Why should Nintendo continue to make consoles?

  • 138 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for GamerEye
GamerEye

1607

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#51 GamerEye
Member since 2011 • 1607 Posts

So far their hardware is the only one that hasn't caused me sever problems this generation. Their hardware is relible, least to me anyways.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#52 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38063 Posts
Because consumers have and will buy them. Why do people here get emotional or personally philosophical about business? You don't like 'em, don't buy 'em. But they aren't going to cater to you.
Avatar image for bbkkristian
bbkkristian

14971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#53 bbkkristian
Member since 2008 • 14971 Posts
Because if they didn't, Microsoft and Sony would have to actually come up with ideas on their own.nini200
:lol: That was good :D
Avatar image for Another48hours
Another48hours

1970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#54 Another48hours
Member since 2012 • 1970 Posts

so let me get this right. Nintendo makes just one weaker console and now they have apparently only ever made weaker consoles...wait???

vtbob88
Makes sense since other than the N64 and GC all other consoles and ALL handhelds are underpowered severely.
Avatar image for jeffwulf
jeffwulf

1569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 jeffwulf
Member since 2004 • 1569 Posts
[QUOTE="fadersdream"][QUOTE="ActionRemix"][QUOTE="fadersdream"]SNES was weaker than the Genesis N64 was cartridge vs. CD Rom Gamecube Weaker than PS2 and Xbox

SNES > Genesis N64 > PS1 Gamecube > PS2 Wii U > Xbox 1080

no they weren't. Best you have is N64 was better than the Saturn(without a meg cartridge and because it was two stacked processors), and Gamecube was better than the dreamcast. The N64 had an intense amount of power but that was only to because that level of power was needed to run a cartridge based system.

I love how hilariously wrong this is.
Avatar image for Thefatness16
Thefatness16

4673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 Thefatness16
Member since 2010 • 4673 Posts

So they can continue to make great games.

Avatar image for Kiro0
Kiro0

1176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Kiro0
Member since 2009 • 1176 Posts

This sums up my thoughts on this thread.

Avatar image for Randolph
Randolph

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 Randolph
Member since 2002 • 10542 Posts

Because they're the only console maker looking to maintain all aspects of what makes a console a console?

SW__Troll
This. I want a game console. I don't like paying extra money for a bunch of stupid features I'm never going to use that are done better elsewhere anyway. Also, the Wii dominated the market this gen, they have no reason not to make a new console.
Avatar image for FPS1337
FPS1337

2519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#59 FPS1337
Member since 2009 • 2519 Posts
The Wii far outsold the Xbox 360 and the PS3, the DS is the strongest selling console of all time, the 3DS is on pace to sell more then the original DS, and the Wii-U is a very innovative, unique idea with tons of gaming possibilities. Plus Nintendo is trying to get a lot more hardcore games on the Wii-U like Batman Arkham City, Ghost Recon:Future Soldier, Ninja Gaiden 3 and Darksiders and they are heavily upgrading the online system two main problems of the original Wii. Also the Wii-U is not underpowered, it hasn't even shown it's complete dev kit, but it is apparently only 20% less powerful then the Xbox 720 which is not very much at all, and considering it's very easy to develop games for the Wii-U. Also it's gonna have everything in Full 1080p, not upscaled like the Xbox 360 does, and the PS3 only had a few games that ran in full 1080p.
Avatar image for Randolph
Randolph

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#60 Randolph
Member since 2002 • 10542 Posts
[QUOTE="fadersdream"] SNES was weaker than the Genesis N64 was cartridge vs. CD Rom Gamecube Weaker than PS2

You have vision problems, go see an optometrist. I've seen fanboys post all kinds of technical on paper reasons why Genesis was stronger than SNES, and PS2 stronger than Gamecube. On paper power and abilities do not mean sh*t if no one can use it to produce results on screen when a gamer is playing a game on it. SNES games were very plainly better looking and better sounding. GC had launch games that looked better than anything ever released on PS2 during any point in it's lifespan. The point about N64 having carts is not relevant in any fashion, N64 was stronger than Sega Saturn and the PSX.
Avatar image for 3dfd
3dfd

767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#61 3dfd
Member since 2008 • 767 Posts

They continue to have games I want to play, thus they should continue making hardware.

lundy86_4

I would actually so much prefer Mario, Smash Bros, etc to come to Xbox and PS than to buy another system that I only play for 2 games

Avatar image for The_Pacific
The_Pacific

1804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 The_Pacific
Member since 2011 • 1804 Posts
Because they innovate the entire industry.
Avatar image for LovePotionNo9
LovePotionNo9

4751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 LovePotionNo9
Member since 2010 • 4751 Posts
Nintendo can do more with less. The others with abundance just whine and look for excuses.
Avatar image for fabz_95
fabz_95

15425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#64 fabz_95
Member since 2006 • 15425 Posts
They make games that people love and their systems have been selling incredibly well.
Avatar image for genfactor
genfactor

1472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#65 genfactor
Member since 2004 • 1472 Posts
[QUOTE="vtbob88"]

so let me get this right. Nintendo makes just one weaker console and now they have apparently only ever made weaker consoles...wait???

fadersdream
SNES was weaker than the Genesis N64 was cartridge vs. CD Rom Gamecube Weaker than PS2 and Xbox .

Um... No just... No. The SNES was more powerful than the Genesis and Turbo Grafix 16. The N64 was more powerful than the TurboDuo, Saturn and PS1. The GameCube was more powerful than the Dreamcast, PS2, and with some games like Rogue Squadron 2&3 and Resident Evil 4, proved to be almost on par with the XBOX when a skilled developer took the GC seriously. The whole "Nintendo makes weak hardware" thing is just wishful thinking invented by young gamers under the age of 30 who aren't old enough to remember the battles of earlier generations.
Avatar image for joojtzu
joojtzu

1118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 joojtzu
Member since 2011 • 1118 Posts
[QUOTE="fadersdream"][QUOTE="vtbob88"]

so let me get this right. Nintendo makes just one weaker console and now they have apparently only ever made weaker consoles...wait???

genfactor
SNES was weaker than the Genesis N64 was cartridge vs. CD Rom Gamecube Weaker than PS2 and Xbox .

Um... No just... No. The SNES was more powerful than the Genesis and Turbo Grafix 16. The N64 was more powerful than the TurboDuo, Saturn and PS1. The GameCube was more powerful than the Dreamcast, PS2, and with some games like Rogue Squadron 2&3 and Resident Evil 4, proved to be almost on par with the XBOX when a skilled developer took the GC seriously. The whole "Nintendo makes weak hardware" thing is just wishful thinking invented by young gamers under the age of 30 who aren't old enough to remember the battles of earlier generations.

Im 26 thank you very much lol. Been gaming since 5:-P
Avatar image for deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20

82724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#67 deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
Member since 2006 • 82724 Posts
Because they do advance hardware, often in unexpected ways. Simple things like D-pads, shoulder buttons, analog sticks, expandable controllers, touch screens and vibrations were all unconventional hardware advancements popularized by them. Not to mention consoles like SNES, N64 and Gamecube, which were all powerhouses for their time.
Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

Great software, mediocre hardware.

Nintendo isn't advancing consoles at this point they only facilitate a way to play Nintendo games. I would love to see N games continue third party but I can't think of a compelling reason to purchase a machine that only does N games.

.

I know this Doom and Gloom thing is done to death, sorry. But I'm genuinely curious if the system brings something to the market that couldn't be accomplished by the software on other systems.

fadersdream

They have to release hardware in order to release software. Nintendo takes as long as they want to produce games. Something tells me this wouldn't go over well if they were 3rd party.

Avatar image for genfactor
genfactor

1472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#69 genfactor
Member since 2004 • 1472 Posts
[QUOTE="joojtzu"][QUOTE="genfactor"] Um... No just... No. The SNES was more powerful than the Genesis and Turbo Grafix 16. The N64 was more powerful than the TurboDuo, Saturn and PS1. The GameCube was more powerful than the Dreamcast, PS2, and with some games like Rogue Squadron 2&3 and Resident Evil 4, proved to be almost on par with the XBOX when a skilled developer took the GC seriously. The whole "Nintendo makes weak hardware" thing is just wishful thinking invented by young gamers under the age of 30 who aren't old enough to remember the battles of earlier generations.

Im 26 thank you very much lol. Been gaming since 5:-P

The veterans of this war keep getting younger and younger.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#70 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
The same reason any business continues to do something... they make money. This industry isn't about pleasing the whims of a select few self-proclaimed "hardcore" gamers who think they have "outgrown" Nintendo's "toys" and feel that only games with gratuitous violence and sex and cursing are what they "like." It's about making a product that people want to pay for... and many of Nintendo's games this generation have been the best selling of the gen. And critically acclaimed no less. Don't bother buying Nintendo's products... because Nintendo doesn't want your business anyways.
Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#71 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

Mediocre Hardware? Only the Wii was the only Nintendo system to be weaker in hardware power than the others, in the past Nintendo systems were always at the top.I buy every Nintendo system that comes out, you know why?

Because of it's exclusives, I grew up with Mario and Zelda ect... so those games are important to me, this is why people that think exclusives don't matter are full of sh!t.

Plus I have NEVER had any problems with any Nintendo system, hell even my origional NES STILL works, and that's over like 15 years old! I wish I could saythe same thing about a certain other company, who can't even release a system with a guranteed failure rate.

They should take some lessons from Nintendo on how to make a good system that's actually reliable andworks.

Not tryingto be a fanboy, but you know it's true.

Avatar image for PillyChickle
PillyChickle

745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 PillyChickle
Member since 2011 • 745 Posts

Because they sell and make them money?

Avatar image for Meinhard1
Meinhard1

6790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Meinhard1
Member since 2010 • 6790 Posts
I like their hardware.
Avatar image for crimsonman1245
crimsonman1245

4253

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 crimsonman1245
Member since 2011 • 4253 Posts

Lets see what the Wii U is capable of before deciding that they shouldnt make hardware anymore.

Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#75 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11699 Posts
[QUOTE="charizard1605"]Because they do advance hardware, often in unexpected ways. Simple things like D-pads, shoulder buttons, analog sticks, expandable controllers, touch screens and vibrations were all unconventional hardware advancements popularized by them. Not to mention consoles like SNES, N64 and Gamecube, which were all powerhouses for their time.

Don't forget wireless controllers was made very popular in console space by Nintendo.
Avatar image for dontshackzmii
dontshackzmii

6026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#76 dontshackzmii
Member since 2009 • 6026 Posts

Mediocre Hardware? Only the Wii was the only Nintendo system to be weaker in hardware power than the others, in the past Nintendo systems were always at the top.I buy every Nintendo system that comes out, you know why?

Because of it's exclusives, I grew up with Mario and Zelda ect... so those games are important to me, this is why people that think exclusives don't matter are full of sh!t.

Plus I have NEVER had any problems with any Nintendo system, hell even my origional NES STILL works, and that's over like 15 years old! I wish I could saythe same thing about a certain other company, who can't even release a system with a guranteed failure rate.

They should take some lessons from Nintendo on how to make a good system that's actually reliable andworks.

Not tryingto be a fanboy, but you know it's true.

ShadowMoses900

this

Nintendo makes one weak system and all the suden they cant make a powerful system ever again.

Avatar image for ActionRemix
ActionRemix

5640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 ActionRemix
Member since 2011 • 5640 Posts
[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"][QUOTE="charizard1605"]Because they do advance hardware, often in unexpected ways. Simple things like D-pads, shoulder buttons, analog sticks, expandable controllers, touch screens and vibrations were all unconventional hardware advancements popularized by them. Not to mention consoles like SNES, N64 and Gamecube, which were all powerhouses for their time.

Don't forget wireless controllers was made very popular in console space by Nintendo.

Yeah, I think Sony's Dualshock is the only non-Nintendo controller since the 70s that influenced future controllers, although the 360 home button kind of half-counts (big whoop).
Avatar image for Jag85
Jag85

20628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 219

User Lists: 0

#78 Jag85
Member since 2005 • 20628 Posts

For the past three decades, Nintendo has been setting the trends in console hardware. With each new generation, Nintendo always introduced controllers that revolutionized console hardware design:

NES - Joypad, D-pad

SNES - Shoulder buttons

N64 - Analog controller, expansion slots, vibrations

GameCube - Wireless controller

DS - Touch-screen control, dual-screen

Wii - Motion control

The console gaming industry, including both Sony and Microsoft, relies on Nintendo to come up with the innovations. Without Nintendo, it's highly unlikely we'll be seeing the innovations necessary to move the console gaming industry forward.

Avatar image for laus_basic
laus_basic

8300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 laus_basic
Member since 2002 • 8300 Posts

because they make money out of it

Avatar image for xOMGITSJASONx
xOMGITSJASONx

2634

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 xOMGITSJASONx
Member since 2009 • 2634 Posts

Because there consoles and name has stood the test of time. Without Nintendo consoles there wouldn't be any Playstation of Xbox probably.

Avatar image for goblaa
goblaa

19304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#81 goblaa
Member since 2006 • 19304 Posts

If it wern't for nintendo, we would just have consoles getting more and more powerful and expensive, with no new ideas or genres and we'd still be using the same two analog control forever.

Avatar image for goblaa
goblaa

19304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#82 goblaa
Member since 2006 • 19304 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

They continue to have games I want to play, thus they should continue making hardware.

3dfd

I would actually so much prefer Mario, Smash Bros, etc to come to Xbox and PS than to buy another system that I only play for 2 games

Then actaully try other wii games. You may be suprised at how good they are instead of just writing them off without playing them.

Avatar image for Tikeio
Tikeio

5332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Tikeio
Member since 2011 • 5332 Posts

[QUOTE="fadersdream"] SNES was weaker than the Genesis N64 was cartridge vs. CD Rom Gamecube Weaker than PS2Randolph
You have vision problems, go see an optometrist. I've seen fanboys post all kinds of technical on paper reasons why Genesis was stronger than SNES, and PS2 stronger than Gamecube. On paper power and abilities do not mean sh*t if no one can use it to produce results on screen when a gamer is playing a game on it. SNES games were very plainly better looking and better sounding.

The Genesis actually was more "powerful" than the SNES, in terms of processing power. But we all know which console had the superior graphics.

Genesis won with Disney's Aladdin in visuals (because it was co-developed by Disney themselves), but that's about it.

And I agree with you on the whole PS2 vs. GCN thing. Tekken 5 comes close, but I have yet to see a PS2 game that looks better than Star Fox Adventures. Hell, the majority of Wii games can't even match SFA in the graphics department.

Avatar image for nini200
nini200

11484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 nini200
Member since 2005 • 11484 Posts
[QUOTE="vtbob88"]

so let me get this right. Nintendo makes just one weaker console and now they have apparently only ever made weaker consoles...wait???

fadersdream
SNES was weaker than the Genesis N64 was cartridge vs. CD Rom Gamecube Weaker than PS2 and Xbox Gameboy weaker than Lynx, Game Gear and Nomad Gameboy advance and DS were weaker than PSP Wii weaker than 360 and PS3 I'm not Bashing Nintendo, just don't see how it would hurt the industry for them to go third party and would like to see reasons not based on Nostalgia or an undefinable "Nintendo"-ness.

Whoa wait just a second, SNES was weaker than the Genesis? I never knew that. I always thought it was the other way around and Battletoads/Double Dragon and TMNT: Tournament Fighters proved that. I'm going to go and look this info up. You've piqued my interest.
Avatar image for p3anut
p3anut

6636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 p3anut
Member since 2005 • 6636 Posts

[QUOTE="ActionRemix"][QUOTE="fadersdream"]SNES was weaker than the Genesis N64 was cartridge vs. CD Rom Gamecube Weaker than PS2 and Xboxfadersdream
SNES > Genesis N64 > PS1 Gamecube > PS2 Wii U > Xbox 1080

no they weren't. Best you have is N64 was better than the Saturn(without a meg cartridge and because it was two stacked processors), and Gamecube was better than the dreamcast. The N64 had an intense amount of power but that was only to because that level of power was needed to run a cartridge based system.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qz0LbKpZtI

Avatar image for goblaa
goblaa

19304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#86 goblaa
Member since 2006 • 19304 Posts

[QUOTE="Randolph"][QUOTE="fadersdream"] SNES was weaker than the Genesis N64 was cartridge vs. CD Rom Gamecube Weaker than PS2Tikeio

You have vision problems, go see an optometrist. I've seen fanboys post all kinds of technical on paper reasons why Genesis was stronger than SNES, and PS2 stronger than Gamecube. On paper power and abilities do not mean sh*t if no one can use it to produce results on screen when a gamer is playing a game on it. SNES games were very plainly better looking and better sounding.

The Genesis actually was more "powerful" than the SNES, in terms of processing power. But we all know which console had the superior graphics.

Genesis won with Disney's Aladdin in visuals (because it was co-developed by Disney themselves), but that's about it.

And I agree with you on the whole PS2 vs. GCN thing. Tekken 5 comes close, but I have yet to see a PS2 game that looks better than Star Fox Adventures. Hell, the majority of Wii games can't even match SFA in the graphics department.

I don't care what the difference in power was, Genesis games sounded awful compared the SNES games.

Avatar image for Tikeio
Tikeio

5332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 Tikeio
Member since 2011 • 5332 Posts

[QUOTE="Tikeio"]

[QUOTE="Randolph"] You have vision problems, go see an optometrist. I've seen fanboys post all kinds of technical on paper reasons why Genesis was stronger than SNES, and PS2 stronger than Gamecube. On paper power and abilities do not mean sh*t if no one can use it to produce results on screen when a gamer is playing a game on it. SNES games were very plainly better looking and better sounding.goblaa

The Genesis actually was more "powerful" than the SNES, in terms of processing power. But we all know which console had the superior graphics.

Genesis won with Disney's Aladdin in visuals (because it was co-developed by Disney themselves), but that's about it.

And I agree with you on the whole PS2 vs. GCN thing. Tekken 5 comes close, but I have yet to see a PS2 game that looks better than Star Fox Adventures. Hell, the majority of Wii games can't even match SFA in the graphics department.

I don't care what the difference in power was, Genesis games sounded awful compared the SNES games.

Yes? I don't believe that I've stated otherwise. :P

Most Genesis games had horrible sound effects, but when it came to music, some games sounded better than others. Mega Turrican, Disney's Aladdin, Sonic 2/3 & Knuckles are good examples of Genesis games with awesome music imo.

Avatar image for madsnakehhh
madsnakehhh

18368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#88 madsnakehhh
Member since 2007 • 18368 Posts

[QUOTE="vtbob88"]

so let me get this right. Nintendo makes just one weaker console and now they have apparently only ever made weaker consoles...wait???

fadersdream

SNES was weaker than the GenesisN64 was cartridge vs. CD Rom Gamecube Weaker than PS2 and Xbox Gameboy weaker than Lynx, Game Gear and Nomad Gameboy advance and DS were weaker than PSP Wii weaker than 360 and PS3 I'm not Bashing Nintendo, just don't see how it would hurt the industry for them to go third party and would like to see reasons not based on Nostalgia or an undefinable "Nintendo"-ness.

rarity

One of the stupidest things i've ever read in this forums...yes, it is THAT stupid.

Avatar image for Another48hours
Another48hours

1970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#89 Another48hours
Member since 2012 • 1970 Posts

Mediocre Hardware? Only the Wii was the only Nintendo system to be weaker in hardware power than the others, in the past Nintendo systems were always at the top.I buy every Nintendo system that comes out, you know why?

Because of it's exclusives, I grew up with Mario and Zelda ect... so those games are important to me, this is why people that think exclusives don't matter are full of sh!t.

Plus I have NEVER had any problems with any Nintendo system, hell even my origional NES STILL works, and that's over like 15 years old! I wish I could saythe same thing about a certain other company, who can't even release a system with a guranteed failure rate.

They should take some lessons from Nintendo on how to make a good system that's actually reliable andworks.

Not tryingto be a fanboy, but you know it's true.

ShadowMoses900
Always at the top? What drugs were you taking? I mean their games are fine but hardware at the top?
Avatar image for Another48hours
Another48hours

1970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#90 Another48hours
Member since 2012 • 1970 Posts
[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"][QUOTE="charizard1605"]Because they do advance hardware, often in unexpected ways. Simple things like D-pads, shoulder buttons, analog sticks, expandable controllers, touch screens and vibrations were all unconventional hardware advancements popularized by them. Not to mention consoles like SNES, N64 and Gamecube, which were all powerhouses for their time.

Don't forget wireless controllers was made very popular in console space by Nintendo.

Shoukder buttons aren't big, Wireless would have happened any way even if they didn't do it almost no one brought Wavebirds, Expandable controllers are good? Touch Screen they did not do, D-pads hey did not do, Analog stciks they did not do. Vibrations? Really? Also SNES was not powerhouse compared to it's expensive competition. The nly thing they popularize don the list was expandable and Touch Screen, but they didn't advance them.
Avatar image for Another48hours
Another48hours

1970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#91 Another48hours
Member since 2012 • 1970 Posts

For the past three decades, Nintendo has been setting the trends in console hardware. With each new generation, Nintendo always introduced controllers that revolutionized console hardware design:

NES - Joypad, D-pad

SNES - Shoulder buttons

N64 - Analog controller, expansion slots, vibrations

GameCube - Wireless controller

DS - Touch-screen control, dual-screen

Wii - Motion control

The console gaming industry, including both Sony and Microsoft, relies on Nintendo to come up with the innovations. Without Nintendo, it's highly unlikely we'll be seeing the innovations necessary to move the console gaming industry forward.

Jag85
NES- No they didn't, No they didn't SNES- Partially N64- No they didn't, ?, No they didn't. Gamecube- No they didn't DS- No they didn't, they already introduced this before with the G&W. Wii- no they didn't. No they don't you have no idea what yu are talking about Nintendo has either been on par with the industry (consoles) or holding it back (Handhelds) hardware wise. They have almost never actually helped move the gaming world forward, they either are given credit for it by people who have no idea what they are talking about, or popularized it. period.
Avatar image for Pray_to_me
Pray_to_me

4041

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 Pray_to_me
Member since 2011 • 4041 Posts

Nintendo makes hardware because they know the losers who love Pokemon and Yugioh will buy it just to get their fix.

Take any game on Wii and you'll see a game that couldve just as easily been done on on PS3 or 360 with better graphics. Heck even the dreamcast could handle most Wii games the graphics are so dated.

The Wii U could be a Super Nintendo with a tablet and Nintendo's weird fanbase would still defend it to the death. They think Nintendo is their friend.

Avatar image for Planeforger
Planeforger

20079

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#93 Planeforger
Member since 2004 • 20079 Posts

[QUOTE="Jag85"]

NES - Joypad, D-pad

SNES - Shoulder buttons

N64 - Analog controller, expansion slots, vibrations

GameCube - Wireless controller

DS - Touch-screen control, dual-screen

Wii - Motion control

Another48hours

NES- No they didn't, No they didn't SNES- Partially N64- No they didn't, ?, No they didn't. Gamecube- No they didn't DS- No they didn't, they already introduced this before with the G&W. Wii- no they didn't. No they don't you have no idea what yu are talking about Nintendo has either been on par with the industry (consoles) or holding it back (Handhelds) hardware wise. They have almost never actually helped move the gaming world forward, they either are given credit for it by people who have no idea what they are talking about, or popularized it. period.

I'm curious now - if Nintendo didn't invent, popularise or standardise those improvements, who did?

Although I must say, if next gen's controllers are identical to those of the previous two gens, I'll be extremely disappointed in Microsoft and Sony. Stagnation ahoy!

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#94 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts
Money
Avatar image for Another48hours
Another48hours

1970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#95 Another48hours
Member since 2012 • 1970 Posts

[QUOTE="Another48hours"][QUOTE="Jag85"]

NES - Joypad, D-pad

SNES - Shoulder buttons

N64 - Analog controller, expansion slots, vibrations

GameCube - Wireless controller

DS - Touch-screen control, dual-screen

Wii - Motion control

Planeforger

NES- No they didn't, No they didn't SNES- Partially N64- No they didn't, ?, No they didn't. Gamecube- No they didn't DS- No they didn't, they already introduced this before with the G&W. Wii- no they didn't. No they don't you have no idea what yu are talking about Nintendo has either been on par with the industry (consoles) or holding it back (Handhelds) hardware wise. They have almost never actually helped move the gaming world forward, they either are given credit for it by people who have no idea what they are talking about, or popularized it. period.

I'm curious now - if Nintendo didn't invent, popularise or standardise those improvements, who did?

Although I must say, if next gen's controllers are identical to those of the previous two gens, I'll be extremely disappointed in Microsoft and Sony. Stagnation ahoy!

The very next post right next to the one you quoted and you couldn't read it???
Avatar image for Mario1331
Mario1331

8929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#96 Mario1331
Member since 2005 • 8929 Posts

because they dominate both parts

Avatar image for helwa1988
helwa1988

2157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 helwa1988
Member since 2007 • 2157 Posts
Because they are not idiots. And their consoles are under powered so what? They have quality 1st party games. Not everyone is a graphics whore. Anyways the wii u will be pretty powerful.
Avatar image for PsychoLemons
PsychoLemons

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 PsychoLemons
Member since 2011 • 3183 Posts

Because they felt like it.

Avatar image for nervmeister
nervmeister

15377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 nervmeister
Member since 2005 • 15377 Posts
Business-wise, consoles are obviously making Ninty money, so why stop making em'? Games-wise, Ninty's first party elite (Zelda, Mario, Metroid, etc.) are still fun. Unless of course we adhere to the SW doctrine that graphics/sales = fun.
Avatar image for Blade8Aus
Blade8Aus

1819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 Blade8Aus
Member since 2006 • 1819 Posts

Because they make a profit on the hardware and because they design the hardware around the software they want to make, instead of the other way around. It's worked very well for them.