Why is there no PS3 price drop?

  • 81 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for istuffedsunny
istuffedsunny

6991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#1 istuffedsunny
Member since 2008 • 6991 Posts

Sony doesn't seem to care it's still being outsold by Nintendo and MS five years later. They both got a $200 system and what's Sony doing? Rather than entice millions of gamers (and now millions of pirates!) at that sweet spot, they're... no I'm actually curious, what are they doing?

Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

Because putting out a 200$ system would cause them to lose more money. The PS3 is selling fine and they're finally making a profit on hardware.

Avatar image for mrmusicman247
mrmusicman247

17601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 mrmusicman247
Member since 2008 • 17601 Posts
Don't blame Sony just because you can't come up with another $100.
Avatar image for chaplainDMK
chaplainDMK

7004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 chaplainDMK
Member since 2008 • 7004 Posts
Why should they? The 200$ Arcade Xbox 360 is hardly competiton to the PS3... And the PS3 is outselling the 360 since it was released...
Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

Why should they? The 200$ Arcade Xbox 360 is hardly competiton to the PS3... And the PS3 is outselling the 360 since it was released... chaplainDMK

Because they might want to go against their other competitor?

Avatar image for coasterguy65
coasterguy65

7133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#6 coasterguy65
Member since 2005 • 7133 Posts

Probably because Sony just finally started to make a small profit on the PS3. If they dropped the price now they would go back to loosing money on each PS3 sold.

This and the fact that as long as they are selling systems at a good pace there is no reason for them to drop the price. If sales drop off then expect a price drop.

Avatar image for Arthas017
Arthas017

295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#7 Arthas017
Member since 2010 • 295 Posts

I think Sony might drop the price next year, unless maybe they take out the wi-fi, no more blu ray movie playback and so on... dude the PS3 has been the console that offers you more features since day 1.

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
Why should they? The 200$ Arcade Xbox 360 is hardly competiton to the PS3... And the PS3 is outselling the 360 since it was released... chaplainDMK
except thats not the case here in blighty, a top end 360 is still 50 quid cheaper than a bottom end Ps3.
Avatar image for fueled-system
fueled-system

6529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 fueled-system
Member since 2008 • 6529 Posts

[QUOTE="chaplainDMK"]Why should they? The 200$ Arcade Xbox 360 is hardly competiton to the PS3... And the PS3 is outselling the 360 since it was released... waltefmoney

Because they might want to go against their other competitor?

and whys that? Nintendo already won its a competition for second place

Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

[QUOTE="waltefmoney"]

[QUOTE="chaplainDMK"]Why should they? The 200$ Arcade Xbox 360 is hardly competiton to the PS3... And the PS3 is outselling the 360 since it was released... fueled-system

Because they might want to go against their other competitor?

and whys that? Nintendo already won its a competition for second place

Because they want to make more money? Because they want more publishers & developers paying them royalties? Because they want a bigger install base and more people buying software? Why do you think Microsoft and Sony are releasing Move/Kinect? To go against Nintendo's market share, that's why.

Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18256 Posts
this may sound odd but sony dont care anymore about being outsold by the competition at this stage.....everything about the PS3 is just about damage limitation and trying to get as much money out of it as possible to lessen the losses it has incurred. there beaten in terms of sales and they know it. at the mo there doing the right thing now...trying to limit the financial hit overall and build up first party devs for next gen (especially important since multiplat is the name of the game now for 3rd parties). selling the PS3 at a profit (yes i know a filthy dirty tactic according to SW) takes priority.
Avatar image for xTheExploited
xTheExploited

12094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 xTheExploited
Member since 2007 • 12094 Posts

I think Sony might drop the price next year, unless maybe they take out the wi-fi, no more blu ray movie playback and so on... dude the PS3 has been the console that offers you more features since day 1.

Arthas017
The only reason I would buy a PS3 would be for the games. If they got rid of a bunch of features that aren't necessary and dropped the price I would buy it. I don't give a damn about the features.
Avatar image for HailCaesarHail
HailCaesarHail

814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 HailCaesarHail
Member since 2010 • 814 Posts
sounds like you are mad because you have no money. Sony is doing fine with the price point they are at. No need for another price drop currently.
Avatar image for tonitorsi
tonitorsi

8692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#15 tonitorsi
Member since 2006 • 8692 Posts

We'll be seeing a price drop in 2011 most likely. Because even with Halo and the Slim, the PS3 is outselling the 360 worldwide.

Avatar image for 3rdbass
3rdbass

3301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 3rdbass
Member since 2009 • 3301 Posts

[QUOTE="chaplainDMK"]Why should they? The 200$ Arcade Xbox 360 is hardly competiton to the PS3... And the PS3 is outselling the 360 since it was released... delta3074
except thats not the case here in blighty, a top end 360 is still 50 quid cheaper than a bottom end Ps3.

That might be true in the UK but here in the US they are the same price $299.

Avatar image for Ravenlore_basic
Ravenlore_basic

4319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#17 Ravenlore_basic
Member since 2003 • 4319 Posts

Blue Ray... yes

OPEN bluetooth.... yep

  1. Free to play online..... yep
  2. Plenty of Third party Peripherals including Wheels for GT5.... yes
  3. very few problems with consoles breaking down ... Cheek
  4. No charge from Sonyto use Netflex, Hulu+... true
  5. Plenty of exclusive games made by Sony first party.... Yes
  6. Swapable HDD that is not propriatary so you do not have to PAY Sony... True

Maybe some people like to pay more by being nickled and Dimed and pay more overall over the years for their console but I like to just pay the 299 up front than take it in the end.

Live 2005 - 2010 50.00 = 250 40.00= 200 30.00= 150 Going foward its going to be $10.00 a year more.

Avatar image for abuabed
abuabed

6606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 abuabed
Member since 2005 • 6606 Posts
Why should they? it's already cheap and is a bang for the buck.
Avatar image for Arthas017
Arthas017

295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#19 Arthas017
Member since 2010 • 295 Posts
[QUOTE="Arthas017"]

I think Sony might drop the price next year, unless maybe they take out the wi-fi, no more blu ray movie playback and so on... dude the PS3 has been the console that offers you more features since day 1.

xTheExploited
The only reason I would buy a PS3 would be for the games. If they got rid of a bunch of features that aren't necessary and dropped the price I would buy it. I don't give a damn about the features.

Although I agree that games are what matters on a console, we both know that the future will bring more and more extra features so... besides a PS3 a have a SNES, and I can assure you, that one only plays games :P
Avatar image for Kokuro_Kun
Kokuro_Kun

2339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Kokuro_Kun
Member since 2009 • 2339 Posts

I think Sony might drop the price next year, unless maybe they take out the wi-fi, no more blu ray movie playback and so on... dude the PS3 has been the console that offers you more features since day 1.

Arthas017
This. and when you think about it, Sony is the only competitor that has cut the launch price in HALF, and they have done so in less time than the other two. MS has even had that year lead.
Avatar image for LovePotionNo9
LovePotionNo9

4751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 LovePotionNo9
Member since 2010 • 4751 Posts

Buy a used one. I bought one for $200 last year with partial-BC (80gb MGS4 model). Works beautifully.

Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

[QUOTE="Arthas017"]

I think Sony might drop the price next year, unless maybe they take out the wi-fi, no more blu ray movie playback and so on... dude the PS3 has been the console that offers you more features since day 1.

Kokuro_Kun

This. and when you think about it, Sony is the only competitor that has cut the launch price in HALF, and they have done so in less time than the other two. MS has even had that year lead.

They did that because they were forced to. I expect Microsoft to drop the price now if Kinect doesn't work out because they've made plenty of money on hardware and can afford to do it.

Avatar image for KaoSXFACTOR
KaoSXFACTOR

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 KaoSXFACTOR
Member since 2009 • 1059 Posts

[QUOTE="Arthas017"]

I think Sony might drop the price next year, unless maybe they take out the wi-fi, no more blu ray movie playback and so on... dude the PS3 has been the console that offers you more features since day 1.

Kokuro_Kun

This. and when you think about it, Sony is the only competitor that has cut the launch price in HALF, and they have done so in less time than the other two. MS has even had that year lead.

Umm.... MS was also not dumb enough to charge $600 dollars for their console at launch....

Avatar image for racing1750
racing1750

14567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#25 racing1750
Member since 2010 • 14567 Posts
The PS3 is selling well at it's current price. Why drop it? Remember how long it took for the PS3 to go to it's current price? I think you should be thankful for what you're getting. Remember what you get as a package.
Avatar image for DuleDuleROFL
DuleDuleROFL

75

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#26 DuleDuleROFL
Member since 2010 • 75 Posts

[QUOTE="waltefmoney"]

[QUOTE="chaplainDMK"]Why should they? The 200$ Arcade Xbox 360 is hardly competiton to the PS3... And the PS3 is outselling the 360 since it was released... fueled-system

Because they might want to go against their other competitor?

and whys that? Nintendo already won its a competition for second place

Dude... How did Nintendo win? Seriously, I gave my Wii to my sister because it was just collecting dust.

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#28 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="chaplainDMK"]Why should they? The 200$ Arcade Xbox 360 is hardly competiton to the PS3... And the PS3 is outselling the 360 since it was released... Locutus_Picard
except thats not the case here in blighty, a top end 360 is still 50 quid cheaper than a bottom end Ps3.

A top end 360 is still inferior to a low end PS3. Hardware-wise. Don't even get me started on peripherals.

no dude, hardware wise they are both equal in power, if you are talking about the extra 'no use to gaming'features than the ps3 is superior, Blu-Ray? doesn't exactly make it a superior games machine unless you are too lazy to install your games to the HDD or take a couple of seconds to change the disk,Blue tooth? wireless is just as good if not better, they both have built in wireless now so the Ps3 isn't superior in that department anymore.
Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#29 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts
It's selling well and they are making a profit now. And your first sentence is horrifically wrong, at least look at some fiscal reports before making a thread with claims like that.
Avatar image for Plagueless
Plagueless

2569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Plagueless
Member since 2010 • 2569 Posts
well, actually, the ps3 has not outsold the 360, especially in NPD, and worldwide numbers indicate the 360 is still in the lead.....soooo, maybe a $250 PS3 is what they need
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62030 Posts

well, actually, the ps3 has not outsold the 360, especially in NPD, and worldwide numbers indicate the 360 is still in the lead.....soooo, maybe a $250 PS3 is what they needPlagueless

It certainly not outsold it in total figures, but it stands to reason it's been outselling it year-to-year (for the most part), due to decreasing the lead the 360 has over it.

Agreed the a $250 console could be the clincher, but who knows... Ahhh well.

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts

Sony doesn't seem to care it's still being outsold by Nintendo and MS five years later. They both got a $200 system and what's Sony doing? Rather than entice millions of gamers (and now millions of pirates!) at that sweet spot, they're... no I'm actually curious, what are they doing?

istuffedsunny
eh....that's a little deceptive. ms makes a $200 console, but it has no hard drive.
Avatar image for SilverChimera
SilverChimera

9256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#33 SilverChimera
Member since 2009 • 9256 Posts
There's no need for a $200 system. They can't take out the HDD or the Blu-ray player. Both are required.
Avatar image for xTheExploited
xTheExploited

12094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 xTheExploited
Member since 2007 • 12094 Posts

[QUOTE="fueled-system"]

[QUOTE="waltefmoney"]

Because they might want to go against their other competitor?

DuleDuleROFL

and whys that? Nintendo already won its a competition for second place

Dude... How did Nintendo win? Seriously, I gave my Wii to my sister because it was just collecting dust.

You hear that everyone, turns out the Wii lost because DuleDuleROFL gave his Wii to his sister. If only he hadn't done that! The Wii might just have one! Seriously? You don't know how the Wii has won? If you add the 360's and PS3's worldwide sales together they barely pass the Wii alone in worldwide sales, thats how the Wii has already won.
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts
[QUOTE="xTheExploited"] You hear that everyone, turns out the Wii lost because DuleDuleROFL gave his Wii to his sister. If only he hadn't done that! The Wii might just have one! Seriously? You don't know how the Wii has won? If you add the 360's and PS3's worldwide sales together they barely pass the Wii alone in worldwide sales, thats how the Wii has already won.

hahaha! maybe the Wii wasn't extreme to the max enough for his tastes.
Avatar image for clr84651
clr84651

5643

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#36 clr84651
Member since 2010 • 5643 Posts

The Wii is a cheap friggin console about half the size of the PS3 and can't do nearly as much and doesn't do gaming and movies at the quality the PS3 does. The 360s $200 console is only a 4gb HDD which has to be upgraded immediately and that makes it cost more than the PS3. You buy a PS3 for $300 and take it home it does more than the other 2 for $300. The 360 you take it home you have to pay $60 to game online, you can't play HD movies in it and you have to pay $13 more for each controller to be charge and play.

Avatar image for J-WOW
J-WOW

3105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 J-WOW
Member since 2010 • 3105 Posts
Are you insane? The PS3 is pretty cheap at $300, the damn thing cost $700,. I mean for the love of God, the PS3 offers so many things all in one, and you're complaing? I dont see another price drop for another 2 years, unless both M$ and Nintendo drop theirs to $100 anytime soon.
Avatar image for coughlanio
coughlanio

4306

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#38 coughlanio
Member since 2005 • 4306 Posts
[QUOTE="chaplainDMK"]Why should they? The 200$ Arcade Xbox 360 is hardly competiton to the PS3... And the PS3 is outselling the 360 since it was released... delta3074
except thats not the case here in blighty, a top end 360 is still 50 quid cheaper than a bottom end Ps3.

But remember that the top end 360 can't play Bluray.
Avatar image for Locutus_Picard
Locutus_Picard

4166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Locutus_Picard
Member since 2004 • 4166 Posts
[QUOTE="Locutus_Picard"][QUOTE="delta3074"]except thats not the case here in blighty, a top end 360 is still 50 quid cheaper than a bottom end Ps3.delta3074
A top end 360 is still inferior to a low end PS3. Hardware-wise. Don't even get me started on peripherals.

no dude, hardware wise they are both equal in power, if you are talking about the extra 'no use to gaming'features than the ps3 is superior, Blu-Ray? doesn't exactly make it a superior games machine unless you are too lazy to install your games to the HDD or take a couple of seconds to change the disk,Blue tooth? wireless is just as good if not better, they both have built in wireless now so the Ps3 isn't superior in that department anymore.

Last time I checked, PS3 games and exclusives make use of the Blu-ray. And they go over the 9 GB limit DVD9 has. HDD, I think it FAIRLY IMPORTANT to have a changeable HDD that isn't propiatary. You need a HDD for DD-only games, to install games etc. I could also start about periherals but 360 loses against almost anything in that department. And the final kick in the groin; PS3's have much more reliable hardware. The 360 RRoD's at lot and randomly and furthermore scratches discs. See? I didn't even have to bring up the non-gaming applications into the equation to prove PS3 is better hardware wise. I am talking about hardware, not power.
Avatar image for Phazevariance
Phazevariance

12356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Phazevariance
Member since 2003 • 12356 Posts
[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="istuffedsunny"]

Sony doesn't seem to care it's still being outsold by Nintendo and MS five years later. They both got a $200 system and what's Sony doing? Rather than entice millions of gamers (and now millions of pirates!) at that sweet spot, they're... no I'm actually curious, what are they doing?

eh....that's a little deceptive. ms makes a $200 console, but it has no hard drive.

You're mistaken, $200 is for the version WITH a hard drive, and $149 for the non hard drive version.
Avatar image for FragTycoon
FragTycoon

6430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 FragTycoon
Member since 2008 • 6430 Posts

The difference in price from the PS3 to other consoles like 360 is easy to understand.

look at the things you get for it.

  1. Larger HDD (180GB vs. 4GB, a larger 360 HDD is about $100)
  2. Free online ($0.00 vs. up to $60.00py, $300 over a 5 year period)
  3. Blu-ray player (not even an option with other consoles, at least a $100 value)

The simple reason why they don't drop the price, they don't have to, it's a great value the way it is.

Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#42 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12869 Posts
The max price drop I see Sony making anytime soon is to $249.99.
Avatar image for TheEroica
TheEroica

24451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 TheEroica  Moderator
Member since 2009 • 24451 Posts

Because putting out a 200$ system would cause them to lose more money. The PS3 is selling fine and they're finally making a profit on hardware.

waltefmoney
this... sony has had their bags beat off this generation compared to MS and Nintendo. they need to gain as much profit as humanly possible right now.
Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#44 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts
[QUOTE="Phazevariance"][QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="istuffedsunny"]

Sony doesn't seem to care it's still being outsold by Nintendo and MS five years later. They both got a $200 system and what's Sony doing? Rather than entice millions of gamers (and now millions of pirates!) at that sweet spot, they're... no I'm actually curious, what are they doing?

eh....that's a little deceptive. ms makes a $200 console, but it has no hard drive.

You're mistaken, $200 is for the version WITH a hard drive, and $149 for the non hard drive version.

It has a 4GB flash drive, not an HDD.
Avatar image for XIntoTheBlue
XIntoTheBlue

1070

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 XIntoTheBlue
Member since 2009 • 1070 Posts

Sony doesn't seem to care it's still being outsold by Nintendo and MS five years later. They both got a $200 system and what's Sony doing? Rather than entice millions of gamers (and now millions of pirates!) at that sweet spot, they're... no I'm actually curious, what are they doing?

istuffedsunny
Because they don't care about cheap skates who think consoles should cost 'em 5 bucks?
Avatar image for ubpoker123
ubpoker123

877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 ubpoker123
Member since 2007 • 877 Posts

I think this thread would be better titled "Why is there no XBOX360 price drop?". Do you seriously think the PS3 needs a price drop? :|

Avatar image for RandomWinner
RandomWinner

3751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 RandomWinner
Member since 2010 • 3751 Posts

Sony doesn't seem to care it's still being outsold by Nintendo and MS five years later. They both got a $200 system and what's Sony doing? Rather than entice millions of gamers (and now millions of pirates!) at that sweet spot, they're... no I'm actually curious, what are they doing?

istuffedsunny

Because in the magic world we live in, things cost money to produce. If they were selling PS3s at $10, more people would buy them, sure, but costing $200 to make they'd loose money for every console sold. It economics and a $200 PS3 would net them very little money if not cause them to loose money (although I'd guess the former)

Avatar image for KBFloYd
KBFloYd

22714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#48 KBFloYd
Member since 2009 • 22714 Posts

they cant lower the price... a basic blu-ray player costs 200-300 dollars.. this thing plays games too(at least i hear it does)

so they would lose money.

Avatar image for hd5870corei7
hd5870corei7

1612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#49 hd5870corei7
Member since 2010 • 1612 Posts

[QUOTE="chaplainDMK"]Why should they? The 200$ Arcade Xbox 360 is hardly competiton to the PS3... And the PS3 is outselling the 360 since it was released... delta3074
except thats not the case here in blighty, a top end 360 is still 50 quid cheaper than a bottom end Ps3.

360 Slim + Fifa 11 =£224.99

PS3 Slim + UC2 =£249.99

You'd have to be a nutter to pick the first one over the second.

Avatar image for HaLoMaStErJT
HaLoMaStErJT

1380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 HaLoMaStErJT
Member since 2008 • 1380 Posts

Sony is finally making money. There is no reason for them to lower the price.