why PS Wand =/= Wii remote

  • 59 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for SilverChimera
SilverChimera

9256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#1 SilverChimera
Member since 2009 • 9256 Posts

everyone thinks the PS wand is a wii remote rip off because it uses a remote and is motion sensing. well here's why it isn't:

NOTE: I do not support motion controls, and i really don't care about Natal, Wii Motion + or PS Wand. Just clearing up facts that people still are confusing (see this thread)

The PS Wand uses the Eye Toy. This means that the camera can sense where the remote is in relation to it. Its different than the wii. On the wii, wherever you stand in relation to the detecctor, it is the same. With PS Wand, standing a little to the right or left moves the item on screen. This is why its good for dual wielding.

Not just motion sensing. The PS Wand in combo with the eye toy uses body sensing too (so its like Wii motion + and natal in one). This means that you can control your full body AND have control of the object on screen with the remote.

Not Infra-Red. The Wii uses IR for motion tracking. PS Wand uses the Eye Toy for precise tracking for things such as writing and other precise movements. The Wii remote isn't as accurate, but that has been 'fixed' with Wii Motion +.

Avatar image for shoryuken_
shoryuken_

3420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 shoryuken_
Member since 2009 • 3420 Posts

another difference is that its going to completely flop

Avatar image for Bentham
Bentham

1154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Bentham
Member since 2008 • 1154 Posts
Both Natal and the Sony Wand are a response to the success of the Nintendo Wii. So, yes it is, essentially, a rip-off.
Avatar image for SilverChimera
SilverChimera

9256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#4 SilverChimera
Member since 2009 • 9256 Posts
Both Natal and the Sony Wand are a response to the success of the Nintendo Wii. So, yes it is, essentially, a rip-off.Bentham
but its not an exact copy like others suggest
Avatar image for thens1563
thens1563

724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 thens1563
Member since 2009 • 724 Posts

another difference is that its going to completely flop

shoryuken_

Oh man, your lucky, I wish I could see into the future...

Avatar image for eo_the_shaman
eo_the_shaman

1800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 eo_the_shaman
Member since 2009 • 1800 Posts

everyone knows all gaming systems are rip offs of the computers used to decode german enigma codes during WW 2....

Avatar image for Bentham
Bentham

1154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Bentham
Member since 2008 • 1154 Posts
[QUOTE="Bentham"]Both Natal and the Sony Wand are a response to the success of the Nintendo Wii. So, yes it is, essentially, a rip-off.SilverChimera
but its not an exact copy like others suggest

Does it really matter? If it weren't for the success Wii, neither Sony's nor Microsoft's device would have been shown. Both concepts closely parallel the "Wii ideology" of gaming.
Avatar image for double_heist
double_heist

2402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 double_heist
Member since 2005 • 2402 Posts

[QUOTE="Bentham"]Both Natal and the Sony Wand are a response to the success of the Nintendo Wii. So, yes it is, essentially, a rip-off.SilverChimera
but its not an exact copy like others suggest

Well, it does have facial and voice recognitions (Toy Wand), so it's not an exact copy.

Avatar image for eo_the_shaman
eo_the_shaman

1800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 eo_the_shaman
Member since 2009 • 1800 Posts

[QUOTE="SilverChimera"][QUOTE="Bentham"]Both Natal and the Sony Wand are a response to the success of the Nintendo Wii. So, yes it is, essentially, a rip-off.double_heist
but its not an exact copy like others suggest

Well, it does have facial and voice recognitions, so it's not an exact copy.

and the wand was only a prototype.....forget that?

Avatar image for TR800
TR800

1814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 TR800
Member since 2009 • 1814 Posts
Im not liking motion controls on the ps3/360 i don't want it to become standard in the future.
Avatar image for hamstergeddon
hamstergeddon

7188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 hamstergeddon
Member since 2006 • 7188 Posts
I don't come to SW very often any more, but here we go. Remember back when the Wii was still called the Revolution, and all the Ninty fans were saying it would redefine gaming and all the Sony and MS fans dismissed it as a "gimmick"? Well then... look who was right :D
Avatar image for CajunShooter
CajunShooter

5276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 CajunShooter
Member since 2006 • 5276 Posts
[QUOTE="SilverChimera"][QUOTE="Bentham"]Both Natal and the Sony Wand are a response to the success of the Nintendo Wii. So, yes it is, essentially, a rip-off.Bentham
but its not an exact copy like others suggest

Does it really matter? If it weren't for the success Wii, neither Sony's nor Microsoft's device would have been shown. Both concepts closely parallel the "Wii ideology" of gaming.

This is called business. You try to take what others have been successful with and improve upon it. We would still be living in caves had it not been for people adopting the techniques of other successful people. "This person has found a way to farm and raise animals so we no longer would have to be nomadic and hunt daily for food....oh dang I can't take this one person's idea. I guess the rest of the human race will have to stay nomadic." Get over it. The most over-used term this gen is rip-off or copying. This is how you improve as an industry. You continue to adopt what others are successful with and drop the things that aren't.
Avatar image for Bentham
Bentham

1154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Bentham
Member since 2008 • 1154 Posts

[QUOTE="Bentham"][QUOTE="SilverChimera"] but its not an exact copy like others suggestCajunShooter
Does it really matter? If it weren't for the success Wii, neither Sony's nor Microsoft's device would have been shown. Both concepts closely parallel the "Wii ideology" of gaming.

This is called business. You try to take what others have been successful with and improve upon it. We would still be living in caves had it not been for people adopting the techniques of other successful people. "This person has found a way to farm and raise animals so we no longer would have to be nomadic and hunt daily for food....oh dang I can't take this one person's idea. I guess the rest of the human race will have to stay nomadic." Get over it. The most over-used term this gen is rip-off or copying. This is how you improve as an industry. You continue to adopt what others are successful with and drop the things that aren't.

I'm well aware that it is a business practice, and I'm certainly not condemning it--If I am, then please point to where I am, and I will correct myself. Once you are finished being hostile, I will consider having a respectful debate with you regarding the issue.

Avatar image for SilverChimera
SilverChimera

9256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#14 SilverChimera
Member since 2009 • 9256 Posts
Im not liking motion controls on the ps3/360 i don't want it to become standard in the future.TR800
yeah same. i don't mind that they're there, but i don't want then to be standard. i want to game the way its been done and the way thats worked the best. with a controller (or keyboard/mouse)
Avatar image for wolverine4262
wolverine4262

20832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 wolverine4262
Member since 2004 • 20832 Posts
Im not sure if you fully realize how the wii- remote works. For one thing it too uses a camera. Basically, the wii-mote and ps wand use very similar techniques but the execution is just flipped...Also, DO NOT compare the ps eye to natal. Natal is far more advanced than the ps eye..
Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

I'm not big on all this stuff, if there's a game I want for it, then fine, but I don't care about it conceptually.

Same for NATAL.

NATAL is being marketed to HELL by M$, so fanboys are going crazy, but if you actually watch what people are playing, it's a joke.

Natal's controls are the answer to a problem and question we haven't come up to yet. It's different, but it's not better.

I don't want Minigames on my Wii, PS3, or Natal.

Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

Im not sure if you fully realize how the wii- remote works. For one thing it too uses a camera. Basically, the wii-mote and ps wand use very similar techniques but the execution is just flipped...Also, DO NOT compare the ps eye to natal. Natal is far more advanced than the ps eye..wolverine4262

It's not FAR MORE Advanced, but it is more advanced. The games aren't improving though. Did you watch anyone play any games on it?

Look, he's saying Don't COMPARE teh PSWand to NATAL, compare the PSEye AND PSWand to NATAL.Same for Wii.

You just took the PSWand away from the PSEye, and then promoted NATAL.

Avatar image for wonderboy63
wonderboy63

720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 wonderboy63
Member since 2008 • 720 Posts

Both Natal and the Sony Wand are a response to the success of the Nintendo Wii. So, yes it is, essentially, a rip-off.Bentham

if thats true, tehn nintendo would have sued sony by now..ignorant much.

Avatar image for wonderboy63
wonderboy63

720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 wonderboy63
Member since 2008 • 720 Posts

Im not sure if you fully realize how the wii- remote works. For one thing it too uses a camera. Basically, the wii-mote and ps wand use very similar techniques but the execution is just flipped...Also, DO NOT compare the ps eye to natal. Natal is far more advanced than the ps eye..wolverine4262

I wouldnt say "far more advance" its just and improvment of teh ps eye

Avatar image for wolverine4262
wolverine4262

20832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 wolverine4262
Member since 2004 • 20832 Posts

[QUOTE="wolverine4262"]Im not sure if you fully realize how the wii- remote works. For one thing it too uses a camera. Basically, the wii-mote and ps wand use very similar techniques but the execution is just flipped...Also, DO NOT compare the ps eye to natal. Natal is far more advanced than the ps eye..SolidTy

It's not FAR MORE Advanced, did you watch anyone play any games on it?

Look, he's saying Don't COMPARE teh PSWand to NATAL, compare the PSEye AND PSWand to NATAL.Same for Wii.

You just took the PSWand away from the PSEye, and then promoted NATAL.

actually he specifically said that the wand + the eye is like having a wii-mote and natal all in one... this is not true...far more advanced may be somewhat strong from the few demos we have seen...However, much of the tech behind natal is definitely not featured in the eye
Avatar image for Bentham
Bentham

1154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Bentham
Member since 2008 • 1154 Posts

[QUOTE="Bentham"]Both Natal and the Sony Wand are a response to the success of the Nintendo Wii. So, yes it is, essentially, a rip-off.wonderboy63

if thats true, tehn nintendo would have sued sony by now..ignorant much.

I'm not sure if that was a joke or not, but, it's a rip-off in the sense that it was a direct response of a popular product. Similar to all the touch screen phones that were released after the Apple iPhone.
Avatar image for wonderboy63
wonderboy63

720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 wonderboy63
Member since 2008 • 720 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

[QUOTE="wolverine4262"]Im not sure if you fully realize how the wii- remote works. For one thing it too uses a camera. Basically, the wii-mote and ps wand use very similar techniques but the execution is just flipped...Also, DO NOT compare the ps eye to natal. Natal is far more advanced than the ps eye..wolverine4262

It's not FAR MORE Advanced, did you watch anyone play any games on it?

Look, he's saying Don't COMPARE teh PSWand to NATAL, compare the PSEye AND PSWand to NATAL.Same for Wii.

You just took the PSWand away from the PSEye, and then promoted NATAL.

actually he specifically said that the wand + the eye is like having a wii-mote and natal all in one... this is not true...far more advanced may be somewhat strong from the few demos we have seen...However, much of the tech behind natal is definitely not featured in the eye

does it mean it is better then the wand? no

Avatar image for wonderboy63
wonderboy63

720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 wonderboy63
Member since 2008 • 720 Posts

[QUOTE="wonderboy63"]

[QUOTE="Bentham"]Both Natal and the Sony Wand are a response to the success of the Nintendo Wii. So, yes it is, essentially, a rip-off.Bentham

if thats true, tehn nintendo would have sued sony by now..ignorant much.

I'm not sure if that was a joke or not, but, it's a rip-off in the sense that it was a direct response of a popular product. Similar to all the touch screen phones that were released after the Apple iPhone.

your trying to say that the wand is the exact same thing as the remote, but not as good, thats not true, the pswand has its advantages, like capturing body movment for and rpg, and also its disadvantages.

Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#25 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

[QUOTE="wolverine4262"]Im not sure if you fully realize how the wii- remote works. For one thing it too uses a camera. Basically, the wii-mote and ps wand use very similar techniques but the execution is just flipped...Also, DO NOT compare the ps eye to natal. Natal is far more advanced than the ps eye..wolverine4262

It's not FAR MORE Advanced, but it is more advanced. The games aren't improving though. Did you watch anyone play any games on it?

Look, he's saying Don't COMPARE teh PSWand to NATAL, compare the PSEye AND PSWand to NATAL. Same for Wii.

You just took the PSWand away from the PSEye, and then promoted NATAL.

actually he specifically said that the wand + the eye is like having a wii-mote and natal all in one... this is not true...far more advanced may be somewhat strong from the few demos we have seen...However, much of the tech behind natal is definitely not featured in the eye

No, it's not the Wii and Natal all in one, if that's what he was saying, that's off. I missed that.

Natal/PSWand are just not interesting to me until I see some great games for it. Until then, I'm skeptical, as I did buy the Eyetoy last gen, and after a few months, never went back to it.

Fool me once, Shame on you.

Fool me Twice, Shame on Me.

Bush sty.le :

Fool me once, Shame on you.

Fool me twice, er...I'll never get fooled again.

Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts
[QUOTE="wonderboy63"]

[QUOTE="wolverine4262"][QUOTE="SolidTy"]

It's not FAR MORE Advanced, did you watch anyone play any games on it?

Look, he's saying Don't COMPARE teh PSWand to NATAL, compare the PSEye AND PSWand to NATAL.Same for Wii.

You just took the PSWand away from the PSEye, and then promoted NATAL.

actually he specifically said that the wand + the eye is like having a wii-mote and natal all in one... this is not true...far more advanced may be somewhat strong from the few demos we have seen...However, much of the tech behind natal is definitely not featured in the eye

does it mean it is better then the wand? no

natal = free controllers, win imo for casual market, Is natal a camera or something else, i heard it measured distance kinda like sonarish type of tech. The magic wand looked so stupid it made me angry, the demo was alike a boxed room and your were stucking in the box facing a single wall and was cented on the wall.
Avatar image for wolverine4262
wolverine4262

20832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 wolverine4262
Member since 2004 • 20832 Posts
does it mean it is better then the wand? nowonderboy63
I never said that it was...its different. it really depends on implementation... Do you realize how easy it would be for MS to throw in a similar controller though? It would not be so easy for sony to completely copy natal especially before the supposed release date...
Avatar image for Bentham
Bentham

1154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Bentham
Member since 2008 • 1154 Posts

your trying to say that the wand is the exact same thing as the remote, but not as good, thats not true, the pswand has its advantages, like capturing body movment for and rpg, and also its disadvantages.

wonderboy63

Your schtick is getting a bit tiresome. I recommend that you re-read my posts or take a basic reading comprehension class for maximum results.

Avatar image for SilverChimera
SilverChimera

9256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#29 SilverChimera
Member since 2009 • 9256 Posts
[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

[QUOTE="wolverine4262"]Im not sure if you fully realize how the wii- remote works. For one thing it too uses a camera. Basically, the wii-mote and ps wand use very similar techniques but the execution is just flipped...Also, DO NOT compare the ps eye to natal. Natal is far more advanced than the ps eye..wolverine4262

It's not FAR MORE Advanced, did you watch anyone play any games on it?

Look, he's saying Don't COMPARE teh PSWand to NATAL, compare the PSEye AND PSWand to NATAL.Same for Wii.

You just took the PSWand away from the PSEye, and then promoted NATAL.

actually he specifically said that the wand + the eye is like having a wii-mote and natal all in one... this is not true...far more advanced may be somewhat strong from the few demos we have seen...However, much of the tech behind natal is definitely not featured in the eye

sorry, i didn't mean it like that. i meant it like you get body sensing and a remote.
Avatar image for themyth01
themyth01

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#30 themyth01
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
So basically they're exactly the same except that the Wii can't detect distance changes? Body sensing? what are you talking about, it simply tracks the sphere on the wiim.. (though I mean wand). It's not nearly as advance as Natal, and barely has any more features than the Wii, in other words, the next Wii will probably outdo it.
Avatar image for themyth01
themyth01

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#31 themyth01
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

[QUOTE="wolverine4262"][QUOTE="SolidTy"]

It's not FAR MORE Advanced, did you watch anyone play any games on it?

Look, he's saying Don't COMPARE teh PSWand to NATAL, compare the PSEye AND PSWand to NATAL.Same for Wii.

You just took the PSWand away from the PSEye, and then promoted NATAL.

SilverChimera

actually he specifically said that the wand + the eye is like having a wii-mote and natal all in one... this is not true...far more advanced may be somewhat strong from the few demos we have seen...However, much of the tech behind natal is definitely not featured in the eye

sorry, i didn't mean it like that. i meant it like you get body sensing and a remote.

But you don't, you only get the remote sensors in relation to the tracking device, it's not nearly as complex as natal.

Avatar image for wolverine4262
wolverine4262

20832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 wolverine4262
Member since 2004 • 20832 Posts

No, it's not the Wii and Natal all in one, if that's what he was saying, that's off. I missed that.

Natal/PSWand are just not interesting to me until I see some great games for it. Until then, I'm skeptical, as I did buy the Eyetoy last gen, and after a few months, never went back to it.

Fool me once, Shame on you.

Fool me Twice, Shame on Me.

Bush sty.le :

Fool me once, Shame on you.

Fool me twice, er...I'll never get fooled again.

SolidTy

MS has said they are waiting for a full library of games before they release it. Im hearing 30 games either on the market day 1 or in the near future before release. Sony on the other hand...

Avatar image for SilverChimera
SilverChimera

9256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#33 SilverChimera
Member since 2009 • 9256 Posts

[QUOTE="SilverChimera"][QUOTE="wolverine4262"] actually he specifically said that the wand + the eye is like having a wii-mote and natal all in one... this is not true...far more advanced may be somewhat strong from the few demos we have seen...However, much of the tech behind natal is definitely not featured in the eye themyth01

sorry, i didn't mean it like that. i meant it like you get body sensing and a remote.

But you don't, you only get the remote sensors in relation to the tracking device, it's not nearly as complex as natal.

i never said it was. i said it was body and controller tracking, which it is.

Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts
[QUOTE="Bentham"]

[QUOTE="wonderboy63"]

your trying to say that the wand is the exact same thing as the remote, but not as good, thats not true, the pswand has its advantages, like capturing body movment for and rpg, and also its disadvantages.

Your schtick is getting a bit tiresome. I recommend that you re-read my posts or take a basic reading comprehension class for maximum results.

it doesn't really caputre body movement though, it just captures the location of the wii mo... er pswand and color of the ball. You could strap like 50 of them to you so you can get full body movement out of that, but then you have the natal except 50x price of pswand.
Avatar image for wolverine4262
wolverine4262

20832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 wolverine4262
Member since 2004 • 20832 Posts
[QUOTE="SilverChimera"] sorry, i didn't mean it like that. i meant it like you get body sensing and a remote.

thats understable but from what I saw of the demos, the eye was only able to track the wand...Even if it could do both, natals motion capabilities trounce it...
Avatar image for ganon546
ganon546

2942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 ganon546
Member since 2007 • 2942 Posts

Personally I'm sick of ALL the motion sensing things. Unfortunately it's something that's only going to grow more and more in the gaming world.

Avatar image for Bentham
Bentham

1154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Bentham
Member since 2008 • 1154 Posts

[QUOTE="Bentham"]

[QUOTE="wonderboy63"]

your trying to say that the wand is the exact same thing as the remote, but not as good, thats not true, the pswand has its advantages, like capturing body movment for and rpg, and also its disadvantages.

savagetwinkie

Your schtick is getting a bit tiresome. I recommend that you re-read my posts or take a basic reading comprehension class for maximum results.

it doesn't really caputre body movement though, it just captures the location of the wii mo... er pswand and color of the ball. You could strap like 50 of them to you so you can get full body movement out of that, but then you have the natal except 50x price of pswand.

I'm not saying it's the same. Both Natal and Sony Wand are an extension of The Nintendo Wii remote; they both retain the fundamental ideology of Wii gaming: motion sensing. Microsoft and Sony are releasing these products as a direct response to the success of the Wii. This is my thesis.

Avatar image for SilverChimera
SilverChimera

9256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#38 SilverChimera
Member since 2009 • 9256 Posts
[QUOTE="wolverine4262"][QUOTE="SilverChimera"] sorry, i didn't mean it like that. i meant it like you get body sensing and a remote.

thats understable but from what I saw of the demos, the eye was only able to track the wand...Even if it could do both, natals motion capabilities trounce it...

really? i remember in the E3 demo when he used the bow and arrow, he bent down on one knee and so did the guy in the game.
Avatar image for SilverChimera
SilverChimera

9256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#39 SilverChimera
Member since 2009 • 9256 Posts

[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"][QUOTE="Bentham"] Your schtick is getting a bit tiresome. I recommend that you re-read my posts or take a basic reading comprehension class for maximum results.

Bentham

it doesn't really caputre body movement though, it just captures the location of the wii mo... er pswand and color of the ball. You could strap like 50 of them to you so you can get full body movement out of that, but then you have the natal except 50x price of pswand.

I'm not saying it's the same. Both Natal and Sony Wand are an extension of The Nintendo Wii remote; they both retain the fundamental ideology of Wii gaming: motion sensing. Microsoft and Sony are releasing these products as a direct response to the success of the Wii. This is my thesis.

natal isn't an extension of wii remote. its an extension of eye toy.
Avatar image for wolverine4262
wolverine4262

20832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 wolverine4262
Member since 2004 • 20832 Posts
[QUOTE="SilverChimera"][QUOTE="wolverine4262"][QUOTE="SilverChimera"] sorry, i didn't mean it like that. i meant it like you get body sensing and a remote.

thats understable but from what I saw of the demos, the eye was only able to track the wand...Even if it could do both, natals motion capabilities trounce it...

really? i remember in the E3 demo when he used the bow and arrow, he bent down on one knee and so did the guy in the game.

and then he said that the game knew his stance b/c of the wands position...the character knelt b/c the wand was closer to the ground...
Avatar image for Bentham
Bentham

1154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Bentham
Member since 2008 • 1154 Posts

[QUOTE="Bentham"]

[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"] it doesn't really caputre body movement though, it just captures the location of the wii mo... er pswand and color of the ball. You could strap like 50 of them to you so you can get full body movement out of that, but then you have the natal except 50x price of pswand.SilverChimera

I'm not saying it's the same. Both Natal and Sony Wand are an extension of The Nintendo Wii remote; they both retain the fundamental ideology of Wii gaming: motion sensing. Microsoft and Sony are releasing these products as a direct response to the success of the Wii. This is my thesis.

natal isn't an extension of wii remote. its an extension of eye toy.

It's an extension of both with the point being that if the Wii was never released, Natal probably wouldn't have been announced.

Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts
[QUOTE="Bentham"]

[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"][QUOTE="Bentham"] Your schtick is getting a bit tiresome. I recommend that you re-read my posts or take a basic reading comprehension class for maximum results.

it doesn't really caputre body movement though, it just captures the location of the wii mo... er pswand and color of the ball. You could strap like 50 of them to you so you can get full body movement out of that, but then you have the natal except 50x price of pswand.

I'm not saying it's the same. Both Natal and Sony Wand are an extension of The Nintendo Wii remote; they both retain the fundamental ideology of Wii gaming: motion sensing. Microsoft and Sony are releasing these products as a direct response to the success of the Wii. This is my thesis.

But the the difference between the natal and pswand is that one of them is directly related to wiimote technology, except with a small glowing sphere on the top that can be tracked so you not only get movement but location relative to the tv. The other is a totally different way of acomploshing the same thing and more advanced, it can track where you are, how your moving, your voice, and comes controller less so a whole family can play easily. Guess which one is which?
Avatar image for SilverChimera
SilverChimera

9256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#43 SilverChimera
Member since 2009 • 9256 Posts
[QUOTE="SilverChimera"][QUOTE="wolverine4262"]thats understable but from what I saw of the demos, the eye was only able to track the wand...Even if it could do both, natals motion capabilities trounce it...wolverine4262
really? i remember in the E3 demo when he used the bow and arrow, he bent down on one knee and so did the guy in the game.

and then he said that the game knew his stance b/c of the wands position...the character knelt b/c the wand was closer to the ground...

oh i probably didn't catch that. but i know for a fact that eye toy can track body motion. whatever
Avatar image for wolverine4262
wolverine4262

20832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 wolverine4262
Member since 2004 • 20832 Posts
[QUOTE="SilverChimera"] oh i probably didn't catch that. but i know for a fact that eye toy can track body motion. whatever

even still that is not the same. natal has a built in micro processor that calculates joint movements in a 3d space..eye toy worked in 2d w/ zero understanding of how the human body is supposed to move..
Avatar image for enterawesome
enterawesome

9477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#45 enterawesome
Member since 2009 • 9477 Posts
[QUOTE="thens1563"]

[QUOTE="shoryuken_"]

another difference is that its going to completely flop

Oh man, your lucky, I wish I could see into the future...

It doesn't take much to know that nowadays new game hardware from Sony will "flop" or not be drastically sucessful. Unless Sony suddenly steps up and pulls a marketing miracle, you can forget about it.
Avatar image for wonderboy63
wonderboy63

720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 wonderboy63
Member since 2008 • 720 Posts

[QUOTE="wonderboy63"]

[QUOTE="wolverine4262"] actually he specifically said that the wand + the eye is like having a wii-mote and natal all in one... this is not true...far more advanced may be somewhat strong from the few demos we have seen...However, much of the tech behind natal is definitely not featured in the eye savagetwinkie

does it mean it is better then the wand? no

natal = free controllers, win imo for casual market, Is natal a camera or something else, i heard it measured distance kinda like sonarish type of tech. The magic wand looked so stupid it made me angry, the demo was alike a boxed room and your were stucking in the box facing a single wall and was cented on the wall.

Wow u can say all that from watching somone do it for a few minutes, your like a technolagical genuis

Avatar image for wonderboy63
wonderboy63

720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 wonderboy63
Member since 2008 • 720 Posts

[QUOTE="wonderboy63"]

your trying to say that the wand is the exact same thing as the remote, but not as good, thats not true, the pswand has its advantages, like capturing body movment for and rpg, and also its disadvantages.

Bentham

Your schtick is getting a bit tiresome. I recommend that you re-read my posts or take a basic reading comprehension class for maximum results.

If thats not what your saying, then tell em why its a ripp-off, what was that u ment to say besides that.

Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts
[QUOTE="wonderboy63"]

[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"][QUOTE="wonderboy63"] does it mean it is better then the wand? no

natal = free controllers, win imo for casual market, Is natal a camera or something else, i heard it measured distance kinda like sonarish type of tech. The magic wand looked so stupid it made me angry, the demo was alike a boxed room and your were stucking in the box facing a single wall and was cented on the wall.

Wow u can say all that from watching somone do it for a few minutes, your like a technolagical genuis

well from the tech demo it just looks at positioning, not direction, so it will be good for games facing one direction all the time, like wiisports, now you can run back and forth and it can see you, hopefully though you have a large living room.
Avatar image for boredy-Mcbored
boredy-Mcbored

1566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 boredy-Mcbored
Member since 2007 • 1566 Posts

Do you have a link because I'm confused. What's the point of the wand if it doesn't use IR sensing? :?

Avatar image for DeadEndPanda
DeadEndPanda

2358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 DeadEndPanda
Member since 2008 • 2358 Posts

another difference is that its going to completely flop

shoryuken_

i must say i lol'd

on topic:

sony could atlast TRY to make it original by not ripping off the wiimote totally and adding a light ball on top o,o