dictating. Obviously the console is still selling enough at $199.

but its not.

http://www.gamespot.com/articles/gamestop-we-d-love-to-see-xbox-360-ps3-price-cuts/1100-6423751/

So gamestop decides at what level MS is satisfied with the sales of the 360? Always makes sense to let another company dictate what your company does.............sure.

Gamestop is a retailer, MS relies on it's retailers to move its units. If a retailer reports that their sales for a system has been poorly and believe a price drop would light a fire in the buy of a slow selling product, yes that would dictate that perhaps the manufacture should listen to its retailer.

In theory? Sure. But as I said to begin with, I guess MS is satisfied with the numbers they have been seeing. If they haven't been, they would have dropped the price by now. But what am I saying, its not like its a multi billion dollar corporation with teams of market analysts. We here at SW definitely know better.

Slightly off-topic, but since you want to go there. MS being a multi-billion dollar corporation with market analyst as you put it doesn't mean that said company will make all the correct decisions, as in this case not taking advantage of a fruitful opportunity with a price drop of its xbox 360 as one of its retailer Gamespot has pointed out.

Secondly a multi-billion dollar generally ends up losing its main product focus, alienates its consumer base, and sometimes ends up flopping big.

Microsoft made a slue of these mistakes in recent years, one with its Xbox One launch, its mis-mangement exclusive games for the Xbox 360 in it's later years are just two that come to mind that I can go deeper on but we really would be reaming off topic.

Continuing with "off topic" non sense, I find it hard to believe a company like Microsoft got to where they are NOT out strategizing people on an internet forum. I'll gamble on their people over you any day. In fact, as a share holder of both MSFT and SNE I already have

Avatar image for coasterguy65
coasterguy65

7133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#31 coasterguy65
Member since 2005 • 7133 Posts

Not sure. but why is the super slim PS4 still selling at $199. Both consoles should be selling for $99 at this point.

Avatar image for papatrop
PapaTrop

1792

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#32 PapaTrop
Member since 2014 • 1792 Posts

Because it's still being supported, and still selling a lot.

Kinda weird because it seems like PS3 and Wii sales dropped substantially after the new gen started, but the 360 still keeps selling a pretty good amount. I have seen it go for $129 though.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#33 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38077 Posts

@coasterguy65 said:

Not sure. but why is the super slim PS4 still selling at $199. Both consoles should be selling for $99 at this point.

Do u mean PS3? Funny how that wasn't included

Avatar image for rrjim1
rrjim1

1983

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 rrjim1
Member since 2005 • 1983 Posts

@coasterguy65 said:

Not sure. but why is the super slim PS4 still selling at $199. Both consoles should be selling for $99 at this point.

At $99 MS would have to be able to manufacture everything in the 360 box for less than $60. IMO a retail price of $99 is a little unreasonable.

Avatar image for coasterguy65
coasterguy65

7133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#35 coasterguy65
Member since 2005 • 7133 Posts

@cainetao11 said:

@coasterguy65 said:

Not sure. but why is the super slim PS4 still selling at $199. Both consoles should be selling for $99 at this point.

Do u mean PS3? Funny how that wasn't included

Yeah...wooops...typing when a little snookered, and tired...so yeah PS3..

Avatar image for coasterguy65
coasterguy65

7133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#36 coasterguy65
Member since 2005 • 7133 Posts

@rrjim1 said:

@coasterguy65 said:

Not sure. but why is the super slim PS4 still selling at $199. Both consoles should be selling for $99 at this point.

At $99 MS would have to be able to manufacture everything in the 360 box for less than $60. IMO a retail price of $99 is a little unreasonable.

I'm of course not sure what their exact BOM price is sitting at. However, 10 years into the generation there is really nothing that expensive in either the 360, or the PS3. I would imagine that $60 price point is probably easily obtained (buying in bulk). I'm guessing a $50, maybe even $40 BOM would not be unreasonable at this point. Pretty much every other console that started out at $299 and up at it's launch was selling at $99 at the 5-6 years point in it's life.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#37 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38077 Posts

@coasterguy65 said:

@cainetao11 said:

@coasterguy65 said:

Not sure. but why is the super slim PS4 still selling at $199. Both consoles should be selling for $99 at this point.

Do u mean PS3? Funny how that wasn't included

Yeah...wooops...typing when a little snookered, and tired...so yeah PS3..

Snookered? You mean as drunk as I am? HO HO HO

Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

Maybe the casuals are keeping demand high.

For example, my PS3 doesn't get that much play time anymore. But, it's used daily (almost non-stop) as a Netflix device. Plus, it's still a darn good Blu Ray player.

Avatar image for c_smithii
c_smithii

1505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39  Edited By c_smithii
Member since 2003 • 1505 Posts

@cainetao11 said:

@c_smithii said:

@cainetao11 said:

@c_smithii said:

@cainetao11 said:

@c_smithii said:

@cainetao11 said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

Because people keep buying and Microsoft earns billion profit. So why would you lower your price when its almost same powerful as Wii U but with more games, better games and better online?

And that's all she wrote. Bad business to lower the price based on what happened in the past instead of what the current consumer market is dictating. Obviously the console is still selling enough at $199.

but its not.

http://www.gamespot.com/articles/gamestop-we-d-love-to-see-xbox-360-ps3-price-cuts/1100-6423751/

So gamestop decides at what level MS is satisfied with the sales of the 360? Always makes sense to let another company dictate what your company does.............sure.

Gamestop is a retailer, MS relies on it's retailers to move its units. If a retailer reports that their sales for a system has been poorly and believe a price drop would light a fire in the buy of a slow selling product, yes that would dictate that perhaps the manufacture should listen to its retailer.

In theory? Sure. But as I said to begin with, I guess MS is satisfied with the numbers they have been seeing. If they haven't been, they would have dropped the price by now. But what am I saying, its not like its a multi billion dollar corporation with teams of market analysts. We here at SW definitely know better.

Slightly off-topic, but since you want to go there. MS being a multi-billion dollar corporation with market analyst as you put it doesn't mean that said company will make all the correct decisions, as in this case not taking advantage of a fruitful opportunity with a price drop of its xbox 360 as one of its retailer Gamespot has pointed out.

Secondly a multi-billion dollar generally ends up losing its main product focus, alienates its consumer base, and sometimes ends up flopping big.

Microsoft made a slue of these mistakes in recent years, one with its Xbox One launch, its mis-mangement exclusive games for the Xbox 360 in it's later years are just two that come to mind that I can go deeper on but we really would be reaming off topic.

Continuing with "off topic" non sense, I find it hard to believe a company like Microsoft got to where they are NOT out strategizing people on an internet forum. I'll gamble on their people over you any day. In fact, as a share holder of both MSFT and SNE I already have

Face it, you couldn't refute the article I linked that backs my point that 360 needs a price drop. The only non-sense is you trying to make system wars discussion of consoles seem irrelevant because we're not employees of Microsoft or Sony. Terrible fallacy on your part. You lose. :)

Avatar image for speedfog
speedfog

4966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#40 speedfog
Member since 2009 • 4966 Posts

Al the 360 bashing, look up the Ps3 prices.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41  Edited By Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

Even more ridiculous is the prices of their HDDs. It ran me $110 to get the 500gb. Then I also had to pay $20 to get a transfer cable cuz it didn't come with it. For that kind of money the thing should have at least been 1tb.

Avatar image for speedfreak48t5p
speedfreak48t5p

14491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 62

User Lists: 0

#42 speedfreak48t5p
Member since 2009 • 14491 Posts

@c_smithii said:

This system is almost 10 years old and it only went down $100 in price since its core launch price of $299 in 2005.

Here I am spending money on cables and tools to replace my DVD drive on my aged Arcade 360 because it stopped reading games. When I would have been happy to just replace the console but hell Microsoft offers no value asking for $150 to repair a 360 or $200 for the new 4GB 360.

The Xbox 360 should have been $99 two years ago, and yet you can only see that deal in a blue-moon, doorbuster-midnight-black Friday only moment.

What has happened to gaming? Nintendo and SEGA when they were the top dogs, they never let an old system run this long at a premium price tag.

Same reason PS3 is still $200.

Avatar image for 2Chalupas
2Chalupas

7286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#43 2Chalupas
Member since 2009 • 7286 Posts
@cainetao11 said:

@c_smithii said:

@cainetao11 said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

Because people keep buying and Microsoft earns billion profit. So why would you lower your price when its almost same powerful as Wii U but with more games, better games and better online?

And that's all she wrote. Bad business to lower the price based on what happened in the past instead of what the current consumer market is dictating. Obviously the console is still selling enough at $199.

but its not.

http://www.gamespot.com/articles/gamestop-we-d-love-to-see-xbox-360-ps3-price-cuts/1100-6423751/

So gamestop decides at what level MS is satisfied with the sales of the 360? Always makes sense to let another company dictate what your company does.............sure.

Actually, it does make sense. You do realize Gamestop is probably one of the largest retail partners, up there with Wal-Mart, Best Buy, Target. I'd say their opinion carries quite a bit of weight if they comment on the price desperately needing a cut.

Besides, they aren't dictating anything to Sony or Microsoft. They are just stating the reality of what is happening to the old consoles - which should be obvious.

Avatar image for Boddicker
Boddicker

4458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#44 Boddicker
Member since 2012 • 4458 Posts

Used PS3's are still going for $199ish depending on the size of the HDD. I just checked out what new PS3's were going for on Amazon. A super slim 500 GB model is going for $250 by itself.

You could just save up a little more and buy a used PS4..............

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33795 Posts

You can see the difference of how MS play depending on how it is position and the reason why they should never lead this industry.

MS who was in a good position with the xbox 360 which =.

No sudden price drops on hardware.

Price hike of services without any reason.

Price hike of Games without any reason.

Over priced peripherals.

Over priced DLC.

Disruptive policies toward small developers.

Hiding of free apps under pay walls.

No free games and forcing even developer to charge for things they wanted to give free.

Vs

MS which is not on a very good position now XBO.

Huge price drops few months after launch.

Free games some times more than 1.

Liberation of Apps under pay wall.

Sudden ease of policies against some small developers.

Comparing this gen MS with last gen one is like comparing 2 different companies,desperate MS will try anything to try to beat the competition,but MS in a good spot will do shit and will milk you dry to hell and beyond.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33795 Posts

@navyguy21 said:

There IS a $179 SKU which can be cheaper when you trade games.

I agree it should be cheaper, but this is how Sony and MS are making money right now.

The PS3 is even more expensive than 360.

You can get both used with a warranty for 99-199 respectively

Using trading game as shield is sad you can also trade in games for a PS3.

And the PS3 is more expensive than the xbox 360,but deliver an experience out of the box that the xbox 360 can't match.

Blu-ray still inside every PS3 on xbox 360 you get old ass DVD,on PS3 you get to play all your games online without any more investment on xbox 360 that is $50 a year,so factoring live alone your cheaper XBO 360 all of the sudden isn't cheaper but more expensive.

Both are at $250 for the 500GB models they should not be the same price the PS3 has hardware over the 360 and online free play.

The $179 model is 4Gb the PS3 $199 which is 20 more is 12GB it has 3 times the storage for $20 more,while also having Bluray,and having free online play.

If you add 1 year of XBL yeah your $179 XBO 360 turns into a $229 system $29 dollars more than the PS3 which has more space and bluray.

That 4GB system should be $99 by now considering it has 4GB of storage no free online play and no bluray there is no reason why MS should be selling the system for $179 other than making huge profits out of its system.

No matter what the PS3 has hardware the xbox one just plain doesn't they should not be in equal footing in any bundle.

@b4x said:

@c_smithii: $299...? Where did you buy your X360 at launch? I think you forgot $100 dollars some where.

I paid like $429 after tax.

There were 2 sku on launch 1 was $399 and the other $299 maybe you forgot that..

That sku is now $179 which is miserable $120 less than it was 9 years ago,by this time the PS2 was $99 dollars,the xbox 360 is over priced as hell.

@lundy86_4 said:

If it's selling decently, then they won't lower the price. The PS3 is still $200-$250.

Yeah and the PS3 has extra hardware over the 360 and free online play,yet the difference in the cheap model is $20 and on the 500gb model non both cost $250 when one is certainly inferior in features and hardware as well,since the xbox 360 totally lack Bluray.

@coasterguy65 said:

Not sure. but why is the super slim PS4 still selling at $199. Both consoles should be selling for $99 at this point.

I guess that by PS4 you mean PS3,no both consoles should not be selling for $99 the PS3 has blu-ray which still is more expensive than DVD,and the PS3 has free online play which the xbox 360 totally lacks,the PS3 may be a little over priced but fact is compare to the launch 20GB unit it shaved $300 from its initial price,the $250 model has shave $350 from its original price on 2006,the xbox 360 has shave $120 on the core unit in 9 years actually 1 year more than the PS3,the $250 model shaved $150 as well with 1 year more on the market there is no way in hell the xbox 360 on any of its models should be priced as it is,it should be way cheaper now.

The 500GB models of both cost $250 on the PS3 you can watch HD movies and play any of your games online without any more investment,on xbox 360 you have no way of watching bluray movies and if you want online is $50 more which actually make your 360 actually more expensive than the PS3 which is completely stupid and moronic if you ask me.

Any one buying into a 360 now specially those $250 models is a total moron.

@papatrop said:

Because it's still being supported, and still selling a lot.

Kinda weird because it seems like PS3 and Wii sales dropped substantially after the new gen started, but the 360 still keeps selling a pretty good amount. I have seen it go for $129 though.

IN US world wide the PS3 continues to dominate the xbox 360,in Japan the unit is dead and in EU the PS3 is king vs the 360.

Non of the 2 consoles is selling great they are barely selling at this point sales have hugely drop.

@cainetao11 said:

Continuing with "off topic" non sense, I find it hard to believe a company like Microsoft got to where they are NOT out strategizing people on an internet forum. I'll gamble on their people over you any day. In fact, as a share holder of both MSFT and SNE I already have

That is a joke considering how many 180 they did because forums like neogaf scorch them in flames over weak ass hardware,crappy ass policies,DRM,no used game always connected shit,MS a company who during the xbox 360 days would not look sideways when news sites flamed them for charging for live like Kotaku and many others did and hiding free apps under pay wall,how budge to sites like neogaf because the publicity was so bad that they sales of the unit were on the dirt.

In fact MS sales didn't pick up until MS took drastic measure and deliver heavy price drops on their units,it was basically been owned even at the same price and with 2 free games.

So yeah what site and internet forum say MS has take it to heart this gen..

Avatar image for GunSmith1_basic
GunSmith1_basic

10548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#47  Edited By GunSmith1_basic
Member since 2002 • 10548 Posts

It probably makes sense to keep the 360 around but not to make it too good of a product in comparison to the Xbox One.

I also have to agree with others that it is based on competition and there's no incentive to undercut Sony too much on these old consoles. Both companies lost too much money early on in the gen and have to make it up now. I won't accuse them of collusion, but maybe some kind of unspoken truce so both can make up what they lost.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#48  Edited By cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38077 Posts

@c_smithii said:

@cainetao11 said:

@c_smithii said:

@cainetao11 said:

@c_smithii said:

@cainetao11 said:

@c_smithii said:

@cainetao11 said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

Because people keep buying and Microsoft earns billion profit. So why would you lower your price when its almost same powerful as Wii U but with more games, better games and better online?

And that's all she wrote. Bad business to lower the price based on what happened in the past instead of what the current consumer market is dictating. Obviously the console is still selling enough at $199.

but its not.

http://www.gamespot.com/articles/gamestop-we-d-love-to-see-xbox-360-ps3-price-cuts/1100-6423751/

So gamestop decides at what level MS is satisfied with the sales of the 360? Always makes sense to let another company dictate what your company does.............sure.

Gamestop is a retailer, MS relies on it's retailers to move its units. If a retailer reports that their sales for a system has been poorly and believe a price drop would light a fire in the buy of a slow selling product, yes that would dictate that perhaps the manufacture should listen to its retailer.

In theory? Sure. But as I said to begin with, I guess MS is satisfied with the numbers they have been seeing. If they haven't been, they would have dropped the price by now. But what am I saying, its not like its a multi billion dollar corporation with teams of market analysts. We here at SW definitely know better.

Slightly off-topic, but since you want to go there. MS being a multi-billion dollar corporation with market analyst as you put it doesn't mean that said company will make all the correct decisions, as in this case not taking advantage of a fruitful opportunity with a price drop of its xbox 360 as one of its retailer Gamespot has pointed out.

Secondly a multi-billion dollar generally ends up losing its main product focus, alienates its consumer base, and sometimes ends up flopping big.

Microsoft made a slue of these mistakes in recent years, one with its Xbox One launch, its mis-mangement exclusive games for the Xbox 360 in it's later years are just two that come to mind that I can go deeper on but we really would be reaming off topic.

Continuing with "off topic" non sense, I find it hard to believe a company like Microsoft got to where they are NOT out strategizing people on an internet forum. I'll gamble on their people over you any day. In fact, as a share holder of both MSFT and SNE I already have

Face it, you couldn't refute the article I linked that backs my point that 360 needs a price drop. The only non-sense is you trying to make system wars discussion of consoles seem irrelevant because we're not employees of Microsoft or Sony. Terrible fallacy on your part. You lose. :)

Great job pulling that shit out of your ass. What are you talking about? When did I bring up us not being employees?

I don't need to refute the article because the question isn't do you, me or Gamestop feel the 360 needs a price drop. The question was "Why the hell is the 360 still $199 in 2015?" See, there is YOUR terrible fallacy. I read the titles question and stand by my answer. The fact that A) Gamestop is not the only retailer, ever hear of BestBuy, Walmart, Target and B) MS hasn't dropped the price even with that fuckin article backs up what I said. They obviously don't feel like they need to. If they did, they would have dropped the price already. Nice try, good game, see you out there

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#49 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38077 Posts

@2Chalupas said:
@cainetao11 said:

@c_smithii said:

@cainetao11 said:

@FreedomFreeLife said:

Because people keep buying and Microsoft earns billion profit. So why would you lower your price when its almost same powerful as Wii U but with more games, better games and better online?

And that's all she wrote. Bad business to lower the price based on what happened in the past instead of what the current consumer market is dictating. Obviously the console is still selling enough at $199.

but its not.

http://www.gamespot.com/articles/gamestop-we-d-love-to-see-xbox-360-ps3-price-cuts/1100-6423751/

So gamestop decides at what level MS is satisfied with the sales of the 360? Always makes sense to let another company dictate what your company does.............sure.

Actually, it does make sense. You do realize Gamestop is probably one of the largest retail partners, up there with Wal-Mart, Best Buy, Target. I'd say their opinion carries quite a bit of weight if they comment on the price desperately needing a cut.

Besides, they aren't dictating anything to Sony or Microsoft. They are just stating the reality of what is happening to the old consoles - which should be obvious.

Yes to the questions you asked. I am aware that company's take what retailers say into their pricing decisions. But his and my conversation is, like this thread about WHY hasn't 360 gotten a price drop. Not do I feel it should have a price drop. As far as why hasn't there been a price drop, I stand by my answer. Obviously MS hasn't felt the need to as of yet.

Avatar image for Lulu_Lulu
Lulu_Lulu

19564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Lulu_Lulu
Member since 2013 • 19564 Posts

If you pay for it... They'll keep doing.