wow mgs 4 looks ugly!

  • 70 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for deactivated-60bf765068a74
deactivated-60bf765068a74

9558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 deactivated-60bf765068a74
Member since 2007 • 9558 Posts

i was in hmv today and there was a running gameplay footage demo of metal gear solid 4 running on their ps3 display. i stood and watched for a while and thought it was incredibly ugly! snake was based in a kind of sandy rundown concrete place and whenever anything moved it looked all blocky like it was back on ps1 (although slightly sharper of course). it may have been an intentional sandy effect but i thought it looked awful. the only redeeming feature i saw was snakes face which looked really good close up - especially the moustache - but i thought the rest of it looked really ugly. naturally i don't judge a game on its graphics but since the mgs games on ps2 were graphical marvels i was really hoping for something spectacular looking on ps3. it may have also just been a particularly graphically dull part of the game that i watched but i really hope konami make the graphics look better than i thought they lookedmy_name_is_ron

diaf plz mgs4 looks fantastic an will be the best lookin game on consoles by far when it comes out plz leave

Avatar image for deactivated-60bf765068a74
deactivated-60bf765068a74

9558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 deactivated-60bf765068a74
Member since 2007 • 9558 Posts

i was in hmv today and there was a running gameplay footage demo of metal gear solid 4 running on their ps3 display. i stood and watched for a while and thought it was incredibly ugly! snake was based in a kind of sandy rundown concrete place and whenever anything moved it looked all blocky like it was back on ps1 (although slightly sharper of course). it may have been an intentional sandy effect but i thought it looked awful. the only redeeming feature i saw was snakes face which looked really good close up - especially the moustache - but i thought the rest of it looked really ugly. naturally i don't judge a game on its graphics but since the mgs games on ps2 were graphical marvels i was really hoping for something spectacular looking on ps3. it may have also just been a particularly graphically dull part of the game that i watched but i really hope konami make the graphics look better than i thought they lookedmy_name_is_ron

diaf plz mgs4 looks fantastic an will be the best lookin game on consoles by far when it comes out plz leave

Avatar image for PelekotansDream
PelekotansDream

7602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#53 PelekotansDream
Member since 2005 • 7602 Posts

*looks at your sig* yup... your credible alright.revolution2k6
Trust me, that guy is a MGS fan.

Avatar image for L_G_X
L_G_X

542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 L_G_X
Member since 2007 • 542 Posts

Yeah..., The masterchief's visor makes it look ugly for some reason.AgentA-Mi6

LOL FUNNY MAN

Avatar image for X3k2007
X3k2007

43

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 X3k2007
Member since 2007 • 43 Posts

[QUOTE="amorbis1001"]I remembered when MGS4 looked better than GeOW, but now it doesnt even look close to as good. could a cow explain why.ejstrup

gameplay and story is about a million times better though

I dont gethow you can say this - its not even out

Avatar image for Drakier
Drakier

1444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 Drakier
Member since 2004 • 1444 Posts

[QUOTE="my_name_is_ron"]i was in hmv today and there was a running gameplay footage demo of metal gear solid 4 running on their ps3 display. i stood and watched for a while and thought it was incredibly ugly! snake was based in a kind of sandy rundown concrete place and whenever anything moved it looked all blocky like it was back on ps1 (although slightly sharper of course). it may have been an intentional sandy effect but i thought it looked awful. the only redeeming feature i saw was snakes face which looked really good close up - especially the moustache - but i thought the rest of it looked really ugly. naturally i don't judge a game on its graphics but since the mgs games on ps2 were graphical marvels i was really hoping for something spectacular looking on ps3. it may have also just been a particularly graphically dull part of the game that i watched but i really hope konami make the graphics look better than i thought they lookedjangojay

Halo 3 is the ugliest shooter I've seen.

Really? Crysis seems to be the worst looking that I've seen.

Seriously, is today opposite day? Everyone seems to be putting down games that look great.

Avatar image for BIGKILLA
BIGKILLA

795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 BIGKILLA
Member since 2003 • 795 Posts
Just download the PSN gameplay footage of MGS4.
Avatar image for deactivated-5dd711115e664
deactivated-5dd711115e664

8956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 deactivated-5dd711115e664
Member since 2005 • 8956 Posts

[QUOTE="ZIMdoom"]I am now officially convinced. If there was a law passed where the only way you could bash Sony or the PS3 was to first jump off a building to your death - lemmings would do it. H3llstrike
Wow insults. It took lots-o-brain power to insult huh?

While your incisive and thought provoking rebuttal has rocked the intelligencia to their core, I would just like to say that the amount of brain power i put into my posts is determined by the level displayed in the thread.

Why would I waste time and analysis in a thread where the tc is clearly desperately flailing for any excuse, made up or not, to bash the PS3?

Avatar image for antifanboyftw
antifanboyftw

2214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 antifanboyftw
Member since 2007 • 2214 Posts

i was in hmv today and there was a running gameplay footage demo of metal gear solid 4 running on their ps3 display. i stood and watched for a while and thought it was incredibly ugly! snake was based in a kind of sandy rundown concrete place and whenever anything moved it looked all blocky like it was back on ps1 (although slightly sharper of course). it may have been an intentional sandy effect but i thought it looked awful. the only redeeming feature i saw was snakes face which looked really good close up - especially the moustache - but i thought the rest of it looked really ugly. naturally i don't judge a game on its graphics but since the mgs games on ps2 were graphical marvels i was really hoping for something spectacular looking on ps3. it may have also just been a particularly graphically dull part of the game that i watched but i really hope konami make the graphics look better than i thought they lookedmy_name_is_ron

are you blind?

Avatar image for carlisledavid79
carlisledavid79

10522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 carlisledavid79
Member since 2006 • 10522 Posts

i was in hmv today and there was a running gameplay footage demo of metal gear solid 4 running on their ps3 display. i stood and watched for a while and thought it was incredibly ugly! snake was based in a kind of sandy rundown concrete place and whenever anything moved it looked all blocky like it was back on ps1 (although slightly sharper of course). it may have been an intentional sandy effect but i thought it looked awful. the only redeeming feature i saw was snakes face which looked really good close up - especially the moustache - but i thought the rest of it looked really ugly. naturally i don't judge a game on its graphics but since the mgs games on ps2 were graphical marvels i was really hoping for something spectacular looking on ps3. it may have also just been a particularly graphically dull part of the game that i watched but i really hope konami make the graphics look better than i thought they lookedmy_name_is_ron

If you dont judge a game on graphics why start a thread about one?

Avatar image for krunkfu2
krunkfu2

4218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 krunkfu2
Member since 2007 • 4218 Posts
take off th blind fold
Avatar image for gamenux
gamenux

5308

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 gamenux
Member since 2006 • 5308 Posts

That's because the developers aren't idiots. They said it themselves that they aren't focusing on the graphics and are focusing on actually making the game better.sexy_chimp

Yup, that is what I recall reading awhile ago.

Avatar image for my_name_is_ron
my_name_is_ron

5549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 my_name_is_ron
Member since 2005 • 5549 Posts

[QUOTE="my_name_is_ron"]i was in hmv today and there was a running gameplay footage demo of metal gear solid 4 running on their ps3 display. i stood and watched for a while and thought it was incredibly ugly! snake was based in a kind of sandy rundown concrete place and whenever anything moved it looked all blocky like it was back on ps1 (although slightly sharper of course). it may have been an intentional sandy effect but i thought it looked awful. the only redeeming feature i saw was snakes face which looked really good close up - especially the moustache - but i thought the rest of it looked really ugly. naturally i don't judge a game on its graphics but since the mgs games on ps2 were graphical marvels i was really hoping for something spectacular looking on ps3. it may have also just been a particularly graphically dull part of the game that i watched but i really hope konami make the graphics look better than i thought they lookedcarlisledavid79

If you dont judge a game on graphics why start a thread about one?

i don't believe i've judged this game at all since i never said the (seemingly) bad graphics would have any effect on the gameplay and i seem to also remember stating in one of my later posts in this thread that i would still be buying the game. i started this thread to express my disappointment in the state of the graphics and especially the textures. i downloaded the video off psn and it did look better on my tv but i thought the surroundings were still very plain and uninteresting, but i guess desert warzones aren't full of vibrant colour and flowers

Avatar image for BambooBanger
BambooBanger

1360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 BambooBanger
Member since 2007 • 1360 Posts
They've had about 3 years to work on the game and it still looks above average.
Avatar image for kemar7856
kemar7856

11789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#65 kemar7856
Member since 2004 • 11789 Posts
are y crazy have seen seen the actual gameplay for the game
Avatar image for channtheman1
channtheman1

1176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 channtheman1
Member since 2007 • 1176 Posts

[QUOTE="amorbis1001"]I remembered when MGS4 looked better than GeOW, but now it doesnt even look close to as good. could a cow explain why.ejstrup

gameplay and story is about a million times better though

A cow saying gameplay over graphics!? BLASPHEMY!

Avatar image for hyperboy152000
hyperboy152000

4815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#67 hyperboy152000
Member since 2003 • 4815 Posts

I remembered when MGS4 looked better than GeOW, but now it doesnt even look close to as good. could a cow explain why.amorbis1001

you decided to put your fanboy goggles back on....it may not look as good but its a hellva lot bigger then geow so i can deal with not as great textures

Avatar image for my_name_is_ron
my_name_is_ron

5549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 my_name_is_ron
Member since 2005 • 5549 Posts

[QUOTE="amorbis1001"]I remembered when MGS4 looked better than GeOW, but now it doesnt even look close to as good. could a cow explain why.hyperboy152000

you decided to put your fanboy goggles back on....it may not look as good but its a hellva lot bigger then geow so i can deal with not as great textures

hang on, he's got his 'fanboy goggles' on yet you agree with him? what's going on?

Avatar image for hyperboy152000
hyperboy152000

4815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#69 hyperboy152000
Member since 2003 • 4815 Posts
[QUOTE="hyperboy152000"]

[QUOTE="amorbis1001"]I remembered when MGS4 looked better than GeOW, but now it doesnt even look close to as good. could a cow explain why.my_name_is_ron

you decided to put your fanboy goggles back on....it may not look as good but its a hellva lot bigger then geow so i can deal with not as great textures

hang on, he's got his 'fanboy goggles' on yet you agree with him? what's going on?

who said i aggreed with him...i think the visual asspect looks miles ahead of gears, its just i dont focus soley on textures like most of the people around here....and no i wasnt agreeing with him

Avatar image for my_name_is_ron
my_name_is_ron

5549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 my_name_is_ron
Member since 2005 • 5549 Posts
[QUOTE="my_name_is_ron"][QUOTE="hyperboy152000"]

[QUOTE="amorbis1001"]I remembered when MGS4 looked better than GeOW, but now it doesnt even look close to as good. could a cow explain why.hyperboy152000

you decided to put your fanboy goggles back on....it may not look as good but its a hellva lot bigger then geow so i can deal with not as great textures

hang on, he's got his 'fanboy goggles' on yet you agree with him? what's going on?

who said i aggreed with him...i think the visual asspect looks miles ahead of gears, its just i dont focus soley on textures like most of the people around here....and no i wasnt agreeing with him

you did actually say it didn't look as good, i bolded and underlined it in your previous post

Avatar image for Killfox
Killfox

6666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Killfox
Member since 2004 • 6666 Posts

[QUOTE="revolution2k6"]*looks at your sig* yup... your credible alright.my_name_is_ron

lol, classic system wars.

i'm actually telling you my thoughts on what i've seen. i'm still going to get the game and was hoping some users in the know could tell me why it looked so bad. obviously when i say looked bad it's all relative. it doesn't look like a ps1 game, it just reminds me of ps1 games when the people go all blocky when they move.

anyway, i#'m not trying to flamebait

This is a typical response in system wars after your credibility has been questioned. That like saying PS3 sucks but I have it but dont show proof. Or saying that you have this sweet sweet computer but only posting specs and not actual pics of your computer.

Avatar image for my_name_is_ron
my_name_is_ron

5549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 my_name_is_ron
Member since 2005 • 5549 Posts
[QUOTE="my_name_is_ron"]

[QUOTE="revolution2k6"]*looks at your sig* yup... your credible alright.Killfox

lol, classic system wars.

i'm actually telling you my thoughts on what i've seen. i'm still going to get the game and was hoping some users in the know could tell me why it looked so bad. obviously when i say looked bad it's all relative. it doesn't look like a ps1 game, it just reminds me of ps1 games when the people go all blocky when they move.

anyway, i#'m not trying to flamebait

This is a typical response in system wars after your credibility has been questioned. That like saying PS3 sucks but I have it but dont show proof. Or saying that you have this sweet sweet computer but only posting specs and not actual pics of your computer.

and why should i have to prove anything to you? i'm just expressing my opinions on the first gameplay video i've seen of this game. if i proved to you that i owned a ps3 would that make my comments that i don#t think mgs4's graphics are particularly mindblowing any more credible? i don't think so. whether i own a ps3 or not is irrelevant in this discussion