I was watching QFT epidsode on Gamespot, and Tom Mcshea brought up a very interesting point.
Whatever the old Halos were, they are over. This is now a new game given into the hands of an "unproven developer" with nothing on their history. This could very much mean that Halo 4 could be a Big F*ck up.
Alot of other people agree with this, yet some lemmings will say...bu bu the secretary for some other game is now on the project. what do you think SW, Discuss how Halo 4 will fail, or will it be another mediocore shooter with the only exclusive online option for lemmings who are pretty much forced to say its the best.
PinnacleGamingP
They could as well change nothing in gameplay from the code they already have from Halo 1-2-3-Reach and be fine
I dont see how you can go wrong starting with a perfect game as base and playing safe
Even the worst developer could make a stunning Halo game when he can have all the code from the previous games in his disposal
It is not like they are staring everything from scratch
And frankly 343 seems way more capable than Bangie, at least in graphics they have surpassed Halo Reach by generations visually, Halo 4 looks like a next gen game and better than all PS3 coming games combined, i dont see anything "unproven" about them really
Log in to comment