This topic is locked from further discussion.
Wii:U fans will be jelly when next gen material (not 6 yr old console material) like this start coming out ;)
g0ddyX
If this new FF turns out to be anything like the last one, Wii U owners won't be missing out much tbh.
Also, get prepared for 599 US dollars consoles that will overheat and crash the game industry (due to sky-high development costs).
Eh, not trusting anymore so it's a Wii :P shall see when the system and the games are launched and available for play and review.
i doubt they are going to be jealous of a game that plays itself and is another crap final fantasy.Wii:U fans will be jelly when next gen material (not 6 yr old console material) like this start coming out ;)
g0ddyX
[QUOTE="g0ddyX"]
Wii:U fans will be jelly when next gen material (not 6 yr old console material) like this start coming out ;)
nameless12345
If this new FF turns out to be anything like the last one, Wii U owners won't be missing out much tbh.
Also, get prepared for 599 US dollars consoles that will overheat and crash the game industry (due to sky-high development costs).
Huhu you running out of strong and valid arguments!! 350$ for a super OVERPRICED hardware just to play another version of mario , mario , zelda, pokemon etc etc... No thnx.. This kind of hardware wont stand a chance for next gen games and Wii-U will end up exactly like Wii... An outdated console missing all the major third party titles. You like it or not ( see it or not ) that will be the case.... 350$ for this ...?! no way!Look at all the sheep getting excited over the garbage that Nintendo plan on releasing.
It will be just like Nintendo Wii, strong for 2 years and spends the next 5 years becoming a dust collector. The Next Gen is irrelevant until Playstation 4 comes out. Best games, best features will be on Playstation 4.
[QUOTE="nameless12345"][QUOTE="g0ddyX"]
Wii:U fans will be jelly when next gen material (not 6 yr old console material) like this start coming out ;)
AzatiS
If this new FF turns out to be anything like the last one, Wii U owners won't be missing out much tbh.
Also, get prepared for 599 US dollars consoles that will overheat and crash the game industry (due to sky-high development costs).
Huhu you running out of strong and valid arguments!!The only good thing I see on that FF tech demo is that it looks good (from a technical standpoint - aesthetics is so-so).
I'm not excited about the game it may turn into one bit because I believe it will follow the footsteps of current Square-Enix's offerings (which means boring, cimenatic games with trashy, melo-dramatic stories and shallow, uninnovative gameplay).
[QUOTE="the9thinning"]More bullsh!t.So hopefully most people have realized by now that the Wii U is definitly more powerful than the PS3 and 360 but in case anyone still has doubts please watch this video which compares in detail Wii U specs to PS3 specshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcnsG11MRE8
darkdude2k12
AMD Radeon HD 4650 kills NVIDIA RSX or AMD Xenos.
AMD Radeon HD 4770 is the first AMD GPU that supports GDDR5. Radeon HD 4650/4670 doesn't support GDDR5.
At the same 45nm process tech, IBM Power7 Quad core + L3 cache would be a joke i.e. the die size is larger than AMD Phenom II X6.
are there official specs of the Wii U or is this just more speculation?
Gue1
With Radeon HD 4xx0 series, you either
1. go below AMD Xenos** i.e. Radeon HD 4550 (80 stream processors @ starting from 600Mhz, 4 ROPs) or below,
2. exceed AMD Xenos** i.e. Radeon HD 4650 (320 stream processors @ starting from 600Mhz, 8 ROPs) or above.
**Xenos is equivalent to Radeon HD with 240 data stream processors @ 500Mhz and 8 ROPs.
With Radeon HD 4xx0 series, there's no known middle GPU between Radeon HD 4550 and Radeon HD 4650.
You know its gotta be weak when Nintendo didn't announce any specs during E3 and that exactly happened with the Wii.silversix_
you know its gotta be a child when the poster doesnt know that Nintendo never announces their specs of their machines
I still supprised that the wiiU is coming out this year. I mean I have not heard really anything about it. No announcement of games aside from dropped 3rd party support. Claims that the tablet is more of a gimmick than anything practical. Is this going to be a bit of a sleeper hit in terms of consoles. No really announcements until its released then it picks up by word of mouth etc.
I can remember the huge excitement for the PS3 and the Xbox360. But the WiiU there is nothing. At all.
More bullsh!t.[QUOTE="darkdude2k12"][QUOTE="the9thinning"]
So hopefully most people have realized by now that the Wii U is definitly more powerful than the PS3 and 360 but in case anyone still has doubts please watch this video which compares in detail Wii U specs to PS3 specshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcnsG11MRE8
ronvalencia
AMD Radeon HD 4650 kills NVIDIA RSX or AMD Xenos.
AMD Radeon HD 4770 is the first AMD GPU that supports GDDR5. Radeon HD 4650/4670 doesn't support GDDR5.
At the same 45nm process tech, IBM Power7 Quad core + L3 cache would be a joke i.e. the die size is larger than AMD Phenom II X6.
Isn't XDR2 faster and cheaper than GDDR5?
AMD 7750 is more efficient/newer and cooler than 4770.
Wasn't the Wii said to have better graphics than the "then upcoming" Xbox360? This is essentially the same sh!t; different smell.[QUOTE="darkdude2k12"][QUOTE="super600"]
You jelly.
super600
The WiiU will be stronger then the 360 and PS3, but the next gen consoles won't crush it in terms of tech specs.
YES, but it's not by a large measure. It's close in power to the PS360.
You can't possibly know that to say so matter-of-factly, none of us know that. We don't even have any specs or features known for the 720/PS4.
Just a heads up, I read the exact same stuff last gen before the Wii released. Will history repeat itself? That's up to 720/PS4 specs.
I'm getting the Wii U, but not under the idea/hope that the 720/PS4 will be comparable in specs. While that could happen, I doubt both companies will follow suit. Anything is possible though.
It would nearly impossible for Nintendo to produce a console that's as slow or slower then a 6 or 7 year old console from 2005/2006. Technology progress's plain and simple. 04dcarraher
NO!!!! You make too much sense and don't belong in SW.
[QUOTE="super600"]
[QUOTE="darkdude2k12"] Wasn't the Wii said to have better graphics than the "then upcoming" Xbox360? This is essentially the same sh!t; different smell.SolidTy
The WiiU will be stronger then the 360 and PS3, but the next gen consoles won't crush it in terms of tech specs.
YES, but it's not by a large measure. It's close in power to the PS360.
You can't possibly know that to say so matter-of-factly, none of us know that. We don't even have any specs or features known for the 720/PS4.
Just a heads up, I read the exact same stuff last gen before the Wii released. Will history repeat itself? That's up to 720/PS4 specs.
I'm getting the Wii U, but not under the idea/hope that the 720/PS4 will be comparable in specs. While that could happen, I doubt both companies will follow suit. Anything is possible though.
From what I seen from the rumored specs and the price of really powerful hardware now a days I have a feeling both consoles at their max will be 3.5X to 5X times more powerful then then WiiU.Their is no way MS and especially sony can afford to produce a console that is more then 5X stronger then the WiiU.I'm not saying both consoles will be comparable to the WiiU,but they won't be able to make porting to the console impossible like porting from the HD consoles to the Wii was this gen because of the modern feature set.
[QUOTE="darkdude2k12"][QUOTE="super600"]Wasn't the Wii said to have better graphics than the "then upcoming" Xbox360? This is essentially the same sh!t; different smell. you sound mad n jelly. Im sure hes jealous of the weakest launch lineup in gaming history. And im sure hes mad about the weak u trying to catch up to this gen's graphics.You jelly.
Tessellation
[QUOTE="Tessellation"][QUOTE="darkdude2k12"] Wasn't the Wii said to have better graphics than the "then upcoming" Xbox360? This is essentially the same sh!t; different smell.needweedyou sound mad n jelly. Im sure hes jealous of the weakest launch lineup in gaming history. And im sure hes mad about the weak u trying to catch up to this gen's graphics.
Weakest in history? Sure.
[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]
[QUOTE="darkdude2k12"] More bullsh!t. nameless12345
AMD Radeon HD 4650 kills NVIDIA RSX or AMD Xenos.
AMD Radeon HD 4770 is the first AMD GPU that supports GDDR5. Radeon HD 4650/4670 doesn't support GDDR5.
At the same 45nm process tech, IBM Power7 Quad core + L3 cache would be a joke i.e. the die size is larger than AMD Phenom II X6.
Isn't XDR2 faster and cheaper than GDDR5?
AMD 7750 is more efficient/newer and cooler than 4770.
Rumbus claims the XDR2 to be faster than GDDR5. There are another reasons why AMD(ATI) and NVIDIA avoids Rumbus's XDR/XDR2.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment