Will Banjo outscore Ratchet and make another area where 360 is better then PS3?

Now first off I think the Wii is the best console for platformers.

Ratchet and Clank scored 7.5 so will Banjo: Nut and Bolts score higher then that? If so it would be another area where 360 is better then PS3 the platformer area. Even though 360 has Kameo that scored 8.7

Just look at the scores of some of the other games that can not be played on the other console. This is 360vs PS3. Only put games that have scores. This is how the other areas of gaming stack up-

Shooter- Halo 3 (9.5) Gears 1 (9.6) > RFoM (8.6) Haze (6.0) (360 wins)

Racers- Forza 2 (9.2) PGR4 (8.5) > Motorstorm (7.9) GT5P (7.5) (360 wins)

RTS- CnC3: Tib wars (8.7)> PS3 does not have any (360 wins)

JRPG-Lost ODyssey (7.5) > ps3 does not have any that the 360 does not have already (360 wins)

WRPG-Mass Effect (8.5)> ps3 does not have any that the 360 does not have (360 wins)

Fighting- DOA 4 (8.8 ) > Tekken 5 (8.3) (360 wins)

Stealth-360 does not have any that the ps3 does not already have that I could think of < MGS4 (10.0)

(PS3 wins)

So if Banjo scores higher then there will be no doubt at all the 360 has the better platformer games over the PS3. So do you think Banjo will score higher then Ratchet?

Edit-Forgot about LBP to late to add to the poll.So if you think LBP will be the best just post that you think it will score better.

waut about lbp

JRPG-Lost ODyssey (7.5) > ps3 does not have any that the 360 does not have already (360 wins)

rybe1025

Add Folklore. Scored a 7, but still.

[QUOTE="rybe1025"]

JRPG-Lost ODyssey (7.5) > ps3 does not have any that the 360 does not have already (360 wins)

VanHelsingBoA64

Add Folklore. Scored a 7, but still.

It prolly will score higher than R&C on GS. but imo R&C should be a 9, it's underrated here.

I don't see how it couldn't outscore 7.5

For fighting, Dead or Alive 5 outscored the non-existant ps3 exclusive fighter.MerisYaki

Tekken 5...fanboy intelligence falls everyday.

Another, you make it sound like the 360 is better than the Ps3. IamTehN00bness

That's because it IS in all categories except stealth.

[QUOTE="MerisYaki"] For fighting, Dead or Alive 5 outscored the non-existant ps3 exclusive fighter.dkhw

Tekken 5...fanboy intelligence falls everyday.

[QUOTE="dkhw"]

[QUOTE="MerisYaki"] For fighting, Dead or Alive 5 outscored the non-existant ps3 exclusive fighter.MerisYaki

Tekken 5...fanboy intelligence falls everyday.

i am just going by lemming logic--the so-called, "Console exclusive," and how am i a cow when i think 360 is better than PS3...

[QUOTE="MerisYaki"] For fighting, Dead or Alive 5 outscored the non-existant ps3 exclusive fighter.dkhw

Tekken 5...fanboy intelligence falls everyday.

DOA4 (8.8 ) > tekken 4 (8.3) ....360 wins

so, rachet and clank is the spokesman of ps3 platforming?iesexywarden

360 already has out scored RnC with Kameo but with another game it would be final which is the better of the two in platforming. Then another area that the 360 is better then PS3.

[QUOTE="dkhw"]

[QUOTE="MerisYaki"] For fighting, Dead or Alive 5 outscored the non-existant ps3 exclusive fighter.rybe1025

Tekken 5...fanboy intelligence falls everyday.

DOA4 (8.8 ) > tekken 4 (8.3) ....360 wins

i detest both franchises, and they are nothing but glorified button mashers compared to Street Fighter or Virtual Fighter, but Tekken is the most overrated fighting franchise ever, and any, i mean ANY fighting game beats any tekken game.

It prolly will score higher than R&C on GS. but imo R&C should be a 9, it's underrated here.

Tykain

To keep it fair, they should have AARON THOMAS review Banjo, but GS is not going to let that happen again, after he messed up R&C. Oh well.

[QUOTE="Tykain"]

It prolly will score higher than R&C on GS. but imo R&C should be a 9, it's underrated here.

SolidTy

To keep it fair, they should have AARON THOMAS review Banjo, but GS is not going to let that happen again, after he messed up R&C. Oh well.

how did he mess up? do you honestly think everyone is going to like the game?

It's obvious Banjo will outscore Ratchet on here. But that's solely down to the fact the reviwer didn't know what he was doing...

I've never heard of a title being rated lower for more vareity. I thought vareity was a good thing.
jonnyt61

This post is the truth!

Remember kids, variety is bad!

[QUOTE="SolidTy"][QUOTE="Tykain"]

It prolly will score higher than R&C on GS. but imo R&C should be a 9, it's underrated here.

spliffstar12

To keep it fair, they should have AARON THOMAS review Banjo, but GS is not going to let that happen again, after he messed up R&C. Oh well.

how did he mess up? do you honestly think everyone is going to like the game?

Whenever a reviewer lowers a games score because it has too much variety, he/she messed up.

[QUOTE="spliffstar12"][QUOTE="SolidTy"][QUOTE="Tykain"]

It prolly will score higher than R&C on GS. but imo R&C should be a 9, it's underrated here.

Chutebox

To keep it fair, they should have AARON THOMAS review Banjo, but GS is not going to let that happen again, after he messed up R&C. Oh well.

how did he mess up? do you honestly think everyone is going to like the game?

Whenever a reviewer lowers a games score because it has too much variety, he/she messed up.

So many different, often unnecessary gameplay mechanics that the game lacks an identity

if thats what your talking about then that variety was unnecessary as in it added nothing meaningful to the gameplay and just because he said that doesnt mean he lowered the games score because of it...

[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="spliffstar12"][QUOTE="SolidTy"][QUOTE="Tykain"]

It prolly will score higher than R&C on GS. but imo R&C should be a 9, it's underrated here.

spliffstar12

To keep it fair, they should have AARON THOMAS review Banjo, but GS is not going to let that happen again, after he messed up R&C. Oh well.

how did he mess up? do you honestly think everyone is going to like the game?

Whenever a reviewer lowers a games score because it has too much variety, he/she messed up.

So many different, often unnecessary gameplay mechanics that the game lacks an identity

if thats what your talking about then that variety was unnecessary as in it added nothing meaningful to the gameplay and just because he said that doesnt mean he lowered the games score because of it...

Are you serious?

The quote you just posted is under the "bad" part about the game...

And again, even though maybe he thought it was unnecessary, how is it bad or negative???

He simply messed up.

because it was under the bad that doesnt mean he lowered the score because of it...

if a game has a bunch of stupid unneeded **** in it how is that not a negative

he didnt mess up get over it

spliffstar12

Make no sense at all.

[QUOTE="spliffstar12"]

because it was under the bad that doesnt mean he lowered the score because of it...

if a game has a bunch of stupid unneeded **** in it how is that not a negative

he didnt mess up get over it

Chutebox

Make no sense at all.

how did that not make sense....

[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="spliffstar12"]

because it was under the bad that doesnt mean he lowered the score because of it...

if a game has a bunch of stupid unneeded **** in it how is that not a negative

he didnt mess up get over it

spliffstar12

Make no sense at all.

how did that not make sense....

If it's in the bad section of the review, it's not going to add points to the score. It's common sense dude.

The game adds variety to benefit the player. There is no way in hell variety can be bad, no way.

[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="spliffstar12"]

because it was under the bad that doesnt mean he lowered the score because of it...

if a game has a bunch of stupid unneeded **** in it how is that not a negative

he didnt mess up get over it

spliffstar12

Make no sense at all.

how did that not make sense....

that really made no sense

[QUOTE="spliffstar12"][QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="spliffstar12"]

because it was under the bad that doesnt mean he lowered the score because of it...

if a game has a bunch of stupid unneeded **** in it how is that not a negative

he didnt mess up get over it

Chutebox

Make no sense at all.

how did that not make sense....

If it's in the bad section of the review, it's not going to add points to the score. It's common sense dude.

The game adds variety to benefit the player. There is no way in hell variety can be bad, no way.

gta4 scored a 10 and has something like visual quirks under the bad does that mean the score got dropped because of it?

and it said many different often unnessecary gameplay mechanics meaning their was no point of having them they were so worthless

[QUOTE="Tykain"]

It prolly will score higher than R&C on GS. but imo R&C should be a 9, it's underrated here.

SolidTy

To keep it fair, they should have AARON THOMAS review Banjo, but GS is not going to let that happen again, after he messed up R&C. Oh well.

No they shouldn't. It sucks what happened to R&C but it would be silly to let that guy review Banjo for the sake of being "fair" for the people of System Wars. They should pick the person who will most likely give the most accurate review and help people make a decision when debating whether or not to buy it.

[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="spliffstar12"][QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="spliffstar12"]

because it was under the bad that doesnt mean he lowered the score because of it...

if a game has a bunch of stupid unneeded **** in it how is that not a negative

he didnt mess up get over it

spliffstar12

Make no sense at all.

how did that not make sense....

If it's in the bad section of the review, it's not going to add points to the score. It's common sense dude.

The game adds variety to benefit the player. There is no way in hell variety can be bad, no way.

gta4 scored a 10 and has something like visual quirks under the bad does that mean the score got dropped because of it?

and it said many different often unnessecary gameplay mechanics meaning their was no point of having them they were so worthless

Because all games have flaws, but some flaws are minor.

A game "not lacking an identity", which by the way is one of the stupidest things I've ever heard, is major.

[QUOTE="SolidTy"][QUOTE="Tykain"]

It prolly will score higher than R&C on GS. but imo R&C should be a 9, it's underrated here.

Snowboarder99

To keep it fair, they should have AARON THOMAS review Banjo, but GS is not going to let that happen again, after he messed up R&C. Oh well.

No they shouldn't. It sucks what happened to R&C but it would be silly to let that guy review Banjo for the sake of being "fair" for the people of System Wars. They should pick the person who will most likely give the most accurate review and help people make a decision when debating whether or not to buy it.

That guy should not review anything other than sports, seriously.

[QUOTE="Snowboarder99"][QUOTE="SolidTy"][QUOTE="Tykain"]

It prolly will score higher than R&C on GS. but imo R&C should be a 9, it's underrated here.

Chutebox

To keep it fair, they should have AARON THOMAS review Banjo, but GS is not going to let that happen again, after he messed up R&C. Oh well.

No they shouldn't. It sucks what happened to R&C but it would be silly to let that guy review Banjo for the sake of being "fair" for the people of System Wars. They should pick the person who will most likely give the most accurate review and help people make a decision when debating whether or not to buy it.

That guy should not review anything other than sports, seriously.

yeah i agree, it would be unfair to have him review Banjo, kowing he might give it an unfair score like he did for R&C... let someone else review Banjo who enjoys games and give fair scores..