Wii all (finally) agree the Wii u is dead right?

  • 135 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for TigerSuperman
TigerSuperman

4331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Edited By TigerSuperman

Poll Wii all (finally) agree the Wii u is dead right? (136 votes)

Yes, it's dead, tracking below saturn, may not even reach that number sold through by 2016. 51%
No, it still has a chance to turn it around. 49%

The Wii u is an interesting story and all the mistakes have been talked about to death, but there are STILL people, yes, STILL people who say they can turn things around. people don't see to realize how dire the situation the Wii U physically and financially.

The Wii U HAD been tracking behind the gamecube for awhile, and while people still say that, saying it now seems more like DC for the Wii u. It ended up tracking behind the Dreamcast and got to the point of tracking behind the Saturn. It's actually a wonder if the Wii u will sell 2 million units before the next console which will likely be announced (and drown out whatever few Wii u sales there are ) in 2016.

not only that, they still can't reduce the price/ditch the gamepad/make a separate sku without the gamepad/go the multi game bundle route becauswe they literally have no more options unless they have a chance at a risk having a decent chance of success.

The Wii U's 2013 was pretty bad after the initial succes. People think it picked up now, and I have no idea why people are saying that, with a barrage of popular entries in FP franchisees, remakes, a ton of indies, and of course, Bundles, they literally made their 2014 year pretty much track almost even. it Slightly went up year over year and this was the Halo 3 of the Wii U's life going by games, deals, bundles etc.

The holiday sales were actually 'worse' than last holidays (going by GFK and NPD anyway) overall, and that also came with their Super Smash Bros push. Nitnendo literally has no other moves, you could say that they could cut the price and take the risk for market share, but the Wii u is still a money vacuum. They could barely have any black Friday deals. it's why those refurbished units for $200 kept selling out. But you know Nintendo cannot afford to use that price on sku's on the street. But it shows that a price drop at around $250 but mostly $199 is Nintendos only way of getting the market share, but they would lose triple the money. That bet is insane, and it's already too late for them to make it. If it was sometime last year (well, 2013) or maybe, maybe, early early, 2014, then maybe. But right now the lossese have piled up and then already wasted all their potential market reviving games. So they can no longer take a risk, because now they will be taking more losses without the ability to claim they grabbed back lost market share.

The only thing Nintendo has left outside of a couple new Ips, is a sequel to Xenoblade, Zelda, Firefox, and maybe a few other unknowns in 2015. Already we have tons of Mario, 2 Zelda, a couple original games, Pikmins revival, a bunch of family games, Super Smash bros. Mario Kart, a Kirby (if not mistaken), Donkey kong, etc. I mean what do they have to increase 2015 over 2014? or even stay with it in pace (even barely)?

So now you got one other excuse, the 3DS can cover it. and the answer is simple. no it can't. The 3DS isn't doing that well outside Japan, and 3DS had quite a few of the Wii U's mistakes as well (name a little, promise of western games, than dropping them after the first few, price, game selection, etc.) and they cut that 3DS price in desperation (and they needed to because without a portable support the Nintendo would be losing money on all fronts, that among other things) and because of that was able to get marketshare at the expense of taking losses for awhile.

In comparison, the GBA was launched outdated as most nintendo handhelds, with a low price tag, high attach rate, cheap games, and was printing money. The Gamecube while a disaster, was able to be recovered by the GBA's profits, which amde it so that the Gamecube could go into firesale status after they had stopped shipments for poor sales. Still not much profits but they avoided heavy casualties.

the 3DS can not do this, it's barely a player itself, it does not "print money" as people keep saying. in japan yeah sure, otherwise, uh no, not the way the people saying it keep implying.

Well tiger, what about the Amiibo they say? AMIIBO? Well there's this theory that it's making Nintendo a lot of money when in reality all it has done is maybe cover some Wii u losses and their questionable strategy of low shipments to inflate demand are a litt uh, weird.

Now i will say Amiibo, among one other thing, is was actually put out to try and get nintendo into another pot. Which they really do need. I also think it will be an important part of the new console and was only really put out now to try and prevent any issues from the 3DS and Wii u sales not reaching expectations. But the lack of implementation also makes it 100% clear that outside of making some extra profits, Amiibo won't be helping make it possible to drop the Wii U $100 or so dollars, or to cover all of their losses, or even really to move much hardware. As shown during the holidays. unless DEC NPD and GFK have surprise numbers we don't see.

I mean i still don't see how anyone could think they can turn it around. Wii u is not moving and is already being taken off the shelves or barely mentioned in multiple countries, people keep thinking it will turn around to be profitable, uh, no it won't and when the new console comes out you're going to have wasted unsold SKu's probably buy backs (which has already happened) and of course other issue. heck the Wii u's struggling to sstay on shelves cost nintendo money. So wtf is this magical turn around supposed to come from?

I mean people even think the Wii U will somehow reach near the gamecube numbers or still have a chance to reach it. The Wii U's going take, if it makes it at all in 2015, to reach 10 million sold through by the last few months of 2015. and that's assuming it reached 10 million sold-through.

I don't know if I'm missing anything but i hope I painted a concrete picture. The nest console will have to start out with a console with cut and declining marketshare. Even the gamcube picked up. Hell people look at Xbox one and PS4 and see pick up, and good sales, the Wii U is literally dead with no hope and all it's cards played. I believe another shipping restriction like the gamecube would be the better option. Well, then again Amiibo may be able to at least help make Wii U's occupy space to create the illusion of sales to casuals in stores. Although it's not really working to well currently hmm...

 • 
Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#101 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

no

http://www.polygon.com/2014/10/30/7131525/wii-u-sales-super-smash-bros-mario-kart-8-iwata

Wii U sales skyrocket, and Nintendo expects more thanks to Super Smash Bros.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b0367b217732
deactivated-5b0367b217732

1697

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 9

#102 deactivated-5b0367b217732
Member since 2014 • 1697 Posts

@mr_huggles_dog said:

Obviously there a lot of Ninrendo fans on these boards.

I know, right? It's like swimming in shark-infested waters. Holy shit...

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#103 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

no

@GrenadeLauncher said:

I consider it to have more of a chance than the Dudbox.

Thats fucking Sarcasm right there, i love the Wii-U more than both the Xbone or the PS4 (60 quid to go) but i am under no illusion that it will end up last place in sales due to lack of substantial 3rd party support with Multiplats making up at least 90% of the games released these days thats going to be a huge issue.

I don't care, the gamecube had the best exclusives and was any fave 6th gen console but it had shit sales and the only thing stopping it coming dead last was the dreamcast bombing.

This is why i don't put Salt in unit sales over games library.

It's pretty obvious the Ps4 will be first, the Xbone second and the Wii-U last.

Stands to reason that the Number one position will probably never be held by an xbox though.

Avatar image for gamevet77
gamevet77

555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#104 gamevet77
Member since 2013 • 555 Posts

I can solve nintendo's problem and make the wiiu a pretty big success.

1. Sell it without that stupid tablet controller. This allows the unit to be priced under $200 maybe even close to $150.

2. Change the stupid name. It was idiotic when I first heard it and it's still stupid today. WiiU. Just makes you want to vomit

3. Get a real online network similiar to psn/live. As it stands the wiiu's online structure is a joke. Include a mic with the console as well for gods sake.

4. Beg, plead, even pay higher royalties to get major 3rd party support on the WiiU. Nintendo is irrelevant to most gamers cause the big games don't release on the system.

Nintendo does that they will be back in the game. They won't

Avatar image for superbuuman
superbuuman

6400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#105  Edited By superbuuman
Member since 2010 • 6400 Posts

@gamevet77 said:

I can solve nintendo's problem and make the wiiu a pretty big success.

1. Sell it without that stupid tablet controller. This allows the unit to be priced under $200 maybe even close to $150.

2. Change the stupid name. It was idiotic when I first heard it and it's still stupid today. WiiU. Just makes you want to vomit

3. Get a real online network similiar to psn/live. As it stands the wiiu's online structure is a joke. Include a mic with the console as well for gods sake.

4. Beg, plead, even pay higher royalties to get major 3rd party support on the WiiU. Nintendo is irrelevant to most gamers cause the big games don't release on the system.

Nintendo does that they will be back in the game. They won't

Even better solution...just do the best they can now, make sure people that did buy the Wii U are happy...& prepare for their next system..coming in 2017. The system is selling & its making profit...sure not selling as much as the other two..but still selling & making profit. :P

Avatar image for NathanDrakeSwag
NathanDrakeSwag

17392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106  Edited By NathanDrakeSwag
Member since 2013 • 17392 Posts

@gamevet77 said:

I can solve nintendo's problem and make the wiiu a pretty big success.

1. Sell it without that stupid tablet controller. This allows the unit to be priced under $200 maybe even close to $150.

2. Change the stupid name. It was idiotic when I first heard it and it's still stupid today. WiiU. Just makes you want to vomit

3. Get a real online network similiar to psn/live. As it stands the wiiu's online structure is a joke. Include a mic with the console as well for gods sake.

4. Beg, plead, even pay higher royalties to get major 3rd party support on the WiiU. Nintendo is irrelevant to most gamers cause the big games don't release on the system.

Nintendo does that they will be back in the game. They won't

1. It isn't a price problem. Its a bad product problem.

2. Wii was a stupid name. Adding a U isn't hurting sales.

3. Too late, Nintendo missed the boat for online gaming. Everyone is already too heavily invested into PSN/XBL to switch.

4. What good would that do? Mario's fanbase doesn't overlap with M rated third party games.

Nintendo is a niche company. They will never have the appeal of PS and XB without fads like Wii Sports.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#108 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

@gamevet77 said:

I can solve nintendo's problem and make the wiiu a pretty big success.

1. Sell it without that stupid tablet controller. This allows the unit to be priced under $200 maybe even close to $150.

2. Change the stupid name. It was idiotic when I first heard it and it's still stupid today. WiiU. Just makes you want to vomit

3. Get a real online network similiar to psn/live. As it stands the wiiu's online structure is a joke. Include a mic with the console as well for gods sake.

4. Beg, plead, even pay higher royalties to get major 3rd party support on the WiiU. Nintendo is irrelevant to most gamers cause the big games don't release on the system.

Nintendo does that they will be back in the game. They won't

  1. The tablet controller carries one of the platforms biggest features: remote play. And how do you know how much it would help them drop the price? Why would they drop the price if they drop the controller if they end up making even more profit without the tablet controller?
  2. This is just business suicide. Changing the name of a product halfway through it's life will just confuse consumers even more. You have no business or consumer sense at all. It should have been the "Wii 2".
  3. They have a real online network that works and doesn't go down on a regular basis. And you really want to listen to other random people on matchmaking services? Just use Teamspeak and talk to the people you want to.
  4. Nintendo is irrelevant to bro gamers. People who buy Nintendo games want or already have the Wii U. Nintendo doesn't need to capture third parties if their main fanbase remains loyal and buys their products. Third parties these days pass on Nintendo platforms on mere principal due to how they were treated in the past or based on how they view their demographics.
Avatar image for NathanDrakeSwag
NathanDrakeSwag

17392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 NathanDrakeSwag
Member since 2013 • 17392 Posts

@farrell2k said:

@NathanDrakeSwag said:

@gamevet77 said:

I can solve nintendo's problem and make the wiiu a pretty big success.

1. Sell it without that stupid tablet controller. This allows the unit to be priced under $200 maybe even close to $150.

2. Change the stupid name. It was idiotic when I first heard it and it's still stupid today. WiiU. Just makes you want to vomit

3. Get a real online network similiar to psn/live. As it stands the wiiu's online structure is a joke. Include a mic with the console as well for gods sake.

4. Beg, plead, even pay higher royalties to get major 3rd party support on the WiiU. Nintendo is irrelevant to most gamers cause the big games don't release on the system.

Nintendo does that they will be back in the game. They won't

1. It isn't a price problem. Its a bad product problem.

2. Wii was a stupid name. Adding a U isn't hurting sales.

3. Too late, Nintendo missed the boat for online gaming. Everyone is already too heavily invested into PSN/XBL to switch.

4. What good would that do? Mario's fanbase doesn't overlap with M rated third party games.

Nintendo is a niche company. They will never have the appeal of PS and XB without fads like Wii Sports.

Nintendo is a niche company? New Super Mario Bros Wii has outsold the entire Uncharted series (yes, every single game combined), 2 to 1.

A niche company, indeed. Ignorant, delusional cow.

Because of the legion of grandmas and soccer moms Wii Sports brought in. Gamecube and WiiU prove they are niche as a hardware maker.

Avatar image for ristactionjakso
ristactionjakso

6118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 39

User Lists: 0

#110  Edited By ristactionjakso
Member since 2011 • 6118 Posts

Well it's not dead, it's just not being treated correctly by Nintendo as a whole. Wii-U had a terrible set of launch games. It tried to sell games that most people already had on ps3/360 months/years before those games came out on Wii-U (i.e. Mass Effect 3 (not even the trilogy), Dues Ex HR, Darksiders 2) It just seems to me Nintendo cares about the 3ds a lot more and it's a shame really. I bought a Wii-U for my kid for x-mas and it's fun to play, well smash bros and mario kart is anyway. To me, the Wii-U doesn't have very many games in general. And again, to me Smash Bros, Mario Kart and Mario/Luigi Land Wii-U are the only games worth owning. Only thing I kind of fear for the Wii-U is that they are taking way to long to release Zelda. That should have been there in either the launch line of games or released withing a few months of launch. Wii-U is only failing in the games line up because they can't compete with ps4 or box1 with what they have released for now.

Avatar image for funsohng
funsohng

29976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111  Edited By funsohng
Member since 2005 • 29976 Posts

@R4gn4r0k said:

@funsohng said:

It has more life than Vita which actually means life in Latin. So yeah.

Vita's name couldn't have been more ironic.

'Life' being dead on arrival...

Representative of modern times.

Sony is genius

Avatar image for Shmiity
Shmiity

6625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#112 Shmiity
Member since 2006 • 6625 Posts

It's not looking good right now. Sales are awful. We can keep supporting Nintendo and patting it on the back, but Wii U sales are awful. Come on, 19 million PS4's in a little over a year, X1 headed in the same direction. Wii U has been out for double the amount of time.This console is going to end up in third place, and everyone knows that. But 3ds sales are very strong, and I don't agree with the TC on the 3ds. It's a big success. Sales are what, 50 million units in 3 years? Pretty good, man.

Avatar image for GrenadeLauncher
GrenadeLauncher

6843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 GrenadeLauncher
Member since 2004 • 6843 Posts

@brimmul777 said:

@GrenadeLauncher said:

I consider it to have more of a chance than the Dudbox.

Talking through your ass again.

You'll get a game soon. :)

Avatar image for GrenadeLauncher
GrenadeLauncher

6843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 GrenadeLauncher
Member since 2004 • 6843 Posts

@delta3074 Yeah, you're right. I was kinda hoping for the Wii U to take off last year because it's a good little console and deserves to do better, but hey. More people would rather have Vine apps. Sad.

Avatar image for ghostwarrior786
ghostwarrior786

5811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#115  Edited By ghostwarrior786
Member since 2005 • 5811 Posts

it doesnt matter if wii ew is tracking behind gamecube after 2 years because if u compare the average of gamecubes entire lifecycle and then compare it against wii ew first 2 years then wii ew wins. so i am expecting it to outsell gamecube

ps. i am mentally challenged, needless to say, take what i say with a grain of salt

Avatar image for TheWalkingGhost
TheWalkingGhost

6092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#116 TheWalkingGhost
Member since 2012 • 6092 Posts

Yes it's dead and Nintendo is jumping off this sinking ship!

Avatar image for deactivated-5bda06edf37ee
deactivated-5bda06edf37ee

4675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#117 deactivated-5bda06edf37ee
Member since 2010 • 4675 Posts

yes it's dead. everyone just threw them out of the window and bought another console. also all devs stopped working on the games they were making for Wii U. it's official.

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7849 Posts

You can count 2015 as the last big year for the Wii U. No way Nintendo green lights anymore AAA exclusives going forward on the Wii U.

Avatar image for emgesp
emgesp

7849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 emgesp
Member since 2004 • 7849 Posts

@farrell2k said:

@NathanDrakeSwag said:

@gamevet77 said:

I can solve nintendo's problem and make the wiiu a pretty big success.

1. Sell it without that stupid tablet controller. This allows the unit to be priced under $200 maybe even close to $150.

2. Change the stupid name. It was idiotic when I first heard it and it's still stupid today. WiiU. Just makes you want to vomit

3. Get a real online network similiar to psn/live. As it stands the wiiu's online structure is a joke. Include a mic with the console as well for gods sake.

4. Beg, plead, even pay higher royalties to get major 3rd party support on the WiiU. Nintendo is irrelevant to most gamers cause the big games don't release on the system.

Nintendo does that they will be back in the game. They won't

1. It isn't a price problem. Its a bad product problem.

2. Wii was a stupid name. Adding a U isn't hurting sales.

3. Too late, Nintendo missed the boat for online gaming. Everyone is already too heavily invested into PSN/XBL to switch.

4. What good would that do? Mario's fanbase doesn't overlap with M rated third party games.

Nintendo is a niche company. They will never have the appeal of PS and XB without fads like Wii Sports.

Nintendo is a niche company? New Super Mario Bros Wii has outsold the entire Uncharted series (yes, every single game combined), 2 to 1.

A niche company, indeed. Ignorant, delusional cow.

I hope you realize that New Super Mario Bros Wii was also bundled with a good number of Wii's. The vast majority of sales weren't for standalone units.

Avatar image for Thunderdrone
Thunderdrone

7154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 Thunderdrone
Member since 2009 • 7154 Posts

@NathanDrakeSwag said:

1. It isn't a price problem. Its a bad product problem.

2. Wii was a stupid name. Adding a U isn't hurting sales.

3. Too late, Nintendo missed the boat for online gaming. Everyone is already too heavily invested into PSN/XBL to switch.

4. What good would that do? Mario's fanbase doesn't overlap with M rated third party games.

Nintendo is a niche company. They will never have the appeal of PS and XB without fads like Wii Sports.

1. Explain. History has given us millions of instances where certain products only start moving when they reach certain price points. Why is the Wii U different and a bad product regardless of price?

2. No it was not. Wii was a fucking stroke of marketing genius. Its distinct, short, visually iconic and recognizable and easy to say in any language. People study the Wii brand in marketing classes, not because its a stupid name ;).

How mishandled the brand got near the end of the Wii's lifespan and the beginning of Wii Us is another story.

3. No one is invested in shit. It is apparent that service loyalty is not as strong as most believed, as the switch from XBL to PSN showed us. And if Nintendo keeps online free, it will make it appealing to a lot of people who don't want to pay for shit they shouldn't.

4. Prove it.

Why was Wii Sports a fad again? The launch game is still being played today by many people and it IS a landmark and a still major influence in accessible game design.

Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#121 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts

Don't think it's dead yet, but it will definitely have a short lifespan. Maybe 5-6 years. I think it will die in 2017-2018 and by then Nintendo's next console will be launched in 2016-2017. I'm still going to get one cause I want to play Super Mario 3D World, Splatoon, Xenoblade Chronicles X, Capt Toad, Mario Kart 8, Zelda, Star Fox, Pikmin, Super Smash Bros and Yoshi.

Avatar image for Nike_Air
Nike_Air

19737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123  Edited By Nike_Air
Member since 2006 • 19737 Posts

The outlook is pretty depressing -

Release dates (scroll to the bottom)-

http://www.gamefaqs.com/wii-u

I think Kotaku ran a story about the Q1 release in Japan , and that the Wii-U only has 2 games while the PS4 had 22. Can Kirby save the Wii-U? Only time will tell.

Avatar image for TigerSuperman
TigerSuperman

4331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#124 TigerSuperman
Member since 2013 • 4331 Posts

@ProtossRushX said:

@NathanDrakeSwag said:

@ProtossRushX said:

how is the WiiU dead?

tons of regular gamers are playing wiiu smashbro and the wiiU mario game

smash is like one of the most talked about games of the year how the heck is wiiU dead exactly?

gamers know what smash is an they all talked about it an played it what planet are u on where wiiU is dead man?

Its selling worse than the Dreamcast in the same time frame.

its because of the price, nintendo can sell more if they lower the price bundle in some hot new games and advertise it

maybe make a slim version of the wiiu cut back on the size of the thing make it look more snazzy

they can def market this better than they are doing put in some smash bro tv commercials

im gonna buy a wiiu just waiting for price to come down a tad nintendo needs to give people reasons to go out to the store imo do a slim model show people what it looks like on tv etc

They can't lower the price.

@Thunderdrone said:

@TigerSuperman said:

It's not profitable, sales are declining, dead means there's no hope for an increase, especially past the LTD everyone is expecting. Which some are now changing to be less than 11 million.

@TigerSuperman said:

It's NOT profitable that's nonsense talk that does not exist.

Wii U becomes profitable after consumer buys one game

Get your shit straight, TigerSuperman.

Also, learn what "profitable" means. You seem to believe its the same thing as financial targets. Its not, they are in the green right now regardless of how much better they wish they were doing.

So it's not profitable. You do realie you just proved my point> Also that's old and is no longer valid, the Wii u has been selling less and less before Amiibo and Smash 9which was not a big boost) and their losses show that the Wii U is not in a good position, why do you think they won't drop the price, throw out more bundles, or remove/ make a new SKu not involving the gamepad as an option?


Why did Nintendo bet on QOL and Amiibo? Why are Nintendo themselves hinting at Wii u support ending (no mario for now until next console is heavily hinted)

Avatar image for TigerSuperman
TigerSuperman

4331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#125 TigerSuperman
Member since 2013 • 4331 Posts

@gamevet77 said:

I can solve nintendo's problem and make the wiiu a pretty big success.

1. Sell it without that stupid tablet controller. This allows the unit to be priced under $200 maybe even close to $150.

2. Change the stupid name. It was idiotic when I first heard it and it's still stupid today. WiiU. Just makes you want to vomit

3. Get a real online network similiar to psn/live. As it stands the wiiu's online structure is a joke. Include a mic with the console as well for gods sake.

4. Beg, plead, even pay higher royalties to get major 3rd party support on the WiiU. Nintendo is irrelevant to most gamers cause the big games don't release on the system.

Nintendo does that they will be back in the game. They won't

Whcih they can't do because they are not in a financial position to do so, strong hints of support moving the the next console meaning they are prepping it with reserved costs now. Ammiibo moved but it's not as big as people thing as it's covered by the holiday curtain. Also chaing the name now would make even less sense, they are going to ride it slowly to the new console, as already hinted and seems to be happening before our eyes. they have made no massive changes.

@ristactionjakso said:

Well it's not dead, it's just not being treated correctly by Nintendo as a whole. Wii-U had a terrible set of launch games. It tried to sell games that most people already had on ps3/360 months/years before those games came out on Wii-U (i.e. Mass Effect 3 (not even the trilogy), Dues Ex HR, Darksiders 2) It just seems to me Nintendo cares about the 3ds a lot more and it's a shame really. I bought a Wii-U for my kid for x-mas and it's fun to play, well smash bros and mario kart is anyway. To me, the Wii-U doesn't have very many games in general. And again, to me Smash Bros, Mario Kart and Mario/Luigi Land Wii-U are the only games worth owning. Only thing I kind of fear for the Wii-U is that they are taking way to long to release Zelda. That should have been there in either the launch line of games or released withing a few months of launch. Wii-U is only failing in the games line up because they can't compete with ps4 or box1 with what they have released for now.

What you just said is why TP and especially western support dropped the system. The lies/promise of bringing TP especially western, and talking about the N64 9not that it means anything) had people thinking Nintendo was changing, even Developers, Nintendo went out with old games and put out partnerships or well, they reached out and really did nothing to support them, and started putting japanese third-parties instead. they did the same with the 3DS (which has nay the WTP support unlike the DS) and WTP just up and bailed after the initial first several months. it got worse as sales slumped, JTP jumped off as well. Although they still have some granted, but it was Nintendo thinking minimal effort would work and it kicked them in the pants.

@GrenadeLauncher said:

@brimmul777 said:

@GrenadeLauncher said:

I consider it to have more of a chance than the Dudbox.

Talking through your ass again.

You'll get a game soon. :)

The PS4 had games this holiday?

@ghostwarrior786 said:

it doesnt matter if wii ew is tracking behind gamecube after 2 years because if u compare the average of gamecubes entire lifecycle and then compare it against wii ew first 2 years then wii ew wins. so i am expecting it to outsell gamecube

I hope this is sarcasm, because the Wii U is also trailing currently behind the Saturn and when/if it passes 9 million sold, it will still be behind the Dreamcast, no possible way Wii u reaches gamecube numbers.

Avatar image for Raptor_Herc
Raptor_Herc

330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 Raptor_Herc
Member since 2013 • 330 Posts

Why the rush to proclaim the Wii U's death? While it will finish in dead last this gen, Nintendo still continues to support the system. It is still getting 3rd party support via indies as well. So no, it ain't dead.

Avatar image for mojito1988
mojito1988

4981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#127  Edited By mojito1988
Member since 2006 • 4981 Posts

I have 16 games for it. (that is more games then I ever had for 360 or ps3. So I define dead by games only so this system has had the most life for me since the Playstation 1. And this year has 5 games for Wii U I want all ready (Splatoon, Fox, Xenoblade, Mario Maker, and Zelda.)

Enjoy playing dem sales.

Avatar image for jdc6305
jdc6305

5058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#128 jdc6305
Member since 2005 • 5058 Posts

I'm having more fun with my WiiU then I am with my PS4. My PS4 has been collecting dust since August. Maybe it's just me but I don't find games like AssCreed Destiny and other mass marketed games appealing.

Avatar image for Thunderdrone
Thunderdrone

7154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 Thunderdrone
Member since 2009 • 7154 Posts

@TigerSuperman said:

So it's not profitable. You do realie you just proved my point > Also that's old and is no longer valid, the Wii u has been selling less and less before Amiibo and Smash 9which was not a big boost) and their losses show that the Wii U is not in a good position, why do you think they won't drop the price, throw out more bundles, or remove/ make a new SKu not involving the gamepad as an option?

Why did Nintendo bet on QOL and Amiibo? Why are Nintendo themselves hinting at Wii u support ending (no mario for now until next console is heavily hinted)

1. Wii U sales have increased since that article lol. And since one game made it profitable back then, its probably MORE profitable as time goes on and production costs lower. lol

2. Smash doubled Wii U sales in Japan and besides being the fastest selling Wii U game it gave the console a 10% boost in NA after MK8 already increased Wii U numbers.

3. Nintendo had the QOL and NFC projects in the works before the console launched.

4. Nintendo is not hinting at Wii U support ending. Myiamoto just said this past week they have unannounced games to reveal in 2015.

Hinting that the next main Mario is for the next platform means shit. N64 got one in 1996 and there were N64 games releasing in 2001.

GC only got Sunshine.

5- Now I ask you; SHOW ME HOW Wii U ISNT PROFITABLE for nintendo. Put up or shut up.

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#130 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42231 Posts

@Raptor_Herc said:

Why the rush to proclaim the Wii U's death? While it will finish in dead last this gen, Nintendo still continues to support the system. It is still getting 3rd party support via indies as well. So no, it ain't dead.

"NintenDOOM"

"Nintendo should go third party!"

Avatar image for hiphops_savior
hiphops_savior

8535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 2

#131 hiphops_savior
Member since 2007 • 8535 Posts

@Thunderdrone: If there is a timeline for the Wii U to end, it's 2016. Why?

The 3DS is nearing the end of its lifespan, and 2016 seems to be the right time for Nintendo to announce its successor. Neither the Wii U or the 3DS seems to have any major releases lined up for 2016, and going by what Nintendo Fusion seems to be hinting at, we might see the next Nintendo handheld converge with the home console at E3 2016.

Avatar image for Thunderdrone
Thunderdrone

7154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 Thunderdrone
Member since 2009 • 7154 Posts

@hiphops_savior said:

@Thunderdrone: If there is a timeline for the Wii U to end, it's 2016. Why?

The 3DS is nearing the end of its lifespan, and 2016 seems to be the right time for Nintendo to announce its successor. Neither the Wii U or the 3DS seems to have any major releases lined up for 2016, and going by what Nintendo Fusion seems to be hinting at, we might see the next Nintendo handheld converge with the home console at E3 2016.

I just don't see the next home console releasing worldwide before 2017.

And not having major announcements for 2016 in the beginning of 2015 means nothing. Thats what gaming events and NDirects are for.

Avatar image for AtariKidX
AtariKidX

7166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#133 AtariKidX
Member since 2010 • 7166 Posts

WiiU is already a dead console.....WiiU...lol

Avatar image for GrenadeLauncher
GrenadeLauncher

6843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 GrenadeLauncher
Member since 2004 • 6843 Posts

@TigerSuperman said:

@GrenadeLauncher said:

@brimmul777 said:

@GrenadeLauncher said:

I consider it to have more of a chance than the Dudbox.

Talking through your ass again.

You'll get a game soon. :)

The PS4 had games this holiday?

It did. Had games throughout the year as well, unlike a certain Xbone...

Avatar image for donderpants
Donderpants

169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#135  Edited By Donderpants
Member since 2015 • 169 Posts

Best console by miles- But with the NX on the way, not even a question anymore. Best games, best controller- worst advertising. While now it's sales are picking up, and if not for the NX might in the end outsell PS4, it's got no chance to catch up, since the Wii U is probably being replaced.

However, Nintendo is still technically making a profit. It's pitiful compared to when they were selling the Wii, but profit is profit. 2012 only has losses because Nintendo was buying back stock in bulk. 2013 was the only year of genuine loss. Ever since then, they've been making a profit.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20

82724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#136 deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
Member since 2006 • 82724 Posts

Don't bump a thread that has been inactive for more than 30 days.