Wii vs GC vs 360

Are you being serious. You posted the best looking GC game against one of the crappy looking 360 games and found the worst pic in dead rising vs the best screen shot you could find in Sonic. I'm not even going to waste my energy in this thread. Silvereign

consider your energy wasted.

[QUOTE="Tony_aaaa"][QUOTE="darth-pyschosis"][QUOTE="Tony_aaaa"][QUOTE="darth-pyschosis"][QUOTE="Tony_aaaa"][QUOTE="darth-pyschosis"]

oh wow, look what he posted. the LP guy doesn't even have two feet!:P

darth-pyschosis

his foot doesn't look like its submerged in snow it looks like it disappeared. if so we'd see snow covering his ankles and not it cutting off from his ankles. i don't think i spelled ankles right. did i?

SMG will look like a 360 game, and i'm saying that the Wii games WILL look like 360 games,... err almost. not that all of them do now. Sonic kinda looks like one, coz it looks better than the Sonic on PS3/360.

I take it your answer is a no.

Wii does not (even "almost") come close to 360 (graphically) Wii will, eventually, pull ahead of Xbox1--probably after 6-9 months or so, every Wii title will look better than Xbox1 If you want Nintendo franchises + motion control, buy a Wii (I did)

but,  your Wii's just not big enough to get into a graphical pissing contest with the 360.

which sonic is which? (platform) do they look even?

darth-pyschosis

[QUOTE="Silvereign"]Are you being serious. You posted the best looking GC game against one of the crappy looking 360 games and found the worst pic in dead rising vs the best screen shot you could find in Sonic. I'm not even going to waste my energy in this thread. darth-pyschosis

consider your energy wasted.

This is why I dislike sheep ever since the wii came out they try to prove why its better than the other console. your badat making valid arguement.

[QUOTE="darth-pyschosis"][QUOTE="Tony_aaaa"][QUOTE="darth-pyschosis"][QUOTE="Tony_aaaa"][QUOTE="darth-pyschosis"][QUOTE="Tony_aaaa"][QUOTE="darth-pyschosis"]

oh wow, look what he posted. the LP guy doesn't even have two feet!:P

Tony_aaaa

his foot doesn't look like its submerged in snow it looks like it disappeared. if so we'd see snow covering his ankles and not it cutting off from his ankles. i don't think i spelled ankles right. did i?

SMG will look like a 360 game, and i'm saying that the Wii games WILL look like 360 games,... err almost. not that all of them do now. Sonic kinda looks like one, coz it looks better than the Sonic on PS3/360.

I take it your answer is a no.

Wii does not (even "almost") come close to 360 (graphically) Wii will, eventually, pull ahead of Xbox1--probably after 6-9 months or so, every Wii title will look better than Xbox1 If you want Nintendo franchises + motion control, buy a Wii (I did)

but,  your Wii's just not big enough to get into a graphical pissing contest with the 360.

which sonic is which? (platform) do they look even?

darth-pyschosis

ah, your questions. yes, i've played all of those games you've said on HD TV's and quite frankly I couldn't care less about HD! Sure they look good, though I saw that kind of stuff on my PC 2 years ago. I don't own some of those games though i've played and beaten most of them (Elder Scrolls no, too long) I went to my brothers house and played Lost Planet. Its nice, pretty, and pretty short. After we beat it in 5 hours he got the same feeling he did after beating gears of war, like he got robbed. but i was talking about graphics right? Well why did GS give Sonic a 5 for graphics on 360 and Sonic Wii a 8?

can anyone here make a argument as to why Gamespot gave the Sonic the Hedgehog for 360/PS3 a 5 in graphics and Sonic and the Secret Rings on the Wii a 8 in graphics?darth-pyschosis

Because OBVIOUSLY the wii's graphical capabilities go far beyond all comprehension.

Zelda ocarina of time got a 10 in graphics does that make it (graphically) the best game of all time?

well sonic and the secret rings scored 3 to 2 points higher in graphics by GS then these 360 games: Bullet Witch, Sonic the Hedgehog, History Channel: Civil War, Tony Hawk's Project 8, Just Cause, Samurai Warriors 2, and Saints row.

scored even with: crackdown, splinter cell

"ah, your questions. yes, i've played all of those games you've said on HD TV's and quite frankly I couldn't care less about HD! Sure they look good, though I saw that kind of stuff on my PC 2 years ago. I don't own some of those games though i've played and beaten most of them (Elder Scrolls no, too long) I went to my brothers house and played Lost Planet. Its nice, pretty, and pretty short. After we beat it in 5 hours he got the same feeling he did after beating gears of war, like he got robbed. but i was talking about graphics right? Well why did GS give Sonic a 5 for graphics on 360 and Sonic Wii a 8?"

 Yes, I also have (several) PCs, I always try to play at higher resolutions....for a reason. Those reasons apply to consoles as well. Surely as a PC gamer you see the benefit of better graphics via higher resolutions, anti-aliasing, and anistropic filtering? Consoles currently need it more than PC's do.

Strange that you dismiss Oblivion (as too long) while at the same time dismiss Gears and LP as too short....I like them all (for different reasons) Dead Rising is a fairly "middle" legnth game...

 I already anwsered your Sonic question in 2 posts...... 3rd time; don't own it/never played it, I don't make "claims" on pictures, only games I own or have played personally.

 considering i've said i play 360 games at my bro's house, and that elder scrolls has like a 100 hours of gameplay then saying thats too long isn't bad.

and if developers work hard as they did with RE4 then the games will look good for their times without HD!

would gears look really good w/o HD? yes.

anyway, i'm signing off.

try to show some ownage or whatever while i'm away and i'll just come back tomorrow with more. thanks for the moron insults to, i wonder if you'll posting tomorrow?

 considering i've said i play 360 games at my bro's house, and that elder scrolls has like a 100 hours of gameplay then saying thats too long isn't bad.

and if developers work hard as they did with RE4 then the games will look good for their times without HD!

would gears look really good w/o HD? yes.

anyway, i'm signing off.

try to show some ownage or whatever while i'm away and i'll just come back tomorrow with more. thanks for the moron insults to, i wonder if you'll posting tomorrow?

darth-pyschosis

Sonic for Xbox360...

Sonic for Wii....


I own a wii and I for one don't care if the Wii graphics stinks...I rather play the Wii sonic game, 7.6 than the Xboxes 4.4.
Click_Clock

Residnt Evil 4. These are in-game pics: Xbox 360: These are in-game pics: Thread Over Sheep attempt to undermine Xbox 360 graphics = FAILflamingschmoes2

funny how you didn't include a picture of Leon Kennedy's face, being as that bares a striking likeness of the hockey player you posted. this thread isn't over. well, the other one about "an end to wii crappy graphics debate" isn't. yeah, looking back probably not the best title. i've been getting alot of thank yous from wii owners so i feel like i have to go on with at least one thread.

give me a picture of a non-cutscene sonic 360 (which someone posted) and sonic wii.

give me a pic of leon kennedy's face and that hockey player. the 360 pics might still look better, but by how much?