If you read the hole article you will stumble on the tools and it has nothing to do with that the games looks better on the Xbox its hardware. Try do get that !!
Even alot of developers have gone mad over Sonys Cell:cry:
Alot of games even seems to get delayed due to problem with cell why do PS3 games lock less good if the hardware is rocking in PS3 ??
heard the catchphrase wait and see from Sony well i think the truth have catch up to Sony.
Read:
Teams are always used for making games. I think its easier to make better-looking games for Xbox360 then PS3.
1. The asymmetric design of Cell requires assembler-level insturctions and microprogramming to fully utilize and divvy up the resources and make up for Cell's ring bus. XCPU does not require that, although it does require multi-threading on six threads.
2. Three fully-pipelined VMX/Altivec (Xbox360) units have at least as good performance as 7 ring-bus-connected SPEs and one VMX/Altivec (Cell) unit for most real-world applications. XCPU has much higher CPU to Cache bandwidth then Cell, and is a better processor for high-bandwidth applications.
3. The XNA framework provides extensive class libraries which streamline game-making which the PS3 doesn't have. Xbox360 games will continue to improve. There's a relatively steep learning curve for programming in six threads. The XGPU is very versatile and can implement a wide range of game engines. ----------
Log in to comment