Why is the ps3 online free and Xbox isnt ?

  • 113 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for destro123
destro123

755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 destro123
Member since 2005 • 755 Posts

Because XBL is better, plain and simple. They dont make you pay for it for no reason. I've used PSN and compared to XBL it isnt so good. Most of my friends own a PS3 and they also all agree that XBL is better than PSN. I think it should be a bit cheaper, maybe 30 a year instead of 60 but whatever. 60 dollars a year is chump change, if you cant afford it then you must be a bum or really, really cheap.

Avatar image for Ryan_Som
Ryan_Som

2474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#102 Ryan_Som
Member since 2009 • 2474 Posts

Because XBL is better, plain and simple. They dont make you pay for it for no reason. I've used PSN and compared to XBL it isnt so good. Most of my friends own a PS3 and they also all agree that XBL is better than PSN. I think it should be a bit cheaper, maybe 30 a year instead of 60 but whatever. 60 dollars a year is chump change, if you cant afford it then you must be a bum or really, really cheap.

destro123

Ahh yes, really cheap. So given that logic, why don't you own a PS3 as well? Clearly you can afford it. I'm sure with a little coercing Sony will let you pay for PSN. ;)

Avatar image for destro123
destro123

755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 destro123
Member since 2005 • 755 Posts

[QUOTE="destro123"]

Because XBL is better, plain and simple. They dont make you pay for it for no reason. I've used PSN and compared to XBL it isnt so good. Most of my friends own a PS3 and they also all agree that XBL is better than PSN. I think it should be a bit cheaper, maybe 30 a year instead of 60 but whatever. 60 dollars a year is chump change, if you cant afford it then you must be a bum or really, really cheap.

Ryan_Som

Ahh yes, really cheap. So given that logic, why don't you own a PS3 as well? Clearly you can afford it. I'm sure with a little coercing Sony will let you pay for PSN. ;)

Haha true, true. Well i'll be happy to tell you that I am glady getting a PS3 very soon. I dont think I'll be paying for PSN though..its just not worth it..............................

Avatar image for Ryan_Som
Ryan_Som

2474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#104 Ryan_Som
Member since 2009 • 2474 Posts

[QUOTE="Brownesque"][QUOTE="Fizzman"]

People like Mariah Carey, and think her music is worth the money. I have no clue what you are trying to get at with that comparison.

thew13

Mariah Carey makes garbage music, LoL. The point is that people will buy anything. If you dress up a piece of poop and market it properly, somebody, somewhere, would probably buy it. That has no bearing on the value of the product whatsoever.

You are incorrect - Value is purely based on what the masses are willing to pay for something.

That's...not entirely correct. Value is a construct based upon the amount you pay versus the amount you get. It's also based upon what corporations think they can get away with charging. Inflation affects these things as well. On top of the old supply and demand model.

Lets say Microsoft decides to charge $5 more a year for their service. You gladly oblige. I mean, hey, what's $5? The service is worth it. A year from that, it goes up $10. You say, "Well, you gotta pay for the best."

Fast forward a few years down the road and we're in a new console generation where people have agreed to pay an extra $100 for a glorified unlock key to use the second half of their games. People jumped on Capcom and others for charging for unlock keys for on-disc content. Explain to me how this is any different.

Avatar image for VoodooHak
VoodooHak

15989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#105 VoodooHak
Member since 2002 • 15989 Posts

[QUOTE="Ryan_Som"]

[QUOTE="destro123"]

Because XBL is better, plain and simple. They dont make you pay for it for no reason. I've used PSN and compared to XBL it isnt so good. Most of my friends own a PS3 and they also all agree that XBL is better than PSN. I think it should be a bit cheaper, maybe 30 a year instead of 60 but whatever. 60 dollars a year is chump change, if you cant afford it then you must be a bum or really, really cheap.

destro123

Ahh yes, really cheap. So given that logic, why don't you own a PS3 as well? Clearly you can afford it. I'm sure with a little coercing Sony will let you pay for PSN. ;)

Haha true, true. Well i'll be happy to tell you that I am glady getting a PS3 very soon. I dont think I'll be paying for PSN though..its just not worth it..............................

If PSN had more features above and beyond barebones to qualify it as a service, I'd have no problem paying for it. Give me cross-game invites. Give me community-focused events. Give me staff that put themselves out there on our behalf. Give me a system-level party system. Then yeah, I'd pay for it.

Avatar image for xboxmad12
xboxmad12

575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#106 xboxmad12
Member since 2009 • 575 Posts

Thanks for the replies . Sony could make so much more money if they added some features ! there losing out.

Xbox will always be better than Ps3 no matter what Sony does.

Avatar image for xboxmad12
xboxmad12

575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#107 xboxmad12
Member since 2009 • 575 Posts

Oh and how did this thread turn into a discussion about Mariah carey's record sales

Avatar image for KingTuttle
KingTuttle

2471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 KingTuttle
Member since 2006 • 2471 Posts
[QUOTE="Brownesque"][QUOTE="Propaganda_"][QUOTE="Brownesque"] People listen to Mariah Carey, what's your point?

People wouldn't pay for PSN if it were priced. That's for sure.

I am certain somebody would. How about this: I would. Just to own you, and for no other reason.

I'm convinced that if Sony told you to jump off a bridge you would.
Avatar image for thew13
thew13

837

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#109 thew13
Member since 2004 • 837 Posts

[QUOTE="thew13"][QUOTE="Brownesque"] Mariah Carey makes garbage music, LoL. The point is that people will buy anything. If you dress up a piece of poop and market it properly, somebody, somewhere, would probably buy it. That has no bearing on the value of the product whatsoever.Ryan_Som

You are incorrect - Value is purely based on what the masses are willing to pay for something.

That's...not entirely correct. Value is a construct based upon the amount you pay versus the amount you get. It's also based upon what corporations think they can get away with charging. Inflation affects these things as well. On top of the old supply and demand model.

Lets say Microsoft decides to charge $5 more a year for their service. You gladly oblige. I mean, hey, what's $5? The service is worth it. A year from that, it goes up $10. You say, "Well, you gotta pay for the best."

Fast forward a few years down the road and we're in a new console generation where people have agreed to pay an extra $100 for a glorified unlock key to use the second half of their games. People jumped on Capcom and others for charging for unlock keys for on-disc content. Explain to me how this is any different.

But it is - if I am selling a service (which XBOX live essential is) I set a price. If enough people are willing to pay that price and it is profitable for me to provide said service than the that value is set. If I am able to raise the price and still see the same or larger profit than the value is still there. Doesn't matter what is being sold, the consumer ultimately sets the value. If the value the consumer sets is not profitable for the product or service than eventually the product or service will cease to exist or be made to be profitable at that value that was set by consumers

Avatar image for TintedEyes
TintedEyes

4769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 TintedEyes
Member since 2009 • 4769 Posts
They want you to beleive that because you pay for it, its miles above the competition.
Avatar image for Communistsheep
Communistsheep

1516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#111 Communistsheep
Member since 2009 • 1516 Posts

Because they want to make money, like very single buisness.

Avatar image for xboxmad12
xboxmad12

575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#112 xboxmad12
Member since 2009 • 575 Posts

well it sucks...dam

Avatar image for DivineSword
DivineSword

15840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 DivineSword  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 15840 Posts

Not entirely sure why you feel the need to bump this thread, but please don't do it again.