I played all GTA games for generation to generation and no, I'm no hardcore of Rockstar games and they are a hit or a miss.
As for GTA3 PS2 which happens to be my first ever GTA game, (never play London) most people seem to think that while GTA3 was extremely innovative for its time, there's very little that the later games don't do much better. But of course, GTA3 had the best open-ended gameplay out of the whole series. For most of the missions, you're given options of how you want to do them, like the one where you have to follow that guy who takes a taxi, you can either follow him, steal a taxi and drive him there yourself, or just go straight to where he's going and wait. And another where you have to kill a certain Mafia boss, you can grab a sniper rifle, wait for him to come out of the club and put one in his head, grab your uzi, wait until they leave and fill their cars with lead, grab all the guns and armor you can and assault them at the club, or wait at his house, using the biggest vehicle you can find, and the two cars in his driveway, to block his garage door, once they start coming in the driveway, start spamming grenades and use your AK-47 to finish off any survivors. You don't get options like that in the other later GTA games but yeah, GTA3 was revolutionary & innovated in ways that was ahead of its time on PS2, but man, I can't go back playing it and it didn't aged well either, so its a yes/no but GTA4 is clearly the winner of the black sheep.
@fedor said:
GTA 4 is the clear black sheep.
With GTA4's superior aiming system, I can't go back to the old series and I'm trying very hard replaying San Andreas.
Log in to comment