Wolfenstein has sold 72,000 across all platforms!

  • 60 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ManicAce
ManicAce

3267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#51 ManicAce
Member since 2009 • 3267 Posts
[QUOTE="ManicAce"]I'm not surprised, it just looks bad and had barely any hype, I didn't even realize it's out. The graphics are on wii level and gameplay from what I've seen is the definition of generic. dc337
So you don't think dragon age looks generic?

When did I mention Dragon Age?
Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#52 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

[QUOTE="ManicAce"]I'm not surprised, it just looks bad and had barely any hype, I didn't even realize it's out. The graphics are on wii level and gameplay from what I've seen is the definition of generic. dc337
So you don't think dragon age looks generic?

It's doesn't play generic from what we've seen so far though

Avatar image for whitetiger3521
whitetiger3521

4686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#53 whitetiger3521
Member since 2005 • 4686 Posts

http://www.wolfenstein.com/stats/

Log into this, and look at the amount of people that have made an account for all three platforms.

Aprox - 72,000

Lol. And its better then COD5 for online.. (Zombies not included.)

Demons-Souls

There is only almost 200 players on the PS3 playing online while CODW@W for the PS3 exceeds 40,000 players *an hour or so ago when I was playing*

This thread is a major fail

Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#54 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

This is good news, Quake and Wolfenstein should have been retired last gen.

dc337

The sci-fi Quake? Maybe. The original fantasy setting? Hell no.

Avatar image for whitetiger3521
whitetiger3521

4686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#55 whitetiger3521
Member since 2005 • 4686 Posts

Isn't this game mediocre anyway? atleast according to reviews?jg4xchamp

GameSpot Score7.5 good

The Good

  • Fantastic boss fights
  • Dramatic battles, featuring plenty of blood
  • Online play offers lasting value
  • The guns are fun to shoot.

The Bad

  • Boring story told by mediocre-looking cutscenes
  • Inconsistent level of challenge
  • A bunch of little issues add up over time.

I personally have yet to play it but I plan on renting it soon :)

Avatar image for Dibdibdobdobo
Dibdibdobdobo

6683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#56 Dibdibdobdobo
Member since 2008 • 6683 Posts
Wii port anyone? lol.
Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts
[QUOTE="campzor"]i can see why....... its not the greatest game... multiplayers unbearable and unplayable (on ps3 version anyways)Midnightshade29
What are you talking about i was on MP a few days ago on PS3 and had a blast...it uses peer to peer though so it's probably your connection or the host connection..thats what sucks about peer to peer you get bad lag if someone is clogging the connection, just look at all the xbox games like gears2 that is all they have. Be thankful for dedicated servers in kz2, r2, etc..

maybe coz no1 bought it in australia so i must of been on an american server or something.. (i didnt buy it just rented it)
Avatar image for Renjinrezo
Renjinrezo

777

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 Renjinrezo
Member since 2006 • 777 Posts

That's expected, since the first Wolfenstein wasn't that much of superb selling game. Also the occult following is very small, so it's a wonder it's sold this much.

*The last game (Return to Wolfenstein), not the original.

Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#59 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

That's expected, since the first Wolfenstein wasn't that much of superb selling game. Also the occult following is very small, so it's a wonder it's sold this much.

*The last game (Return to Wolfenstein), not the original.

Renjinrezo

RTWC was actualy a quite a big seller....on PC that is (over 1mln in two months AFAIR), thus making it's sequel console-centric...well it's their fault for the game failing I guess. I wonder why publishers always assume that even if they make console sequel to PC shooter the PC version will sell as good as original, it's obviously never the case it seemks.

Avatar image for Midnightshade29
Midnightshade29

6003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 301

User Lists: 0

#60 Midnightshade29
Member since 2008 • 6003 Posts

[QUOTE="Renjinrezo"]

That's expected, since the first Wolfenstein wasn't that much of superb selling game. Also the occult following is very small, so it's a wonder it's sold this much.

*The last game (Return to Wolfenstein), not the original.

AdrianWerner

RTWC was actualy a quite a big seller....on PC that is (over 1mln in two months AFAIR), thus making it's sequel console-centric...well it's their fault for the game failing I guess. I wonder why publishers always assume that even if they make console sequel to PC shooter the PC version will sell as good as original, it's obviously never the case it seemks.

You are absolutley right!!! I can name quite a few games that had this fate... my most famous example and the biggest travesty being Dues Ex 2, the original... being built on PC first was a spectacular achievement in melding rpg and fps and it was perfection by most players and cirtics alike. It later got ported to the ps2 a year later.(the way it should be for pc games!) Then the xbox was brought to market... The developer ion storm (not Romero's team..warren spector, but he kinda took a backseat and let someone else have the helm) Designed the game around xbox... it turned out a complete mess and paled in comparison to the original. They made the levels extremly limited and short, marred by freaquent load-times due to the limited 64mb ram the xbox had, the game took away all of the stat based depth that the orginal had...it was like they were dumbing the game down, like they felt the console crowd wouldn't get the rpg elments. (which is just stupid if you ask me.) The game was so bad compared to the first! and it was the start of the offical term "consolitus" -def: a disease that inflicts games when the developers abandon the pc root audience of a game, and instead make it for the console and taking all depth out thinking that console gamers like simpler games...

Wolfenstien suffers from this some what.. you can see it in how they made the character look, the over use of shaders, the less clean looking game. RTCW came out on PC in early 2001 and it still looks great! There is a very clean look to the textures.. I don't know if it is the quake 3 engine that makes the difference or what, but the new game while has some cool graphics effects deffinatly doesn't have the same feel to the graphics. Also they placed too much emphasis on zombie and super-natural foes when the original wolfenstien had that but the majority was just people. The game is not bad at all, it just doesn't feel like wolfenstien and it feels like they abandoned their pc heritage and made this game for the consoles mostly. Being that wolfenstien is the first major quasi - 3d fps game on pc... this should of been a pc focused game to match it's roots and then ported...but it's Activision, that would never happen with that miling company...