I should note that I don't think they should "skip" the generation. But there's a reasoned argument for holding out a couple years after Nintendo release their machine next year.
[QUOTE="verbtex"][QUOTE="gamefan67"]No, losing market share is never a good idea.gamefan67
I wrote this five posts above you. "Will it really be "losing marketshare" if the PS3 and Xbox360 keep their current sales and then "Project Cafe" releases with 0? Isn't that above average marketshare, especially if all the console have pretty much the same specs?"
To stay competitive it would be a bad idea. Devs usually demand better hardware, PC tech keeps getting stronger, We dont know how much more powerful Cafe will be, smartphones and tablets are getting cheaper and less expensive, plus Microsoft and Sony would be pressured into lowering the cost one their consoles while Dev prices stay the same. All in all, not a very smart move, and I havent even brought saturation into the discussion yet.Except the market isn't saturated.And the consoles are currently still at ASPs similar to the launch pricepoint of the PS2.
If anything development is getting too costly and there's little desire for new hardware to increase development costs even further from developers and publishers alike.
Some publicised examples:
"At this point I have no desire as a developer and zero desire as a gamer to see the next generation come out," Ken Levine
"It would be horrible," Bilson told Eurogamer in an exclusive interview published today. "But I think they all know our model's broken anyway.
"It still costs us a fortune to make games on this platform. If they're going to up the scale, up the art, up the content, I don't know how to make that and sell it to anybody for under $100 a game.
"Who wants to do that?" he asked. "It's bad for everybody."
Log in to comment