Will Crysis 2 take the FPS graphics king crown from Killzone 2?????

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"][QUOTE="kittyloaf69"]It'll be the best looking average shooter available.kittyloaf69

If it was average,it wouldn´t have got FPS of the year over Halo 3 and CoD4,and GS(and many,many others) wouldn´t have called it one of the best FPS ever made.

Even though i like KZ2 graphics and i think its about equally impressive to UC2,Crysis 2 on consoles and PC of course will beat them in style.nothing in those two games compare to what Crysis 2 does on consoles in open world environment,ok maybe KZ2 post processing(who likes it) and some UC2 vistas,other then that,nothing.

[QUOTE="kittyloaf69"][QUOTE="jg4xchamp"] Crysis? Average? :lol:Arach666

If it was average,it wouldn´t have got FPS of the year over Halo 3 and CoD4,and GS(and many,many others) wouldn´t have called it one of the best FPS ever made.

[QUOTE="Brainkiller05"][QUOTE="kittyloaf69"]It'll be the best looking average shooter available.lespaul1919

tech + graphics = awesome. truely awesome.
gunplay + gameplay = not awesome.

if it's so awesome then why do I choose a 9 year old game as my multiplayer fix of choice day after day?

[QUOTE="Brainkiller05"][QUOTE="kittyloaf69"] No, the graphics are awesome, I Think the gameplay is average. [QUOTE="Brainkiller05"][QUOTE="kittyloaf69"]It'll be the best looking average shooter available.kittyloaf69

[QUOTE="kittyloaf69"]

[QUOTE="Brainkiller05"] Average shooters don't score 9.5 out of 10.04dcarraher

[QUOTE="tupapi006"]

battlefield bad company 2>>>>>>>>>>>>> Killzone 2

Eddie-Vedder

you are just a Fanboy if you think that :? .....

I honestly dont see how crysis is a bad or average game, while halo is set on the "superb" pedistol.

Crysis GAMEPLAY>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Halo gameplay.

[QUOTE="Mystic-G"]

[QUOTE="lowe0"] Nah. For FPS this year, my money's on Bad Company 2. Also, you should probably add "console" to the thread title. Not that it'll help much.lowe0

Wait are you saying Bad Company 2 looks better than Crysis 2? >.

LMAO Crytek and Free Radical have NOTHING to do with each other what the hell are you talking about?

I think yes, there is something on killzoen that lowers the graphics quallity to me, it looks like....hmm that god of war gif you have? See the character's skin? Well thats how the entire world looks to me in killzone 2, like the shaders are kinda weak in comparison with crysis 2.dakan45

Im confused , you are saying Kratos skin looks bad? LOL pretty much everyone has gone on record to say its one of the most detailed character models ever put in a videogame nobody could logically debate that it isnt it looks amazing .

[QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="Mystic-G"]

Wait are you saying Bad Company 2 looks better than Crysis 2? >.

TheSterls

LMAO Crytek and Free Radical have NOTHING to do with each other what the hell are you talking about?

Free Radical = Crytek UK.

Crytek bought them as a specific console team.

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="lowe0"] Factoring in destruction - yes. On top of that, I don't have any faith in Crytek's abilities working with fixed hardware - and let's not forget that their console team previously brought us the masterpiece known as HAZE (their last game as Free Radical).organic_machine

LMAO Crytek and Free Radical have NOTHING to do with each other what the hell are you talking about?

Free Radical = Crytek UK.

Crytek bought them as a specific console team.

They had nothing to do with the development of Haze though , when they were "Free Radical " Crytek was not involved.

i didnt even know killzone 2 had the FPS graphic king crown

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="lowe0"] Factoring in destruction - yes. On top of that, I don't have any faith in Crytek's abilities working with fixed hardware - and let's not forget that their console team previously brought us the masterpiece known as HAZE (their last game as Free Radical).organic_machine

LMAO Crytek and Free Radical have NOTHING to do with each other what the hell are you talking about?

Free Radical = Crytek UK.

Crytek bought them as a specific console team.

False. Stop saying things that are blatantly wrong.

Crytek UK was NOT purchased to be a "console team." Crytek Frankfurt is doing all 3 versions of Crysis 2. And the work on CryENGINE 3 is spread out between all of Crytek's studios, but is mostly focused at the Frankfurt and Budapest offices.

Crytek UK, is primarily focused on developing its own IP development, but as with any major studio, there is a certain level of crossover between projects. Crytek UK is assisting on Crysis 2, but it is NOT tasked with doing the "console versions."

They had nothing to do with the development of Haze though , when they were "Free Radical " Crytek was not involved.

TheSterls

He wasn't saying they were. He was saying that the people who are working on development for the console versions of this game previously under Free Radical worked on Haze.

I'm not exactly sure if he was right, as I don't know what Crytek UK specfic involvement is with Crysis 2.

Crytek UK, is primarily focused on developing its own new IP, but as with any major studio, there is a certain level of crossover between projects. Crytek UK is assisting on Crysis 2, but it is NOT tasked with doing the "console versions."

KingsMessenger

I am not wrong. I never said CUK was working on Crysis 2, but that they were hired as a console specific team. Look at my last post.

I honestly dont see how crysis is a bad or average game, while halo is set on the "superb" pedistol.

Crysis GAMEPLAY>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Halo gameplay.

brennan7777

how many professional gaming leagues use crysis? thought so.

Killzone 2? Best FPS graphics on consoles? :lol:

That would be BC2.

[QUOTE="KingsMessenger"]

Crytek UK, is primarily focused on developing its own new IP, but as with any major studio, there is a certain level of crossover between projects. Crytek UK is assisting on Crysis 2, but it is NOT tasked with doing the "console versions."

organic_machine

I am not wrong. I never said CUK was working on Crysis 2, but that they were hired as a console specific team. Look at my last post.

And just to clarify, Crytek UK was not brought in to work on the console versions of CE3. The first CE3 tech demo was shown 1 month after Crytek purchase Free Radical. If they managed to get a workable console version of the engine up in less than a month, then Crytek managed to hire gods among programmers. Crytek UK is not a technical studio. It is primarily an IP studio, working on developing new and existing IPs. This is in addition to serving as a satelite studio to attract talent within the UK.

[QUOTE="brennan7777"]

I honestly dont see how crysis is a bad or average game, while halo is set on the "superb" pedistol.

Crysis GAMEPLAY>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Halo gameplay.

lespaul1919

how many professional gaming leagues use crysis? thought so.

i didnt even know killzone 2 had the FPS graphic king crown

Half-Way

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

They had nothing to do with the development of Haze though , when they were "Free Radical " Crytek was not involved.

organic_machine

He wasn't saying they were. He was saying that the people who are working on development for the console versions of this game previously under Free Radical worked on Haze.

I'm not exactly sure if he was right, as I don't know what Crytek UK specfic involvement is with Crysis 2.

[QUOTE="organic_machine"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

They had nothing to do with the development of Haze though , when they were "Free Radical " Crytek was not involved.

lowe0

He wasn't saying they were. He was saying that the people who are working on development for the console versions of this game previously under Free Radical worked on Haze.

I'm not exactly sure if he was right, as I don't know what Crytek UK specfic involvement is with Crysis 2.

Crytek UK was purchased because it was convenient to their plans for expansion. Within Europe, the UK is a major source to talented artists, programmers and designers, and if Crytek wanted to expand they needed to make a satelite studio within the UK. As I have said NUMEROUS times, Crytek UK was purchased for reasons OTHER than console development. It didn't hurt, but that was hardly the primary motivating factor in the purchase.

[QUOTE="organic_machine"]

[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

They had nothing to do with the development of Haze though , when they were "Free Radical " Crytek was not involved.

lowe0

He wasn't saying they were. He was saying that the people who are working on development for the console versions of this game previously under Free Radical worked on Haze.

I'm not exactly sure if he was right, as I don't know what Crytek UK specfic involvement is with Crysis 2.

Why are you so strung up on Haze. Free Radical also made Timesplitters, and worked on Goldeneye, I believe. Yes, Haze sucked, but that's like saying Al Pachino starred in GodFather 3, does that instantly make all the other awesome movies he's made irrelevent? :|

Killzone 2? Best FPS graphics on consoles? :lol:

That would be BC2.

EndorphinMaster

[QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="organic_machine"]

He wasn't saying they were. He was saying that the people who are working on development for the console versions of this game previously under Free Radical worked on Haze.

I'm not exactly sure if he was right, as I don't know what Crytek UK specfic involvement is with Crysis 2.

Dataleak

Why are you so strung up on Haze. Free Radical also made Timesplitters, and worked on Goldeneye, I believe. Yes, Haze sucked, but that's like saying Al Pachino starred in GodFather 3, then that instantly makes all the other awesome movies he's made irrelevent? :|

[QUOTE="dakan45"]I think yes, there is something on killzoen that lowers the graphics quallity to me, it looks like....hmm that god of war gif you have? See the character's skin? Well thats how the entire world looks to me in killzone 2, like the shaders are kinda weak in comparison with crysis 2.TheSterls

Im confused , you are saying Kratos skin looks bad? LOL pretty much everyone has gone on record to say its one of the most detailed character models ever put in a videogame nobody could logically debate that it isnt it looks amazing .

I don't understand... why is it everytime one graphics king topic dies off someone insists on reviving this dead horse. Crysis 2 will be the best visual game on consoles. There's nothing more to add... if you care so much you could argue that KZ2 has better gameplay than Crysis. I found Crysis gameplay novel at best how it got such high scores was suspiciously EA's fault I believe.

[QUOTE="Arach666"]

[QUOTE="kittyloaf69"] Yes. Besides the graphics, I really didn't like Crysis at all.kittyloaf69

If it was average,it wouldn´t have got FPS of the year over Halo 3 and CoD4,and GS(and many,many others) wouldn´t have called it one of the best FPS ever made.

You are "average" because you cannot play properly this game...
Crysis is not like the corridor shooters with scripted and linear approach.
In order to play Crysis properly and have fun with this game you must have a strategy make decisions before walking into the crossfire it is NOT like run and shoot everything

Crysis is definitely the best fps of all time.

[QUOTE="kittyloaf69"][QUOTE="Arach666"] The fact that you didn´t liked it doesn´t mean that´s average.

If it was average,it wouldn´t have got FPS of the year over Halo 3 and CoD4,and GS(and many,many others) wouldn´t have called it one of the best FPS ever made.

MK-Professor

You are "average" because you cannot play properly this game...
Crysis is not like the corridor shooters with scripted and linear approach.
In order to play Crysis properly and have fun with this game you must have a strategy make decisions before walking into the crossfire it is NOT like run and shoot everything

Crysis is definitely the best fps of all time.

No it isn't. A quick journey to Metacritic and GameRankings shows that ... And ironically, in 1st place (highest rated game overall on PC) is a very linear and scripted game ...

It will probably take the console technology king crown. Talking about KZ2 - it has so many details and graphical effects it's amazing. Probably the best among the console games in this regard. Just slow down a bit during a campaign and you will see. But most of them are just neat effects + smoke and mirrors. Crysis 2 will surely have more raw technological power but I bet it all will be bland compared to all the details GG put into Killzone 2.

[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]

[QUOTE="kittyloaf69"] Ok, The fact that you DID like it doesn't mean it's above average, either. I'm posting MY views of the game, I Felt it was extremely average besides the incredible graphics. Other people can disagree, and I'm fine with that, but you can't tell me I'm wrong for posting my views of the game.KiZZo1

You are "average" because you cannot play properly this game...
Crysis is not like the corridor shooters with scripted and linear approach.
In order to play Crysis properly and have fun with this game you must have a strategy make decisions before walking into the crossfire it is NOT like run and shoot everything

Crysis is definitely the best fps of all time.

No it isn't. A quick journey to Metacritic and GameRankings shows that ... And ironically, in 1st place (highest rated game overall on PC) is a very linear and scripted game ...

And HL2 was the most groundbreaking FPS game of its time. Do you even know what you're talking about here?

[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]

[QUOTE="kittyloaf69"] Ok, The fact that you DID like it doesn't mean it's above average, either. I'm posting MY views of the game, I Felt it was extremely average besides the incredible graphics. Other people can disagree, and I'm fine with that, but you can't tell me I'm wrong for posting my views of the game.KiZZo1

You are "average" because you cannot play properly this game...
Crysis is not like the corridor shooters with scripted and linear approach.
In order to play Crysis properly and have fun with this game you must have a strategy make decisions before walking into the crossfire it is NOT like run and shoot everything

Crysis is definitely the best fps of all time.

No it isn't. A quick journey to Metacritic and GameRankings shows that ... And ironically, in 1st place (highest rated game overall on PC) is a very linear and scripted game ...

I honestly dont see how crysis is a bad or average game, while halo is set on the "superb" pedistol.

Crysis GAMEPLAY>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Halo gameplay.

brennan7777

[QUOTE="Mystic-G"]

[QUOTE="lowe0"] Nah. For FPS this year, my money's on Bad Company 2. Also, you should probably add "console" to the thread title. Not that it'll help much.Ravensmash

Wait are you saying Bad Company 2 looks better than Crysis 2? >.

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/gdc-10-cryengine-3/63096

Bad Company 2 looks good...but not that good.

Anyone that says that looks better than KZ2 has not played KZ2, its as simple as that. From what I'm seeing in that video,Crysis 2 doesn't look like anything special on consoles. Those bullshots be damned!

Crysis is definitely the best fps of all time.MK-Professor

I just about fell out of my chair.

[QUOTE="Ravensmash"]

[QUOTE="Mystic-G"]

Wait are you saying Bad Company 2 looks better than Crysis 2? >.

iKINGBOBi

Bad Company 2 looks good...but not that good.

Anyone that says that looks better than KZ2 has not played KZ2, its as simple as that. From what I'm seeing in that video,Crysis 2 doesn't look like anything special on consoles. Those bullshots be damned!

Oh please...just look at newest Cryengine 3 running on consoles,what it does is much more impressive then KZ2.Everything from textures to shaders,destruction and even lightning,real time global illumination,dynamic rain effects on environments...everything.Even though KZ2 is damn impressive game,Crysis 2 will take the crown with ease;)

[QUOTE="KiZZo1"]

[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]

You are "average" because you cannot play properly this game...
Crysis is not like the corridor shooters with scripted and linear approach.
In order to play Crysis properly and have fun with this game you must have a strategy make decisions before walking into the crossfire it is NOT like run and shoot everything

Crysis is definitely the best fps of all time.

Dynafrom

No it isn't. A quick journey to Metacritic and GameRankings shows that ... And ironically, in 1st place (highest rated game overall on PC) is a very linear and scripted game ...

And HL2 was the most groundbreaking FPS game of its time. Do you even know what you're talking about here?

What don't you agree with? That HL2 is linear and scripted? Did I say that is a bad thing par se?

[QUOTE="Dynafrom"]

[QUOTE="KiZZo1"]

No it isn't. A quick journey to Metacritic and GameRankings shows that ... And ironically, in 1st place (highest rated game overall on PC) is a very linear and scripted game ...

KiZZo1

And HL2 was the most groundbreaking FPS game of its time. Do you even know what you're talking about here?

What don't you agree with? That HL2 is linear and scripted? Did I say that is a bad thing par se?

Killzone 2? Best FPS graphics on consoles? :lol:

That would be BC2.

EndorphinMaster

I don't know what world you live in but KZ2 wasnt ever FPS graphics king.93soccer

I would definitely want to see something better looking than Killzone 2.