will RTS and MMORPG's ever be popular on Consoles?

  • 185 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#101 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

MMORPG's will be the next big thing on consoles. I would actually be surprised if MS or Sony dont make a 1st party attempt at one within the next generation. There is simply too much money to be made (take WoW for example). Again they wont be on consoles in the same form as they are on PC but people really need to get over that they have to be. alextherussian

DC universe is Sony's and it's coming out next year.

Avatar image for Unnatural101
Unnatural101

361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 Unnatural101
Member since 2010 • 361 Posts
First of all..... RTS's could be done on console. In case any of you weren't aware, All the HD consoles have USB ports, and thus have Keyboard and mouse capability. There are games on the PS3 that use K/M. Also, as far as MMORPG's are concerned, if there's anyone who mistakenly thinks they can't be done on console: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEYqM_U_ZAQ
Avatar image for juliankennedy23
juliankennedy23

894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#103 juliankennedy23
Member since 2005 • 894 Posts

[QUOTE="R3FURBISHED"]

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"] Halo Wars is pathetic for PC standards.GeneralShowzer

I realize you are just trying to troll, but at least make a somewhat acceptable answer to understand what is going on.

What do I mean by this? We are talking about the RTS and MMO on consoles. You are talking about all games on PC. See where we I'm going with this?

I am not trying to troll. Halo : Reach, for FPS is good by any standards, Halo Wars is not.

Well in all fairness a more accurate statement would be Halo Wars is pathetic for console standards.

I mean it isn't that awful a game but it is to complex RTS's what Fable 2 is to complex open world RPGs. There are good RTS's on the consoles and there is little excuse why more couldn't be ported over.

Avatar image for MagicMan4597
MagicMan4597

413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 MagicMan4597
Member since 2007 • 413 Posts

The only reason that RTS has not made a complete transition to consoles is the fact that, excluding Starcraft, the RTS genre caters to a relatively small group of gamers. Most console gamers are not these gamers.

Avatar image for tricksta189
tricksta189

342

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 tricksta189
Member since 2006 • 342 Posts

The only reason that RTS has not made a complete transition to consoles is the fact that, excluding Starcraft, the RTS genre caters to a relatively small group of gamers. Most console gamers are not these gamers.

MagicMan4597

"intelligent gamers" is what you are trying to say, I believe..

Avatar image for HaloinventedFPS
HaloinventedFPS

4738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 HaloinventedFPS
Member since 2010 • 4738 Posts

The only reason that RTS has not made a complete transition to consoles is the fact that, excluding Starcraft, the RTS genre caters to a relatively small group of gamers. Most console gamers are not these gamers.

MagicMan4597

the 2 biggest RTS games belong to a PC exclusive dev, thats why

so unless Microsoft/Sony can kill Starcraft/Warcraft 3 i doubt RTS will ever be big on consoles with the whole RTS install base stuck to PC

same with MMORPGS, Sony/Microsoft will have to kill WoW

i wonder what would have happened if Valve stayed PC exclusive...

Avatar image for supdotcom
supdotcom

1121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 supdotcom
Member since 2010 • 1121 Posts

unless they ad kb/m support it'll never grow very popular on consoles. I could see a very dumbed down version working on consoles, but the point of having a console is jumping straight into the action with games like rpgs and fps games.

Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

[QUOTE="MagicMan4597"]

The only reason that RTS has not made a complete transition to consoles is the fact that, excluding Starcraft, the RTS genre caters to a relatively small group of gamers. Most console gamers are not these gamers.

HaloinventedFPS

the 2 biggest RTS games belong to a PC exclusive dev, thats why

so unless Microsoft/Sony can kill Starcraft/Warcraft 3 i doubt RTS will ever be big on consoles with the whole RTS install base stuck to PC

same with MMORPGS, Sony/Microsoft will have to kill WoW

i wonder what would have happened if Valve stayed PC exclusive...

Sony has a very successful MMO department (SOE), that brought about the first major MMO (Ever "crack").

They have the department, and don't need to beat WoW to be successful.

Avatar image for HaloinventedFPS
HaloinventedFPS

4738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 HaloinventedFPS
Member since 2010 • 4738 Posts

[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]

[QUOTE="MagicMan4597"]

The only reason that RTS has not made a complete transition to consoles is the fact that, excluding Starcraft, the RTS genre caters to a relatively small group of gamers. Most console gamers are not these gamers.

dercoo

the 2 biggest RTS games belong to a PC exclusive dev, thats why

so unless Microsoft/Sony can kill Starcraft/Warcraft 3 i doubt RTS will ever be big on consoles with the whole RTS install base stuck to PC

same with MMORPGS, Sony/Microsoft will have to kill WoW

i wonder what would have happened if Valve stayed PC exclusive...

Sony has a very successful MMO department (SOE), that brought about the first major MMO (Ever "crack").

They have the department, and don't need to beat WoW to be successful.

SOE makes games for PC

Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

[QUOTE="dercoo"]

[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]

the 2 biggest RTS games belong to a PC exclusive dev, thats why

so unless Microsoft/Sony can kill Starcraft/Warcraft 3 i doubt RTS will ever be big on consoles with the whole RTS install base stuck to PC

same with MMORPGS, Sony/Microsoft will have to kill WoW

i wonder what would have happened if Valve stayed PC exclusive...

HaloinventedFPS

Sony has a very successful MMO department (SOE), that brought about the first major MMO (Ever "crack").

They have the department, and don't need to beat WoW to be successful.

SOE makes games for PC

1.DC universe will be released in a few months for PC + PS3.

2. They stated all future MMOs would be on PC + console (ps3)

Avatar image for HaloinventedFPS
HaloinventedFPS

4738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 HaloinventedFPS
Member since 2010 • 4738 Posts

[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]

[QUOTE="dercoo"]

Sony has a very successful MMO department (SOE), that brought about the first major MMO (Ever "crack").

They have the department, and don't need to beat WoW to be successful.

dercoo

SOE makes games for PC

1.DC universe will be released in a few months for PC + PS3.

2. They stated all future MMOs would be on PC + console (ps3)

Yes MMO's and RTS can work on consoles we get that, i said will they ever be popular on consoles? for now they are not

Avatar image for NaveedLife
NaveedLife

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 NaveedLife
Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

Here's your problem.

mattuk69

LOL! I think they will become more popular, but as with FPS games, they will still be better and there will be more of them, on the PC.

Avatar image for alextherussian
alextherussian

2642

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 alextherussian
Member since 2009 • 2642 Posts

[QUOTE="alextherussian"]

MMORPG's will be the next big thing on consoles. I would actually be surprised if MS or Sony dont make a 1st party attempt at one within the next generation. There is simply too much money to be made (take WoW for example). Again they wont be on consoles in the same form as they are on PC but people really need to get over that they have to be. Espada12

DC universe is Sony's and it's coming out next year.

There you go then. Good to know, thank you. Ill have a read into it
Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

[QUOTE="dercoo"]

[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]

SOE makes games for PC

HaloinventedFPS

1.DC universe will be released in a few months for PC + PS3.

2. They stated all future MMOs would be on PC + console (ps3)

Yes MMO's and RTS can work on consoles we get that, i said will they ever be popular on consoles? for now they are not

The only real difficulty console MMOs face in terms of pay to play plans (which are foreign to console gamers).

Free or cheap MMOs can easily grow in popularity. Look at "Home", its been successful for Sony. (its like an MMO)

Avatar image for alextherussian
alextherussian

2642

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 alextherussian
Member since 2009 • 2642 Posts
[QUOTE="lowe0"]I don't think anyone would accuse chess of lacking complexity, and it could be adequately controlled on a handheld using just a d pad and one button.Vandalvideo
I would say Chess has less potential complexity than something like SC2.

The roundabout nature of saying something is potentially something else null and voids pretty much any argument. Much like Im saying there is potentially ways of having complex RTS's played with a controller your basically arguing that potentially PC games will be more complex. Since thats going to go nowhere, lets just leave it at:

Potentially
Avatar image for cobrax55
cobrax55

1364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 cobrax55
Member since 2007 • 1364 Posts

[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]

[QUOTE="MagicMan4597"]

The only reason that RTS has not made a complete transition to consoles is the fact that, excluding Starcraft, the RTS genre caters to a relatively small group of gamers. Most console gamers are not these gamers.

dercoo

the 2 biggest RTS games belong to a PC exclusive dev, thats why

so unless Microsoft/Sony can kill Starcraft/Warcraft 3 i doubt RTS will ever be big on consoles with the whole RTS install base stuck to PC

same with MMORPGS, Sony/Microsoft will have to kill WoW

i wonder what would have happened if Valve stayed PC exclusive...

Sony has a very successful MMO department (SOE), that brought about the first major MMO (Ever "crack").

They have the department, and don't need to beat WoW to be successful.

lol, are you kidding? SOE hasnt had a good MMO release in pretty much forever.

And I seriously doubt DC Universe will change that.

Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

[QUOTE="dercoo"]

[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]

the 2 biggest RTS games belong to a PC exclusive dev, thats why

so unless Microsoft/Sony can kill Starcraft/Warcraft 3 i doubt RTS will ever be big on consoles with the whole RTS install base stuck to PC

same with MMORPGS, Sony/Microsoft will have to kill WoW

i wonder what would have happened if Valve stayed PC exclusive...

cobrax55

Sony has a very successful MMO department (SOE), that brought about the first major MMO (Ever "crack").

They have the department, and don't need to beat WoW to be successful.

lol, are you kidding? SOE hasnt had a good MMO release in pretty much forever.

And I seriously doubt DC Universe will change that.

Free realms launched recently to great success for a FTP.

DC Universe has some of the highest preorders of any game right now, and has lots of positie feedback from both PC and console betas.

Avatar image for cobrax55
cobrax55

1364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 cobrax55
Member since 2007 • 1364 Posts

[QUOTE="cobrax55"]

[QUOTE="dercoo"]

Sony has a very successful MMO department (SOE), that brought about the first major MMO (Ever "crack").

They have the department, and don't need to beat WoW to be successful.

dercoo

lol, are you kidding? SOE hasnt had a good MMO release in pretty much forever.

And I seriously doubt DC Universe will change that.

Free realms launched recently to great success for a FTP.

DC Universe has some of the highest preorders of any game right now, and has lots of positie feedback from both PC and console betas.

Free realms is a FTP MMO aimed at the extreamly casual audience, its for a very different crowd then what SOE normally does. SOE's MMO's have pretty much bombed all the way back to everquest 2. I thinking you are fooling yourself if you think that DC Universe is going to be a AAA MMO. The Hype for it, especially among the MMO crowd, is pretty minimal. The game is being released between numerous high profile MMO's, and I doubt the game will actually be anything more then a semi-entertaining side project for MMO players.

Avatar image for Unnatural101
Unnatural101

361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 Unnatural101
Member since 2010 • 361 Posts
[QUOTE="cobrax55"]Free realms is a FTP MMO aimed at the extreamly casual audience, its for a very different crowd then what SOE normally does. SOE's MMO's have pretty much bombed all the way back to everquest 2. I thinking you are fooling yourself if you think that DC Universe is going to be a AAA MMO. The Hype for it, especially among the MMO crowd, is pretty minimal. The game is being released between numerous high profile MMO's, and I doubt the game will actually be anything more then a semi-entertaining side project for MMO players./QUOTE] The point is, Free Realms is and MMO and it has had success...period. According to Sony, Free Realms will arrive on the PS3. DC Universe might end up pretty good....we don't know...lets wait and see. Personally though, I'm hoping GUILD WARS 2 goes to the PS3....that's would be great.
Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#120 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

I'm hoping GUILD WARS 2 goes to the PS3....that's would be great.Unnatural101
I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you.

Avatar image for Unnatural101
Unnatural101

361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 Unnatural101
Member since 2010 • 361 Posts

[QUOTE="Unnatural101"]I'm hoping GUILD WARS 2 goes to the PS3....that's would be great.AdrianWerner

I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you.

I would. NC SOFT has said that they were interested in bringing some of their games to the PS3. What better game to bring than Guild Wars? While I can't give a definitive prediction on GW2, I can say that there is a pretty good chance. However, Star Wars: TOR, I do give a definitive prediction. I predict that at some point EA and/or Bioware will announce that MMO to consoles....specifically the PS3. Why? Because EA is buddy buddy with Sony, and 2, because EA is serious about pitting that game against WoW. But the only real way for that to happen is to go where WoW isn't.....to consoles. Unfortunately, TOR isn't what I really want.....like I said I want Guild Wars 2.
Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

[QUOTE="AdrianWerner"]

[QUOTE="Unnatural101"]I'm hoping GUILD WARS 2 goes to the PS3....that's would be great.Unnatural101

I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you.

I would. NC SOFT has said that they were interested in bringing some of their games to the PS3. What better game to bring than Guild Wars? While I can't give a definitive prediction on GW2, I can say that there is a pretty good chance. However, Star Wars: TOR, I do give a definitive prediction. I predict that at some point EA and/or Bioware will announce that MMO to consoles....specifically the PS3. Why? Because EA is buddy buddy with Sony, and 2, because EA is serious about pitting that game against WoW. But the only real way for that to happen is to go where WoW isn't.....to consoles. Unfortunately, TOR isn't what I really want.....like I said I want Guild Wars 2.

I hope SW TOR goes PS3 bound, even though bioware seems infuriated at the concept. (Still EA wants > bioware)

I won't be getting a PC good enough to play it.

Avatar image for Unnatural101
Unnatural101

361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 Unnatural101
Member since 2010 • 361 Posts

I hope SW TOR goes PS3 bound, even though bioware seems infuriated at the concept. (Still EA wants > bioware)

I won't be getting a PC good enough to play it.

dercoo
Throughout Bioware's history, while they do make some really good games, they've also shown that their business acuity is lower than their talent....That's why EA owns them now, and why Star Wars: TOR will be on consoles, regardless of whether Bioware particularly likes it or not. Kudo's to EA.
Avatar image for Vesica_Prime
Vesica_Prime

7062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#124 Vesica_Prime
Member since 2009 • 7062 Posts

Once consoles get some decent controls I guess.

Avatar image for dalscowboys22
dalscowboys22

1335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#125 dalscowboys22
Member since 2005 • 1335 Posts

when the spend the time to devolp one and allow people to use a mouse and keyboard or controller yes.

Avatar image for coreybg
coreybg

2608

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#126 coreybg
Member since 2009 • 2608 Posts

[QUOTE="dercoo"]

I hope SW TOR goes PS3 bound, even though bioware seems infuriated at the concept. (Still EA wants > bioware)

I won't be getting a PC good enough to play it.

Unnatural101

Throughout Bioware's history, while they do make some really good games, they've also shown that their business acuity is lower than their talent....That's why EA owns them now, and why Star Wars: TOR will be on consoles, regardless of whether Bioware particularly likes it or not. Kudo's to EA.

Since you obviously work at EA or BioWare, could you tell me how you're gonna play an MMO with a controller?

Avatar image for Unnatural101
Unnatural101

361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 Unnatural101
Member since 2010 • 361 Posts

when the spend the time to devolp one and allow people to use a mouse and keyboard or controller yes.

dalscowboys22
BINGO! It isn't that there isn't a market for Console RTS's.....it's that there has never been a great RTS on Consoles, ever...and pretty good (Halo Wars) doesn't equal "GREAT". Almost every single developer has been too lazy to give the simple option of adding Keyboard and Mouse functionality for their RTS-console game. I mean, if you're gonna be too inept to bring good controller based user interfaces, the least you can do is add a K/M option. But those who are saying there is no market for console RTS's, they speak prematurely. Fact is, there has never been a great RTS delivered to consoles. When one does arrive and if said game does perform poorly, sales wise...at that point, then those people will have a right and reason to make that claim. Currently, there is no legitimate right.
Avatar image for Unnatural101
Unnatural101

361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 Unnatural101
Member since 2010 • 361 Posts
Since you obviously work at EA or BioWare, could you tell me how you're gonna play an MMO with a controller?coreybg
Probably much the same way as this one, perhaps. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEYqM_U_ZAQ
Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

The official state of TOR on consoles as of now:

BioWare: No The Old Republic for consoles!

Just because EA gave Sony some DLC doesn't mean they'll gladly port over one of their most expensive projects ever.

Avatar image for Unnatural101
Unnatural101

361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 Unnatural101
Member since 2010 • 361 Posts

The official state of TOR on consoles as of now:

BioWare: No The Old Republic for consoles!

Just because EA gave Sony some DLC doesn't mean they'll gladly port over one of their most expensive projects ever.

waltefmoney
Need I remind you: http://kotaku.com/5462963/mass-effect-on-ps3-bioware-says-no EA's the new sherriff in town, now. EA Loves Consoles EA loves Sony. EA wants Star Wars to do WoW type numbers Nuff said, really.
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="GodofEmpires"][QUOTE="R3FURBISHED"]The RTS has a future on consoles, if developers can take the time to craft a good game ala Halo Wars.R3FURBISHED

PSMove can make RTS games work on consoles, but they just need a great developer behind the game for it to work.

Either Move or Kinect (is that the name of Msofts motion system, i forget) can allow the player to have a freedom with RTS that has never been experienced before. But as we both have stated, you need a developer who is willing to spend the time to create such an experience.

More RAM is needed, though. RTS's, especially today, can be very hungry especially when you get a high unit count. But for an RTS to work, you can't rely on the PC RTS formula--it's micromanagement motif relies too much on the PC's preferred devices. You'd need a different scheme altogether--a way to alter the S part of the RTS so that, perhaps, you can't micromanage, can only give orders in broad, or have delays in being able to see movements or having commands carried out (I say this because these could add more realistic elements to an RTS which may be a good way to take RTS's in new directions, but the audience has to want it first).
Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

[QUOTE="waltefmoney"]

The official state of TOR on consoles as of now:

BioWare: No The Old Republic for consoles!

Just because EA gave Sony some DLC doesn't mean they'll gladly port over one of their most expensive projects ever.

Unnatural101

Need I remind you: http://kotaku.com/5462963/mass-effect-on-ps3-bioware-says-no EA's the new sherriff in town, now. EA Loves Consoles EA loves Sony. EA wants Star Wars to do WoW type numbers Nuff said, really.

Fair enough, so you can expect to hear info about TOR on consoles a year after the game is released.. if it survives that long. As of now - the game is NOT coming to consoles.

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
[QUOTE="waltefmoney"]

The official state of TOR on consoles as of now:

BioWare: No The Old Republic for consoles!

Just because EA gave Sony some DLC doesn't mean they'll gladly port over one of their most expensive projects ever.

Unnatural101
Need I remind you: http://kotaku.com/5462963/mass-effect-on-ps3-bioware-says-no EA's the new sherriff in town, now. EA Loves Consoles EA loves Sony. EA wants Star Wars to do WoW type numbers Nuff said, really.

But even EA knows that MMOs are a real hit-or-miss affair on consoles. Two Phantasy Star MMOs have come and gone. FF11's a shadow of its former self, and 14's a big question mark along with DC Online. Taking TOR to the PS3 will depend a lot on what happens here, and I would think EA is canny enough to make sure it'll take before diving in.
Avatar image for Unnatural101
Unnatural101

361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 Unnatural101
Member since 2010 • 361 Posts
More RAM is needed, though. RTS's, especially today, can be very hungry especially when you get a high unit count. But for an RTS to work, you can't rely on the PC RTS formula--it's micromanagement motif relies too much on the PC's preferred devices. You'd need a different scheme altogether--a way to alter the S part of the RTS so that, perhaps, you can't micromanage, can only give orders in broad, or have delays in being able to see movements or having commands carried out (I say this because these could add more realistic elements to an RTS which may be a good way to take RTS's in new directions, but the audience has to want it first).HuusAsking
More ram is needed for what, exactly? The ram in consoles (512 MB) may seem small in comparison to PC ram, but it's also not an apples to apples comparison. Because of the low overhead of consoles, and with proper game optimizations, That half gig of console ram is equivalent to 1.5 - 2 GB of PC ram....approx. That's an estimation of course, but a proper "in the ballpark" one.
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
[QUOTE="HuusAsking"]More RAM is needed, though. RTS's, especially today, can be very hungry especially when you get a high unit count. But for an RTS to work, you can't rely on the PC RTS formula--it's micromanagement motif relies too much on the PC's preferred devices. You'd need a different scheme altogether--a way to alter the S part of the RTS so that, perhaps, you can't micromanage, can only give orders in broad, or have delays in being able to see movements or having commands carried out (I say this because these could add more realistic elements to an RTS which may be a good way to take RTS's in new directions, but the audience has to want it first).Unnatural101
More ram is needed for what, exactly? The ram in consoles (512 MB) may seem small in comparison to PC ram, but it's also not an apples to apples comparison. Because of the low overhead of consoles, and with proper game optimizations, That half gig of console ram is equivalent to 1.5 - 2 GB of PC ram....approx. That's an estimation of course, but a proper "in the ballpark" one.

(Shakes head) PC games are usually optimized, too, so they'll flow better (needed for high-intensity RTS's). Plus Windows overhead is usually overrated. Subtracting that usually shows the game still using much more memory than a console will allow. Plus you have to figure the graphics RAM, which is distinct on PCs. Why else would console RTS's have unit caps their PC counterparts don't.
Avatar image for Unnatural101
Unnatural101

361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 Unnatural101
Member since 2010 • 361 Posts
But even EA knows that MMOs are a real hit-or-miss affair on consoles. Two Phantasy Star MMOs have come and gone. FF11's a shadow of its former self, and 14's a big question mark along with DC Online. Taking TOR to the PS3 will depend a lot on what happens here, and I would think EA is canny enough to make sure it'll take before diving in.HuusAsking
Phantasy Star is nice.....but Phantasy Star isn't STAR WARS....not even by a longshot. FF11 is still running on consoles too btw, and has been a success overall. The game is 8 years old too btw. EA already has the network infrastructure on the PS3 to do this. It will happen. I'd honestly be shocked and surprised if it didn't. But I'm a prophet, so count it already. ;)
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
[QUOTE="HuusAsking"]But even EA knows that MMOs are a real hit-or-miss affair on consoles. Two Phantasy Star MMOs have come and gone. FF11's a shadow of its former self, and 14's a big question mark along with DC Online. Taking TOR to the PS3 will depend a lot on what happens here, and I would think EA is canny enough to make sure it'll take before diving in.Unnatural101
Phantasy Star is nice.....but Phantasy Star isn't STAR WARS. FF11 is still running on consoles too btw, and has been a success overall. The game is 8 years old too btw. EA already has the network infrastructure on the PS3 to do this. It will happen. I'd honestly be shocked and surprised if it didn't. But I'm a prophet, so count it already. ;)

Where did EA's network infrastructure come from? An MMO's network infrastructure is a lot different from that used for other types of games because they have to run persistent content. It's like comparing Home's infrastructure to PSN's. Plus MMOs take dedication to play properly (look at the real-life incidents relating to MMO players going too far). Do you really see console gamers having the dedication to play an MMO long enough to make it worthwhile? Perhaps FF14 and DC Online will provide some much-needed measuring sticks.
Avatar image for Unnatural101
Unnatural101

361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 Unnatural101
Member since 2010 • 361 Posts
Where did EA's network infrastructure come from? An MMO's network infrastructure is a lot different from that used for other types of games because they have to run persistent content. It's like comparing Home's infrastructure to PSN's. Plus MMOs take dedication to play properly (look at the real-life incidents relating to MMO players going too far). Do you really see console gamers having the dedication to play an MMO long enough to make it worthwhile? Perhaps FF14 and DC Online will provide some much-needed measuring sticks.HuusAsking
You made a grave mistake in mentioning HOME. Maybe you didn't know, but HOME is a first party MMO.....multiple updates and all. However, the reason I mentioned EA's network infrastructure is because EA runs their own private servers away from PSN. A select few developer/publishers are granted this latitude....EA, Konami, Tecmo-Koei, Valve, and presumably NC SOFT whenever they get their unannounced game ready.
Avatar image for madsnakehhh
madsnakehhh

18368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#139 madsnakehhh
Member since 2007 • 18368 Posts

Mark my words.

If this

MC

Or this:

poke

Someday arrive as MMORPG's on consoles and it's done well, then it will work.

Avatar image for Unnatural101
Unnatural101

361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 Unnatural101
Member since 2010 • 361 Posts

[QUOTE="Unnatural101"][QUOTE="waltefmoney"]

The official state of TOR on consoles as of now:

BioWare: No The Old Republic for consoles!

Just because EA gave Sony some DLC doesn't mean they'll gladly port over one of their most expensive projects ever.

waltefmoney

Need I remind you: http://kotaku.com/5462963/mass-effect-on-ps3-bioware-says-no EA's the new sherriff in town, now. EA Loves Consoles EA loves Sony. EA wants Star Wars to do WoW type numbers Nuff said, really.

Fair enough, so you can expect to hear info about TOR on consoles a year after the game is released.. if it survives that long. As of now - the game is NOT coming to consoles.

Since Bioware lied before, Closer to the truth is, Star Wars: TOR hasn't been announced for consoles...... yet. ;)
Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#141 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

[QUOTE="waltefmoney"]

The official state of TOR on consoles as of now:

BioWare: No The Old Republic for consoles!

Just because EA gave Sony some DLC doesn't mean they'll gladly port over one of their most expensive projects ever.

Unnatural101

Need I remind you: http://kotaku.com/5462963/mass-effect-on-ps3-bioware-says-no EA's the new sherriff in town, now. EA Loves Consoles EA loves Sony. EA wants Star Wars to do WoW type numbers Nuff said, really.

Unfortunately TOR is created with PC in mind as opposed to SOE doing it with Ps3 in mind. So the gameplay won't translate very well so it's highly unlikely.

Avatar image for Unnatural101
Unnatural101

361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 Unnatural101
Member since 2010 • 361 Posts
Unfortunately TOR is created with PC in mind as opposed to SOE doing it with Ps3 in mind. So the gameplay won't translate very well so it's highly unlikely.Espada12
What does being developed for the "PC in mind" have to do with anything? Sure didn't mean a thing for this MMORPG: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncharted_Waters_Online
Avatar image for HaloinventedFPS
HaloinventedFPS

4738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 HaloinventedFPS
Member since 2010 • 4738 Posts

TOR is going to flop, ive heard its just another Wow clone

i wish more MMO's try to be more original, only Runescape is doing original things atm, Runescape has great quests, instead of just killing 10 boars

Avatar image for cobrax55
cobrax55

1364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 cobrax55
Member since 2007 • 1364 Posts

[QUOTE="Espada12"]Unfortunately TOR is created with PC in mind as opposed to SOE doing it with Ps3 in mind. So the gameplay won't translate very well so it's highly unlikely.Unnatural101
What does being developed for the "PC in mind" have to do with anything? Sure didn't mean a thing for this MMORPG: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncharted_Waters_Online

That MMO doesnt even resemble any Western PC MMO, nor TOR. I really have no idea why you keep posting that? Have you ever actualy played an MMO Before? or does it contend you just to post random crap that has nothing to do with the discussion at hand.

TOR isnt coming to consoles, get over it.

Avatar image for Unnatural101
Unnatural101

361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 Unnatural101
Member since 2010 • 361 Posts
That MMO doesnt even resemble any Western PC MMO, nor TOR. I really have no idea why you keep posting that? Have you ever actualy played an MMO Before? or does it contend you just to post random crap that has nothing to do with the discussion at hand. TOR isnt coming to consoles, get over it.cobrax55
Oh I see...it only counts if it meats a Western Standard. *rolls eyes* TOR has about as much of a chance to go to consoles as Mass Effect 2 did around this time last year. Besides, like I said, I prophesized it already....it's a done deal. ;)
Avatar image for cobrax55
cobrax55

1364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 cobrax55
Member since 2007 • 1364 Posts

[QUOTE="cobrax55"]That MMO doesnt even resemble any Western PC MMO, nor TOR. I really have no idea why you keep posting that? Have you ever actualy played an MMO Before? or does it contend you just to post random crap that has nothing to do with the discussion at hand. TOR isnt coming to consoles, get over it.Unnatural101
Oh I see...it only counts if it meats a Western Standard. *rolls eyes* TOR has about as much of a chance to go to consoles as Mass Effect 2 did around this time last year. Besides, like I said, I prophesized it already....it's a done deal. ;)

The fact that its not a Western MMO matterns, in terms of interface design. Interfaces for Western MMO's are very button heavy, going well beyond what console controllers can handle.

And again, you have absolutly no evidence of TOR going to consoles. I dont know why you bring up mass effect 2 as some sort of example as though it actually matters. Mass effect was already on consoles, not to mention in a totally different genre then what we are talking about.

Avatar image for Unnatural101
Unnatural101

361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 Unnatural101
Member since 2010 • 361 Posts
But to your question, cobrax55, I keep showing this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mfE9lnDGQA Because I know alot of people didn't even know this existed, and I like to educate the masses... and #2, because it shows a frame of reference of an MMORPG that once was on PC only for years, and then "suddenly" appeared on the PS3. Proof, if you will. So obviously, if this game can be done on the consoles, specifically the PS3, then it isn't a stretch for other MMORPG's to be done either. Edit.....Also the reason I sited Mass Effect 2 and the reason it matters is because it shows that Bioware LIED. So when they say TOR won't appear, we have a recent enough example that tells us they are not to be trusted when questioned about platform choice(es). Knowing is half the battle. :)
Avatar image for cobrax55
cobrax55

1364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148 cobrax55
Member since 2007 • 1364 Posts

But to your question, cobrax55, I keep showing this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mfE9lnDGQA Because I know alot of people didn't even know this existed, and I like to educate the masses... and #2, because it shows a frame of reference of an MMORPG that once was on PC only for years, and then "suddenly" appeared on the PS3. Proof, if you will. So obviously, if this game can be done on the consoles, specifically the PS3, then it isn't a stretch for other MMORPG's to be done either.Unnatural101

This game has nothing in common with western MMO's. Not to mention that its a Japenese game, and the market over their is very different then it is here. It wasnt even released in the US for the PS3.

your not even talking about similar situations.

Avatar image for cobrax55
cobrax55

1364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 cobrax55
Member since 2007 • 1364 Posts

But to your question, cobrax55, I keep showing this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mfE9lnDGQA Because I know alot of people didn't even know this existed, and I like to educate the masses... and #2, because it shows a frame of reference of an MMORPG that once was on PC only for years, and then "suddenly" appeared on the PS3. Proof, if you will. So obviously, if this game can be done on the consoles, specifically the PS3, then it isn't a stretch for other MMORPG's to be done either. Edit.....Also the reason I sited Mass Effect 2 and the reason it matters is because it shows that Bioware LIED. So when they say TOR won't appear, we have a recent enough example that tells us they are not to be trusted when questioned about platform choice(es). Knowing is half the battle. :)Unnatural101

Bioware didnt lie, they said what they did knowing what they did at that time.

Mass Effect 2 was already on consoles, its not like it was a PC game designed for a different interface and for a genre that pretty much doesnt exist on consoles.

I dont know why you keep saying all of this like its of some sort of importance.

Avatar image for Unnatural101
Unnatural101

361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#150 Unnatural101
Member since 2010 • 361 Posts
Bioware didnt lie, they said what they did knowing what they did at that time. Mass Effect 2 was already on consoles, its not like it was a PC game designed for a different interface and for a genre that pretty much doesnt exist on consoles. I dont know why you keep saying all of this like its of some sort of importance.cobrax55
Yes they did...they lied. They knew all along Mass Effect 2 was gonna be on the PS3. But that and the Uncharted Waters info by itself isn't of great importance by itself, but when you take in everything, then the picture becomes more clear. 1. Bioware lies 2. PC based MMORPG(s) already exists on the PS3 3. EA loves consoles. 4. EA is buddy buddy with Sony 5. EA has gone on record to say they want MMO's on consoles. 6. EA has high aspirations for SW: TOR 7. 50+ million user install base on the PS3 at TOR's launch with low MMORPG competition 8. EA has the proper network infrastucture to do MMO's...an "autonomous" PS3 infrastructure that runs away from PSN The bottom line is, when you put all of that together and understand all of said info, it makes it much easier to make the prediction.