With all these excellent Zelda clones. Will the Zelda series finally die..?

  • 153 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for farnham
farnham

21147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 farnham
Member since 2003 • 21147 Posts

As many of you know when the clones of the genre king get better and better the main series usually dies. We have seen this with FPS games (Doom is no longer the predominant FPS game), with realistic racing games (Virtua Racer was the benchmark at one point then it was GT now its Forza) and it kinda happens now with open world games (GTA IV was successful but GTA EoLC sold well below expectations and GTA CW bombed on every platform it appeared -of course relatively speaking-) and also WRPG games (Once Ultima was the predominant one. Now its probably between Bioware RPGs and Bethesda RPGs).

On the contrary no 2D Platformers ever reached Mario, no 3D platformer ever reached Mario and no Kart Racer ever reached Mario Kart (Yes Sonic, Sonic Adventure and Sonic and Sega Superstars racing are great and all. But they dont compare to the sales number and overall quality of the aforementioned games) And we see that the progenitor franchise is still intact while the challengers have dwindled a lot. Similar things can be said about JRPGs as the two origin titles (Dragon Quest and Final Fantasy) have yet to encounter a successful clone (Pokemon is a JRPG too but it is geared towards another crowd then the other two games i believe).

Now Zelda was long considered to be a game that has no clone. Or at least no successful clone. The only game that was considered to be a worthy clone was Okami. Now in 2010 things have changed quite a lot. Darksiders came out and people consider it to be way superior then any 3D zelda game ever created and 3D Dot Heroes is considered to be even better then Alttp. Not only that on the DS Okamiden will comeout and will probably claim the crown of DS Action Adventure Puzzler that Zelda Spirit Track currently holds. Now Zelda is getting attacked by three superb clones or followers that are considered to be both evolutionary as well as potentially even more successful (Especially since Darksiders and 3D Dot Heroes are being published on HD consoles which tend to sell more software). Could this mean the end of the Zelda series and the beginning of a new era of Zelda like games ? Especially since Zelda sales were pretty bad in the last decade (all less then 10 million. which is bad in nintendo terms).

Avatar image for sleepingzzz
sleepingzzz

2263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#2 sleepingzzz
Member since 2006 • 2263 Posts

No

Avatar image for michael582
michael582

1064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 michael582
Member since 2003 • 1064 Posts

Nope

Avatar image for CDUB316
CDUB316

6589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 CDUB316
Member since 2009 • 6589 Posts

sure they're excellent, but they are FAR from better

Avatar image for farnham
farnham

21147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 farnham
Member since 2003 • 21147 Posts

No

sleepingzzz
could you elaborate..? There is more and more competition in the same genre and the series itself has no selling power compared to mario, pokemon or wii sports while it probably costs a lot more in comparison to those games. sure the game probably doesnt loose money. but nintendo can make 4 wii... titles if they cut the zelda series and that means about x8 the sales
Avatar image for farnham
farnham

21147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 farnham
Member since 2003 • 21147 Posts

sure they're excellent, but they are FAR from better

CDUB316
a lot of people consider them far better.
Avatar image for gammon56
gammon56

779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 gammon56
Member since 2009 • 779 Posts

Hahahahahahahahaha no hopefully it will cause nintendo to actually change the games up a bit though.

Avatar image for AmayaPapaya
AmayaPapaya

9029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#8 AmayaPapaya
Member since 2008 • 9029 Posts

We will see at E3. I doubt Zelda will be stolen of anything.

Avatar image for nitromuffin
nitromuffin

972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 nitromuffin
Member since 2007 • 972 Posts

No

sleepingzzz
Avatar image for Shottayouth13-
Shottayouth13-

7018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Shottayouth13-
Member since 2009 • 7018 Posts
Not even if Nintendo kills it themselves.
Avatar image for CDUB316
CDUB316

6589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 CDUB316
Member since 2009 • 6589 Posts

[QUOTE="CDUB316"]

sure they're excellent, but they are FAR from better

farnham

a lot of people consider them far better.

besides you....who?

Avatar image for roxlimn
roxlimn

1104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 roxlimn
Member since 2003 • 1104 Posts
Don't know of all that many people who would consider Darksiders better than Twilight Princess. I mean, what reasons could there be? That it's more "mature?" Most people I know think it's rather a good game that's not as good at Zelda at being Zelda, nor as good at being GoW as GoW - a nice combination, but hardly a threat to either series.
Avatar image for pitty8982
pitty8982

1072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 pitty8982
Member since 2008 • 1072 Posts
No
Avatar image for kussese
kussese

1555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#14 kussese
Member since 2008 • 1555 Posts

No

sleepingzzz

Pretty much.

Avatar image for sonic_spark
sonic_spark

6196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#15 sonic_spark
Member since 2003 • 6196 Posts

[QUOTE="CDUB316"]

sure they're excellent, but they are FAR from better

farnham

a lot of people consider them far better.

Nobody, not one person, not one reviewer, think that any of the Zelda clones are anywhere near the caliber of the Zelda games.

Zelda is something else. Zelda will never die.

Avatar image for AmayaPapaya
AmayaPapaya

9029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#16 AmayaPapaya
Member since 2008 • 9029 Posts

[QUOTE="farnham"][QUOTE="CDUB316"]

sure they're excellent, but they are FAR from better

CDUB316

a lot of people consider them far better.

besides you....who?

I'd consider Okami better than TP, or about the same. But that is the highest I'm willing to go.

Avatar image for farnham
farnham

21147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 farnham
Member since 2003 • 21147 Posts

[QUOTE="farnham"][QUOTE="CDUB316"]

sure they're excellent, but they are FAR from better

sonic_spark

a lot of people consider them far better.

Nobody, not one person, not one reviewer, think that any of the Zelda clones are anywhere near the caliber of the Zelda games.

Zelda is something else. Zelda will never die.

well people claimed similar things about Doom and Ultima. where are those games now.
Avatar image for 789shadow
789shadow

20195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#18 789shadow
Member since 2006 • 20195 Posts

.

Seriously, no way.

Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts

Darksiders came out and people consider it to be way superior then any 3D zelda game ever created

farnham

Considered by whom?

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

I don't think yo get exactly just how fanatic the Zelda base really is.

Avatar image for GamerForca
GamerForca

7203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 78

User Lists: 0

#21 GamerForca
Member since 2005 • 7203 Posts
[QUOTE="farnham"][QUOTE="CDUB316"]

sure they're excellent, but they are FAR from better

a lot of people consider them far better.

Yeah, maybe younger gamers that have never played Zelda. I'd agree that Okami is better than most Zeldas, but Darksiders? Is this a sick joke? Darksiders > Ocarina of Time? Wtf?
Avatar image for painguy1
painguy1

8686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 painguy1
Member since 2007 • 8686 Posts

People siad Darksiders is better than Zelda? hahah yeah sure. Maybe in yourworld dude.

Avatar image for sonic_spark
sonic_spark

6196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#23 sonic_spark
Member since 2003 • 6196 Posts

[QUOTE="sonic_spark"]

[QUOTE="farnham"] a lot of people consider them far better.farnham

Nobody, not one person, not one reviewer, think that any of the Zelda clones are anywhere near the caliber of the Zelda games.

Zelda is something else. Zelda will never die.

well people claimed similar things about Doom and Ultima. where are those games now.

Zelda has been doing it for over a dozen games, each of them memorable. From 8-bit to the current gen. You're using examples of games that had very very few installments.

The only reason Doom gets acknowledged because at the time it was revolutionary. But once other games came out, they failed to recapture their audience. Nintendo with Zelda has done it over a dozen times. Through different gens, crossing different platforms, and they amaze us each and everytime. The games in your examples don't have the track record of Zelda.

Few games do.

Avatar image for skinny_man_69
skinny_man_69

5147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 94

User Lists: 0

#24 skinny_man_69
Member since 2005 • 5147 Posts

[QUOTE="farnham"]

Darksiders came out and people consider it to be way superior then any 3D zelda game ever created

PannicAtack

Considered by whom?

Best signature of all time goes to PannicAtack

Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts
funny seeing as most of these clones aren't even as good as lower tier Zelda's
Avatar image for Mario1331
Mario1331

8929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#26 Mario1331
Member since 2005 • 8929 Posts

[QUOTE="farnham"][QUOTE="CDUB316"]

sure they're excellent, but they are FAR from better

GamerForca

a lot of people consider them far better.

Yeah, maybe younger gamers that have never played Zelda. I'd agree that Okami is better than most Zeldas, but Darksiders? Is this a sick joke? Darksiders > Ocarina of Time? Wtf?

lol thats funny

but seriously i dont even think Okami is better then most zeldas okami is a good game no an excellent game but not better then most zeldas

people just like to see nintendo franchises die which idk why they are the cream of the crop in the gaming industry

Avatar image for farnham
farnham

21147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 farnham
Member since 2003 • 21147 Posts

I don't think yo get exactly just how fanatic the Zelda base really is.

Serraph105
thats the problem. nintendo cant live off a fanatic fanbase alone. making a zelda game takes a lot of talented developers around 4 years. a wii.. title takes half of those developers 2 years. which means one zelda game costs similar effort to four wii.. titles. moreover the wii... titles sell 2 times as much as zelda do minimum. in other words making one zelda game to please the fanatic fanbase makes 1/8 Money in comparison to selling four wii.. games to the casuals.
Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts

[QUOTE="PannicAtack"]

[QUOTE="farnham"]

Darksiders came out and people consider it to be way superior then any 3D zelda game ever created

skinny_man_69

Considered by whom?

Best signature of all time goes to PannicAtack

Eh. I've got like a dozen of them.
Avatar image for 789shadow
789shadow

20195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#29 789shadow
Member since 2006 • 20195 Posts

[QUOTE="Serraph105"]

I don't think yo get exactly just how fanatic the Zelda base really is.

farnham

thats the problem. nintendo cant live off a fanatic fanbase alone. making a zelda game takes a lot of talented developers around 4 years. a wii.. title takes half of those developers 2 years. which means one zelda game costs similar effort to four wii.. titles. moreover the wii... titles sell 2 times as much as zelda do minimum. in other words making one zelda game to please the fanatic fanbase makes 1/8 Money in comparison to selling four wii.. games to the casuals.

You mean they can't do what they've been doing for years now?

Avatar image for gamecubepad
gamecubepad

7214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -12

User Lists: 0

#30 gamecubepad
Member since 2003 • 7214 Posts

According to Metacritic:

Twilight Princess - 95

Wind Waker - 96

Majora's Mask - 95

Ocarina of Time - 99

---

According to VGChartz(lulz):

Twilight Princess - 7.08 million

Wind Waker - 4.55 million

Majora's Mask - 3.36 million

Ocarina of Time - 7.60 million

---

My guess is the new Zelda Wii game will have a metacritic rating of 95+ and top 5 million sales. Am I going out on a limb here?

Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#31 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts

Darksiders came out and people consider it to be way superior then any 3D zelda game ever created and 3D Dot Heroes is considered to be even better then Alttp.

farnham

:|

No they don't and no it isn't.

Stop using strawmen.

Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts
Yeah. Zelda is one of the most highly esteemed and most popular franchises in the industry. Who has been saying these clones are better? I'll grant Okami is very highly-esteemed, but Darksiders and 3D Dot Game Heroes? I haven't seen anyone say those are on the same level or superior.
Avatar image for D00nut
D00nut

7618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#33 D00nut
Member since 2003 • 7618 Posts

Did Mario die?

Did Street Fighter die?

Did Halo die?

Avatar image for farnham
farnham

21147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 farnham
Member since 2003 • 21147 Posts

[QUOTE="farnham"][QUOTE="sonic_spark"]

Nobody, not one person, not one reviewer, think that any of the Zelda clones are anywhere near the caliber of the Zelda games.

Zelda is something else. Zelda will never die.

sonic_spark

well people claimed similar things about Doom and Ultima. where are those games now.

Zelda has been doing it for over a dozen games, each of them memorable. From 8-bit to the current gen. You're using examples of games that had very very few installments.

The only reason Doom gets acknowledged because at the time it was revolutionary. But once other games came out, they failed to recapture their audience. Nintendo with Zelda has done it over a dozen times. Through different gens, crossing different platforms, and they amaze us each and everytime. The games in your examples don't have the track record of Zelda.

Few games do.

yes but think of the reason why. Zelda was not as significant to Nintendo in the SNES days since they had games like final fantasy, donkey kong, mario or dragon quest that did a better job selling systems. On N64 and Gamecube it became very significant because a lot of fanboys would buy systems just for that game. It was on N64 and Gamecube that zelda became the third pillar franchise (first one mario, second pokemon) Now that third pillar has been removed financially since Nintendo has way bigger guns (Braintraining, nintendogs, Wii.. series) then zelda that are way cheaper to make. The only reason why Nintendo made Zelda still, was that they had little competition in that niche space. Now that darksiders or 3D dot heroes as well as okami came out there are a lot of clones that do a much better job then zelda does. And that probably wont end. Dark siders is already getting a sequel and 3D dot heroes could get one too. EA and Activision might follow suit and create a zelda like action adventure (especially looking at the sales of darksiders which did quite well for a new IP) In other words the genre is getting more and more crowded and as the genre is only catering to a very specific crowd it is going to get harder and harder to even get zelda right for the fans. Which makes developing Wii.. titles even more attractive then it already is
Avatar image for ogvampire
ogvampire

9210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 ogvampire
Member since 2008 • 9210 Posts

[QUOTE="sonic_spark"]

[QUOTE="farnham"] well people claimed similar things about Doom and Ultima. where are those games now.farnham

Zelda has been doing it for over a dozen games, each of them memorable. From 8-bit to the current gen. You're using examples of games that had very very few installments.

The only reason Doom gets acknowledged because at the time it was revolutionary. But once other games came out, they failed to recapture their audience. Nintendo with Zelda has done it over a dozen times. Through different gens, crossing different platforms, and they amaze us each and everytime. The games in your examples don't have the track record of Zelda.

Few games do.

yes but think of the reason why. Zelda was not as significant to Nintendo in the SNES days since they had games like final fantasy, donkey kong, mario or dragon quest that did a better job selling systems. On N64 and Gamecube it became very significant because a lot of fanboys would buy systems just for that game. It was on N64 and Gamecube that zelda became the third pillar franchise (first one mario, second pokemon) Now that third pillar has been removed financially since Nintendo has way bigger guns (Braintraining, nintendogs, Wii.. series) then zelda that are way cheaper to make. The only reason why Nintendo made Zelda still, was that they had little competition in that niche space. Now that darksiders or 3D dot heroes as well as okami came out there are a lot of clones that do a much better job then zelda does. And that probably wont end. Dark siders is already getting a sequel and 3D dot heroes could get one too. EA and Activision might follow suit and create a zelda like action adventure (especially looking at the sales of darksiders which did quite well for a new IP) In other words the genre is getting more and more crowded and as the genre is only catering to a very specific crowd it is going to get harder and harder to even get zelda right for the fans. Which makes developing Wii.. titles even more attractive then it already is

this whole time you have only named 3 games, 2 of which are nowhere near zelda's quality... so where are these 'lot of clones that do a better job'?

Avatar image for caryslan2
caryslan2

2486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 caryslan2
Member since 2005 • 2486 Posts

[QUOTE="sonic_spark"]

[QUOTE="farnham"] a lot of people consider them far better.farnham

Nobody, not one person, not one reviewer, think that any of the Zelda clones are anywhere near the caliber of the Zelda games.

Zelda is something else. Zelda will never die.

well people claimed similar things about Doom and Ultima. where are those games now.

Doom 3 was a success and Doom 4 is currently in development, so Doom is far from dead. As for Ultima, that series died due to EA's poor handling of the franchise.

Avatar image for Kashiwaba
Kashiwaba

8059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Kashiwaba
Member since 2005 • 8059 Posts

Probably no I'm not a big Zelda fan and I agree recently the series is going on a downfall but still I dont think Zelda will die anytime soon.

Avatar image for _BlueDuck_
_BlueDuck_

11986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 _BlueDuck_
Member since 2003 • 11986 Posts

Darksiders lacked everything that makes the Zelda series amazing. It can't even match up to the Zelda clones of last gen (Starfox Adventures, Sphinx and the Cursed Mummy, Beyond Good and Evil).

3D Dot Heroes is a great clone of the original Zelda but little more, and all subsequent Zelda games have improved upon that game.

Okami is excellent though I don't think it matches Zelda in quality, nor do I consider it a clone unless you consider all action-adventure games with an overworld and dungeons to be Zelda clones.

But let's say you're right, and all these games are better; that in no way indicates that the Zelda series will die.

Avatar image for roxlimn
roxlimn

1104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 roxlimn
Member since 2003 • 1104 Posts
Talk to us when you have a clear example of a Zelda clone that's better than a Zelda game. Until then, your concerns are ill-founded. I think it's nice that we're getting more games in this style, but I don't think third parties have that formula down pat just yet. Okami was a great game, but I don't consider it superior to TP or Wind Waker.
Avatar image for farnham
farnham

21147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 farnham
Member since 2003 • 21147 Posts

Did Mario die?

Did Street Fighter die?

Did Halo die?

D00nut
Mario had no real Platforming competitor. Not in 2D and not in 3D. The games that came out did never reach the critical acclaim or sales popularity of mario. the only exception is maybe sonic but he has fallen deep since the genesis days.. Street Fighter was in a very long sleep because of the same reason. 2D fighting games and 3D fighting games got very very crowded in the late 90s with games like KOF, Fatal Fury, Art of Fighting, Marvel Vs. Capcom, Street Fighter, Soul Calibur, Tekken, Virtua Fighter, Last Blade, Samurai Showdown, World Heroes, Guilty Gears etc. etc. The whole Genre did not expand but the individual game sales suffered. Street Fighter 2 for example managed to sell over 2 million copies in japan only. In the late 90s a fighting game was lucky to break 1 million. Now street fighter 4 (which is probably the most popular out of them) sold about 200k in Japan alone. The market got overcrowded without proper expandition and ultimately it let to the death of many franchises. Halo is hardly the first FPS game. It is a highly regarded and popular franchise at the moment. But its definately not the origin.
Avatar image for farnham
farnham

21147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 farnham
Member since 2003 • 21147 Posts

Darksiders lacked everything that makes the Zelda series amazing. It can't even match up to the Zelda clones of last gen (Starfox Adventures, Sphinx and the Cursed Mummy, Beyond Good and Evil).

3D Dot Heroes is a great clone of the original Zelda but little more, and all subsequent Zelda games have improved upon that game.

Okami is excellent though I don't think it matches Zelda in quality, nor do I consider it a clone unless you consider all action-adventure games with an overworld and dungeons to be Zelda clones.

But let's say you're right, and all these games are better; that in no way indicates that the Zelda series will die.

_BlueDuck_
well zelda did not sell 20 million units did it. why would nintendo make zelda when it cant even reach wii fit sales while wii fit is a lot cheaper to develop ?
Avatar image for farnham
farnham

21147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 farnham
Member since 2003 • 21147 Posts

According to Metacritic:

Twilight Princess - 95

Wind Waker - 96

Majora's Mask - 95

Ocarina of Time - 99

---

According to VGChartz(lulz):

Twilight Princess - 7.08 million

Wind Waker - 4.55 million

Majora's Mask - 3.36 million

Ocarina of Time - 7.60 million

---

My guess is the new Zelda Wii game will have a metacritic rating of 95+ and top 5 million sales. Am I going out on a limb here?

gamecubepad

yeah you got it right none of the game sold more then 10 million units. right now that is disastrous for nintendo standards

Avatar image for ogvampire
ogvampire

9210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 ogvampire
Member since 2008 • 9210 Posts

[QUOTE="gamecubepad"]

According to Metacritic:

Twilight Princess - 95

Wind Waker - 96

Majora's Mask - 95

Ocarina of Time - 99

---

According to VGChartz(lulz):

Twilight Princess - 7.08 million

Wind Waker - 4.55 million

Majora's Mask - 3.36 million

Ocarina of Time - 7.60 million

---

My guess is the new Zelda Wii game will have a metacritic rating of 95+ and top 5 million sales. Am I going out on a limb here?

farnham

yeah you got it right none of the game sold more then 10 million units. right now that is disastrous for nintendo standards

huh? oh, i got it... this is a joke thread

Avatar image for Half-Way
Half-Way

5001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Half-Way
Member since 2010 • 5001 Posts

As many of you know when the clones of the genre king get better and better the main series usually dies. We have seen this with FPS games (Doom is no longer the predominant FPS game), with realistic racing games (Virtua Racer was the benchmark at one point then it was GT now its Forza) and it kinda happens now with open world games (GTA IV was successful but GTA EoLC sold well below expectations and GTA CW bombed on every platform it appeared -of course relatively speaking-) and also WRPG games (Once Ultima was the predominant one. Now its probably between Bioware RPGs and Bethesda RPGs).

On the contrary no 2D Platformers ever reached Mario, no 3D platformer ever reached Mario and no Kart Racer ever reached Mario Kart (Yes Sonic, Sonic Adventure and Sonic and Sega Superstars racing are great and all. But they dont compare to the sales number and overall quality of the aforementioned games) And we see that the progenitor franchise is still intact while the challengers have dwindled a lot. Similar things can be said about JRPGs as the two origin titles (Dragon Quest and Final Fantasy) have yet to encounter a successful clone (Pokemon is a JRPG too but it is geared towards another crowd then the other two games i believe).

Now Zelda was long considered to be a game that has no clone. Or at least no successful clone. The only game that was considered to be a worthy clone was Okami. Now in 2010 things have changed quite a lot. Darksiders came out and people consider it to be way superior then any 3D zelda game ever created and 3D Dot Heroes is considered to be even better then Alttp.Not only that on the DS Okamiden will comeout and will probably claim the crown of DS Action Adventure Puzzler that Zelda Spirit Track currently holds. Now Zelda is getting attacked by three superb clones or followers that are considered to be both evolutionary as well as potentially even more successful (Especially since Darksiders and 3D Dot Heroes are being published on HD consoles which tend to sell more software). Could this mean the end of the Zelda series and the beginning of a new era of Zelda like games ? Especially since Zelda sales were pretty bad in the last decade (all less then 10 million. which is bad in nintendo terms).

farnham

me, gamerankings and 99% of the worlds population disagree, everything you have left is yourself and some cows, and maybe a lemming whos willing to agree.

Okami is, and will still in many years to come be, the only Worthy clone

Avatar image for _BlueDuck_
_BlueDuck_

11986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 _BlueDuck_
Member since 2003 • 11986 Posts

[QUOTE="_BlueDuck_"]

Darksiders lacked everything that makes the Zelda series amazing. It can't even match up to the Zelda clones of last gen (Starfox Adventures, Sphinx and the Cursed Mummy, Beyond Good and Evil).

3D Dot Heroes is a great clone of the original Zelda but little more, and all subsequent Zelda games have improved upon that game.

Okami is excellent though I don't think it matches Zelda in quality, nor do I consider it a clone unless you consider all action-adventure games with an overworld and dungeons to be Zelda clones.

But let's say you're right, and all these games are better; that in no way indicates that the Zelda series will die.

farnham

well zelda did not sell 20 million units did it. why would nintendo make zelda when it cant even reach wii fit sales while wii fit is a lot cheaper to develop ?

Why would any company ever make any game that isn't their best selling/most profitable franchise?

And that has nothing to do with competition from similar games.

Avatar image for 789shadow
789shadow

20195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#46 789shadow
Member since 2006 • 20195 Posts

[QUOTE="gamecubepad"]

According to Metacritic:

Twilight Princess - 95

Wind Waker - 96

Majora's Mask - 95

Ocarina of Time - 99

---

According to VGChartz(lulz):

Twilight Princess - 7.08 million

Wind Waker - 4.55 million

Majora's Mask - 3.36 million

Ocarina of Time - 7.60 million

---

My guess is the new Zelda Wii game will have a metacritic rating of 95+ and top 5 million sales. Am I going out on a limb here?

farnham

yeah you got it right none of the game sold more then 10 million units. right now that is disastrous for nintendo standards

Yep, Nintendo expects all it's games to sell the same amount of copies.

:|

Avatar image for AmayaPapaya
AmayaPapaya

9029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#47 AmayaPapaya
Member since 2008 • 9029 Posts

[QUOTE="gamecubepad"]

According to Metacritic:

Twilight Princess - 95

Wind Waker - 96

Majora's Mask - 95

Ocarina of Time - 99

---

According to VGChartz(lulz):

Twilight Princess - 7.08 million

Wind Waker - 4.55 million

Majora's Mask - 3.36 million

Ocarina of Time - 7.60 million

---

My guess is the new Zelda Wii game will have a metacritic rating of 95+ and top 5 million sales. Am I going out on a limb here?

farnham

yeah you got it right none of the game sold more then 10 million units. right now that is disastrous for nintendo standards

10 mil is not disastrous! SSBB and Galaxy haven't even sold that much, and Both are considered extremely successful. Last time I check, Nintendo still makes Metroid games, which don't ever reach the 2 mil mark.

Avatar image for farnham
farnham

21147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 farnham
Member since 2003 • 21147 Posts

[QUOTE="farnham"][QUOTE="Serraph105"]

I don't think yo get exactly just how fanatic the Zelda base really is.

789shadow

thats the problem. nintendo cant live off a fanatic fanbase alone. making a zelda game takes a lot of talented developers around 4 years. a wii.. title takes half of those developers 2 years. which means one zelda game costs similar effort to four wii.. titles. moreover the wii... titles sell 2 times as much as zelda do minimum. in other words making one zelda game to please the fanatic fanbase makes 1/8 Money in comparison to selling four wii.. games to the casuals.

You mean they can't do what they've been doing for years now?

well nintendo did not look so great at the end of the gamecube days did they? the new mantra of nintendo is capturing people that are not nintendo fans and so far it has worked A LOT better then trying to please the fans
Avatar image for sonic_spark
sonic_spark

6196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#50 sonic_spark
Member since 2003 • 6196 Posts

[QUOTE="sonic_spark"]

[QUOTE="farnham"] well people claimed similar things about Doom and Ultima. where are those games now.farnham

Zelda has been doing it for over a dozen games, each of them memorable. From 8-bit to the current gen. You're using examples of games that had very very few installments.

The only reason Doom gets acknowledged because at the time it was revolutionary. But once other games came out, they failed to recapture their audience. Nintendo with Zelda has done it over a dozen times. Through different gens, crossing different platforms, and they amaze us each and everytime. The games in your examples don't have the track record of Zelda.

Few games do.

yes but think of the reason why. Zelda was not as significant to Nintendo in the SNES days since they had games like final fantasy, donkey kong, mario or dragon quest that did a better job selling systems. On N64 and Gamecube it became very significant because a lot of fanboys would buy systems just for that game. It was on N64 and Gamecube that zelda became the third pillar franchise (first one mario, second pokemon) Now that third pillar has been removed financially since Nintendo has way bigger guns (Braintraining, nintendogs, Wii.. series) then zelda that are way cheaper to make. The only reason why Nintendo made Zelda still, was that they had little competition in that niche space. Now that darksiders or 3D dot heroes as well as okami came out there are a lot of clones that do a much better job then zelda does. And that probably wont end. Dark siders is already getting a sequel and 3D dot heroes could get one too. EA and Activision might follow suit and create a zelda like action adventure (especially looking at the sales of darksiders which did quite well for a new IP) In other words the genre is getting more and more crowded and as the genre is only catering to a very specific crowd it is going to get harder and harder to even get zelda right for the fans. Which makes developing Wii.. titles even more attractive then it already is

1. A Link to the Past is considered one of the greatest SNES titles of all time.

2. The "Wii" games or any "casual game" is fine. It's a money maker sure. So does that mean Nintendo is to forget about the core Nintendo fans who expect their Zelda, Mario, Metroid, etc.? That's like saying Microsoft will axe Gears and Halo because of Project Natal. Or Sony will axe God of War or Gran Turismo because of Move.

3. Zelda definitely isn't a niche title. The reason it lacks competition because no other developer can pull off a Zelda-esque title the same way Nintendo has for 20+ years.

4. Zelda doesn't need to "get right for the fans". Zelda is Zelda. It's something special. It's irreplaceable, and has a lair of polish that few games in this industry have. Zelda only worries about being Zelda. Nintendo could care less about second rate clones like Darksiders or 3d Dot Heroes. Good games, but they're no Zelda.

5. If Nintendo developed only these casual titles, it would alienate their core crowd. Like any console/software developer knows, the core keeps coming back, the casuals can flip flop.

6. Zelda can't sell systems? The Gamecube had 20 million installed systems. Windwaker sold 5 million. That means 1 out of 4 gamecubes were playing Zelda. Zelda TP on the Wii sold 5 million at launch according to VGchartz (lulz).

7. You seriously have no idea what you're talking about.