So far their hardware is the only one that hasn't caused me sever problems this generation. Their hardware is relible, least to me anyways.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Because if they didn't, Microsoft and Sony would have to actually come up with ideas on their own.nini200:lol: That was good :D
Makes sense since other than the N64 and GC all other consoles and ALL handhelds are underpowered severely.so let me get this right. Nintendo makes just one weaker console and now they have apparently only ever made weaker consoles...wait???
vtbob88
This. I want a game console. I don't like paying extra money for a bunch of stupid features I'm never going to use that are done better elsewhere anyway. Also, the Wii dominated the market this gen, they have no reason not to make a new console.Because they're the only console maker looking to maintain all aspects of what makes a console a console?
SW__Troll
[QUOTE="vtbob88"]SNES was weaker than the Genesis N64 was cartridge vs. CD Rom Gamecube Weaker than PS2 and Xbox . Um... No just... No. The SNES was more powerful than the Genesis and Turbo Grafix 16. The N64 was more powerful than the TurboDuo, Saturn and PS1. The GameCube was more powerful than the Dreamcast, PS2, and with some games like Rogue Squadron 2&3 and Resident Evil 4, proved to be almost on par with the XBOX when a skilled developer took the GC seriously. The whole "Nintendo makes weak hardware" thing is just wishful thinking invented by young gamers under the age of 30 who aren't old enough to remember the battles of earlier generations.so let me get this right. Nintendo makes just one weaker console and now they have apparently only ever made weaker consoles...wait???
fadersdream
[QUOTE="fadersdream"][QUOTE="vtbob88"]SNES was weaker than the Genesis N64 was cartridge vs. CD Rom Gamecube Weaker than PS2 and Xbox . Um... No just... No. The SNES was more powerful than the Genesis and Turbo Grafix 16. The N64 was more powerful than the TurboDuo, Saturn and PS1. The GameCube was more powerful than the Dreamcast, PS2, and with some games like Rogue Squadron 2&3 and Resident Evil 4, proved to be almost on par with the XBOX when a skilled developer took the GC seriously. The whole "Nintendo makes weak hardware" thing is just wishful thinking invented by young gamers under the age of 30 who aren't old enough to remember the battles of earlier generations. Im 26 thank you very much lol. Been gaming since 5:-Pso let me get this right. Nintendo makes just one weaker console and now they have apparently only ever made weaker consoles...wait???
genfactor
Great software, mediocre hardware.
Nintendo isn't advancing consoles at this point they only facilitate a way to play Nintendo games. I would love to see N games continue third party but I can't think of a compelling reason to purchase a machine that only does N games.
.
I know this Doom and Gloom thing is done to death, sorry. But I'm genuinely curious if the system brings something to the market that couldn't be accomplished by the software on other systems.
fadersdream
They have to release hardware in order to release software. Nintendo takes as long as they want to produce games. Something tells me this wouldn't go over well if they were 3rd party.
Mediocre Hardware? Only the Wii was the only Nintendo system to be weaker in hardware power than the others, in the past Nintendo systems were always at the top.I buy every Nintendo system that comes out, you know why?
Because of it's exclusives, I grew up with Mario and Zelda ect... so those games are important to me, this is why people that think exclusives don't matter are full of sh!t.
Plus I have NEVER had any problems with any Nintendo system, hell even my origional NES STILL works, and that's over like 15 years old! I wish I could saythe same thing about a certain other company, who can't even release a system with a guranteed failure rate.
They should take some lessons from Nintendo on how to make a good system that's actually reliable andworks.
Not tryingto be a fanboy, but you know it's true.
Mediocre Hardware? Only the Wii was the only Nintendo system to be weaker in hardware power than the others, in the past Nintendo systems were always at the top.I buy every Nintendo system that comes out, you know why?
Because of it's exclusives, I grew up with Mario and Zelda ect... so those games are important to me, this is why people that think exclusives don't matter are full of sh!t.
Plus I have NEVER had any problems with any Nintendo system, hell even my origional NES STILL works, and that's over like 15 years old! I wish I could saythe same thing about a certain other company, who can't even release a system with a guranteed failure rate.
They should take some lessons from Nintendo on how to make a good system that's actually reliable andworks.
Not tryingto be a fanboy, but you know it's true.
ShadowMoses900
this
Nintendo makes one weak system and all the suden they cant make a powerful system ever again.
For the past three decades, Nintendo has been setting the trends in console hardware. With each new generation, Nintendo always introduced controllers that revolutionized console hardware design:
NES - Joypad, D-pad
SNES - Shoulder buttons
N64 - Analog controller, expansion slots, vibrations
GameCube - Wireless controller
DS - Touch-screen control, dual-screen
Wii - Motion control
The console gaming industry, including both Sony and Microsoft, relies on Nintendo to come up with the innovations. Without Nintendo, it's highly unlikely we'll be seeing the innovations necessary to move the console gaming industry forward.
Because there consoles and name has stood the test of time. Without Nintendo consoles there wouldn't be any Playstation of Xbox probably.
[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]
They continue to have games I want to play, thus they should continue making hardware.
3dfd
I would actually so much prefer Mario, Smash Bros, etc to come to Xbox and PS than to buy another system that I only play for 2 games
Then actaully try other wii games. You may be suprised at how good they are instead of just writing them off without playing them.
[QUOTE="fadersdream"] SNES was weaker than the Genesis N64 was cartridge vs. CD Rom Gamecube Weaker than PS2RandolphYou have vision problems, go see an optometrist. I've seen fanboys post all kinds of technical on paper reasons why Genesis was stronger than SNES, and PS2 stronger than Gamecube. On paper power and abilities do not mean sh*t if no one can use it to produce results on screen when a gamer is playing a game on it. SNES games were very plainly better looking and better sounding.
The Genesis actually was more "powerful" than the SNES, in terms of processing power. But we all know which console had the superior graphics.
Genesis won with Disney's Aladdin in visuals (because it was co-developed by Disney themselves), but that's about it.
And I agree with you on the whole PS2 vs. GCN thing. Tekken 5 comes close, but I have yet to see a PS2 game that looks better than Star Fox Adventures. Hell, the majority of Wii games can't even match SFA in the graphics department.
[QUOTE="vtbob88"]SNES was weaker than the Genesis N64 was cartridge vs. CD Rom Gamecube Weaker than PS2 and Xbox Gameboy weaker than Lynx, Game Gear and Nomad Gameboy advance and DS were weaker than PSP Wii weaker than 360 and PS3 I'm not Bashing Nintendo, just don't see how it would hurt the industry for them to go third party and would like to see reasons not based on Nostalgia or an undefinable "Nintendo"-ness. Whoa wait just a second, SNES was weaker than the Genesis? I never knew that. I always thought it was the other way around and Battletoads/Double Dragon and TMNT: Tournament Fighters proved that. I'm going to go and look this info up. You've piqued my interest.so let me get this right. Nintendo makes just one weaker console and now they have apparently only ever made weaker consoles...wait???
fadersdream
[QUOTE="ActionRemix"][QUOTE="fadersdream"]SNES was weaker than the Genesis N64 was cartridge vs. CD Rom Gamecube Weaker than PS2 and XboxfadersdreamSNES > Genesis N64 > PS1 Gamecube > PS2 Wii U > Xbox 1080 no they weren't. Best you have is N64 was better than the Saturn(without a meg cartridge and because it was two stacked processors), and Gamecube was better than the dreamcast. The N64 had an intense amount of power but that was only to because that level of power was needed to run a cartridge based system.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qz0LbKpZtI
You have vision problems, go see an optometrist. I've seen fanboys post all kinds of technical on paper reasons why Genesis was stronger than SNES, and PS2 stronger than Gamecube. On paper power and abilities do not mean sh*t if no one can use it to produce results on screen when a gamer is playing a game on it. SNES games were very plainly better looking and better sounding.[QUOTE="Randolph"][QUOTE="fadersdream"] SNES was weaker than the Genesis N64 was cartridge vs. CD Rom Gamecube Weaker than PS2Tikeio
The Genesis actually was more "powerful" than the SNES, in terms of processing power. But we all know which console had the superior graphics.
Genesis won with Disney's Aladdin in visuals (because it was co-developed by Disney themselves), but that's about it.
And I agree with you on the whole PS2 vs. GCN thing. Tekken 5 comes close, but I have yet to see a PS2 game that looks better than Star Fox Adventures. Hell, the majority of Wii games can't even match SFA in the graphics department.
I don't care what the difference in power was, Genesis games sounded awful compared the SNES games.
[QUOTE="Tikeio"]
[QUOTE="Randolph"] You have vision problems, go see an optometrist. I've seen fanboys post all kinds of technical on paper reasons why Genesis was stronger than SNES, and PS2 stronger than Gamecube. On paper power and abilities do not mean sh*t if no one can use it to produce results on screen when a gamer is playing a game on it. SNES games were very plainly better looking and better sounding.goblaa
The Genesis actually was more "powerful" than the SNES, in terms of processing power. But we all know which console had the superior graphics.
Genesis won with Disney's Aladdin in visuals (because it was co-developed by Disney themselves), but that's about it.
And I agree with you on the whole PS2 vs. GCN thing. Tekken 5 comes close, but I have yet to see a PS2 game that looks better than Star Fox Adventures. Hell, the majority of Wii games can't even match SFA in the graphics department.
I don't care what the difference in power was, Genesis games sounded awful compared the SNES games.
Yes? I don't believe that I've stated otherwise. :P
Most Genesis games had horrible sound effects, but when it came to music, some games sounded better than others. Mega Turrican, Disney's Aladdin, Sonic 2/3 & Knuckles are good examples of Genesis games with awesome music imo.
[QUOTE="vtbob88"]SNES was weaker than the GenesisN64 was cartridge vs. CD Rom Gamecube Weaker than PS2 and Xbox Gameboy weaker than Lynx, Game Gear and Nomad Gameboy advance and DS were weaker than PSP Wii weaker than 360 and PS3 I'm not Bashing Nintendo, just don't see how it would hurt the industry for them to go third party and would like to see reasons not based on Nostalgia or an undefinable "Nintendo"-ness.so let me get this right. Nintendo makes just one weaker console and now they have apparently only ever made weaker consoles...wait???
fadersdream
One of the stupidest things i've ever read in this forums...yes, it is THAT stupid.
Always at the top? What drugs were you taking? I mean their games are fine but hardware at the top?Mediocre Hardware? Only the Wii was the only Nintendo system to be weaker in hardware power than the others, in the past Nintendo systems were always at the top.I buy every Nintendo system that comes out, you know why?
Because of it's exclusives, I grew up with Mario and Zelda ect... so those games are important to me, this is why people that think exclusives don't matter are full of sh!t.
Plus I have NEVER had any problems with any Nintendo system, hell even my origional NES STILL works, and that's over like 15 years old! I wish I could saythe same thing about a certain other company, who can't even release a system with a guranteed failure rate.
They should take some lessons from Nintendo on how to make a good system that's actually reliable andworks.
Not tryingto be a fanboy, but you know it's true.
ShadowMoses900
NES- No they didn't, No they didn't SNES- Partially N64- No they didn't, ?, No they didn't. Gamecube- No they didn't DS- No they didn't, they already introduced this before with the G&W. Wii- no they didn't. No they don't you have no idea what yu are talking about Nintendo has either been on par with the industry (consoles) or holding it back (Handhelds) hardware wise. They have almost never actually helped move the gaming world forward, they either are given credit for it by people who have no idea what they are talking about, or popularized it. period.For the past three decades, Nintendo has been setting the trends in console hardware. With each new generation, Nintendo always introduced controllers that revolutionized console hardware design:
NES - Joypad, D-pad
SNES - Shoulder buttons
N64 - Analog controller, expansion slots, vibrations
GameCube - Wireless controller
DS - Touch-screen control, dual-screen
Wii - Motion control
The console gaming industry, including both Sony and Microsoft, relies on Nintendo to come up with the innovations. Without Nintendo, it's highly unlikely we'll be seeing the innovations necessary to move the console gaming industry forward.
Jag85
Nintendo makes hardware because they know the losers who love Pokemon and Yugioh will buy it just to get their fix.
Take any game on Wii and you'll see a game that couldve just as easily been done on on PS3 or 360 with better graphics. Heck even the dreamcast could handle most Wii games the graphics are so dated.
The Wii U could be a Super Nintendo with a tablet and Nintendo's weird fanbase would still defend it to the death. They think Nintendo is their friend.
[QUOTE="Jag85"]NES- No they didn't, No they didn't SNES- Partially N64- No they didn't, ?, No they didn't. Gamecube- No they didn't DS- No they didn't, they already introduced this before with the G&W. Wii- no they didn't. No they don't you have no idea what yu are talking about Nintendo has either been on par with the industry (consoles) or holding it back (Handhelds) hardware wise. They have almost never actually helped move the gaming world forward, they either are given credit for it by people who have no idea what they are talking about, or popularized it. period.NES - Joypad, D-pad
SNES - Shoulder buttons
N64 - Analog controller, expansion slots, vibrations
GameCube - Wireless controller
DS - Touch-screen control, dual-screen
Wii - Motion control
Another48hours
I'm curious now - if Nintendo didn't invent, popularise or standardise those improvements, who did?
Although I must say, if next gen's controllers are identical to those of the previous two gens, I'll be extremely disappointed in Microsoft and Sony. Stagnation ahoy!
NES- No they didn't, No they didn't SNES- Partially N64- No they didn't, ?, No they didn't. Gamecube- No they didn't DS- No they didn't, they already introduced this before with the G&W. Wii- no they didn't. No they don't you have no idea what yu are talking about Nintendo has either been on par with the industry (consoles) or holding it back (Handhelds) hardware wise. They have almost never actually helped move the gaming world forward, they either are given credit for it by people who have no idea what they are talking about, or popularized it. period.[QUOTE="Another48hours"][QUOTE="Jag85"]
NES - Joypad, D-pad
SNES - Shoulder buttons
N64 - Analog controller, expansion slots, vibrations
GameCube - Wireless controller
DS - Touch-screen control, dual-screen
Wii - Motion control
Planeforger
I'm curious now - if Nintendo didn't invent, popularise or standardise those improvements, who did?
Although I must say, if next gen's controllers are identical to those of the previous two gens, I'll be extremely disappointed in Microsoft and Sony. Stagnation ahoy!
The very next post right next to the one you quoted and you couldn't read it???Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment