[QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"]Seriously, the PS3 is a disaster in terms of gaming. It succeeded in doing what it was built to do though, which is defeat HD-DVD. So I'm sure that Sony is happy with their crappy Blu-Ray war weapon...acemasta21
@-GeordiLaForge- ps3s capable of way more than 360 please try and prove me wrong are you a developer?
[QUOTE="-GeordiLaForge-"]Seriously, the PS3 is a disaster in terms of gaming. It succeeded in doing what it was built to do though, which is defeat HD-DVD. So I'm sure that Sony is happy with their crappy Blu-Ray war weapon...acemasta21
@-GeordiLaForge- ps3s capable of way more than 360 please try and prove me wrong Maybe you should prove the PS3 IS more capable. So far Exclusive only prove which company has better developers, more resorces spent and the most time spent on those games. Multiplats given the same amount of time, resorces and the same devs prove the 360 is every bit as capable as the PS3.
You must only be talking about Sony's lineup for this year right? Because last time I checked, 360 had many, many more exclusives.
"Many, many more exclusives" is quite the exageration. By my last count the 360 has only 6 more overall exclusives in it's library and had been out for a year longer than PS3. Both are also pretty much tied in AAAE and 360 still does not have a AAAAE.
My point is the false perception out there that still exists regarding the libraries of games is still often exagerated by 360 owners. PS3's 2008-2009 has been better.
this is the bottom line: xbox 360: 19 AAA PS3: 20 AAA ps3 has more, in shorter time, case closed. doesnt mean its better or worse, I prefer my 360 for multiplats but still like my ps3 for bluray, and the sony 1st party titles. so my 360 gets more playtime but primarily because of the multiplat quality discrepancy
comparitively. 400 dollars for a failbox is quite high considering it has inferior versions of most games, a ps1 controlleer, a poor online service, a 15 year old joypad, no third party exclusives, none of the 360/pc multiplats, load times and forced installs it's the worst console this gen, biggest failure this gen
250 dollars for a failbox without HD support, crappy online, no ps360/pc multiplatform games, a waggle controller, crappy online, last gen graphics, it's the worst console this gen, biggest failure this gen. that's a massive price tag IMO
comparitively. 400 dollars for a failbox is quite high considering it has inferior versions of most games, a ps1 controlleer, a poor online service, a 15 year old joypad, no third party exclusives, none of the 360/pc multiplats, load times and forced installs it's the worst console this gen, biggest failure this gen
250 dollars for a failbox without HD support, crappy online, no ps360/pc multiplatform games, a waggle controller, crappy online, last gen graphics, it's the worst console this gen, biggest failure this gen. that's a massive price tag IMO
Shouldn't be like $200, maybe a little less. And the Wii has less AAAs than 360 and PS3.
Log in to comment