Why so much hate for Resistance 2?

  • 76 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for dvalo9
dvalo9

1301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 dvalo9
Member since 2010 • 1301 Posts

Alot of the it's mentioned here it is always being slated, it got solid reviews and anyone i know who played it enjoyed it. Why so much hate for Resistance 2 here?

Avatar image for tagyhag
tagyhag

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 tagyhag
Member since 2007 • 15874 Posts
Aside from its weapons, it felt very generic. The campaign was meh. The multiplayer was great. And Nathan was a horrible protagonist.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#3 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

Campaign is considered trash, has bad graphics acording to some, missing things from the 1st, the multiplayer saved it though.

Avatar image for AmayaPapaya
AmayaPapaya

9029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#4 AmayaPapaya
Member since 2008 • 9029 Posts

I like the game a lot. IDK why I do though. I shouldn't like it because I don't like many other FPS' out there.

Avatar image for NoobisMaxcimus
NoobisMaxcimus

2893

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 NoobisMaxcimus
Member since 2007 • 2893 Posts

Crap compared to the first.

Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#6 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts
The campaign put me to sleep but the co-op, that was amazing, the competitive multiplayer too.
Avatar image for finalstar2007
finalstar2007

27952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#7 finalstar2007
Member since 2008 • 27952 Posts

Resistance was my first multiplayer game on PS3. never hated on it. its pretty good so im hoping for part 3 soon

Avatar image for GreenGoblin2099
GreenGoblin2099

16988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 GreenGoblin2099
Member since 2004 • 16988 Posts

I like the game TBH... can't say it's a PoS, but when it comes to the narrative of the game, it came out as a Halo clone when RFoM had what I think it was a better story telling.

Oh yeah, and the boss fights were really disappointed, specially the Leviathan.

Avatar image for MrJack3690
MrJack3690

2227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 MrJack3690
Member since 2004 • 2227 Posts

No Split Screen Campaign like in R1

Other than that I loved it, the campaign was fun, (at least the bosses) some of the firefights could have been better, as well as sniping missions, Multiplayer was fun for a while too

Avatar image for fastr
fastr

2100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 fastr
Member since 2010 • 2100 Posts
If its anything like the first one I understand. I'll be staying away from the second. Pretty generic, bad AI, bad story, well just bad everything.
Avatar image for devious742
devious742

3924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 devious742
Member since 2003 • 3924 Posts

I enjoyed it very much.. as a matter of fact I was going to buy it the other day but ended up getting uncharted 2... heck I might go get it again:P

I loved the sp, coop and MP.. it felt like a complete package

Avatar image for EdenProxy
EdenProxy

1561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 EdenProxy
Member since 2010 • 1561 Posts

Cool weapons. But very boring characters.

Heck the characters in the first where MUCH BETTER. :( i missed them

Avatar image for monson21502
monson21502

8230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 monson21502
Member since 2009 • 8230 Posts

Alot of the it's mentioned here it is always being slated, it got solid reviews and anyone i know who played it enjoyed it. Why so much hate for Resistance 2 here?

dvalo9

i say alot of bad things about sony and their exclusives because my 60 gig broke. but i must admit i liked res 2 better then kz3 **edit crapkz2 lol: dam,n psp version threw me off:x **and uncharted 2

Avatar image for tomarlyn
tomarlyn

20148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#14 tomarlyn
Member since 2005 • 20148 Posts
It seems like nobody can agree about whats wrong with it. I was thinking about getting it until I saw the amount of hate here. Although I wasn't exactly crazy about the demo for R1.
Avatar image for nZiFFLe
nZiFFLe

1481

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 nZiFFLe
Member since 2009 • 1481 Posts

I liked the coop and the MP was good as well. Aside from that, it was very disappointing; campaign was horrid. The first one was much better. Hopefully R3 (if it's announced) combines the best elements of the first two.

Avatar image for ianuilliam
ianuilliam

4955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 ianuilliam
Member since 2006 • 4955 Posts

I had fun playing the campaign, but the co-op was pure awesome.

Avatar image for TSNAKE617
TSNAKE617

5494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 TSNAKE617
Member since 2008 • 5494 Posts

It seems like nobody can agree about whats wrong with it. I was thinking about getting it until I saw the amount of hate here. Although I wasn't exactly crazy about the demo for R1.tomarlyn

Generic campaign, great multiplayer, amazing weapons. That's a summary.

Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10934 Posts

If its anything like the first one I understand. I'll be staying away from the second. Pretty generic, bad AI, bad story, well just bad everything. fastr
it had one of the best multiplayer layout around.

Avatar image for fastr
fastr

2100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 fastr
Member since 2010 • 2100 Posts

[QUOTE="fastr"]If its anything like the first one I understand. I'll be staying away from the second. Pretty generic, bad AI, bad story, well just bad everything. ermacness

it had one of the best multiplayer layout around.

I have a 360 too, if I want to play online it'll be gears 1 or halo 3, or even MW2
Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10934 Posts

[QUOTE="ermacness"]

[QUOTE="fastr"]If its anything like the first one I understand. I'll be staying away from the second. Pretty generic, bad AI, bad story, well just bad everything. fastr

it had one of the best multiplayer layout around.

I have a 360 too, if I want to play online it'll be gears 1 or halo 3, or even MW2

What was the point of this post?:|

Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

Well I loved it, but there where somethings I hated.

1. They ditched the Scifi horror WW2 atmosphere of R1, for 50's/cold war space invaders atmosphere.

2. So few weapons online/or offline. Your ******** Insomniac games, I expect 20+ (I want 30+) mind blowingly awesome scifi weapons. Not just over 10 guns, with most of them being the standard shooter weapons (assault rifle with grenade launcher, mini gun, shotgun, sniper rifle, ectect)

3. The bosses where well designed, but the fights were not. Most of the boss fights were dull and boring.

Avatar image for fastr
fastr

2100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 fastr
Member since 2010 • 2100 Posts

[QUOTE="fastr"][QUOTE="ermacness"]it had one of the best multiplayer layout around.

ermacness

I have a 360 too, if I want to play online it'll be gears 1 or halo 3, or even MW2

What was the point of this post?:|

You are the one who said to me it's good online, and i'm simply telling you it's not as good as other options I have, or that are out there.Pretty obvious isn't it? Just a response to what you said.
Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10934 Posts

[QUOTE="ermacness"]

[QUOTE="fastr"] I have a 360 too, if I want to play online it'll be gears 1 or halo 3, or even MW2fastr

What was the point of this post?:|

You are the one who said to me it's good online, and i'm simply telling you it's not as good as other options I have, or that are out there.Pretty obvious isn't it? Just a response to what you said.

Actually, R2 online is WAY more stable than any of those game you mentioned, and many would agree that R2 online multiplayer on a technical side of things best MW2 and Gears 1 by a landslide. What you may consider "better" may not be for me. While i like Halo 3 multiplayer, and may find MW2 multiplayer very addictive, Gears 1 multiplayer on the other hand was atrocious and bested by far with R2's multiplayer.

Avatar image for fastr
fastr

2100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 fastr
Member since 2010 • 2100 Posts

[QUOTE="fastr"][QUOTE="ermacness"]What was the point of this post?:|

ermacness

You are the one who said to me it's good online, and i'm simply telling you it's not as good as other options I have, or that are out there.Pretty obvious isn't it? Just a response to what you said.

Actually, R2 online is WAY more stable than any of those game you mentioned, and many would agree that R2 online multiplayer on a technical side of things best MW2 and Gears 1 by a landslide. What you may consider "better" may not be for me. While i like Halo 3 multiplayer, and may find MW2 multiplayer very addictive, Gears 1 multiplayer on the other hand was atrocious and bested by far with R2's multiplayer.

Exactly as you said, just because you think the R2 multiplayer was better doesn't mean I do. Gears 1 is by far the best multiplayer experience to be had. I still put it in some times for a couple rounds even tho it's years old and other great MP games have come out.
Avatar image for Basinboy
Basinboy

14558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#25 Basinboy
Member since 2003 • 14558 Posts

First, not all people who played it liked it (I being one). That said, I think R2 gets a bad rap because the strides it tried to take forward didn't work and the central design model of the game was altered which changed the experience from the first. R1, IMO, was loads better than R2 as a result of better storytelling and better controls in general. The MP options in R2, however, were better, but the gameplay still taints the well.

Avatar image for AsadMahdi59
AsadMahdi59

7226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#26 AsadMahdi59
Member since 2005 • 7226 Posts

I like the campaign. MP is alright and I dislike Co-op

Lack of vehicles,weaker storyand weak boss battles heldthe campaignback from surpassing RFoM's.

Avatar image for Magik85
Magik85

1078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Magik85
Member since 2009 • 1078 Posts
I like R2 more than KZ2...really underrated game IMO
Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts
It's a mediocre shooter. It isn't terrible, it's just that people overrate the hell out of it.
Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts

The campaign had SO much potential and opportunity to be better than it was. Seriously, passing over the whole initial invasion of the mainland USA, which was what all the previews and trailers were going on and on about, and giving us a 'years later' text? That is beyond lame.

Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#30 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

I don't hate it, I actually played it quite a bit, but where I think it gets a lot of hate is it's boring campaign and its competitive MP that tries really hard to be like Halo and Call of Duty at the same time, but never really excels at being either of them. The Online Co-op is really where its at on that game

Avatar image for SilverChimera
SilverChimera

9256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#31 SilverChimera
Member since 2009 • 9256 Posts

The campaign had SO much potential and opportunity to be better than it was. Seriously, passing over the whole initial invasion of the mainland USA, which was what all the previews and trailers were going on and on about, and giving us a 'years later' text? That is beyond lame.

Verge_6
Yea it was a major letdown as far as campaign is considered. I loved the mutliplayer though. Co-op is a blast.
Avatar image for Ziek-AAT
Ziek-AAT

717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Ziek-AAT
Member since 2008 • 717 Posts

Co-op was pretty much the only thing going for it. Campaign had some decent moments but could've been better (wasted potential for the boss fights, stupid AI, only able to carry 2 guns, etc.). It's basically a letdown compared to R1.

Avatar image for DJChuy
DJChuy

1851

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#33 DJChuy
Member since 2010 • 1851 Posts

Campaign was dull & generic. I like the scale/designs of the bosses, and I was expecting some epic fight between them. But they were very disappointing. This first boss was this huge robot thing, and the way to defeat him was by waiting 'til he turned his back on you so you can shoot him with rockets. There's another boss where you just shoot two rockets to end the battle. And there's another one where you have to run around and lure him into a trap. The boss fights were disappointing for the most part.

Weapons placement was awful and killed a lot of the suspense. If you saw a rocket on the floor, you'll know a titan was going to come out.

Co-op was very repetitive & dull. Go to objective and fight waves of chimeras. Repeat 'til the mission is over. It got old very fast. The MP was pretty good though.

Avatar image for Deathtransit
Deathtransit

3086

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Deathtransit
Member since 2007 • 3086 Posts
The campaign was stupid, just set pieces and no story whatsoever. R1 was much better.
Avatar image for deactivated-61cc564148ef4
deactivated-61cc564148ef4

10909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 deactivated-61cc564148ef4
Member since 2007 • 10909 Posts

I never hated it. Nor did I love it

Avatar image for acasero44
acasero44

437

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 acasero44
Member since 2010 • 437 Posts

Sold it on ebay for7 dollars that shows how much people are willing to pay for this thrash game.

"2 weapons make it more tactical and fun" quote from Sony fanboy

GTFOH!@!@! Have you ever hear of the MORE THE MERRIER.

"The multiplayer is amazing" quote from Sony fanboy

Yeah if you never want to rank up and remain level 1 playing on dedicated servers. It is good but nothing revolutionazing, the ranked multiplayer on the other hand is the MOST UNFAIR system ive ever witnessed in my life. I could never kill a single person. Well i did like twice but died 20 times in the process AND its not BECAUSE I SUCK.

if you actually played the ranked multiplayer youll notice a bunch of people fully maxed out with best armor and weapons against a commando soldier like myself. Takes 4 to 5 shotguns in the head to kill such players whenI only take a single hit and im dead. I quit after the 2nd day. Too many generals tankers feeding off the nooblets.

"Singleplayer storyline is very compelling" quote from Sony fanboy

Right.... because the aliens(chimera) jumped from Russia to America without warning and now its fully invaded. The explanation of such events give little to NONE detail.

These fanboys get the highest votes with their biased reviews but when it comes down to playing with them online. You find them playing a multiplatform like MW2. Hmmm Hypocricy much? If you ever bump to this game dont get it. Get Resistance 1 which is still a much better version.

Avatar image for General_X
General_X

9137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 General_X
Member since 2003 • 9137 Posts
It was pretty ho-hum, the hate probably stems from people who were expecting more from it, really I don't think anyone else cares about it.
Avatar image for VendettaRed07
VendettaRed07

14012

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#38 VendettaRed07
Member since 2007 • 14012 Posts

Terrible campaign. It was SUPER rushed, it had awful graphics and the effects where even worse. Normal bad graphics like that dont really bother me but to me everything about it just screamed either lazy or unfinished.. like some things in the campaign like when you were ontop of a tower and you looked down and there is just a google maps picture pasted on the ground you are just like um WTF IS THAT...

It got rid of good aspects of the first game like its health system and being able to hold multiple weapons at a time. Seriously the first resistance was a great game I have no idea why they felt the need to change so many basic things about it to try and make it more like halo. They should have built off the original more, like one of the biggest reasons I loved the first one was because I had all these weapons that did all this crazy stuff that I could play around with and kill guys and I always had access to pretty much all my weapons... Resistance 2 doesnt let you do that it says heres bullseye, and well throw you a rocket launcher once or twice and thats all you get..

And the multiplayer was awful as well... Terrible, terrible map and just over all game design... Too many people, its retarded, it took all the skill out of the game and matches just turned into one giant mess to the point where there were so many people its almost like the individual player didnt even matter anymore, You had really no control or impact over who would really win in bigger 60 match games. And there was really nothing tactical or anything about the gameplay either it was just hectic. The maps were huge, and there were only like 5 or 6 of them. And even one the smaller variations of the maps the game was still just bad.. The weapon load out + skill thing was a terrible idea, again not only changing the game to be more like Halo, but to be more like Call of Duty as well.. Hey insomniac how about making your series unique huh?.. Seriously wtf, you cant just take ideas that other shooters used recently, put them in your new game and call it a sequel.. Do something original jesus....

All they needed to do was expand on the first game and what made that alot of fun. Good interesting narrative/story, tons of crazy weapons to kill guys with and fast furious, yet balanced multiplayer. Instead they just said, screw the story and campaign, well just make it more colorful, take ideas from COD and Halo, and call it a day

Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts
campaign..... gave hale a voice .. generic character... multiplayer was meh in my opinion i dont know how people liked it...im still looking forward to Resistance 3 though
Avatar image for deactivated-66e3137ab3ad5
deactivated-66e3137ab3ad5

16761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#40 deactivated-66e3137ab3ad5
Member since 2006 • 16761 Posts
Because people hate it.
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

I have no idea either its one of the few ps3 games I thoroughly enjoyed, I loved its online component and 8 player coop, its story was great, it was a superior game compared to resistance 1. resistance 1 was a n64 game in reality when I first came upon a bush in that game and realized it was 2 2d textures set in a cross formation and scripted to turn with my view of them a technique I first saw in mario 64....

I loved resistance 2, I cant wait for 3.

Avatar image for dkjestrup
dkjestrup

1214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 dkjestrup
Member since 2007 • 1214 Posts
If its anything like the first one I understand. I'll be staying away from the second. Pretty generic, bad AI, bad story, well just bad everything. fastr
Are you calling Fall of Man bad? Seriously one of the best single players I've played on a shooter. Was hard but not cheap, great enemies, weapons, level design. Great, intriguing story with good presentation (I found it very fitting).
Avatar image for Tessellation
Tessellation

9297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Tessellation
Member since 2009 • 9297 Posts
game has horrible single player / graphics,multiplayer is fun.
Avatar image for DethSkematik
DethSkematik

3900

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 117

User Lists: 0

#44 DethSkematik
Member since 2008 • 3900 Posts
Personally, I was just disappointed in it. I liked the first one a lot, so it was strange that I didn't click with the second one...the campaign just felt like it was going nowhere (tons of action, but most of the time it felt like I wasn't going anywhere with the story :?). Other than some really awesome set pieces, most of the game was just a blur to me.
Avatar image for great1985
great1985

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 great1985
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
I love the second one and hated the first one.
Avatar image for edinsftw
edinsftw

4243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 edinsftw
Member since 2009 • 4243 Posts

Its boring, linear, repetetive, a bad storyline, bad guns, console fps.

Avatar image for deactivated-66e3137ab3ad5
deactivated-66e3137ab3ad5

16761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#47 deactivated-66e3137ab3ad5
Member since 2006 • 16761 Posts

Its boring, linear, repetetive, a bad storyline, bad guns, console fps.

edinsftw
Who're you talking to, man? :?
Avatar image for reiv
reiv

1038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 reiv
Member since 2008 • 1038 Posts
Campaign was pretty good. I didn't really get into the competitive multiplayer but I loved the co-op, especially when everyone works as a unit.
Avatar image for 3rdbass
3rdbass

3301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 3rdbass
Member since 2009 • 3301 Posts

I actually liked it better than the first(better campaign though shorter), and better graphics. It sucks that it didn't have co-op offline for campaign like the first but the co-op online is great. I know a lot of people also complain about getting rid of the weapons wheel.

Avatar image for ianuilliam
ianuilliam

4955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 ianuilliam
Member since 2006 • 4955 Posts

I actually liked it better than the first(better campaign though shorter), and better graphics. It sucks that it didn't have co-op offline like the first but the co-op online is great. I know a lot of people also complain about getting rid of the weapons wheel.

3rdbass

You can play R2's co-op mode 2p splitscreen offline if you want. It's hard as hell with only 2 players, but that makes it kind of fun at the same time. The first time me and a buddy beat Chicago with only a soldier and spec ops, I had to jump up out of my chair and proclaim my godliness.