Wii only owners aren't core gamers.

If they were they would want to play games with the latest technology that create realistic atmospheres and gameplay not possible last generation. Am I right folks?.

Wut? Graphics and the newest tech doesn't make anything 'core' or not.

The Wii has some core games, and it has casual games.. This feels like a troll/joke topic though.

how can wii only gamers be the core gamers if the wii wasnt even made for them, it was made for non-gamers

Guess I'm not a core gamer then. Oh no.

Won't that make only PC gamers core gamers? HarlockJC

This topic again? If you play games, you're still a gamer, who made up this core gamer bullcrap?

I wonder, who said they were to begin with. I don't see them parading around here shouting that they're core or anything. Further more, why would anyone take your word for it? You have no proof, all you did was say "because I said so".

You're wrong. There.

What's that Lassie? "You are only a core gamer if you play games with the best avalible graphics"?

Well I think you're talking rubbish there, Lassie, and dogs can't play games anyway.

No, you aren't right. By your definition of a core gamer, everyone with only one console and no PC isn't a core gamer.

Wii gamers are half and half some play wii fit etc, some play mario galaxy and zelda etc, you do the math some are core some are not. your just as bad as the pc gamers who tell me im not hardcore because i play 360, even though i play about 10 hours a night of xbox on many an occassion.

You contradicted yourself. Right now, the Wii has the best motion sensing technology, which makes games seem a lot more realistic than the graphics do, although the other systems have great visuals.

One question, what exactly is a core gamer?

Agreed. Only hardcore gamers play titles like The Sims, You're In The Movies and Buzz.

Well if they love games so much why do the play a console that has a non shovelware game every 6 months when they could have one that releases actual games every week.LiquidShnake

Because what you posted is factually wrong and a quick look at our google spreadsheet would say there are more than 1 none shovelware games released every 6 months. Someone link me the google spreadsheet stat.

If they were they would want to play games with the latest technology that create realistic atmospheres and gameplay not possible last generation. Am I right folks?.

LiquidShnake

OP, let me see if I understand you correctly:

YOUR definition of a "hARDCORE" gamer is somebody who only plays games with 'realistic' graphics?

Only a successful troll could be this ignorant

Good job, you are an inspiration to your kind

TC, you consider yourself a core gamer because your Mommy and Daddy pay over 1 grand to buy you multiple systems and games? :roll:

I need to pay for all of my games by myself, hence why I only own a Wii. I have other things to spend my money on like college tuition.

The Wii has way more than one quality game released every six months.

Here's the 2009 only list.

[QUOTE="LiquidShnake"]Well if they love games so much why do the play a console that has a non shovelware game every 6 months when they could have one that releases actual games every week.ActicEdge

Because what you posted is factually wrong and a quick look at our google spreadsheet would say there are more than 1 none shovelware games released every 6 months. Someone link me the google spreadsheet stat.

Well if they love games so much why do the play a console that has a non shovelware game every 6 months when they could have one that releases actual games every week.LiquidShnake

I am a core gamer and I only own a Wii, therefore proving your hypothesis wrong.

I am a core gamer and I only own a Wii, therefore proving your hypothesis wrong.

_BlueDuck_

[QUOTE="_BlueDuck_"]

I am a core gamer and I only own a Wii, therefore proving your hypothesis wrong.

Bentham

Team-work, high five.

oh nois!

a topic with many flaws, you dont see that ofen here

[QUOTE="Bentham"][QUOTE="_BlueDuck_"]

I am a core gamer and I only own a Wii, therefore proving your hypothesis wrong.

_BlueDuck_

Team-work, high five.

There you go guys. Enjoy :)

[QUOTE="_BlueDuck_"]

[QUOTE="Bentham"] I am a casual gamer and I don't own the Wii--so I proved him wrong, as well. ActicEdge

Team-work, high five.

There you go guys. Enjoy :)

Epic fail.

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

[QUOTE="_BlueDuck_"]

Team-work, high five.

Bentham

There you go guys. Enjoy :)

That's pretty awesome right there lol. I wish I knew where it was from though :(

I really dont understand why wii-only owners are limiting themselves. Its not just about graphics, its about lack of quality games, or even decent games. The experience almost always translates better on the 360 and ps3. And its nice that theyre pioneering motioncontrol, but that doesnt mean its good yet. the so called added benefits of 'game immersion' are so negligable at the moment taht they definately do not outweigh the other setbacks of the system. I cant think of many games where the motion control 1ups the console/pc counterparts. If you want precision use a mouse. If you want immersion, play a game with good graphics, the motion control wont do that for you just yet.

[QUOTE="Bentham"]

[QUOTE="ActicEdge"]

There you go guys. Enjoy :)

ActicEdge

That's pretty awesome right there lol. I wish I knew where it was from though :(

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pro_Wrestling_%28NES_video_game%29

If they were they would want to play games with the latest technology that create realistic atmospheres and gameplay not possible last generation. Am I right folks?.

LiquidShnake

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pro_Wrestling_%28NES_video_game%29

Yandere

I learned something new today. Thank you.

I really dont understand why wii-only owners are limiting themselves. Its not just about graphics, its about lack of quality games, or even decent games. The experience almost always translates better on the 360 and ps3. And its nice that theyre pioneering motioncontrol, but that doesnt mean its good yet. the so called added benefits of 'game immersion' are so negligable at the moment taht they definately do not outweigh the other setbacks of the system. I cant think of many games where the motion control 1ups the console/pc counterparts. If you want precision use a mouse. If you want immersion, play a game with good graphics, the motion control wont do that for you just yet.

FeedOnATreeFrog

[QUOTE="FeedOnATreeFrog"]

I really dont understand why wii-only owners are limiting themselves. Its not just about graphics, its about lack of quality games, or even decent games. The experience almost always translates better on the 360 and ps3. And its nice that theyre pioneering motioncontrol, but that doesnt mean its good yet. the so called added benefits of 'game immersion' are so negligable at the moment taht they definately do not outweigh the other setbacks of the system. I cant think of many games where the motion control 1ups the console/pc counterparts. If you want precision use a mouse. If you want immersion, play a game with good graphics, the motion control wont do that for you just yet.

OreoMilkshake

If they were they would want to play games with the latest technology that create realistic atmospheres and gameplay not possible last generation. Am I right folks?.

LiquidShnake

No, you're not right. And I own both a Wii and a 360. I play them both equally as much.

Mike Gundy knows...

[QUOTE="OreoMilkshake"][QUOTE="FeedOnATreeFrog"]

I really dont understand why wii-only owners are limiting themselves. Its not just about graphics, its about lack of quality games, or even decent games. The experience almost always translates better on the 360 and ps3. And its nice that theyre pioneering motioncontrol, but that doesnt mean its good yet. the so called added benefits of 'game immersion' are so negligable at the moment taht they definately do not outweigh the other setbacks of the system. I cant think of many games where the motion control 1ups the console/pc counterparts. If you want precision use a mouse. If you want immersion, play a game with good graphics, the motion control wont do that for you just yet.

mitu123

[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="OreoMilkshake"]What lack of quality games? The 7 AAE's this year?OreoMilkshake

[QUOTE="OreoMilkshake"][QUOTE="mitu123"] It's 8 now actually.mitu123

those 8 exclusives could have been done on the 360/ps3 with better graphics and sold at the same price.

FeedOnATreeFrog

those 8 exclusives could have been done on the 360/ps3 with better graphics and sold at the same price. Thats the point. But noooo, nintendo had to come along with their cheap console, capture a fatttty user base and keep games looking last gen.

FeedOnATreeFrog

Who cares? Fact is they weren't and there is no proof those games would even exist if the wii wasn't around. Would you like to try again?

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="OreoMilkshake"]I don't think we count Wiiware.OreoMilkshake